1
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. The most important determinant of survival and prognosis is the stage and presence of metastasis. The liver is the most common location for CRC metastasis. The only curative treatment for CRC liver metastasis (CRLM) is resection; however, many patients are ineligible for surgical resection of CRLM. Locoregional treatments such as ablation and intra-arterial therapy are also available for patients with CRLM. Assessment of response after chemotherapy is challenging due to anatomical and functional changes. Antiangiogenic agents such as bevacizumab that are used in the treatment of CRLM may show atypical patterns of response on imaging. It is vital to distinguish patterns of response in addition to toxicities to various treatments. Imaging plays a critical role in evaluating the characteristics of CRLM and the approach to treatment. CT is the modality of choice in the diagnosis and management of CRLM. MRI is best used for indeterminate lesions and to assess response to intra-arterial therapy. PET-CT is often utilized to detect extrahepatic metastasis. State-of-the-art imaging is critical to characterize patterns of response to various treatments. We herein review the imaging characteristics of CRLM with an emphasis on imaging changes following the most common CRLM treatments.
Collapse
|
2
|
McLoughlin JM, Jensen EH, Malafa M. Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Current Perspectives. Cancer Control 2017; 13:32-41. [PMID: 16508624 DOI: 10.1177/107327480601300105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastases to the liver is the leading cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS The authors review the data on diagnosis and management of this clinical problem, and they discuss management options that can be considered. RESULTS Complete surgical resection of metastases from colorectal cancer that are localized to the liver results in 5-year survival rates ranging from 26% to 40%. CONCLUSIONS By adding modalities such as targeted systemic therapy and other "local" treatments for liver metastases, further gains in survival are anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M McLoughlin
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612-9497, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The response rate of colorectal metastases to chemotherapy, ranging from 50 to 60%, has been shown to be a prognostic factor. Complete pathologic and radiological response rates are approximately 4 and 7%, respectively. Hepatotoxic effects of oxaliplatin and irinotecan on the non-tumoral liver parenchyma have been reported and are incriminated in vascular changes (sinusoidal obstruction syndrome [SOS]) and chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis (CASH). Oxaliplatin-based regimens are associated with an increased risk of vascular lesions and irinotecan-based regimens are associated with increased risks of steatosis and steatohepatitis. SOS increases morbidity after major liver resection, mostly after administration of more than six cycles of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. CASH increases morbidity and mortality rates after hepatectomy. Preliminary results have shown that the addition of targeted molecular therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) to conventional chemotherapy does not increase the postoperative morbidity or mortality rates after hepatectomy and does not create additional injury to the non-tumoral liver parenchyma. However, bevacizumab may impair regeneration of the future remnant. Chemotherapy may reduce the sensitivity of CT scan and PET scan in the detection of metastases.
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Coenegrachts K. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: New imaging strategies for evaluating focal liver lesions. World J Radiol 2009; 1:72-85. [PMID: 21160723 PMCID: PMC2999307 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v1.i1.72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2009] [Revised: 11/12/2009] [Accepted: 11/16/2009] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The early detection of focal liver lesions, particularly those which are malignant, is of utmost importance. The resection of liver metastases of some malignancies (including colorectal cancer) has been shown to improve the survival of patients. Exact knowledge of the number, size, and regional distribution of liver metastases is essential to determine their resectability. Almost all focal liver lesions larger than 10 mm are demonstrated with current imaging techniques but the detection of smaller focal liver lesions is still relatively poor. One of the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver is better soft tissue contrast (compared to other radiologic modalities), which allows better detection and characterization of the focal liver lesions in question. Developments in MRI hardware and software and the availability of novel MRI contrast agents have further improved the diagnostic yield of MRI in lesion detection and characterization. Although the primary modalities for liver imaging are ultrasound and computed tomography, recent studies have suggested that MRI is the most sensitive method for detecting small liver metastatic lesions, and MRI is now considered the pre-operative standard method for diagnosis. Two recent developments in MRI sequences for the upper abdomen comprise unenhanced diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and keyhole-based dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI (4D THRIVE). DWI allows improved detection (b = 10 s/mm2) of small (< 10 mm) focal liver lesions in particular, and is useful as a road map sequence. Also, using higher b-values, the calculation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value, true diffusion coefficient, D, and the perfusion fraction, f, has been used for the characterization of focal liver lesions. DCE 4D THRIVE enables MRI of the liver with high temporal and spatial resolution and full liver coverage. 4D THRIVE improves evaluation of focal liver lesions, providing multiple arterial and venous phases, and allows the calculation of perfusion parameters using pharmacokinetic models. 