Influence of pleural drain insertion in lung function of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Comparison of Intercostal and Subxiphoid Left Pleural Drain After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), a prevalent surgery for coronary artery disease, often involves left internal mammary artery harvesting, necessitating left pleural drain insertion. This can lead to pain, discomfort, and respiratory issues. This analysis compares outcomes between subxiphoid and intercostal left pleural drain insertion. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis involved searches in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clinical Trial Registry. Studies were selected based on primary outcomes (postoperative ventilator support duration and pain score) and secondary outcomes (percentage predicted vital capacity (VC), forced VC (FVC), and partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) in arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis). Statistical analysis used a random effect model, pooled risk ratio, and I2 heterogeneity. Nine studies (seven randomized and two nonrandomized) with 412 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis indicated reduced ventilation time and postoperative pain with the subxiphoid drain compared to the intercostal drain. Spirometry parameters showed improved VC, FVC, and PO2 in ABG analysis. This meta-analysis suggests that subxiphoid pleural drain insertion in CABG patients is associated with shorter ventilation times, lower pain scores, and improved pulmonary function compared to intercostal drain placement.

Left lateral intercostal region versus subxiphoid position for pleural drain during elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The pleural drain insertion site after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may alter lung function, especially respiratory muscle strength. The main objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of use of the left lateral intercostal region versus the subxiphoid position for pleural drainage during elective CABG surgery using extracorporeal circulation (ECC).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized trial conducted in a tertiary-level hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

METHODS

48 patients were assigned to group 1 (pleural drain in the left lateral intercostal region) or group 2 (pleural drain in the subxiphoid position). Respiratory muscle strength was measured in terms of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), in cmH2O, by means of manovacuometry preoperatively, 24 and 72 hours after drain removal and before discharge from hospital. Painand dyspnea scales, presence of infections, pleural effusion and atelectasis, duration of drain use, drainage volumes and surgical reinterventions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

After adjustments, there were no significant differences between the groups at the end of the study (before discharge), in predicted percentages either for MIP (delta group 1: -17.21% versus delta group 2: -22.26%; P = 0.09) or for MEP (delta group 1: -9.38% versus delta group 2: -13.13%; P = 0.17). Therewere no differences between the groups in relation to other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in maximal respiratory pressures in relation to the pleural drain insertion site among patients who underwent CABG surgery using ECC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ReBEc V1111.1159.4447.