How should polypoid lesions of the gallbladder be treated in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

A prospective observational study of laparoscopic approaches for suspected gallbladder cancer in Yamaguchi (YPB-002 LAGBY)

We have previously reported laparoscopic total biopsy methods for suspected gallbladder cancer (GBC). The present prospective observational study evaluated the safety and feasibility of a novel two-stage algorithm using laparoscopic total biopsy methods. The two-stage algorithm was applied for 40 patients with suspected GBC between July 2018 and September 2022. Laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy (LWLC) was performed for early-stage or suspected malignant lesions without liver invasion and laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection (LGBR) was performed for lesions with an unclear border between the gallbladder and liver. The appropriate strategy could be selected postoperatively depending on the final pathological diagnosis according to examination of permanent sections of gallbladder. If preoperative imaging reveals enlarged lymph nodes (LNs) with possible metastases, LN sampling with intraoperative pathological diagnosis is performed prior to gallbladder removal to determine whether to introduce neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As the first diagnostic procedure, we performed LWLC in 30 cases, LGBR in 8 cases, and LN sampling alone in 2 cases. Median operation time was 165 min and median blood loss was 5.5 ml. No bile leakage caused by intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder was observed. Histologically, GBC was diagnosed in 16 cases (pTis, n = 2; pT1a, n = 2; pT1b, n = 2; pT2, n = 6; pT3, n = 4). Seven of the 10 pT2/3 cases underwent additional open lymphadenectomy. The two-stage algorithm using laparoscopic total biopsy methods for suspected GBC appears to represent a safe, feasible procedure that could play an important role in the optimal treatment strategy.

Interpretation, Reporting, Imaging-Based Workups, and Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening: 2025 Recommendations From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

Sonographic Characteristics of ≥7 mm Gallbladder Polyps: A Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To describe the sonographic characteristics of gallbladder polyps measuring ≥7 mm focusing on echogenicity, correlate with surgical pathology when available, and assess stability in size over time.

METHODS

This retrospective study used a natural language processing application to screen ultrasound (US) reports between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, that contained the words "gallbladder polyp" or "polyps." Reports were reviewed to identify polyps ≥7 mm. The most hyperechoic components of the polyps were compared to the adjacent inner wall of the gallbladder and categorized as more echogenic, isoechoic, and less echogenic. Other sonographic characteristics such as heterogeneity, sessile configuration, vascularity, multiplicity, presence of gallstones, and wall thickening were recorded. Surgical pathology reports were reviewed when available. Polyps in nonsurgical patients with ≥48-month US follow-up and ≤1 mm/year growth rate were characterized as benign. Clinical outcomes were followed until December 31, 2023.

RESULTS

Review of 4897 reports yielded 550 reports in 450 patients with polyps ≥7 mm. Surgical pathology reports were available in 22.0% (99/450) of patients; 96 (97%) had non-neoplastic etiologies and 3 (3.0%) neoplastic. There were no malignancies. All of the neoplastic polyps and 56.1% (87/155) of non-neoplastic polyps had components more echogenic than the adjacent inner wall. There were no deaths related to the polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of gallbladder polyps are benign. In our large series of gallbladder polyps, we found that increased echogenicity is a nonspecific feature, found in slightly more than half of benign but also in all neoplastic polyps. Our findings support current Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus guidelines.

Coagulation and fibrinolytic markers offer utility when distinguishing between benign and malignant gallbladder tumors: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The metabolic or proliferative abnormalities that are characteristic of tumor cells can lead to abnormal fibrinolysis or coagulation system activity, with certain tumors exhibiting hypercoagulability or existing in a fibrinolytic state. However, the utility of biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis when seeking to differentiate between benign gallbladder disease and malignant gallbladder tumors remains uncertain.

METHODS

This study included a total of 81 patients with benign gallbladder polyps and 94 patients with malignant gallbladder tumors. Pre-biopsy or pretreatment levels of PT, APTT, FIB, D-dimer, FDP, PLT, PIC, TAT, TM, and t-PAIC from these patients were compared using Mann-Whitney tests. The baseline data of the patients were analyzed using chi-square tests, and the diagnostic utility of these biomarkers in distinguishing between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions was evaluated using ROC curves, and Spearman correlation analysis was employed to assess the correlation between these indicators and tumor parameters.

RESULTS

The average age of malignant gallbladder tumor group was higher than benign gallbladder polyp group. And the base line analysis showed that there was a statistic difference in age, history of smoking, drinking, biliary tract disease, BMI of over weight between these two groups. In patients with malignant gallbladder tumors, FIB, D-dimer, FDP, PIC, TAT, TM, and t-PAIC levels were significantly elevated relative to those in patients affected by benign gallbladder polyp. The AUC for FIB, D-dimer, and FDP was 0.8469, 0.6514, 0.5950, while for PIC, TAT, TM, t-PAIC and four biomarker combined diagnosed was 0.8455, 0.6554, 0.7130, 0.6806, and 0.8859. Among these, TM was associated with the vascular invasion of tumor patients; TAT and t-PAIC were associated with neural invasion; D-dimer and FDP were related to the maximum tumor diameter; and FDP had a certain correlation with the tumor stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In gallbladder tumor patients, conventional coagulation metrics like FIB, D-dimer, and FDP, as well as newer thrombotic indicators such as PIC, TAT, TM, and t-PAIC, were obviously increased. Correlations with tumor parameters suggested their potential as biomarkers to distinguish benign from malignant gallbladder growths.

Value of Conventional Ultrasound-based Scoring System in Distinguishing Adenomatous Polyps From Cholesterol Polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ultrasound has increased the detection of gallbladder polyps, but it has limitations in evaluating the nature of gallbladder polyps, especially the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm. We assessed the value of ultrasound scoring system based on independent predictive parameters in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps with the maximum size of 1.0 to 1.5 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 163 patients with gallbladder polyps (1.0 to 1.5 cm) who underwent ultrasonography and cholecystectomy. Ultrasound image characteristics were compared between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort from April 2018 to January 2020. An ultrasound scoring system was constructed in the training cohort, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated in the validation cohort from February 2020 to February 2021.

RESULTS

Maximum size, height/width ratio, stone or sludge, vascularity, and hyperechoic spot were significantly different between cholesterol polyps and adenomatous polyps in the training cohort ( P <0.05). The independent predictive parameters for adenomatous polyps were lower height/width ratio, presence of vascularity and absence of hyperechoic spot. The total score was as follows: (height/width ratio, <0.9=4, ≥0.9=0) + (vascularity, present=3, absent=0) + (hyperechoic spot, absent=2, present=0). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasound scoring system ≥5 for diagnosis of adenomatous polyps in the validation cohort were 73.33%, 80.49%, and 78.57%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound scoring system aids in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps, and effectively decreasing unnecessary cholecystectomy.