4D THRIVE has potential benefits in terms of detection, characterization and staging of focal liver lesions and in monitoring therapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating hepatic hemangioma from other hypervascular liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008; 32:750-6. [PMID: 18830105 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0b013e31816a6823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating between hepatic hemangiomas, both typical and atypical, and other hypervascular liver lesions. METHODS Retrospective review of 182 hypervascular liver lesions in 117 patients was performed. Diffusion and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were performed using a 1.5-T unit. Imaging protocol consisted of T2-weighted fast spin-echo images, breath-hold diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and breath-hold unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted 3-dimensional fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo images in the arterial phase (20 seconds) and portal venous phase (60 seconds). Signal intensity changes and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluated for all lesions. Unpaired t test was used to compare the mean ADC values for different lesions, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.01. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating hemangiomas from other hypervascular liver lesions. RESULTS Lesions included typical and atypical hemangioma (n = 38), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 58), focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH; n = 22), and neuroendocrine tumor metastasis (NET; n = 64) with a mean tumor size of 5.3 cm. Mean ADC value for hemangioma, HCC, FNH, and NET was 2.29 x 10(-3), 1.55 x 10(-3), 1.65 x 10(-3), and 1.43 x 10(-3) mm2/s, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the ADC value of hemangioma compared with that of FNH (P < 0.001), HCC (P < 0.001), and NET (P < 0.001), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91. CONCLUSIONS Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and ADC maps can provide rapid quantifiable information to differentiate typical and atypical hemangiomas from other hypervascular liver lesions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Although prospective, randomized clinical trials never have been conducted, retrospective and comparative studies strongly indicate that hepatic resection is the only available treatment that allows long-term survival in colorectal carcinoma that has metastasized to the liver. Unfortunately, curative resection can be performed in less than 25% of the patients. Ten years ago, hepatic resection was contraindicated in case of multiple or bilobar nodules. Currently, the trend is to be more aggressive and to increase the indications for surgical resection with the development of new strategies using a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jaeck
- Centre de Chirurgie Viscérale et de Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université Louis Pasteur, Avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Metastases: Experimental Comparison of Anionic and Conventional Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles With a Hepatobiliary Contrast Medium During Dynamic and Uptake Phases. Invest Radiol 2008; 43:496-503. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e31816f1be1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
9
|
Clasen S, Pereira PL. Magnetic resonance guidance for radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27:421-33. [PMID: 18219677 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors is a minimally invasive treatment option. Techniques used for thermal ablation are radiofrequency (RF) ablation, laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT), microwave (MW) ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and cryoablation. Among these techniques RF ablation attained widespread consideration. Image guidance should ensure a precise ablation therapy leading to a complete coagulation of tumor tissue without injury to critical structures. Therefore, the modality of image guidance has an important impact on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous RF ablation. The current literature regarding percutaneous RF ablation mainly describes the use of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) guidance. In addition, interventional MR systems offer the possibility to utilize the advantages of MR imaging such as excellent soft-tissue contrast, multiplanar and interactive capabilities, and sensitivity to thermal effects during the entire RF ablation procedure. Monitoring of thermally induced coagulation by MR imaging is supportive to control the ablation procedure. MR imaging can be advantageously used to guide overlapping ablation if necessary as well as to define the endpoint of RF ablation after complete coverage of the target tissue is verified. Furthermore, monitoring of thermal effects is essential in order to prevent unintended thermal damage from critical structures surrounding the target region. Therefore, MR-guided RF ablation offers the possibility for a safe and effective therapy option in the treatment of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. The article summarizes the role of MR guidance for RF ablation of liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Clasen
- Eberhard-Karls-University, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miller G, Schwartz LH, D'Angelica M. The use of imaging in the diagnosis and staging of hepatobiliary malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2007; 16:343-68. [PMID: 17560517 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2007.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This review addresses the optimal use of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning of patients with hepatobiliary neoplasms. We focus on primary liver cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well as extrahepatic biliary tract malignancies, including hilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer. In each section, we provide an overview of the staging requirements for each disease followed by a discussion of various imaging modalities that can be used to optimally stage the disease and plan therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Miller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Rapid advances in imaging technology have improved the detection, characterization and staging of colorectal liver metastases. Multi-modality imaging approach is usually the more useful in staging colorectal liver metastases. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) remains the main imaging modality for preoperative planning, lesion detection and tumour surveillance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast enhanced ultrasonography (US) are invaluable in problem solving for characterization indeterminate lesions, while contrast enhanced intra-operative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) may be the new gold standard staging tool prior to liver resection. Ultimately, the imaging strategy has to be tailored to the clinical situation to obtain the most relevant information for optimal use of available imaging resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keh Oon Ong
