Making a situational diagnosis. Psychiatrists at the interface of psychiatry and ethics in the consultation-liaison setting

Ethical Issues in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

This article contextualizes several key ethical issues in consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry within historical and principlist frameworks. After summarizing the history of the field, it focuses on 3 main areas of ethical import in C-L psychiatry: decisional capacity assessment, psychosocial evaluations for transplant, and treating mental illness in pregnant patients.

Medical Termination Of Pregnancy For Psychosocial Reasons

The requesting of medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) for psychosocial reasons invites several questions concerning progress in medicine as well raising necessary and legitimate ethical questions. The law currently permits MTP for maternal reasons at any stage of pregnancy if the woman's health is at a significant risk. However, conceptions of mental health risks remain a grey area and present difficulties in terms of psychiatric assessment. When dealing with a patient suffering from a psychiatric disorder, questions must be asked on the reasons behind the request as well as questions concerning free and clear consent. It must also be taken into account that the progressive nature of pregnancy means patient care must be provided relatively quickly. These cases invite discussion on medical decisions, on both a moral and rational level, and the legitimacy of the basis on which the medical decision is taken in the context of MTP for psychosocial reasons.

Comparison of liaison psychiatry service models for older patients

Aims and Method

At a London teaching hospital, the existing off-site consultation model psychiatric liaison service for older people was replaced with an on-site liaison model service in December 2000. Several indicators of the functioning of the service were audited using identical methods before and after this change.

Results

The case-load increased by 50%, but the liaison psychiatrists were more satisfied with the appropriateness of referrals. The case mix did not change. The new service achieved target waiting times more consistently, particularly for urgent referrals. Referring teams were more satisfied with the speed of response, while the new service maintained the salience and clarity of advice.

Clinical Implications

Findings are on the whole favourable, and support the wider introduction of specialist old-age liaison psychiatric services.

Psychiatric considerations in the oncology setting

An aging population and advances in diagnostics and treatment have resulted in a rapidly growing population of people impacted by cancer. People live longer after a cancer diagnosis and tolerate more aggressive treatments than in the past. Younger patients struggle with diversions from the normal developmental milestones in career and relationships, while older patients deal with the dual challenges of aging and cancer. Cancer's transition from likely death to survival has increased interest in its impact on psychosocial issues and quality of life, rather than just longevity. In this article, the authors review the psychiatric diagnosis and management of the mental health issues most often encountered in oncology. Oncology treatment teams, including oncologists, nurses, social workers, and other ancillary staff, are often on the front lines of addressing psychiatric distress and clinical syndromes when psychiatrists are not easily available. The purpose of this review article is to highlight opportunities for nonpsychiatrists to improve identification and treatment of psychosocial distress and psychiatric syndromes and to request formal psychiatric consultation in appropriate situations. Psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacologic, cognitive, and behavioral-oriented interventions, as well as supportive interventions, are discussed for treating patients who are facing challenges during active cancer treatment, survivorship, and at the end of life. This review is not exhaustive but highlights the more common psychosomatic medicine and palliative care scenarios that impact cancer patient care. The importance of recognizing and addressing burnout and compassion fatigue in multidisciplinary professionals who care for those treated for cancer is also discussed given the secondary impact this can have on patient care.

A comparison of general medical and clinical ethics consultations: what can we learn from each other?

Despite the emergence of clinical ethics consultation as a clinical service in recent years, little is known about how clinical ethics consultation differs from, or is the same as, other medical consultations. A critical assessment of the similarities and differences between these 2 types of consultations is important to help the medical community appreciate ethics consultation as a vital service in today's health care setting. Therefore, this Special Article presents a comparison of medical and clinical ethics consultations in terms of fundamental goals of consultation, roles of consultants, and methodologic approaches to consultation, concluding with reflections on important lessons about the physician-patient relationship and medical education that may benefit practicing internists. Our aim is to examine ethics consultation as a clinical service integral to the medical care of patients. Studies for this analysis were obtained through the PubMed database using the keywords ethics consultation, medical consultation, ethics consults, medical consults, ethics consultants, and medical consultants. All English-language articles published from 1970 through August 2011 that pertained to the structure and process of medical and ethics consultation were reviewed.

"Through a glass, darkly": the clinical and ethical implications of Munchausen syndrome

Patients who present repeatedly for care with medically unexplained symptoms raise challenges for the health system. One proposed strategy for dealing with such patients is the introduction of electronic medical records (EMRs) to identify these patients and thus limit the demands on resources their management involves. This measure may ultimately be appropriate but fails to consider equally critical core issues in psychiatric ethics. Identifying patients as "somatisers" invites a problematic relaxation of clinical vigilance, increasing the likelihood that an actual life-threatening medical problem will not be identified. Management of such patients requires regular, structured therapeutic contact with a skilled mental health clinician, that is independent of the patient's distress level. Psychiatric problems and medical problems are frequently seen as two distinct, unrelated categories. This is a false dichotomy, as mental health and physical health are interdependent. Given patient privacy considerations, EMRs would be unlikely to reveal the kind of sensitive mental health information needed for the identification and management of somatising patients in busy health systems. Cost-effective interventions for somatising patients' problematic behaviour, such as structured clinical intervention, antidepressant medication and cognitive behaviour therapy, are available at a fraction of the cost of EMR systems. Citing cost savings as a justification for violating the privacy of mental health patients compounds the manifest injustice these patients already face in the health system.

