Haemoccult compliance rates and reasons for non-compliance

Understanding the barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among low income immigrant hispanics

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low among Hispanics; thus understanding screening barriers and facilitators is essential. A survey, based on blended health promotion theories, was conducted with low income, mostly immigrant, Hispanics at community based organizations and health clinics in New York City. Correlates of undergoing colonoscopy screening were examined. Four hundred men (28%) and women were interviewed. Older age, longer US residence, having a regular health care provider and provider recommendation predicted colonoscopy receipt (P values <0.01). Greater fear and worry concerning colonoscopy and fewer perceived screening benefits were associated with reduced screening likelihood (P values <0.05). In a multivariate model, colonoscopy receipt was negatively associated with Medicaid and positively associated with English preference, physician recommendation for and encouragement of screening and less fear. Interventions that educate physicians and patients regarding colonoscopy screening guidelines, increase physicians' screening referrals, and reduce patients' fear are needed.

A multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer screening increases knowledge and willingness to consider screening among Hispanic/Latino patients

OBJECTIVE

To test a multimedia patient education program on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening that was designed specifically for the Hispanic/Latino community, and developed with input from community members.

METHODS

A total of 270 Hispanic/Latino adults, age 50-80 years, participated in Spanish for all phases of this pretest-posttest design. Patients were randomly assigned to a version of the multimedia program that opened with either a positive or negative introductory appeal. Structured interviews assessed screening relevant knowledge (anatomy and key terms, screening options, and risk information), past screening behavior, willingness to consider screening options, intention to discuss CRC screening with the doctor, and reactions to the multimedia patient education program.

RESULTS

The multimedia program significantly increased knowledge of anatomy and key terms (e.g., polyp), primary screening options (FOBT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy), and risk information as well as willingness to consider screening (p<.001 for all). No significant differences emerged between positive and negative introductory appeals on these measures, intention to discuss CRC screening with their doctor, or rating the multimedia program.

CONCLUSION

Multimedia tools developed with community input that are designed to present important health messages using graphics and audio can reach Hispanic/Latino adults across literacy levels and ethnic backgrounds. Additional research is needed to determine effects on actual screening behavior.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Despite promising results for engaging a difficult-to-reach audience, the multimedia program should not be considered a stand-alone intervention or a substitute for communication with physicians. Rather, it is a priming mechanism intended to prepare patients for productive discussions of CRC screening.

Investigating Hispanic/Latino perceptions about colorectal cancer screening: a community-based approach to effective message design

OBJECTIVE

The Hispanic/Latino population has been documented as having the lowest colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the United States, putting this group at-risk for late-stage presentation of disease. We assessed knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding CRC screening to inform the development of messages that promote screening among Hispanic/Latino patients.

METHODS

In-person structured interviews with Spanish-speaking adults age 50-80 at two clinics and a senior center in a Hispanic/Latino community (N=234).

RESULTS

Most (67.1%) participants had no more than an eighth-grade education and 63.3% reported their reading ability as less than "very good." Only 18.4% of participants correctly identified the colon on a diagram; 19.2% correctly described at least one aspect of a polyp. Less than half of the participants perceived themselves as at-risk for CRC, and less than one-third knew about any of the standard screening tests. After hearing descriptions of the screening tests, participants perceived stool cards as easier, safer, less painful, less embarrassing, and less scary than endoscopy (p<.001). Approximately two-thirds of unscreened patients said that screening had never been mentioned or suggested to them; about one-quarter said they did not get screened because they felt fine or were not worried. Over 96% of participants said they would get screened if a doctor suggested it.

CONCLUSION

Assessing knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and experiences in the community of interest is a promising approach for developing effective targeted health messages.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Messages to increase CRC screening knowledge and behavior in the Hispanic/Latino community should address risk factors, identify relevant anatomy, explain polyps and their asymptomatic presentation, and clearly describe options.

Is the type of test used for mass colorectal cancer screening a determinant of compliance? A cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing fecal occult blood testing with flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of colorectal cancer screening has been proved, and three different screening tests are recommended by international guidelines: the faecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. While the effectiveness of a screening program depends on the compliance obtained, the role of the type of test on compliance has not yet been sufficiently studied.

