Positionnement de la cupule d’une prothèse totale de hanche par navigation sans image basée sur la cinématique articulaire

Spine-hip relations in patients with hip osteoarthritis

Patients with hip osteoarthritis often have an abnormal spine-hip relation (SHR), meaning the presence of a clinically deleterious spine-hip and/or hip-spine syndrome.

Definition of the individual SHR is ideally done using the EOS® imaging system or, if not available, with conventional lumbopelvic lateral radiographs.

By pre-operatively screening patients with abnormal SHR, it is possible to refine total hip replacement (THR) surgical planning, which may improve outcomes.

An important component of the concept of kinematically aligned total hip arthroplasty (KA THA) consists of defining the optimal acetabular cup design and orientation based on the assessment of an individual’s SHR, and use of the transverse acetabular ligament to adjust the cup positioning.

The Bordeaux classification might advance the understanding of SHR and hopefully help improve THR outcomes.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:39-44. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170020

Measuring extension of the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex with the EOS® system

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal balance of the coxofemoral joint in standing position and its extension capacity determine hip/spine adaptation, especially in relation to pelvic retroversion, which may be age-associated or follow either spinal arthrodesis or vertebral osteotomies. The concept of extension reserve is essential for assessing posterior hip impingement. The global visualization of the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex obtained by EOS(®) imaging enables this sagittal analysis of both the subpelvic region and lumbar spine by combining the reference standing position and the possibility of dynamic tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 46 patients and their 92 hips. The EOS(®) radiography was performed in neutral standing position and with one foot on a step, alternately the right and left feet. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic version, and femoral version were measured twice by two operators. The global extension reserve (GER) was defined by the sum of the intrinsic extension reserve (allowed by the hips, IER) and the extrinsic extension reserve (allowed by the spine, EER). The IER for each hip corresponds to the difference in the sacrofemoral angle (SFA) for each of the two positions. The EER was measured by the difference in the sacral slope. A descriptive study was performed, together with studies of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility, right/left symmetry, and an analysis according to age, sex, and BMI.

RESULTS

The mean femoral version in the reference position was 11.7° (SD 14.3°). The reproducibility of the SFA measurement was statistically verified. The IER (mean 8.8°), EER (mean -0.7°), and GER (mean 8.2°) all differed significantly between the two sides for each patient and were not associated with age, sex, or BMI.

DISCUSSION

The femoral axis is not perpendicular to the ground in neutral position, contrary to the conventional view of this position. The measurements proposed for dynamic sagittal analysis of the hip are reproducible and make it possible to identify the IER within the GER of the spinal-pelvic-femoral complex.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of the lumbar-pelvic-femoral complex by EOS imaging makes it possible to define the intrinsic and extrinsic extension reserves to describe the reciprocal adaptive capacities of the hips and spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Accessing 3D Location of Standing Pelvis: Relative Position of Sacral Plateau and Acetabular Cavities versus Pelvis

The goal of this paper is to access to pelvis position and morphology in standing posture and to determine the relative locations of their articular surfaces. This is obtained from coupling biplanar radiography and bone modeling. The technique involves different successive steps. Punctual landmarks are first reconstructed, in space, from their projected images, identified on two orthogonal standing X-rays. Geometric models, of global pelvis and articular surfaces, are determined from punctual landmarks. The global pelvis is represented as a triangle of summits: the two femoral head centers and the sacral plateau center. The two acetabular cavities are modeled as hemispheres. The anterior sacral plateau edge is represented by an hemi-ellipsis. The modeled articular surfaces are projected on each X-ray. Their optimal location is obtained when the projected contours of their models best fit real outlines identified from landmark images. Linear and angular parameters characterizing the position of global pelvis and articular surfaces are calculated from the corresponding sets of axis. Relative positions of sacral plateau, and acetabular cavities, are then calculated. Two hundred standing pelvis, of subjects and scoliotic patients, have been studied. Examples are presented. They focus upon pelvis orientations, relative positions of articular surfaces, and pelvis asymmetries.

Limitations of imageless computer-assisted navigation for total hip arthroplasty

We prospectively evaluated acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty with an imageless computer navigation system or using conventional manual technique. The achieved cup orientation in the manual group had substantially larger variances and greater placement error than the navigation cases. The use of navigation was abandoned in 3 cases because of excessive pelvic tilt and unreliable registration of the pelvis. Computer navigation system helped improve the accuracy of the acetabular cup placement for total hip arthroplasty in this study. The variation between the intraoperative navigation readings and the computed tomographic values suggests that relying on palpation of bony landmarks through drapes and tissue is a limitation of this method. Further, the variation in pelvic tilt has an effect on cup placement that requires further studies.

Acetabular center axis: is it the future of hip navigation?

There are 2 distinct methods of cup navigation in total hip arthroplasty. One predicts orientation of the acetabulum through bony landmarks outside the acetabulum (eg, the anterior pelvic plane); its unreliability is well published. The other identifies acetabular center axis (ACA) and is patient-specific method that is independent of pelvic tilt, making it more reliable. Data from readily palpable acetabular registration points were compared with postoperative pelvic computed tomography images in 137 cases. Findings show that ACA software is accurate in determining acetabular/cup version and inclination. Cup center axis should coincide within 4 mm of ACA to minimize impingement and maximize stability without altering preoperative femoral version.

Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature

The correct determination of cup orientation in THA regarding the intraoperative as well as the postoperative assessment due to the pelvic tilt and rotation with inexact incorporation of the pelvis is uncertain. The anterior pelvic plane (APP) seems to be the most reliable reference frame and computer-assisted navigation systems seem to provide the best tool for correct implantation to date. For the intraoperative assessment of the APP, the exact determination of the bony landmarks is mandatory. For the standard plain radiography, standardized positioning of the patient and approximation of pelvic tilt by a lateral view are mandatory. An additional CT must be carried out for certain indications. More emphasis has to be given to the individuality of pelvic tilt and range of motion.

Morphologic analysis of the proximal ulna with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment

A better understanding of the morphology of the proximal ulna should permit the development of ulnar component designs which have an improved fit to the native bone, thus leading to more accurate implant positioning. Computed-tomography (CT) scans of 31 cadaveric proximal ulnae were analyzed using computer aided design software to determine the shape of the medullary canal relative to the articular surface. The diameter, curvature, cross-sectional centroid position, and coronal and sagittal angulation of the ulnar canal were all calculated with respect to the center of the greater sigmoid notch. Posterior and lateral offsets increased distally from the articulation center, and the mean diameter of the canal was larger in males than in females (P < .05). The average valgus angulation was 8.0 +/- 4.0 degrees for males and 7.2 +/- 3.1 degrees for females (P = .6). Longer stemmed ulnar implants may require a modular design to meet anatomic constraints during implant positioning.