A New Risk Scoring System to Predict Malignancy in Gallbladder Polyps: a Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonography (US) is the most commonly used radiological method in the diagnosis of gallbladder polyps (GBPs). Patients diagnosed with GBPs on US are operated on with risk factors that do not have a high level of evidence. Our aim in this study is to determine the sensitivity of US in diagnosis GBPs, to define risk factors for neoplastic (NP) polyps, and to develop the risk scoring system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2011 and July 2021, 173 patients who were found to have GBPs in the pathology specimens after cholecystectomy were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: nonneoplastic and NP groups.

RESULTS

GBPs in patients who underwent abdominal US for any reason was 4.5%. The sensitivity of US in the diagnosis of GBPs was 56.6%. Comparison between groups, age ≥50, presence of symptoms, polyp size >12.5mm, single polyp, concomitant gallstones, and gallbladder wall thickness ≥4mm were statistically in the NP group. A risk scoring system was developed using these values. If the risk score was <4, 0.6% of GBPs was NP polyps. If the risk score was ≥4, 63.2% of GBPs were NP polyps.

CONCLUSION

Our risk scoring system can prevent unnecessary choelcystectomy. Because the incidence of NP polyps in low-risk patients (risk score <4) is extremely rare.

Risk of developing gallbladder cancer in patients with gallbladder polyps detected on transabdominal ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of malignancy in gallbladder polyps of incremental sizes detected during transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS).

METHODS

We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies recording the polyp size from which gallbladder malignancy developed, confirmed following cholecystectomy, or by subsequent follow-up. Primary outcome was the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with polyps. Secondary outcome was the effect of polyp size as a prognostic factor for cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool. Bayesian meta-analysis estimated the median cancer risk according to polyp size. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020223629).

RESULTS

82 studies published since 1990 reported primary data for 67,837 patients. 67,774 gallbladder polyps and 889 cancers were reported. The cumulative median cancer risk of a polyp measuring 10 mm or less was 0.60% (99% credible range 0.30-1.16%). Substantial heterogeneity existed between studies (I2 = 99.95%, 95% credible interval 99.86-99.98%). Risk of bias was generally high and overall confidence in evidence was low. 13 studies (15.6%) were graded with very low certainty, 56 studies (68.3%) with low certainty, and 13 studies (15.6%) with moderate certainty. In studies considered moderate quality, TAUS monitoring detected 4.6 cancers per 10,000 patients with polyps less than 10 mm.

CONCLUSION

Malignant risk in gallbladder polyps is low, particularly in polyps less than 10 mm, however the data are heterogenous and generally low quality. International guidelines, which have not previously modelled size data, should be informed by these findings.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This large systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the mean cumulative risk of small gallbladder polyps is low, but heterogeneity and missing data in larger polyp sizes (>10 mm) means the risk is uncertain and may be higher than estimated.Studies considered to have better methodological quality suggest that previous estimates of risk are likely to be inflated.

Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations

Gallbladder polyps (also known as polypoid lesions of the gallbladder) are a common incidental finding. The vast majority of gallbladder polyps smaller than 10 mm are not true neoplastic polyps but are benign cholesterol polyps with no inherent risk of malignancy. In addition, recent studies have shown that the overall risk of gallbladder cancer is not increased in patients with small gallbladder polyps, calling into question the rationale for frequent and prolonged follow-up of these common lesions. In 2021, a Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, or SRU, consensus conference was convened to provide recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps at US. See also the editorial by Sidhu and Rafailidis in this issue.

Longitudinal Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Size and Number of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps

BACKGROUND. Previous European multisociety guidelines recommend routine follow-up imaging of gallbladder polyps (including polyps < 6 mm in patients without risk factors) and cholecystectomy for polyp size changes of 2 mm or more. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal changes in the number and size of gallbladder polyps on serial ultrasound examinations. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent at least one ultrasound examination between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 (as part of a hepatocellular carcinoma screening and surveillance program) that showed a gallbladder polyp. Number of polyps and size of largest polyp were recorded based primarily on review of examination reports. Longitudinal changes on serial examinations were summarized. Pathologic findings from cholecystectomy were reviewed. RESULTS. Among 9683 patients, 759 (8%) had at least one ultrasound examination showing a polyp. Of these, 434 patients (248 men, 186 women; mean age, 50.6 years) had multiple examinations (range, 2-19 examinations; mean, 4.8 examinations per patient; mean interval between first and last examinations, 3.6 ± 3.1 [SD] years; maximum interval, 11.0 years). Among these 434 patients, 257 had one polyp, 40 had two polyps, and 137 had more than two polyps. Polyp size was 6 mm or less in 368 patients, 7-9 mm in 52 patients, and 10 mm or more in 14 patients. Number of polyps increased in 9% of patients, decreased in 14%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 22%, and showed no change in 55%. Polyp size increased in 10% of patients, decreased in 16%, both increased and decreased on serial examinations in 18%, and showed no change in 56%. In 9% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on follow-up imaging; in 6% of patients, gallbladder polyps were not detected on a follow-up examination but were then detected on later studies. No gallbladder carcinoma was identified in 19 patients who underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION. Gallbladder polyps fluctuate in size, number, and visibility over serial examinations. Using a 2-mm threshold for growth, 10% increased in size. No carcinoma was identified. CLINICAL IMPACT. European multisociety guidelines that propose surveillance of essentially all polyps and a 2-mm size change as the basis for cholecystectomy are likely too conservative for clinical application.

Conventional Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cholesterol and Adenomatous Polyps (1-2 cm)

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine ultrasonic image characteristics that enable differentiation between cholesterol and adenomatous polyps and to assess the diagnostic efficacy of combining conventional ultrasound (CUS) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with gallbladder polyps of 1-2 cm in diameter were enrolled and examined by CUS and CEUS before cholecystectomy. The appearances on CUS and CEUS were recorded and analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal size threshold for distinguishing cholesterol from adenomatous polyps. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify diagnostic variables. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the size, the independent variables, and the combined factors.

RESULTS

There were differences in size, number, vascularity on CUS and intralesional vascular shape, wash-out, and area under the curve on CEUS between the two groups (P < .05). ROC analysis indicated that a maximum diameter of 1.45 cm was the optimal threshold for the prediction of adenomatous polyps. The logistic regression analysis proved that the single polyp, presence of vascularity, and intralesional linear vessels were associated with adenomatous polyps (P < .05). ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the combination of the three independent variables were 0.858, 87.3%, and 67.6%. The number combined with intralesional vascular shape had the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 91.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CUS and CEUS demonstrated great significance in the differential diagnosis of cholesterol and adenomatous polyps.