A basic decision-making approach to common ethical issues in consultation-liaison psychiatry

Ethical dilemmas are found throughout the daily work of C-L psychiatrists. Unfortunately, most psychiatrists have no more training in ethics than their nonpsychiatric colleagues. Psychiatric consults spurred by ethical dilemmas can provoke anxiety in psychiatrists and leave anxious colleagues without the clear recommendations they seek. C-L psychiatrists, and probably all psychiatrists, need more training in clinical ethics. C-L psychiatrists do not need to become clinical ethicists, but competence in handling the ethical issues most commonly seen in C-L work is needed. The 2008 ABPN guidelines for specialists in psychosomatic medicine mention specific ethics topics important in C-L work, and ways of attaining competence in these areas have been discussed in the C-L literature. The four cases discussed here illustrate the high level of complexity often seen in situations in which ethical dilemmas arise in C-L psychiatry. Given the sometimes furious pace of hospital work, it can be easy for C-L psychiatrists to be seduced by the idea of the quick, focused consult that simply responds to a simple question with a simple answer. Because cases involving ethical dilemmas often involve multiple stakeholders, each with his or her own set of concerns, a brief consult focused only on the patient often leads to errors of omission. A wider approach, such as that suggested by the Four Topics Method, is needed to successfully negotiate ethical dilemmas. Busy C-L psychiatry services may struggle at first to find the time to do the type of global evaluations discussed here, but increasing familiarity with approaches such as the Four Topics Method should lead to quicker ways of gathering and processing the needed information.

Many faces of the dual-role dilemma in psychiatric ethics

OBJECTIVE

To identify the various potential manifestations of the dual-role dilemma in the psychiatric ethics literature.

METHOD

The terms 'dual role', 'dual agency', 'overlapping roles', and 'double agency' were searched on the electronic databases PubMed, Medline, Embase and PsychInfo. Classic papers in the field of psychiatric ethics and their references were manually searched. Papers were selected for relevance to the topic of the dual-role dilemma in relation to psychiatry.

RESULTS

The dual-role dilemma is most explicitly addressed in the literature on forensic psychiatry and military psychiatry. Review of the ethics literature in other fields of psychiatry indicates many instances of the dilemma of psychiatrists facing conflicting obligations akin to the dual-role problem identified in the literature on forensic psychiatry. Many of these dilemmas are characterized by the presence of a powerful third party to whom the psychiatrist has some perceived obligations.

CONCLUSIONS

In psychiatric ethics, the dual-role dilemma refers to the tension between psychiatrists' obligations of beneficence towards their patients, and conflicting obligations to the community, third parties, other health-care workers, or the pursuit of knowledge in the field. These conflicting obligations transcend a conflict of interest in that the expectations of the psychiatrist, other than the patient's best interests, are so compelling. This tension illustrates how the discourse in psychiatric ethics is embedded in the social and cultural context of the situations encountered. It appears that as society changes in its approach to the value of liberal autonomy and the 'collective good', psychiatrists may also need to change.

Countertransference and ethics: A perspective on clinical dilemmas in end-of-life decisions

Ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care, such as the request for assisted suicide, must be understood in the context of the relationship that exists between patients and the clinicians treating them. This context includes the way health professionals respond to the tasks in caring for a dying patient. This article reviews the literature exploring the factors the influence clinical decision making at the end of life. The interplay of ethics, countertransference and transference are explained in detail.

A combined ethics & psychiatric consultation

A case presentation is used to illustrate how psychiatrists can contribute to clinical ethics. A 75-year-old man with end-stage COPD was admitted to the ICU. His condition deteriorated and he lost decision-making capacity without expressing his wishes about end-of-life care. Although he no longer needed care in the ICU his surrogate decision-maker objected to his being transferred. Seven months after the patient's admission an ethics consultation was carried out by a psychiatrist-ethicist. The following issues are discussed, elaborating on points previously made by the authors [1,2]: the absence of an advance directive, surrogate decision-making, the allocation of ICU beds, guidelines for discharge from the hospital, the lateness of the ethics consultation, and the interweaving of ethical questions with psychiatric factors. The psychiatrist-ethicist was ideally suited to address all these issues and to make a significant contribution to the care of the patient and his family.

Psychiatric consultations and ethics consultations. similarities and differences

Although consultation-liaison psychiatry and clinical ethics both developed largely in response to the problems engendered by the new medical technology and the dilution of the traditional doctor-patient relationship, they represent distinct fields that rely on different, but overlapping, domains of expertise. To be effective, ethics consultants often need to augment their own background with psychiatric knowledge and skills. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists are well prepared to contribute to clinical ethics but cannot serve effectively as ethics consultants without additional education and training. Several case examples are presented to elucidate these points and to illustrate the similarities and differences between psychiatric consultations and ethics consultations.

Ethical issues for the consultant in the general hospital

Medical practice has changed dramatically in the past 50 years since psychiatry first made inroads into the general hospital setting. The image of the wise, gentleman-psychiatrist in a tweed jacket, spreading pearls of wisdom to a train of eager students and house-officers has been gradually replaced by that of a harried consultant being summoned for triage and tranquilization. In her quest to be all things to all people, the consultation-liaison psychiatrist has to confront many an ethical dilemma. This article highlights some familiar conflicts and attempts to achieve resolution.

Disentangling ethical and psychological issues--a guide for oncologists

The rapid growth of bioethics has injected a new style of analysis into medicine. It requires philosophical rigor, yet is deeply embedded in human situations that frustrate abstract thinking and are laced with subjective factors. These interlaced ethical and psychological components can lead to conflicts and dilemmas. Doctors, as experts and decision-makers, play a key role, but will benefit from additional skills to disentangle these situations. This paper notes ways in which patients, families and caregivers are newly vulnerable and delineates how ethical dilemmas and psychological issues mold or frustrate decision-making. To help physicians manage such cases, a method of systematic analysis, the 'situational diagnosis', and a related hierarchy of interventions, is described and illustrated with case examples.