Explorations EEG et vidéo-EEG des épilepsies partielles pharmaco-résistantes

Clinical Analysis of Partial Epilepsy with Auras

Background:

An aura is usually considered to be the initial clinical sign of a seizure. The types of abnormal neuron activities (i.e., localized and generalized firing) play an important role in the diagnosis of epilepsy. The goal of this study was to investigate the types of auras and its correlation with the localization and treatment of epilepsy.

Methods:

The 426 epileptic patients with auras from a single center were reviewed with reference to International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE, 1981) classification; the clinical manifestations and incidence of auras were analyzed in this retrospective study, as well as the results of electroencephalogram (EEG), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the treatment methods.

Results:

Among the 426 epileptic patients, six different types of auras were defined, including autonomic auras, sensory auras, mental and affective auras, aura as vertigo, cognitive auras, and unspeakable feelings. Duration of auras ranged from 2 s to 7 min; the median duration of auras was 64.2 s. Abnormal EEG was observed in 297 (69.72%) patients. Moreover, abnormal brain MRI was observed in 125 (29.34%) patients. Nineteen (4.46%) epilepsy patients with auras underwent both surgeries and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) while others were treated only with AEDs.

Conclusions:

This study suggested that auras played an important role in the diagnosis, classification, and localization of epilepsy. Epileptic aura could help differentiate partial seizure from generalized seizure.

[Evaluation of a pathway of epilepsy surgery in a polyvalent video-EEG center: retrospective analysis of a series of 295 patients]

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The supply for diagnosis and treatment is inadequate in France for epileptic patients eligible for surgery. Our institution includes a Video-electroencephalography (v-EEG) unit and a general neurosurgery department. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and morbidity of the surgery performed in a center non-dedicated to epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of a cohort of 295 patients explored with long lasting v-EEG from 1991 to 2008 in Tours in which we evaluated the efficacy and morbidity of the surgery distinguishing between hippocampal sclerosis and other epileptogenic lesions.

RESULTS

Phase I directly led to surgery in 31 cases. Of them were 19 hippocampal sclerosis were operated with no surgical morbidity, and 12 other epileptogenic lesions operated with a comorbidity in two patients. Results of surgery were similar to larger studies, with 80% of patients Engel's Class I. Best results were observed in the hippocampal sclerosis group: 94.7 Class I (IA: 84%), versus 58% Class I (IA: 33%) for other etiologies.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small number of operated patients, the surgical treatment keeps its efficiency without adding morbidity. v-EEG centers combined with non-specialists neurosurgical teams can contribute to improve care without reducing their quality.

[On the best strategies on the best results for surgery of frontal epilepsy]

Frontal lobe epilepsy surgery is the second most common surgery performed for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. We investigated the longitudinal outcome in a cohort of patients investigated since 1990 with SEEG and modern diagnostic techniques. We reviewed 105 patients who underwent surgery between 1990 and 2005 (mean follow-up, six years; range: one to 17 years) and analyzed the year-per-year follow-up according to Engel's classification. Favorable outcome (Class I) was observed for 70% and this result was stable at least five years after surgery. More than 90% of patients with lesion-related epilepsies (focal cortical dysplasia and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors) became seizure-free. Less than 50% of patients classified as having cryptogenic epilepsy (defined as normal imaging and neuropathology on surgical specimen) had a favorable outcome. Permanent neurological sequelae were subtle and rare, especially after surgery for dysplasia in eloquent cortex (primary motor cortex). Our data indicate that frontal surgery is a successful treatment in patients when electrophysiological and morphological investigations demonstrate a well-defined epileptogenic zone or lesion to be surgically resected. Progress in electrophysiological and brain-imaging techniques will further improve the selection of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery candidates.