Lymphoid hyperplasia with a polyp form of the gallbladder macroscopically mimicking carcinoma

Lymphoid hyperplasia is a type of tumor-like hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue. There have been few reports on lymphoid hyperplasia of the gallbladder. Here, we report a case of lymphoid hyperplasia with a polyp form of the gallbladder macroscopically mimicking carcinoma. Liver dysfunction was diagnosed in a 75-year-old woman who presented with a gallbladder mass measuring 20 mm during an annual health checkup. Antibody tests for infectious diseases were positive for anti-HBs and anti-HBc antibodies. Accordingly, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Macroscopically, the mass was a papillary/sessile tumor (29 × 25 mm) located in the fundus of the gallbladder. Histologically, the tumor was accompanied by an erosion on a portion of the surface layer, while the remaining epithelium showed regenerative changes and mild hyperplasia. No atypia was observed in the constituent epithelium. Hyperplasia of the polarized lymphoid follicles was observed in the interstitium, and tingible body macrophages were scattered in the germinal center. Immuno-histologically, the germinal center showed CD20 positivity, weak CD10 positivity, Bcl-2 negativity, and a high Ki-67 index (MIB-1). These findings suggested that the proliferating lymphoid follicles were reactive rather than neoplastic. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with lymphoid hyperplasia of the gallbladder and chronic cholecystitis.

Papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder diagnosed as gallbladder cancer before surgery: A case report

Introduction and importance

Gallbladder cancer has a poor prognosis. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis is required, for which various tests are performed. However, in some cases, it is difficult to distinguish between benign and malignant diseases before surgery. Papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder is known for its secondary changes. Papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder, which is known for its secondary changes, is a benign disease. We encountered papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder with morphological changes over the course of 1 year. In addition, the tumor was suggested to be malignant during various examinations. We present a case of papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder showing an increasing tendency and findings indicative of malignancy on imaging.

Presentation of case

A 70-year-old man underwent routine abdominal ultrasonography every year. We observed that the gallbladder wall was thickened. The tumor size was 24 mm. FDG-PET and other examinations indicated malignancy requiring surgery.

Clinical discussion

Accurate diagnosis of gallbladder tumor is difficult only by diagnostic imaging. There are problems with preoperative cytology and histology. FS can be an important test to avoid extended surgery.

Conclusion

We report a rare case of papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder, which was difficult to diagnose. Even when morphological changes and imaging findings suggest malignancy, similar findings could appear in papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder owing to chronic inflammation.

•

Gallbladder cancer has a poor prognosis.

•

It is difficult to distinguish between benign diseases before surgery.

•

Papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder shows secondary changes.

•

Papillary hyperplasia of the gallbladder can be confused for a malignancy.

Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polyps in primary health care centers among patients examined by abdominal ultrasonography in Qatar: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder (GB) polyps are raised lesions from the GB wall and projected into its lumen. The prevalence of GB polyps ranged between 4.3% and 12.3%. The clinical presentation of GB polypoid lesions vary, can be nonspecific and vague, and may be asymptomatic. Identifying malignant and premalignant polyps is important to provide treatment early and prevent cancer spread or development of malignancy. Ultrasonography (US) is the first imaging modality widely used in abdominal imaging. It is a noninvasive, rapid, painless, and safe imaging technique, with no radiation; thus, it is considered the best available examination with good sensitivity and specificity for GB polyps.

AIM OF THE WORK

This study aimed to determine the relative frequency of the GB polyps and its risk factors among patients who underwent abdominal US in Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was quantitative multicenter observational case-control study nested in a cross-sectional design. For the cross-sectional top-level study, the first step was to assess available abdominal ultrasound studies for the presence of GB polyps and stones. The second step was to perform a case-control study with three groups (a case group and two control groups; first, participants without GB stones and GB polyps; second, patients with GB stones but without GB polyps).

RESULTS

The study evaluated the GB images of 7156 individuals. The overall prevalence of GB polyps was 7.4% in the study population. Specifically, the overall prevalence of solitary GB polyp was 4.2% and that of multiple GB polyps was 3.2%. Regarding the size distribution of GB polyps in positive cases, 89.4% were < 6 mm, 9.3% were 69 mm, and 1.3% were ≥ 10 mm. Prevalence rate of selected comorbidities were as follows: liver disease, 1.8%; diabetes mellitus, 25.5%; hypertension, 25.5%; and dyslipidemia, 29.8%. The prevalence in male and female patients was 7.7% and 7%, respectively. The prevalence of GB polyps was higher in south-eastern patients (21.4% of positive cases) and was the highest in the overweight group (8.8%). A higher prevalence was noted in the hypertensive group (hypertensive group, 9.8%; non-hypertensive group, 6.6%) and dyslipidemia group (dyslipidemia group, 7.8%; no dyslipidemia group, 7.2%). Moreover, a higher prevalence was noted in hepatitis B surface (HBS)-positive group (15%) than in the HBS-negative group (8.2%) and slightly higher in Helicobacter pylori antigen positive group than in the negative group.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal US is an important and commonly used imaging modality in the detection of GB polyps. In this study, the prevalence of GB polyps was approximately 7.4%, with higher prevalence in participants who were overweight and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.

Pyloric adenomatous carcinoma of the gallbladder following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Adenoma and intra-adenoma carcinoma of the gallbladder are relatively rare diseases, and the World Health Organization classification reports a frequency of 0.3% for gallbladder adenomas. Precise preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer, especially in the early stages, is challenging. Herein, we report a case of pyloric adenomatous carcinoma of the gallbladder, diagnosed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pathology, along with a literature review. This case was reported in accordance with the SCARE 2020 Guideline (Ref).

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed with a 4-mm polypoid lesion in the gallbladder during a medical examination. The patient was followed-up by ultrasonography (US) once a year and was referred to our department because of an increase in size. Carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were within normal limits. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a pedunculated polypoid lesion in the body of the gallbladder measuring 8 mm. Computed tomography demonstrated that the whole tumor was enhanced in the early phase without significant lymph node enlargement. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography demonstrated a type Ip polypoid lesion located in the body of the gallbladder without pancreaticobiliary junctional abnormalities. Endoscopic ultrasound detected a superficial nodular-type Ip polypoid lesion in the gallbladder body with a parenchyma-like internal echogenic pattern.

