Détection du ganglion sentinelle dans les carcinomes épidermoïdes de la cavité buccale et de l’oropharynx. Étude préliminaire

Effectiveness of sentinel lymph node scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probing with gold standard elective neck dissection in patients with N0 oral squamous cell cancers

OBJECTIVE

Oral cancer ranks in the top three of all cancers in India, accounting for over 30% of all cancers reported. Elective neck dissection (END) is the mainstay of treatment in early disease. Performing ENDs for node negative (N0) patients can result in significant morbidity with questionable benefit and impair the patients' quality of life. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), is an emerging investigation helping in risk stratification of patients with early oral cancer and node negative disease. SLNB is a simple, easy to perform investigation with a high sensitivity and plays a major role in avoiding neck dissection. Studies have compared SLNB-based neck dissection with END in early oral cancers, and also on survival benefit with prophylactic neck dissection at the time of primary surgery as compared to watchful waiting followed by therapeutic neck dissection for nodal relapse, in patients with clinical N0 (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) on literature search.

AIM

Our primary aim was to determine the effectiveness of lymphoscintigraphy in OSCC in clinically neck node negative (cN0) patients in comparison to gold standard END for nodal metastases identification and secondly to assess the utility of gamma probe in guiding SLNB in this group of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients (M:F = 42:16) with histologically confirmed OSCC of T1-3 stage with cN0 and planned for curative intent primary surgical treatment were divided into two arms. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) imaging and biopsy. Arm 1 underwent nodal dissection based on SLNB positivity, while all patients in arm 2 had wide neck dissection irrespective of SLNB findings.

RESULTS

SLN was detected in all 58 patients, 96.4% patients showed SLN immediately postinjection. More than one SLN was found in 94.3% patients and 6.8% patients showed contralateral SLN also. Higher proportion of nodal metastasis were observed in tongue cancers than in remaining floor of mouth and buccal mucosa cancers (38% vs 12%, P< 0.01). We also found significant association between T size and nodal metastasis in our series. Sensitivity of SLNB was 88.23% with a specificity of 100%, both for SLN imaging and gamma probing localization reflecting the reliability of this technique. Serial step sectioning at 150 micrometre is recommended. SLNB showed positive nodes in 29.3 % patients with cN0 neck. We found that the association between the outcome in both arms was not statistically significant. On follow-up, three patients with T3N0 OSCC of arm 2 had nodal recurrence/lung metastases. One patient of arm 1 had nodal recurrence. Two patients expired within one year. As high as 73% patients (22 negative necks out of 30) had unwarranted neck dissection in arm 2.

CONCLUSION

SLNB is an effective method to circumvent unwarranted neck dissection in early OSCC and prevent complications. Gamma probing is a robust and easy tool to identify SLN in T1-3 stages with N0 necks clinically. A positive SLNB is found to be reliable in guiding neck dissection in this small study. Larger studies are warranted to establish its recommendation in routine clinical practice.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Sentinel Node or Selective Neck Dissection

Improved knowledge about the metastatic behavior of mucosal squamous cell cancer of the head and neck made it possible to reduce the extension of elective and even therapeutic neck dissections by sparing selected levels, thereby reducing morbidity. The diagnostic question of when to treat a clinically negative neck to avoid unnecessary overtreatment, even through selective neck dissections, might be answered with sentinel lymph node biopsy. A thorough and sophisticated evaluation of this technique is necessary when defining suited patients.

Sentinel node biopsy and head and neck tumors—Where do we stand today?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node sampling may be studied profitably in series of patients with 1 tumor type, such as breast carcinoma, in 1 anatomic locale. The present work analyzes the efficacy of sentinel node sampling in a pathologically diverse group of lesions from an anatomically diverse region such as the head and neck; however, there are risks conflating the findings in different tumors with radically different behaviors, in the process producing muddled data. This report reviews the head and neck experience with sentinel sampling and concludes that certain tumor types that have a known propensity for aggressive behavior are the best candidates for trials employing sentinel node sampling; candidates include many cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck, oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas, and selected thyroid carcinomas. Despite the growing popularity of sentinel node sampling in a variety of regions of the body, however, at this juncture this technique remains an investigational procedure, pending demonstration of a tangible improvement in patient outcome through its use. It is recommended that studies of the efficacy of this technique strive, whenever possible, to segregate results of different tumor types in different head and neck locales from one another so as to produce more focused findings for discrete types of malignancies, and not group together tumor types that may in reality exhibit different biological behaviors.