Extended right posterior segmentectomy for metastatic liver tumors

Hepatectomy preserving drainage veins of the posterior section for liver malignancy invading the right hepatic vein: an alternative to right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Although a right hepatectomy (RH) traditionally has been performed for liver tumors infiltrating the main trunk of the right hepatic vein (RHV), the presence of drainage veins of the posterior section (DVPS) beside the RHV provides a chance to preserve their draining area even if the main trunk of the RHV is removed.

METHODS

Since 2005, we systematically have performed DVPS-preserving hepatectomies whenever possible. In the present study, we describe our experience treating 12 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure.

RESULTS

We performed the following types of liver resections concomitant with the main trunk of the RHV without packed red cell transfusion, liver failure, or 90-day mortality: extended right anterior sectionectomy in 2 patients, extended segmentectomy 7 in 3, extended segmentectomy 8 in 2, and partial resection of segment 7 in 2 and segment 8 in 3. Postoperative morbidity was observed in 4 (33%) cases, all of which had pleural effusion requiring a tap. A free resection margin was obtained in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure could be a useful alternative to RH, providing a chance for radical liver resection with minimal parenchymal sacrifice in selected patients with DVPS.

A study of factors influencing prognosis after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal and gastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the absolute contraindication for hepatic resection for colorectal metastases and investigate the value of hepatectomy for gastric metastases by comparing it with the results of colorectal metastases performed with the same criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal (n = 64) and gastric (n = 17) carcinomas. Common predictive factors for both metastases were analyzed by the stratified Cox proportional hazard model. In this model, the different baseline hazard was set for each disease, whereas the risk of each covariate was assumed to be equal in both gastric and colorectal metastases.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-yr survival rates after hepatectomy for colorectal and gastric metastases were 90%, 73%, 42%, and 47%, 22%, 0%, respectively. Factors controlling prognosis were as follows: age > or = 60, extrahepatic metastases, serosal invasion, grade of lymph node metastases, tumor cell differentiation of the primary lesion(s), carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor-exposed surgical margin, and blood transfusion. In particular, presence of extrahepatic metastases showed the markedly high-risk ratio among these eight variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomy, if possible, is indicated in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma if there are no extrahepatic metastases and if the primary disease is controlled. It is indicated only in carefully selected patients with metastases from gastric carcinoma.

Aggressive surgical approach to recurrent tumors after hepatectomy for metastatic spread of colorectal cancer to the liver

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is currently accepted as the only potential cure for patients with metastases of colorectal tumors in the liver. However, cancer will recur in more than 70% of patients.

METHODS

In the 7 years to December 1997, 60 patients underwent liver resections for colorectal metastases at our institute. Of these, 20 patients had repeated surgical resections for recurrent disease of the liver and other organs. Another 2 patients had undergone previous hepatectomy elsewhere. The clinical data for these patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The median interval between the 2 resections was 16 months. Eighteen hepatectomies, 6 lung resections, and 1 pancreatoduodenectomy were performed in 22 patients. Operative mortality and complication rates were 0% and 18%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 25 months after repeated resection, the survival rate in these patients was 73% at 2 years (12 of 16 evaluable patients are surviving) and 22% at 5 years (2 of 10 evaluable patients are surviving); the median survival time was 44 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated resections for recurrent colorectal metastases yield comparable results to first liver resections in operative mortality and morbidity rates, survival time, and pattern of recurrence. Although the number of patients surviving more than 5 years is still limited, the absence of other proven treatments supports the concept of an aggressive resectional approach for these patients.