DISCUSSION

Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with gallbladder adenoma, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Histopathological examination revealed the tumor was a papillary growth of atypical high columnar epithelial cells. The final diagnosis was pyloric adenoma with high-grade dysplasia and intra-adenoma carcinoma. The patient is currently undergoing outpatient follow-up without recurrence for 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Early gallbladder carcinoma with adenoma should be considered in patients with small gallbladder polypoid lesions. Considering the surgical stress of cholecystectomy and the malignant potential of gallbladder cancer, preceding surgery would be acceptable.

How Can We Manage Gallbladder Lesions by Transabdominal Ultrasound?

The most important role of ultrasound (US) in the management of gallbladder (GB) lesions is to detect lesions earlier and differentiate them from GB carcinoma (GBC). To avoid overlooking lesions, postural changes and high-frequency transducers with magnified images should be employed. GB lesions are divided into polypoid lesions (GPLs) and wall thickening (GWT). For GPLs, classification into pedunculated and sessile types should be done first. This classification is useful not only for the differential diagnosis but also for the depth diagnosis, as pedunculated carcinomas are confined to the mucosa. Both rapid GB wall blood flow (GWBF) and the irregularity of color signal patterns on Doppler imaging, and heterogeneous enhancement in the venous phase on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) suggest GBC. Since GWT occurs in various conditions, subdividing into diffuse and focal forms is important. Unlike diffuse GWT, focal GWT is specific for GB and has a higher incidence of GBC. The discontinuity and irregularity of the innermost hyperechoic layer and irregular or disrupted GB wall layer structure suggest GBC. Rapid GWBF is also useful for the diagnosis of wall-thickened type GBC and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Detailed B-mode evaluation using high-frequency transducers, combined with Doppler imaging and CEUS, enables a more accurate diagnosis.

Detectability on Plain CT is an Effective Discriminator between Carcinoma and Benign Disorder for a Polyp >10 mm in the Gallbladder

An appropriate diagnosis is required to avoid unnecessary surgery for gallbladder cholesterol polyps (GChPs) and to appropriately treat pedunculated gallbladder carcinomas (GCs). Generally, polyps >10 mm are regarded as surgical candidates. We retrospectively evaluated plain and contrast-enhanced (CE) computed tomography (CT) findings and histopathological features of 11 early GCs and 10 GChPs sized 10–30 mm to differentiate between GC and GChP >10 mm and determine their histopathological background. Patient characteristics, including polyp size, did not significantly differ between groups. All GCs and GChPs were detected on CE-CT; GCs were detected more often than GChPs on plain CT (73% vs. 9%; p < 0.01). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy for GCs were 73%, 90%, 89%, 75%, and 81%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, lesion detectability on plain CT was independently associated with GCs (odds ratio, 27.1; p = 0.044). Histopathologically, GChPs consisted of adipose tissue. Although larger vessel areas in GCs than in GChPs was not significant (52,737 μm² vs. 31,906 μm²; p = 0.51), cell densities were significantly greater in GCs (0.015/μm² vs. 0.0080/μm²; p < 0.01). Among GPs larger than 10 mm, plain CT could contribute to differentiating GCs from GChPs.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess gallbladder polyps

PURPOSE

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing adenomatous gallbladder polyps from cholesterol gallbladder polyps.

METHODS

A total of 164 patients with gallbladder polyps were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent B-mode ultrasound (US) and CEUS before cholecystectomy. Gallbladder polyps were divided into cholesterol polyp group and adenomatous polyp group according to pathology. Differences in patient's age, gender, maximum polyp size, number, presence of gallstones, vascularity and stalk width measured by US and vascular stalk width measured by CEUS were tested between the two groups. The diagnostic performance of specific US features was evaluated. The independent factors related with adenomatous polyps were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were 114 cholesterol polyps and 50 adenomatous polyps in 164 patients analyzed in the study. Differences in maximum size, vascularity, and stalk width of the gallbladder polyp were significant between the two groups (p < 0.05), whereas differences in patient's age, gender, number of gallbladder polyp, and presence of gallstones between the two groups were not (p > 0.05). Stalk width was wider than vascular stalk width between the two groups (p < 0.05). Vascular stalk width was also statistically different between the two groups (p < 0.05). The diagnostic performance of vascular stalk width was more significant than stalk width. Only vascular stalk width and vascularity were independent factors related with adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSION

Vascular stalk width measured by CEUS is more accurate than stalk width measured by grayscale US in distinguishing adenomatous polyps from cholesterol polyps.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound for gallbladder disease

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has excellent spatial resolution and allows more detailed examination than abdominal ultrasonography (US) in terms of qualitative diagnosis of tumors and evaluation of tumor invasion depth. To understand the role of EUS in gallbladder disease, we need to understand the normal gallbladder wall structure and how to visualize it on EUS. In addition, gallbladder lesions can be classified into two broad categories: protuberant and wall-thickening lesions. Here, the features on EUS were outlined. We also outlined the current status of EUS-FNA for gallbladder lesions as there have been scattered reports of EUS-FNA in recent years.

Laparoscopic total biopsy for suspected gallbladder cancer: A case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Imaging diagnosis of gallbladder cancer remains difficult to achieve preoperatively. We developed a novel approach based on laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy (LWLC) and laparoscopic gallbladder bed dissection (LGBD) for total biopsy, for ultimately determining the optimal treatment strategy for suspected gallbladder cancer detected on preoperative imaging. Here, we describe a case series of patients who underwent this procedure at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined clinicopathological data of consecutive patients with suspected gallbladder carcinoma at Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine from September 2016 to July 2018 on which a laparoscopic approach was used. Preoperative imaging findings suggestive of gallbladder cancer were defined as follows: elevated lesion >10 mm in diameter, increasing tumor size over time compared with the previous imaging, sessile lesion, irregular wall thickness lesion mimicking cancer, elevated lesion with dense enhancement, or positive results on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. LWLC was performed for early-stage or suspected malignant lesions without liver invasion, and LGBD was performed for lesions with an unclear border between the gallbladder and the liver. When postoperative pathological examination revealed the presence of gallbladder cancer invading into the subserosal layer, additional gallbladder bed resection and regional lymphadenectomy were considered. Patient characteristics, perioperative findings, pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent LWLC or LGBD were reviewed retrospectively, and the short-term outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen consecutive patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR 42-76 years); 7 patients were males. We performed LWLC in 12 cases and LBGD in 3 cases. Median (IQR) operation time was 159 (140-193) min and median blood loss was 10 (5-30) mL. No bile leakage caused by intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder was seen. Median hospital stay was 7 (5-9) days. Only one patient developed postoperative complications (abdominal abscess). Histologically, gallbladder cancer was diagnosed in five cases (pT1a, n = 2; pT2, n = 3), and two of the pT2 patients underwent additional open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our laparoscopic-based approach for suspected gallbladder cancer might represent a safe strategy and could play an important role in defining the optimal treatment strategy.