AIMS

To measure the effect of the type of screening test used, i.e. faecal occult blood test or flexible sigmoidoscopy, on the compliance to colorectal cancer screening programs.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A cluster-randomized two-arm trial was conducted. We randomly assigned 20 GP's practices that had an average of 150 patients between 50 and 74 years old.

RESULTS

1449 individuals were referred to faecal occult blood test and 1538 to flexible sigmoidoscopy. The faecal occult blood test obtained higher compliance: 17.2% (95%CI 12.5-25.7) versus 7.0% (95%CI 5.7-9.0). The socio-economic status was an effect modifier of the test type: the effect of the type of test was smaller in low socioeconomic classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of screening test used for colorectal cancer is a determinant of participation. In a low compliance area, better compliance will result from offering the faecal occult blood test than from the flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Understanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: a case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072]

Background

The major limit to colorectal cancer screening effectiveness is often low compliance. We studied the reasons for non compliance and determinants of compliance to faecal occult blood tests in Lazio, Italy.

Methods

This is a case-control study nested within a trial that tested the effect of type of test and provider on colorectal cancer screening compliance. Non compliant trial subjects were classified as cases, and compliant subjects were classified as controls. We sampled 600 cases and 600 controls matched by their general practitioner, half were invited for screening at the hospital, and the other half directly at their general practitioner's office. Cases and controls answered questions on: distance from test provider, logistical problems, perception of colorectal cancer risk, confidence in screening efficacy, fear of results, presence of colorectal cancer in the family, and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Results

About 31% of cases never received the letter offering free screening, and 17% of the sampled population had already been screened. The first reported reason for non-compliance was "lack of time" (30%); the major determinant of compliance was the distance from the test provider: odds ratio >30 minutes vs <15 minutes 0.3 (95%CI = 0.2–0.7). The odds ratio for lack of time was 0.16 (95% IC 0.1–0.26). The effect was stronger if the hospital (0.03 95%CI = 0.01–0.1) rather than the general practitioner (0.3 95%CI = 0.2–0.6) was the provider. Twenty-two percent of controls were accompanied by someone to the test.

Conclusion

To increase compliance, screening programmes must involve test providers who are geographically close to the target population.

Trying to improve the compliance to colorectal cancer screening: A complex study design for a complex planning question

The efficacy of faecal occult blood test as primary screening for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated. Screening programs, to be effective, should guarantee high compliance in the target population. The aim of this paper is to describe the design of three connected studies aimed at obtaining precise indications for planning a colorectal cancer screening program with high compliance. We designed a survey, with a randomised controlled trial nested within it, and a case-control study nested within that and defined by the results of the trial. The complex interconnection of studies reflects the aim to produce indications for an evidence-based planning of a public health program, which is itself, a complex phenomenon. The trial was designed to evaluate two different types of tests, Immunochemical and Guaiac, and two different providers, general practitioner and hospital, with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The randomization was performed at two different levels to minimize the loss of power: at the practice level for test type (cluster randomisation) and individual level for provider type.

The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT

BACKGROUND

Population-wide screening for people at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is under consideration in Australia.

METHODS

Qualitative methods were used to examine the views of community members who did (n = 18) or did not (n = 12) participate in a pilot program of FOBT screening. In addition, views were obtained from general practitioners (GPs) and specialist gastroenterologists directly involved in the implementation of the program. Two focus group sessions were conducted with screening participants and interviews were conducted with nonparticipants, GPs and gastroenterologists.

RESULTS

The findings suggest that CRC screening by FOBT distributed to households by mail was well accepted by the community and by the medical practitioners involved in its implementation. The trial had little negative effect on general practice. Both medical practitioners and consumers raised concerns about the efficacy of FOBT screening. Medical practitioners were also concerned about the potential burden mass screening could place on the public (government-funded) health care sector.

CONCLUSIONS

It would seem that CRC screening using FOBT will not enjoy unqualified support from the community or from medical practitioners involved in the continuum of screening. Information about the objectives of screening programs, in general, and the efficacy of FOBT screening in particular, needs to be provided to the community to ensure informed individual choice.

Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among Chinese-Americans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with receipt of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among urban senior Chinese-Americans.

METHODS

Two hundred three men and women from three senior centers completed a questionnaire that included sections on demographics, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy use, and potential barriers to screening.

