Ostéosynthèse par plaque antérieure verrouillée des fractures complexes de l’extrémité distale du radius

What happens to the posterior comminution in extra-articular fractures of the distal radius treated with volar locking plates?

Extra-articular fractures of the distal radius with posterior displacement are typically treated with volar locking plates. However, this fixation method does not address the posterior comminution, which seems to have no impact on the final result. The purpose of this study was to determine the fate of the posterior comminution. This was a retrospective study of 22 patients over 50 years old with a distal radius fracture. A preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to evaluate the comminution. All fractures were fixed with a volar locking plate. All patients underwent a bone density scan. Patients were reviewed at 6 months post-operative to determine their clinical, radiological and functional outcomes. The CT scan was performed again to determine the fate of the comminution. At 6 months post-operative, 82% of patients had an oval metaphyseal defect. The mean volume of this defect was 1.86 mL. The contents of this defect most closely resembled fat. There was no statistical link between the defect's volume and the various parameters studied. On the other hand, the defect's density was positively related to the functional outcome and negatively related to the patients' body mass index. Because of the compression experienced by the cancellous bone, a distal metaphyseal defect often persists after consolidation in dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The posterior comminution is ultimately of little consequence.

Treatment of complex fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation 'versus' locked volar plating

The traditional treatment of severely impacted fractures of the distal radius involves bridging external fixation and maintaining reduction by applying continuous traction. The recent technique using fixed-angle screws within volar plates is reported restore the radial length and the articular profile whilst avoiding joint distraction. It is also believed to produce better and quicker clinical results. To test these claims, we carried out a randomised controlled comparison of the efficiency of external fixation (EF) 'versus' open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating severely impacted fractures of the distal radius. A total of 39 patients were treated with EF, eventually associated with percutaneous pinning, whereas 36 underwent ORIF with a locked volar plate. There was no significant difference in the two groups with regard to changes in the ulnar variance. Articular reduction was poor in two patients in the EF group with residual step-offs exceeding 2mm; another patient of the EF group suffered a secondary loss of reduction, healing with a severe articular malunion (>2mm). By contrast, articular reduction was satisfactory in all the patients of the ORIF group. The clinical results on the Green and O'Brien rating were significantly better in the ORIF group than in the EF group (p<0.01 at 6 weeks, p<0.05 at 6 months). Nevertheless, open reduction and volar plating did not yield better subjective results than EF. However, although not statistically significant, patients treated by ORIF seemed to resume their usual activities quicker than those treated with EF, suggesting that this technique may be adapted to a greater extent in the case of active, young individuals.