[A comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty]

All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, rate of revisions and complications of all-polyethylene tibial and metal-backed tibial components in patients treated with knee arthroplasty for primary or secondary osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the keywords such as "knee", "arthroplasty", "metal-backed", and "all-polyethylene", since inception of databases to 2016, was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles, describing patients with all-polyethylene tibial or metal-backed tibial components in the setting of osteoarthritis, were included. A total of 68,202 knees in 58,942 patients were included, with an average age at surgery of 69.3 years, ranging from a mean age of 57.9-82 years. The mean KSS was 82.4 and 81.3 (n.s.), the mean KSS(F) was 73.6 and 74.9 (p = 0.04), the mean ROM was 104.5 and 104.6 (n.s.), and the mean HSS was 87 and 86, each, respectively, for the metal-backed tibial components group and all-polyethylene tibial components group. The overall rate of revisions was 1.90 %. The rate of revision in the metal-backed tibial components group was 1.85 %, whilst the rate of revision in the all-polyethylene tibial components group was 2.02 % (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Metal-backed tibial and all-polyethylene tibial components did not show any significant difference in most of the included outcome scores, but statistical differences were found in terms of complications and revision rate. These items have a negative impact on the cost-effectiveness of all-polyethylene tibial components. Even if all-polyethylene tibial components show similar clinical outcome score, equivalent range of knee motion, and long-term survival compared to metal-backed tibial components, complications and revision rate seem to lead the surgeon to prefer the last ones. The clinical relevance of this study is that metal-backed tibial components should be preferred in TKA surgery because complications are higher using all-polyethylene tibial components. On the other hand, the quality of evidence, according to GRADE system, is low underling the necessity of more randomised study to clarify these items.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Survivorship and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive Uniglide medial fixed bearing, all-polyethylene tibia, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 7.3years

BACKGROUND

Medial UKA performed in England and Wales represents seven to 11% of all knee arthroplasty procedures, and is most commonly performed using mobile-bearing designs. Fixed bearing eliminates the risk of bearing dislocation, however some studies have shown higher revision rates for all-polyethylene tibial components compared to those that utilize metal-backed implants. The aim of the study is to analyse survivorship and maximum eight-year clinical outcome of medial fixed bearing, Uniglide unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using an all-polyethylene tibial component with a minimal invasive approach.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2009, 270 medial fixed UKAs were performed in our unit. Patients were reviewed pre-operatively, five and eight years post-operatively. Clinical and radiographic reviews were carried out. Patients' outcome scores (Oxford, WOMAC and American Knee Score) were documented in our database and analysed.

RESULTS

Survival and clinical outcome data of 236 knees with a mean of 7.3years follow-up are reported. Every patient with less than 4.93years of follow-up underwent a revision. The patients' average age at the time of surgery was 69.5years. The American Knee Society Pain and Function scores, the Oxford Knee Score and the WOMAC score all improved significantly. The five-year survival rate was 94.1% with implant revision surgery as an end point. The estimated 10years of survival rate is 91.3%. Fourteen patients were revised before the five-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Fixed bearing Uniglide UKA with an all-polyethylene tibial component is a valuable tool in the management of a medial compartment osteoarthritis, affording good short-term survivorship. Level of evidence IV.

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals

PURPOSE

We evaluated the risk of hypersensitivity to metals in a population of consecutive subjects undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also proposed a diagnostic pathway to address any sensitivity to metals. We finally presented the mid-term outcomes of a full non allergenic knee implant.

METHODS

We developed a protocol based on the medical history, patch testing, and on specific laboratory assays, in order to assess a sensitization to metals. Twenty-four patients (25 knees) with referred or suspected allergy to metals were found in more than 1,000 treated patients, with a mean age of 72.9 years. We proceeded to a radiologic study, a clinical evaluation by the visual analogic scale (VAS), and Knee Society rating system (KSS). In all cases a full anallergic cemented implant with an oxidized zirconium femoral component and an all-polyethylene tibial baseplate was chosen.

RESULTS

Four (16.6%) of the 24 patients were considered to be hypersensitive to metals. The mean follow-up was 79.2 months. No patient reported any reaction related to hypersensitivity or complications after TKA. The VAS improved from a mean preoperative value of 7.2 to 1.8 postoperatively; the KSS and the functional score increased from 38 to 91 points and from 39 to 88 points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider careful research of medical history for metals hypersensitivity crucial, and we perform patch testing and lab assays in case of doubtful sensitization. The choice of a modern hypoallergenic implant may prevent any kind of potential reactions.