RESULTS

Receipt of a FOBT within the prior 12 months (37.9% of sample) was associated with fewer years of US residency, lower level of worries or fears of test results, and higher level of perceived susceptibility to CRC. Receipt of a flexible sigmoidoscopy within the past 5 years (22.2% of sample) was associated with higher levels of education, lower levels of worries or fears of test results, and higher level of perceived susceptibility of CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention programs may target these areas to facilitate CRC screening in Chinese-Americans so that national goals can be met for all Americans.

Impact of genetic counseling and testing on colorectal cancer screening behavior

One goal of cancer genetic counseling is to improve early detection and prevention of cancers by identifying individuals at risk and providing screening recommendations. This study determined the impact of genetic counseling and testing on patient's post-genetic risk assessment colorectal cancer screening behaviors. Follow-up data from patients seen August, 1996, through May, 1998, at the Johns Hopkins Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic were analyzed. Eligible patients included those without cancer who were due for a colon examination by the time of follow-up, based on recommendations given during genetic risk assessment (GRA). We analyzed the role of gender, age, time since GRA, prior screening, genetic testing decision, mutation status, and post-GRA screening. Of 65 patients evaluated, 50 (76.9%) had undergone at least one endoscopic colon exam prior to visiting the Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic. At the time of GRA, 37 of 65 (56.9%) were overdue for a colon exam and at the time of follow-up, 15/65 (23.1%) were past due (p < 0.001). Patients with mutation-positive genetic tests were more likely to adhere to screening guidelines than those with negative gene tests (100% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.05). Genetic counseling and testing increases overall patient adherence with recommended colon screening, especially for those with positive genetic test results. However, patients with negative results may receive false reassurance about cancer risks and fail to follow recommended screening. Emphasis should be placed on the importance of screening even when genetic test results are negative.

Compliance and findings in a Swedish population screened for colorectal cancer with sigmoidoscopy

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of compliance and the frequency of adenomas and neoplasms in a Swedish population.

METHODS

In 1996, 2000 men and women born in 1935 or 1936 were selected at random from the population registers of Uppsala and Malmö/Lund. All subjects were invited by mail to participate. In a randomised study design, subjects were either called up by a nurse to schedule the appointment for sigmoidoscopy or instructed to call themselves. At sigmoidoscopy subjects with a cancer, an adenoma (neoplastic polyp) or more than three hyperplastic polyps were scheduled for a complete colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent (770/1988) of all the invited subjects had a sigmoidoscopy. The participation differed between the two centres, 47% at the Uppsala centre and 30% at the Malmö/Lund centre (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the two different invitation groups. In all, 98 subjects (13%) were planned for colonoscopy. Thirty-one (35%) of the subjects having a colonoscopy were women and 57 (65%) were men. Fifty-five true adenomas were found in 46 subjects. All together, six subjects had proximal adenomas. Five adenocarcinomas were diagnosed, all within the reach of the sigmoidoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance was lower and the adenomas were fewer than expected. To increase compliance it is necessary with rigorously controlled invitation routines.

Barriers to screening for colorectal cancer

Rapidly growing interest in colon cancer screening is a crucial first step to identifying and reducing many of the barriers that impede population screening for this common disease. Promoting screening demands health care policy change to increase the percentage of Americans with insurance coverage that includes a colon cancer screening benefit. A systematic approach to screening with invitations that come from a clinician are likely to be the most effective way to prompt more individuals to be screened. Awareness campaigns and patient educational aids, including decision tools, implemented in multiple sites, such as worksites, community centers, health care systems, and physician offices, increase the percent of eligible Americans who understand their personal risk, the need for screening, and the options available to them.

Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials

BACKGROUND

In this paper two large nationwide trials are described, both of which will test a comparable telephone-based counseling intervention to promote cancer screening among the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast and colorectal cancer patients. The unit of randomization will be the family unit of eligible FDRs. Access to FDRs will be obtained from their relatives with cancer. Selected intervention and design issues are reviewed, including how both projects will respond to FDRs who exhibit significant levels of cancer-specific anxiety or distress and how potential high-risk cancer families will be accommodated.

METHODS

Pursuant to the development of both studies, two feasibility surveys were conducted to determine whether patients would grant access to their FDRs and whether the FDRS identified by these patients would be receptive to the telephone intervention.