The management of gallbladder polyps

Neoplastic gallbladder polyps (NGP) are rare; the prevalence in the overall population is less than 10%. NGP are associated with a risk of malignant degeneration and must be distinguished from other benign gallbladder polypoid lesions that occur more frequently. NGP are adenomas and the main risk associated with their management is to fail to detect their progression to gallbladder cancer, which is associated with a particular poor prognosis. The conclusions of the recent European recommendations have a low level of evidence, based essentially on retrospective small-volume studies. Abdominal sonography is the first line study for diagnosis and follow-up for NGP. To prevent the onset of gallbladder cancer, or treat malignant degeneration in its early phases, all NGP larger than 10mm, or symptomatic, or larger than 6mm with associated risk factors for cancer (age over 50, sessile polyp, Indian ethnicity, or patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis) are indications for cholecystectomy. Apart from these situations, simple sonographic surveillance is recommended for at least five years; if the NGP increases in size by more than 2mm in size, cholecystectomy is indicated. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is possible but if the surgeon feels that the risk of intra-operative gallbladder perforation is high, conversion to laparotomy should be preferred to avoid potential intra-abdominal tumoral dissemination. When malignant NGP is suspected (size greater than 15mm, signs of locoregional extension on imaging), a comprehensive imaging workup should be performed to search for liver extension: in this setting, radical surgery should be considered.

Neoplastic polyps in gallbladder: a retrospective study to determine risk factors and treatment strategy for gallbladder polyps

Background

Preoperative differentiation of malignant and premalignant gallbladder polyps (GBPs) from benign lesions is a key imperative to guide treatment decision-making. We aimed to characterize the various types of GBPs and sought to identify the risk factors for neoplastic polyps. Our findings may help optimize treatment strategy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 686 patients with post-cholecystectomy pathologically-proven GBPs between January 2003 and December 2016. The patients were classified into non-neoplastic polyp group, benign neoplastic polyp group, and adenoma canceration group. Clinical features, ultrasound findings, and results of laboratory investigations and histopathological examination were reviewed and compared between the groups.

Results

Out of 686 patients, 542 (79.0%) had non-neoplastic polyps, 134 (19.5%) had neoplastic polyps, and 10 (1.5%) had adenoma canceration. The mean age was 46.06±12.12 years; 383 (55.8%) patients were female. The median (25^th percentile, 75^th percentile) time between diagnosis and surgery in the cholesterol polyp group [24 (3.5, 60) months] was significantly longer than that in adenoma [12 (2, 60) months] and adenoma canceration [5 (0.475, 12) months] groups. The mean diameter was 1.14±0.61 cm (range, 0.5-8.4 cm). Three hundred twelve (45.5%) patients had solitary polyps and intralesional blood flow was observed in 41 (6.0%) patients. On univariate analysis, age >49.5 years, polyp size >1.15 cm, solitary polyp, intralesional blood flow, absence of symptoms, and lack of cholecystitis showed a significant association with adenoma. On multivariate analysis, polyp size (>1.15 cm), intralesional blood flow, and lack of cholecystitis were independent predictors of adenoma.

Conclusions

Polyp size >1.15 cm, intralesional blood flow, and lack of cholecystitis were predictors of neoplastic polyps. Malignant transformation of adenoma may occur over a relatively short time.

Quantitative contrast-enhanced US helps differentiating neoplastic vs non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps

OBJECTIVES

To differentiate between large (≥ 1 cm in diameter) gallbladder (GB) non-neoplastic and neoplastic polyps using quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings.

METHODS

From September 2017 to May 2018, 29 patients (10 males; median age, 63 years) with GB polyps of ≥ 1 cm in diameter who were undergoing cholecystectomy were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative conventional US and CEUS examinations. Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings using time-intensity curves between the two groups was independently performed by two radiologists. The interobserver agreement for the quantitative analysis of the CEUS results was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS examination.

RESULTS

After the cholecystectomy, the patients were classified into the non-neoplastic polyp group (n = 12) and the neoplastic polyp group (n = 17) according to the pathological results. The interobserver agreement for quantitative assessment between the two radiologists was near perfect to substantial. Quantitative assessment of the CEUS findings revealed that the rise time, mean transit time, time to peak, and fall time of non-neoplastic GB polyps were significantly shorter than those of neoplastic polyps (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p = 0.013, and p = 0.002, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative CEUS parameters for the differentiation between the two groups were 76.5-100% and 75%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.765-0.887.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings could be valuable in differentiating GB neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings could be valuable in differentiating gallbladder neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps. • Quantitative analysis of CEUS findings in gallbladder polyps provides cut-off values for differentiation between neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps with near-perfect to substantial interobserver agreement.

Abdominal pain and vomiting during pregnancy due to cholesterolosis

We present a 22-year-old pregnant woman at 15 weeks of gestation, with abdominal pain and vomiting. We demonstrate that diagnosis and treatment of vomiting and abdominal pain in pregnancy can be difficult. Therefore, involvement of other medical specialists is important when common treatments fail. Cholesterolosis can cause symptoms similar to those caused by cholelithiasis. Controversial to gallstones, identification of cholesterolosis by ultrasound is hard. Cholecystectomy is the only effective treatment option for cholesterolosis and can be performed safely during pregnancy. Cholecystectomy in pregnancy should be considered if, despite atypical symptoms, gallbladder disease is suspected and other diagnoses are ruled out. This may reduce recurrent symptoms, hospital admissions, exposure to harmful drugs and obstetric complications.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps: Current Perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are generally harmless, but the planning of diagnosis and treatment of the GBP is of clinical importance due to the high mortality risk of delays in the diagnosis of gallbladder carcinomas that show polypoid development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GBPs are usually incidentally detected during ultrasonographic (USG) examinations of the abdomen. The risk of carcinoma development from polypoid lesions in the literature is reported as 0-27%. There is no consensus about the management of the GBPs. Herein, we reviewed the contemporary data to update our knowledge about diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder polyps.

RESULTS

Polyps can be identified in five different groups, primarily as neoplastic and non-neoplastic. Cholesterol polyps account for 60% of all cases. The most common (25%) benign polypoid lesions after cholesterol polyps are adenomyomas.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography seems to be the most important tool in differential diagnosis and treatment. Ultrasonography should be repeated in every 3-12 months in cases that are thought to be risky. Nowadays, the most common treatment approach is to perform cholecystectomy in patients with polyps larger than 10 mm in diameter. Radical cholecystectomy and/or segmental liver resections should be planned in cases of malignancy.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Dilek ON, Karsu S, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps: Current Perspectives. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2019;9(1):40-48.

