Detection of cancer cells in mesenteric vein and peripheral vessels by measuring telomerase activity in patients with colorectal cancer

Activation of CCR9/CCL25 in cutaneous melanoma mediates preferential metastasis to the small intestine

PURPOSE

Specific chemokines and their respective receptors have been implicated in distant tumor cell metastasis. Cutaneous melanoma has a distinct pattern of metastasis, preferentially targeting the submucosa of the small intestine. However, the underlying pathogenic mechanism remains unknown. Migration of CCR9(+) lymphocytes to the small intestine is known to occur in response to the chemoattractant effects of CCL25 (thymus-expressed chemokine). The integrin heterodimers alphabeta are also known to be important mediators of cellular adhesion. We hypothesize that the mechanism of small intestinal metastasis by melanoma is via the CCR9-CCL25 axis and specific integrins.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry were used to assess melanoma tumors for CCR9 and CCL25. Integrin expression was assessed using flow cytometry. CCR9 expression by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR was assessed in primary (n = 23) and metastatic (n = 198) melanomas, and melanoma lines derived from small intestinal metastases (n = 23).

RESULTS

We showed CCR9 expression in 88 of 102 paraffin-embedded metastatic melanomas from the small intestine, 8 of 8 melanoma lines derived from metastases in the small intestine, and 0 of 96 metastatic melanomas from other sites. In vitro migration and invasion studies done on CCR9(+) melanoma lines showed migration in response to CCL25 that was inhibited by anti-CCR9 antibody or by short interfering RNA CCR9. Flow cytometric analysis confirmed CCR9 expression by melanomas to the small intestine and showed concomitant alpha(4)beta(1) integrin expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that functionally active CCR9 on melanoma cells facilitates metastasis to the small intestine. The CCR9-CCL25 axis may explain the high incidence of melanoma metastasis to this specific location.

Long-term prognostic value of detection of circulating colorectal cancer cells using CGM2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay

BACKGROUND

The criteria commonly used for prognosis of colorectal cancer remain histoprognostic and are based on primarily TNM classification. The lack of discrimination of purely histoprognostic criteria is evidenced by the development of different outcomes in similarly staged patients. The aim of this work was to study the long-term prognostic value of preoperative detection of circulating enterocytes in the blood of colorectal cancer patients using the CGM2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay.

METHODS

A nested RT-PCR with specific primers for CGM2 was used preoperatively to detect circulating enterocytes in 121 patients (64 men, 57 women; mean age, 70 years) with colorectal neoplasms.

RESULTS

Circulating enterocytes were detected in 58/121 (48%) patients. The positivity rate was not correlated with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging (stage I, 11/28 (39%); stage II, 13/34 (38%); stage III, 15/23 (65%); stage IV, 17/32 (53%); sterilized (after radiotherapy, no residual neoplasm) 2/4 (50%); not significant [NS]), but circulating enterocytes were detected more frequently in patients with metastatic lymph nodes (60% vs 41%, P = .06). Overall 5-year survival rates (mean +/- SD) were 40 +/- 13% and 45 +/- 13% for patients without and with circulating enterocytes, respectively (P = NS). Similarly, recurrence-free survival rates were 71 +/- 4% versus 72 +/- 14% (P = NS). Using univariate analysis, AJCC stage (P < .0001) was correlated with survival. AJCC stage (P = .007) and obstructive neoplasms (P = .043) were correlated with recurrence-free survival. Using multivariate analysis, AJCC stage was correlated with survival and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative detection of circulating enterocytes using CGM2 RT-PCR assay provides no specific prognostic information and cannot be used as a decision criterion for adjuvant therapy.