RESULTS

Approximately 80% (106 of 132) of breast cancer patients agreed to provide access to their eligible FDRs when contacted on-site at participating hospitals and clinics. Of those subsequently selected for telephone follow-up (n = 95 or 90%), 80% (n = 76) were successfully contacted by telephone, and of these 97% (n = 74) provided the names and telephone numbers of their FDRs. Among colorectal cancer patients contacted on-site (n = 46), 96% (n = 44) agreed to provide access to their FDRs, and of those contacted by telephone (n = 33 or 75%), 91% (n = 30) provided the requested information about their FDRs. Once contacted, 95% of breast cancer FDRs (55 of 58) and 91% of colorectal cancer patients (51 of 56) endorsed the intervention strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is argued that this intervention, if proven effective, could provide an exportable strategy for reaching large numbers of high-risk individuals to promote cancer screening.

Population based randomized study of uptake and yield of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by faecal occult blood testing

OBJECTIVES

To compare the feasibility of mass screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy with screening by faecal occult blood testing (Haemoccult) and both tests combined.

DESIGN

Patients were randomised to screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy, faecal blood testing, or both tests. The flexible sigmoidoscopy examinations were performed by a general practitioner.

SETTING

General practice.

SUBJECTS

3744 patients aged 50-75 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Uptake, positive results, detection of neoplasia, complications, and recall for diagnostic colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Uptake was significantly higher in the flexible sigmoidoscopy group (46.6%) than in the faecal blood test group (31.6%; P<0.001) or than in the group having both tests (30.1%; P<0.001). Telephone reminders increased uptake of sigmoidoscopy to 61.8%. In total, 1116 sigmoidoscopy examinations were performed without major complication. Polyps were found in 19. 3% (95% confidence interval 17.0% to 21.6%) but only 6.8% (5.3% to 8. 3%) had adenomas and 2.4% (1.5% to 3.3%) "high risk" adenomas. Cancer was detected in four subjects. The faecal blood test yielded positive results in 0.8% (0.2% to 1.4%) but missed at least one cancer and 30 cases of adenoma which were found by sigmoidoscopy in the combined group. Use of histological criteria-shown elsewhere to correlate with future risk of colorectal cancer-to select "positive" patients could reduce recall for diagnostic colonoscopy from about 20% to less than 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the predicted obstacles to screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy are surmountable. Clear evidence relating to efficacy will be obtained only from a randomised controlled trial.

Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.

Determinants of persistent compliance with screening for colorectal cancer

Mass population screening for colorectal cancer is currently being evaluated by means of randomized controlled trials. These trials point to the likelihood that, if implemented, the level of both initial and sustained compliance will prevent the full potential of screening being realised. The paper opens by reviewing the evidence on determinants of compliance, both initial and longer term, although little empirical evidence on adherence to repeated screening is currently available. The paper then presents the results of a survey of persistent compliers and non-compliers within the English screening trial, in order to identify those characteristics most closely associated with persistent compliance behaviour. Persistent compliers are found, inter alia, to be of higher socio-economic classes than persistent non-compliers, to have more personal and family experiences of illness and to visit their dentists more regularly. The results suggest that generalized attempts at compliance enhancement would be ineffectual against the prevailing background characteristics of the non-compliant population, and that the more overt targeting of efforts in this respect is to be preferred.

Factors associated with participation in screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with attending screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing was studied.

METHODS

Sixty-eight per cent of 34,144 subjects participated in the primary screening and/or rescreening in a randomized screening study. The mortality and causes of death in the two groups were studied. A sample of the subjects received a questionnaire, in which they were asked about their reaction to the invitation. A statistical sample was called for a telephone interview.

RESULTS

The mortality among the non-attenders was higher than among the attenders (p < 0.001), which might reflect a higher morbidity among the non-attenders. The mortality was equal in the test and control groups. There was no difference among the attenders and non-attenders who had a full or 50% pension. Among immigrants the attitude to screening was less positive among those born in 1918 but was the same as that of the whole group among those born in 1929. Significantly fewer persons among the non-attenders than among the attenders could be reached for a telephone interview (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a possibility that the compliance can be increased. The non-attenders' attitude to screening was more negative than that of the attenders.