Predictive Model for Neoplastic Potential of Gallbladder Polyp

GOAL

To provide the statistical predictive model for neoplastic potential of gallbladder polyp (GBP).

BACKGROUND

Many studies have attempted to define the risk factors for neoplastic potential of GBP. It remains difficult to precisely adapt the reported risk factors for the decision of surgery. Estimating the probability for neoplastic potential of GBP using a combination of several risk factors before surgical resection would be useful in patient consultation.

STUDY

We collected data of patients confirmed as GBP through cholecystectomy at Samsung Medical Center between January 1997 and March 2015. Those with a definite evidence for malignancy, such as adjacent organ invasion, metastasis on preoperative imaging studies, polyp >15 mm, and absence of proper preoperative ultrasonographic imaging were excluded. A total of 1976 patients were enrolled. To make and validate the predictive model, we divided the cohort into the modeling group (n=979) and validation group (n=997). Clinical information, ultrasonographic findings, and blood tests were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Clinical factors of older age, single lesion, sessile shape, and polyp size showed statistical significance for neoplastic potential of GBP in the modeling group. A predictive model for neoplastic potential of GBP was constructed utilizing the statistical outcome of the modeling group. Statistical validation was performed with the validation group to determine the optimal clinical sensitivity and specificity of the predictive model. Optimal cut-off value for neoplastic probability was 7.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model for neoplastic potential of GBP may support clinical decisions before cholecystectomy.

The efficacy of real-time colour Doppler flow imaging on endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the usefulness of real-time colour Doppler flow (CDF) endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating neoplastic gallbladder (GB) polyps from non-neoplastic polyps.

METHODS

Between August 2014 and December 2016, a total of 233 patients with GB polyps who underwent real-time CDF-EUS were consecutively enrolled in this prospective study. CDF imaging was subjectively categorized for each patient as: strong CDF pattern, weak CDF pattern and no CDF pattern.

RESULTS

Of the 233 patients, 115 underwent surgical resection. Of these, there were 90 cases of non-neoplastic GB polyps and 23 cases of neoplastic GB polyps. In a multivariate analysis, a strong CDF pattern was the most significant predictive factor for neoplastic polyps; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 52.2 %, 79.4 %, 38.7 %, 86.9 % and 73.9 %, respectively. Solitary polyp and polyp size were associated with an increased risk of neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a strong CDF pattern as well as solitary and larger polyps on EUS may be predictive of neoplastic GB polyps. As real-time CDF-EUS poses no danger to the patient and requires no additional equipment, it is likely to become a supplemental tool for the differential diagnosis of GB polyps.

KEY POINTS

• Differential diagnosis between neoplastic polyps and non-neoplastic polyps of GB is limited. • The use of real-time CDF-EUS was convenient, with high agreement between operators. • The real-time CDF-EUS is helpful in differential diagnosis of GB polyps.

The gallbladder polypoid-lesions conundrum: moving forward with controversy by looking back

Gallbladder polypoid-lesions (GPs) are found in 5-10% of the general population. Although the majority of GPs are asymptomatic and benign in nature, some of them can develop into cancer, which carries a poor prognosis. Currently, the risk factors, natural history and classification of GPs remain unclear, differentiation of benign from malignant or premalignant GPs based on available diagnostic modalities and/or features of patients and GPs remain difficult, and there are still no evidence-based guidelines to dictate when and how GPs of varying sizes and subtypes should be managed. All of these facts have left GPs in uncertainty. Areas covered: A literature search was performed using the terms 'gallbladder polyps' AND 'polypoid lesion of gallbladder' in the PubMed database from January 2000 to September 2016. Original and review articles on almost all aspects of GPs in humans, especially diagnosis, treatment and surveillance, were reviewed and analyzed. Reference lists of reviews and original articles were also examined for relevant publications. Expert commentary: The present article summarizes almost all aspects of GPs, analyzes the controversies, and outlines our data and comments. It is the authors' purpose that this article be beneficial for scientific, accurate and appropriate management of GPs.

Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps : Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)

Objectives

The management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps on radiological examinations is contentious. The incidental radiological finding of a gallbladder polyp can therefore be problematic for the radiologist and the clinician who referred the patient for the radiological examination. To address this a joint guideline was created by the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery – European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).

Methods

A targeted literature search was performed and consensus guidelines were created using a series of Delphi questionnaires and a seven-point Likert scale.

Results

A total of three Delphi rounds were performed. Consensus regarding which patients should have cholecystectomy, which patients should have ultrasound follow-up and the nature and duration of that follow-up was established. The full recommendations as well as a summary algorithm are provided.

Conclusions

These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidance when a gallbladder polyp is encountered in clinical practice.

Key Points

• Management of gallbladder polyps is contentious

• Cholecystectomy is recommended for gallbladder polyps >10 mm

• Management of polyps <10 mm depends on patient and polyp characteristics

• Further research is required to determine optimal management of gallbladder polyps

Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder (PLG) are common, and most are benign. Few lesions are found to be malignant, but are not preoperatively distinguished as such using common imaging modalities. Therefore, we compared characteristics of benign and malignant PLGs in depth.

METHODS

We enrolled 1204 consecutive patients diagnosed with PLG at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 2004 and December 2013. Patients underwent either surgery or regular follow-up with various imaging modalities for at least 24 months. The mean follow-up duration was 72 ± 32 months.

RESULTS

Of 1204 patients, 194 underwent surgical treatment and 1010, regular follow-up. In addition, 73 % patients were asymptomatic. The mean PLG size was 6.9 ± 7.7 (range 0.8-129) mm; the PLGs of 337 patients (28 %) grew during their follow-up periods. The majority of PLGs (90.4 %) were single lesions, and 10.5 % of patients had associated gallstones. The PLGs of 20.1 % of surgical patients were malignant. Malignant PLGs were found in 32.4 % of patients ≥50 years old and in 4.7 % of those <50 years old (p < 0.001). Right quadrant abdominal pain, epigastric pain, and body weight loss were the three most common symptoms associated with malignancy. Malignant PLGs were significantly larger than benign lesions (means: 27.5 ± 18.4 mm vs. 12.3 ± 12.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.001). Notably, the size of 5 % of malignant PLGs was 3-5 mm, and that of 8 % was 5-10 mm. The negative predictive value for gallbladder malignancy was 92.8 % based on a size ≥10 mm and 100 % based on a size ≥3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reassesses the PLG size that warrants more aggressive intervention. Cholecystectomy remains mandatory for PLGs > 10 mm, but should also be considered a definitive diagnostic and treatment modality for PLGs with diameters of 3-10 mm.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may distinguish gallbladder adenoma from cholesterol polyps: a prospective case-control study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to find the independent risk factors related with gallbladder (GB) adenoma compared to cholesterol polyp by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and September 2014, a total of 122 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy for GB polypoid lesions were enrolled. Before cholecystectomy, each patient underwent conventional US and CEUS examination and all image features were documented. The patients were divided into adenoma group and cholesterol polyp group according to the pathological findings. All the image features between two groups were statistically compared.