- Radiology Department, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Diagnosis of hepatic masses requires clinical correlation with imaging and pathologic information. In this review we will discuss the differential diagnosis of hepatic masses and present the relevant pathologic and radiologic issues in different clinical situations. We address the challenges in obtaining, handling, and interpreting biopsy of a liver mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Anders
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastases to the liver is the leading cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS The authors review the data on diagnosis and management of this clinical problem, and they discuss management options that can be considered. RESULTS Complete surgical resection of metastases from colorectal cancer that are localized to the liver results in 5-year survival rates ranging from 26% to 40%. CONCLUSIONS By adding modalities such as targeted systemic therapy and other "local" treatments for liver metastases, further gains in survival are anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Kuehrer
- University Clinic of Surgery, General Hospital of Vienna
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mainardi LT, Passera KM, Lucesoli A, Potepan P, Setti E, Musumeci R. A method for dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver. BMC Med Imaging 2006; 6:5. [PMID: 16759378 PMCID: PMC1564010 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-6-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2005] [Accepted: 06/07/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subtraction of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance (DCE-MR) volumes can result in images that depict and accurately characterize a variety of liver lesions. However, the diagnostic utility of subtraction images depends on the extent of co-registration between non-enhanced and enhanced volumes. Movement of liver structures during acquisition must be corrected prior to subtraction. Currently available methods are computer intensive. We report a new method for the dynamic subtraction of MR liver images that does not require excessive computer time. METHODS Nineteen consecutive patients (median age 45 years; range 37-67) were evaluated by VIBE T1-weighted sequences (TR 5.2 ms, TE 2.6 ms, flip angle 20 degrees , slice thickness 1.5 mm) acquired before and 45s after contrast injection. Acquisition parameters were optimized for best portal system enhancement. Pre and post-contrast liver volumes were realigned using our 3D registration method which combines: (a) rigid 3D translation using maximization of normalized mutual information (NMI), and (b) fast 2D non-rigid registration which employs a complex discrete wavelet transform algorithm to maximize pixel phase correlation and perform multiresolution analysis. Registration performance was assessed quantitatively by NMI. RESULTS The new registration procedure was able to realign liver structures in all 19 patients. NMI increased by about 8% after rigid registration (native vs. rigid registration 0.073 +/- 0.031 vs. 0.078 +/- 0.031, n.s., paired t-test) and by a further 23% (0.096 +/- 0.035 vs. 0.078 +/- 0.031, p < 0.001, paired t-test) after non-rigid realignment. The overall average NMI increase was 31%. CONCLUSION This new method for realigning dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR volumes of liver leads to subtraction images that enhance diagnostic possibilities for liver lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca T Mainardi
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Biomedica, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
| | - Katia M Passera
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria Biomedica, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
| | - Agnese Lucesoli
- Dipartimento di Elettromagnetismo e Bioingegneria, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy
| | - Paolo Potepan
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Istituto Nazionale per la Cura e la Prevenzione dei tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Ernesto Setti
- Laboratorio di Analisi Radiologica Avanzata (LARA), Milano, Italy
| | - Renato Musumeci
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia, Istituto Nazionale per la Cura e la Prevenzione dei tumori di Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Triantopoulou C, Komitopoulos N, Polyzou A, Maniatis P, Varsamis E, Papailiou J. Pylephlebitis associated with intrauterine device: CT evaluation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrex.2005.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Abstract
Imaging of the liver is undertaken for the detection and characterization of suspected primary or secondary neoplasms, prior to planning a surgery or chemotherapy pump placement, for assessing treatment response, for evaluating biliary pathology, and for screening for liver neoplasms in high-risk groups. In this article, we review the advantages and disadvantages of various imaging modalities in the evaluation of the liver and formulate guidelines for the imaging of common clinical indications. A brief review of imaging findings in focal and diffuse liver disease is also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dushyant V Sahani
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sobue S, Nomura T, Nakao H, Mizuno Y, Nojiri S, Kanematsu T, Senda K, Murasaki G, Itoh M. Clinicopathological Study of Hepatic Nodular Lesions in Patients With Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2004.tb03241.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|