Screening for colorectal cancer

In the United Kingdom there are almost 31,000 new cases of colorectal cancer each year and nearly 20,000 deaths. It is the second most common cause of all deaths from cancer in the United Kingdom. The efficacy of screening with faecal occult blood tests to detect and treat tumours at an early stage, and thereby to reduce mortality, is currently being assessed in several randomised controlled trials. In general, faecal occult blood tests have a low sensitivity and only moderate levels of uptake among the population invited for screening. Until the studies in Denmark, Sweden, and Nottingham report their findings, there is no case for providing such screening routinely to an asymptomatic population. Detecting and removing premalignant adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy could be more effective than detecting early localised, asymptomatic cancers in reducing deaths from colorectal cancer. It is estimated that screening people at about the age of 60 by a single flexible sigmoidoscopy examination with appropriate colonoscopic surveillance could prevent 5500 cases of colorectal cancer and 3500 deaths in the United Kingdom each year. A randomised controlled trial to confirm these observations should be seen as a priority.

Views of a general population on mass screening for colorectal cancer: the Burgundy Study

BACKGROUND

The success of a screening program depends on a number of factors, including the validity of the test, its efficacy, its feasibility, and the rate of compliance. Thus, it is important to determine the factors influencing compliance to the screening test in order to obtain a high participation rate.

METHODS

A mass screening campaign for colorectal cancer using the Hemoccult test was conducted in Burgundy, France. One year later, a questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of the population to assess the views of the general public (870 persons who had not completed the Hemoccult test, 750 persons who had a negative test, and 100 persons who had a positive test). The compliance rate of this survey was 32.2% among persons who had not completed the screening test, 88.2% among persons with a negative result, and 98.0% among persons with a positive result.

RESULTS

The main reason for not participating was not wanting to know more about their health status (34.3%). Of the factors credited with encouraging persons to perform the test, the most important ones were the practitioner's explanations (55.7%) and the leaflet sent by mail (42.5%). The impact of the media campaign was weak. A small portion of the population (4.3%) said that they were very anxious while waiting for the results. Among persons with a positive screening test, only 1.2% regretted having taken it. Among those who took the test, 94.2% said they were ready to do it again; and among those who did not take it, 36.7% would accept it at a second screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that overall the Hemoccult is well accepted, that the campaign did not upset the population, and that it is worthwhile at the second screening to include those who did not participate in the first screening test.

Acceptability of opportunistic screening for occult gastrointestinal blood loss

OBJECTIVE

To test patient compliance for faecal occult blood testing in suburban and inner city general practice.

DESIGN

Prospective opportunistic trial using the Haemoccult test kit. Tests were offered during routine surgery attendance.

SETTING

Three group general practices in Birmingham.

SUBJECTS

All patients aged 40 years or older on the start date who routinely attended surgery during two years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Numbers of patients approached for testing and the numbers refusing, accepting, and returning the test kits.

RESULTS

Only 26.3% (1230/4677) of the potential target population had been screened within the two years, although 988 (39.3%) of the suburban practice target were screened. However, 55.7% (1230/2207) of patients actually offered a test returned completed kits, with only 6% (133) refusing the kit. 683 (61.6%) patients aged 50-69 returned kits, compared with 343 (54.3%) aged 70 or over and 204 (43.8%) aged 40-49. These differences were significant (p less than 0.001). Patients from the inner city practice were significantly less likely to be offered the test than those in suburban practice (242 (11.2%) v 988 (39.9%), p less than 0.001) and return the samples (242 (38.8%) v 988 (62.4%), p less than 0.001). Patients from the inner city practice were also more likely to refuse the test (78 (12.5%) v 55 (3.5%), p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunistic testing for occult faecal blood in asymptomatic patients was reasonably acceptable to patients, especially those in a suburban practice. If the test is shown to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer then formal screening would probably achieve acceptable target rates, especially among patients aged 50-69, who represent the prime risk group.

Participation and screening programmes for colorectal cancer: more would be better?

In clinical terms, a screening compliance rate of 100% may be deemed optimal in that the number of abnormalities detected is thereby maximized. This paper explores optimum compliance rates from the cost-effectiveness point of view by modelling the individual's decision to participate in the screening programme. Using data derived from contemporary colorectal screening trials, it assesses the compliance and cost effects of utilizing differing methods of screening invitation, and explores the incremental cost and benefits associated with compliance enhancement techniques. Given the estimated costs and benefits, attempts to attain higher levels of compliance would appear justifiable.