RESULTS

There were differences in patient age, lesion size, echogenicity, and vascularity of lesion between two groups (P < 0.05). There were differences in stalk width and enhancement intensity between the two groups (P < 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis proved that enhancement intensity, stalk of lesion, and vascularity were the independent risk factors related with GB adenoma (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS could offer useful information to distinguish adenoma from cholesterol polyp. The treatment algorithm for gallbladder polyp lesions would likely benefit from CEUS as a routine imaging investigation, especially in cases where the polyp is larger than 1 cm.

Is it necessary to perform prophylactic cholecystectomy for all symptomatic gallbladder polyps diagnosed with ultrasound?

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study is to determine the necessity of cholecystectomy in patients with ultrasound diagnosed symptomatic polypoid lesions of the gallbladder.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of 82 patients with polypoid lesions of the gallbladder who had cholecystectomy between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed retrospectively with preoperative ultrasound and histopathology results.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.05±11.18 years (range 25-74 years). All patients underwent preoperative ultrasound examination. Eighteen (22%) of the 82 patients were asymptomatic; their polypoid lesions of the gallbladder were detected with ultrasound during a check-up or other reasons. In 45 (55%) of cases pathology reported no polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Right upper quadrant or epigastric pain was the most common symptom (41.46%) that led to hepatobiliary ultrasound, the other symptom was dyspepsia (36.59%). On preoperative ultrasound evaluation, 22 patients had multiple polyps, and 9 of these 22 patients had at least 3 polyps.

CONCLUSION

There is an inaccuracy of ultrasound to detect polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. After diagnosing polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by using standard ultrasound, further pre-operative diagnostic tests are needed to help discriminating benign lesions from malignant ones, which may prevent unnecessary surgery regardless of symptoms.

Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gall Bladder Polyps

Background and Objectives:

Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) was introduced to improve patients' postoperative quality of life and cosmesis over the conventional approach (CLC). The purpose of this case–control study was to compare the outcome of SPLC with that of CLC in a specific disease: gall bladder (GB) polyps.

Methods:

Eligible for the study were all patients with GB polyps who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between June 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011. The 112 patients studied (56 each for SPLC and CLC) were matched by using a propensity score that included gender, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of previous abdominal operation, and pathology outcome. To avoid selection bias caused by the surgeon's choice (often dependent on the degree of inflammation) and to investigate the efficacy of SPLC for a single disease, GB polyps, we excluded patients with acute or chronic cholecystitis.

Results:

Characteristics of the patients matched by a propensity score between SPLC and CLC showed no significant difference. Incidentally detected malignancy was in postoperative pathology in cases in both groups. Although operative time was shorter for SPLC, there was no significant difference in time between the 2 groups. There were 3 open conversions in the CLC group, and an additional port was used in the SPLC group. There was no difference between the groups in hospital stay and postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

In the management of GB polyps, the operative results of SPLC are comparable to those of CLC. We conclude that SPLC is as safe as CLC and has the potential for greater cosmetic satisfaction for patients than CLC. Further trials for objective appraisal of cosmetic outcomes are needed.

Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: A systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy

BACKGROUND

There are no evidence-based guidelines to dictate when Gallbladder Polyps (GBPs) of varying sizes should be resected.

AIM

To identify factors that accurately predict malignant disease in GBP; to provide an evidence-based algorithm for management.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed using terms "gallbladder polyps" AND "polypoid lesion of gallbladder", from January 1993 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria required histopathological report or follow-up of 2 years. RTI-IB tool was used for quality analysis. Correlation with GBP size and malignant potential was analysed using Euclidean distance; a logistics mixed effects model was used for assessing independent risk factors for malignancy.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles were included in review. Data from 21 studies was pooled for analysis. Optimum size cut-off for resection of GBPs was 10 mm. Probability of malignancy is approximately zero at size <4.15 mm. Patient age >50 years, sessile and single polyps were independent risk factors for malignancy. For polyps sized 4 mm-10 mm, a risk assessment model was formulated.

CONCLUSIONS

This review and analysis has provided an evidence-based algorithm for the management of GBPs. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the behaviour of polyps <10 mm, that are not at a high risk of malignancy, but may change over time.

Gall Bladder Cancer

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common biliary epithelial malignancy, with an estimated 10,910 new cases and 3700 deaths per year (Siegel et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 65:5–29, 2015 [1]). This disease’s insidious nature and typically late presentation place it among the most lethal of invasive neoplasms. Gallbladder cancer spreads early by lymphatic or hematogenous metastasis and by direct invasion into the liver. While surgery may well be curative at early stages, both surgical and nonsurgical treatments remain largely unsuccessful in patients with more advanced disease.

Management and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Recommendation for management of gallbladder polyps (GBPs) >1 cm is cholecystectomy. No consensus exists on management of GBPs <1 cm. This systematic review examines current evidence on management of GBPs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases were searched from January 1991 to June 2013 using specified terms. A predefined protocol for data extraction was used to retrieve specified end points.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 43 manuscripts with a dataset of 11,685 patients with GBPs. M:F ratio was 1.3:1. Average age (range) was 49 years (32-83). Patients with malignant GBPs had an average (range) age of 58 (50-66) years with M:F ratio of 0.78:1. Cholesterol polyps constituted 60.5% of GBPs followed by adenomas (15.2%) and cancer (11.6%). Malignant GBPs ≥1 cm, <1 cm and <5 mm constituted 8.5, 1.2 and 0% of GBPs, respectively. Majority of patients requiring surgical intervention had laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Presently employed policy of cholecystectomy for GBPs >1 cm is appropriate. For GBPs <1 cm, the authors propose (accepting existence of differing proposals) the following: 1. Surveillance may not be needed for GBPs <5 mm. 2. For GBPs between 5 and 10 mm, two scans at six monthly intervals is suggested and after that, tailor surveillance to age, growth and ethnicity. In the non-Asian population, if GBP remains the same size or number, discontinuation of surveillance may be considered. In the Asian population, if GBPs remain the same, yearly surveillance is continued for a suggested period of 3 years. 3. Discontinue surveillance if GBPs is/are smaller/ disappeared. Cholecystectomy is advised where size increases to >10 mm.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract cancers 2015: the 2nd English edition

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas in 2008. Novel treatment modalities and handling of clinical issues have been proposed after the publication. New approaches for editing clinical guidelines, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, also have been introduced for better and clearer grading of recommendations.

