[Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with monthly pulsed cyclophosphamide-methylprednisolone: predictive factors of treatment response]

High-dose cyclophosphamide in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

High dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) has been successfully used for the treatment of a variety of autoimmune diseases. In this study, we sought to determine whether the use of high dose cyclophosphamide provided stabilization of relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), or primary progressive MS (PPMS). The parameters evaluated were EDSS scores, lesion load and brain volumes by MRI and frequency of relapses. Twenty-three patients underwent immunoablative therapy with HDC and were followed for 3.5 years. Nine were relapsing remitting (RRMS), 11 secondary progressive (SPMS), and 3 primary progressive (PPMS). Four of 9 RRMS have had no clinical progression up to 3.5 years following treatment. Three of 9 patients maintained a normal neurologic examination with improved EDSS scores. Seven of the nine RRMS patients had reduction in flare frequency which was maintained for 3.5 years following treatment or no immunomodulating agents. Subgroup analysis in the RRMS patients of lesion load and brain parenchymal volume revealed a favorable trend in these parameters which did not reach statistical significance. The treatment was generally ineffective for SPMS and failed in the 2 PPMS patients. HDC was well tolerated, demonstrated a good safety profile and had minimal adverse effects. These results along with previous reports suggest that early use of HDC therapy in RRMS is promising.

Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis is a presumed cell-mediated autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Cyclophosphamide (CFX) is a cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agent, used in systemic autoimmune diseases. Controversial results have been reported on its efficacy in MS. We conducted a systematic review of all relevant trials, evaluating the efficacy of CFX in patients with progressive MS.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to determine whether CFX slows the progression of MS.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (searched June 2006), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2006), EMBASE (January 1988 to June 2006) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical effect of CFX treatment in patients affected by clinically definite progressive MS.CFX had to be administered alone or in combination with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or steroids. The comparison group had to be placebo or no treatment or the same co-intervention (ACTH or steroids)

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently decided the eligibility of the study, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. We also contacted study authors for original data.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 461 identified references, we initially selected 70: only four RCTs were included for the final analysis. Intensive immunosuppression with CFX (alone or associated with ACTH or prednisone) in patients with progressive MS compared to placebo or no treatment (152 participants) did not prevent the long-term (12, 18, 24 months) clinical disability progression as defined as evolution to a next step of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. However, the mean change in disability (final disability subtracted from the baseline) significantly favoured the treated group at 12 (effect size - 0.21, 95% confidence interval - 0.25 to -0.17) and 18 months (- 0.19, 95% confidence interval - 0.24 to - 0.14) but favoured the control group at 24 months (0.14, CI 0.07 to 0.21). We were unable to verify the efficacy of other schedules. Five patients died; sepsis and amenorrhea frequently occurred in treated patients (descriptive analysis).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to achieve all of the objectives specified for the review. This review shows that the overall effect of CFX (administered as intensive schedule) in the treatment of progressive MS does not support its use in clinical practice.