All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Less than 1% of all primary TKAs are performed with an all-polyethylene tibial component, although recent studies indicate all-polyethylene tibial components are equal to or better than metal-backed ones.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether the metal-backed tibial component was clinically superior to the all-polyethylene tibial component in primary TKAs regarding revision rates and clinical functioning, and which modifying variables affected the revision rate.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature for clinical studies comparing all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components used in primary TKAs in terms of revision rates, clinical scores, and radiologic parameters including radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Meta-regression techniques were used to explore factors modifying the observed effect. Our search yielded 1557 unique references of which 26 articles were included, comprising more than 12,500 TKAs with 231 revisions for any reason.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed no differences between the all-polyethylene and metal-backed components except for higher migration of the metal-backed components. Meta-regression showed strong evidence that the all-polyethylene design has improved with time compared with the metal-backed design.

CONCLUSIONS

The all-polyethylene components were equivalent to metal-backed components regarding revision rates and clinical scores. The all-polyethylene components had better fixation (RSA) than the metal-backed components. The belief that metal-backed components are better than all-polyethylene ones seems to be based on studies from earlier TKAs. This might no longer be true for modern TKAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

PURPOSE

Despite the frequency with which total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed, whether they are best performed using all-polyethylene or metal-backed tibial components remains a controversy. The aim of the present study was to determine the advantages and disadvantages of metal-backed compared with all-polyethylene tibial components during TKAs through an evaluation of current literature.

METHODS

A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized and non-randomized comparative studies comparing metal-backed with all-polyethylene tibial components during TKAs were performed. The focus of the analysis was on the outcomes of knee score, range of motion (ROM), quality of life, implant alignment, tibial migration, radiolucent line, complication, reoperation, and implant survivorship.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized/quasi-randomized controlled trials and 13 non-randomized comparative studies assessing 19,767 TKAs were eligible. On the basis of these studies, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to knee score, ROM, quality of life, complication, and reoperation. The findings indicated that using all-polyethylene tibial components is associated with lower continuous migration rate compared with metal-backed tibial components. Only 13 studies provided adequate data on implant survivorship during intermediate or long-term follow-up. Of these, 9 found that no statistical significance existed between the 2 groups. The other 3 studies found that using all-polyethylene components yielded a higher survival rate than using metal-backed components.

CONCLUSIONS

Metal-backed tibial components had no obvious advantages over all-polyethylene tibial components in TKAs. However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to publication bias, low methodological quality of the included studies, and different surgical interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study (systematic review and meta-analysis), Level III.

Eleven-year implant survival rates of the all-polyethylene and metal-backed modular Optetrak posterior stabilized knee in bilateral simultaneous cases

A prospective randomized study was conducted to determine if a design change in the articular surface geometry introduced in the Optetrak total knee to increase prosthetic joint conformity and further reduce polyethylene stress had any impact on implant survival, particularly when the all-polyethylene version of the implant was used. Forty-seven patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasties were randomized for the side, receiving an all-polyethylene tibial component and followed up for a mean 11.6 years. Survival rates for the all-polyethylene and metal-backed modular versions of the implant were both 98%, excluding a single case of deep infection. Survival rates with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point were 100%. The increase in tibial and femoral radii in the coronal plane of the Optetrak posterior stabilized knee did not result in a reduced implant survival rate in either the metal-backed modular or all-polyethylene versions of the implant.

Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The choice of either all-polyethylene (AP) tibial components or metal-backed (MB) tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials that have evaluated MB and AP tibial components in primary TKA.

METHODS

The search strategy included a computerized literature search (Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and a manual search of major orthopedic journals. A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized trials that compared the performance of tibial components in primary TKA was performed using a fixed or random effects model. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using Detsky quality scale.

RESULTS

9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2009 met the inclusion quality standards for the systematic review. The mean standardized Detsky score was 14 (SD 3). We found that the frequency of radiolucent lines in the MB group was significantly higher than that in the AP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the MB and AP tibial components regarding component positioning, knee score, knee range of motion, quality of life, and postoperative complications.

INTERPRETATION

Based on evidence obtained from this study, the AP tibial component was comparable with or better than the MB tibial component in TKA. However, high-quality RCTs are required to validate the results.