METHODS

Clinical questions (CQs) were proposed in seven topics. Recommendation, grade of recommendation and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by evidence-based approach. Recommendation was graded to grade 1 (strong) and 2 (weak) according to the concept of GRADE system.

RESULTS

The 29 CQs covered seven topics: (1) prophylactic treatment, (2) diagnosis, (3) biliary drainage, (4) surgical treatment, (5) chemotherapy, (6) radiation therapy, and (7) pathology. In 27 CQs, 19 recommendations were rated strong and 11 recommendations weak. Each CQ included the statement of how the recommendation was graded.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides recommendation for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with cancer registry will be a key for assessment of the guidelines and establishment of new evidence. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of this guideline are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/biliary-tract2.html.

Gallbladder cancer: Clinical and pathological approach

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) shows a marked geographical variation in its incidence. Middle-aged and elderly women are more commonly affected. Risk factors for its development include the presence of gallstones, chronic infection and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Controversy remains in regard to the theory of carcinogenesis from adenomyomatosis, porcelain gallbladder and adenoma of the gallbladder. The surgical strategy and prognosis after surgery for GBC differ strikingly according to T-stage. Discrimination of favorable cases, particularly T2 or T3 lesions, is useful for the selection of surgical strategies for individual patients. Although many candidate factors predicting disease progression, such as depth of subserosal invasion, horizontal tumor spread, tumor budding, dedifferentiation, Ki-67 labeling index, p53 nuclear expression, CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, mitotic counts, Laminin-5-gamma-2 chain, hypoxia-inducible factor-1a, cyclooxygenase-2 and the Hedgehog signaling pathway have been investigated, useful prognostic makers or factors have not been established. As GBC is often discovered incidentally after routine cholecystectomy and accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult, close mutual cooperation between surgeons and pathologists is essential for developing a rational surgical strategy for GBC.

Gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer remains a relatively rare malignancy with a highly variable presentation. Gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary tract malignancy with the worst overall prognosis. With the advent of the laparoscope, in comparison with historical controls, this disease is now more commonly diagnosed incidentally and at an earlier stage. However, when symptoms of jaundice and pain are present, the prognosis remains dismal. From a surgical perspective, gallbladder cancer can be suspected preoperatively, identified intraoperatively, or discovered incidentally on final surgical pathology.

Gallbladder polyps: Factors affecting surgical decision

AIM: To determine the factors affecting the decision to perform surgery, and the efficiency of ultrasonography (USG) in detecting gallbladder polyps (GP).

METHODS: Data for 138 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 1996 and 2012 in our clinic with a diagnosis of GP were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, clinical presentation, principal symptoms, ultrasonographic and histopathological findings were evaluated. Patients were evaluated in individual groups according to the age of the patients (older or younger than 50 years old) and polyp size (bigger or smaller than 10 mm) and characteristics of the polyps (pseudopolyp or real polyps). χ² tests were used for the statistical evaluation of the data.

RESULTS: The median age was 50 (26-85) years and 91 of patients were female. Of 138 patients who underwent cholecystectomy with GP diagnosis, only 99 had a histopathologically defined polyp; 77 of them had pseudopolyps and 22 had true polyps. Twenty-one patients had adenocarcinoma. Of these 21 patients, 11 were male, their median age was 61 (40-85) years and all malignant polyps had diameters > 10 mm (P < 0.0001). Of 138 patients in whom surgery were performed, 112 had ultrasonographic polyps with diameters < 10 mm. Of the other 26 patients who also had polyps with diameters > 10 mm, 22 had true polyps. The sensitivity of USG was 84.6% for polyps with diameters > 10 mm (P < 0.0001); however it was only 66% in polyps with diameters < 10 mm.

CONCLUSION: The risk of malignancy was high in the patients over 50 years old who had single polyps with diameters > 10 mm.

Differences between images of large adenoma and protruding type of gallbladder carcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between images of large adenoma of the gallbladder and the protruding type carcinoma of the gallbladder. A retrospective study was performed on 130 patients who underwent cholecystectomy or biopsy for gallbladder polypoid lesions larger than 10 mm; among them, 20 patients were malignant and 110 patients were benign. Patients’ details including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) findings were analyzed. All patients whose lesions were >15 mm by US, had CT or MR scans to further determine the nature of the lesion; two patients who were suspected to have a malignant lesion due to their large tumor size were benign by histological examination. Distinct differences were found between large adenoma and protruding type of gallbladder carcinoma. There were distinct differences between adenomas and the protruding type gallbladder cancers, and there was a pathological basis for the differences. Benign tumors had a more homogeneous texture, had spaces between the tumor and the gallbladder wall and a relatively normal configuration of the gallbladder wall. Based on these findings, certain lesions could be definitively diagnosed as benign adenomas and could help in treatment strategy.

[Surgical indications in gallbladder polyps]

INTRODUCTION

The surgery of gallbladder polyps is not well defined due to the lack of evidence-based clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the management of polyps in Spain, and a review of the literature and treatment standards.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The reports on cholecystectomy with gallbladder polyps (GBP) were extracted from the Pathology data base. Patients subjected to surgery with a diagnosis of GBP were identified in the Surgery data base. A single list was prepared and a review was made of the clinical histories, including, age, gender, clinical data, ultrasound report, and histopathology report.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients, with a median age of 51 years (range 22-83), 21 of whom were female, were included. The ultrasound diagnosis was GBP in 19 patients, GBP and calculi in 7 cases, and calculi with no polyps in 4 cases. Other diagnoses concurrent with GBP were multiple haemangiomas (3), large single simple cyst (1), and multiple simple cysts (1). Eleven patients had typical pain (biliary origin), 5 of which showed no calculi on ultrasound. Eight had non-specific pain, which persisted in 3 cases after the cholecystectomy. Pseudopolyps were found in 20 gallbladders, and true polyps in 4 cases. In 3 cases, polyps were not found in the pathology study.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound report must specify the size, shape, and number of polyps. Patients with biliary type pain would benefit from a cholecystectomy. The probability of malignancy is minimum if the GBP is less than 10mm and aged under 50 years, and a cholecystectomy is not required. A GBP greater than 10mm should be an indication of cholecystectomy.