Is there a preference for different ways of performing faecal occult blood tests?

Low compliance with faecal occult blood screening reduces the power of clinical trials, potential benefit, and efficiency. It has been proposed that the faecal manipulation required to perform conventional guaiac based tests may be an important factor in low compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether use of a new method (vehicle) of stool collection for the faecal occult blood guaiac test would be preferred to the established standard. A novel self-interpreted test, Early Detector (ED), requires the subject to apply a guaiac/peroxide spray to a stool sample collected simply by wiping the anus with a specimen pad. To determine whether this method would be preferred to the stool manipulation required by Haemoccult (HO) and to compare test validity, employees at a London company were invited to use both tests. Eight-hundred and fifty-seven subjects were shown both tests. Before use, 48% indicated a preference for the method of Early Detector; 24% chose Haemoccult (p less than 0.001), while 28% indicated no immediate preference. Seven-hundred and one performed both tests. After use, 74% preferred ED; 5% preferred HO (p less than 0.001); 21% had no preference (NP). The preference for the ED test method was consistent by sex categories, age groups and occupational class. Logistics, aesthetics, and immediacy of results were the main reasons indicated for choosing ED. Whether the preference for ED could result in higher compliance remains to be proven. Its high positivity (14%), however, would preclude its use as a sole test to determine the need for endoscopic and/or radiologic investigation in the screened patient.

Health belief and compliance with screening for fecal occult blood

Additional data regarding compliance with screening for occult bowel neoplasm using hemoccult II is reported in this paper. The effects of 'health beliefs' and 'barriers to compliance' among a subset of 256 compliers and 166 noncompliers drawn from the population of 5003 patients previously screened were analyzed. Health belief variables as predictors of compliance were found to be age related. Being 'too busy' was frequently given as the reason for noncompliance in all age groups. The percentage of patients correctly classifies as to compliance was appreciably higher than in the earlier study which considered demographic data and the effect of diet restriction. These findings carry implications extending into clinical practice.

The pros and cons of fecal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasms

Testing feces for occult blood is widely recommended as a means of detecting subclinical colorectal tumors. Guaiac tests such as Hemoccult are the most widely used, but chemical sensitivity is relatively low and the tests are affected by dietary peroxidases, the state of fecal hydration, and certain drugs. The newly devised HemoQuant and immunologic techniques appear more sensitive and specific, but they require further evaluation before widespread clinical usage can be recommended. Occult blood screening has both merits and weaknesses. Testing does uncover subclinical colorectal cancer, often at a relatively early stage, but whether this actually improves the prognosis remains to be proven. Benign neoplastic polyps are also detected, although it is debatable whether this is a valid rationale for screening. Test sensitivity for malignancy varies from good to moderate, but is poor for benign polyps. Specificity is usually around 97%-98%, yet the predictive value of a positive test for cancer is only about 10%; hence most test-positive individuals are needlessly subjected to invasive colonic investigations. Reported figures on public compliance with occult blood testing vary widely from excellent to poor. Published costs of screening are usually quite low, but these overlook important indirect and hidden expenses and are therefore misleading. On balance, the problems of occult blood testing currently appear to outweight the merits. This could change, however, with the newer testing techniques and with awaited mortality data from controlled clinical trials now underway.

Screening of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a cancer in a disappointing location. However, its location clearly has an advantage that could theoretically permit efficient secondary prevention: the preceding of the cancer by a benign lesion, ie, the adenoma. Complete colonoscopy and its substitute, the double-contrast barium enema, and their specific limitations, must be reserved for high-risk patients: hereditary cancers and ulcerative colitis. For all the others, ie, adults of 45 years of age and with standard risks, the proposal is either to select the patients to be colonoscoped through occult blood testing of the stools or to perform a fiber sigmoidoscopy or a combination of both. Although imperfect, both methods allow the detection of polyps and cancers at a presymptomatic stage, when they are either benign or malignant, but localized and with a better prognosis. However, the absolute proof of the benefits of this strategy of screening would be the demonstration by controlled studies of a prolonged survival rate or a decrease in morbidity. Until now, this proof is not fully available.