Conversion from bladder to enteric drainage after pancreaticoduodenal transplantations. Surgery. 1998;124:883-893. [PMID: 9823403 DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(98)70013-3]

Exocrine drainage in pancreas transplantation: Complications and management

The aim of this minireview is to compare various pancreas transplantation exocrine drainage techniques i.e., bladder vs enteric. Both techniques have different difficulties and complications. Numerous comparisons have been made in the literature between exocrine drainage techniques throughout the history of pancreas transplantation, detailing complications and their impact on graft and patient survival. Specific emphasis has been made on the early postoperative management of these complications and the related surgical infections and their consequences. In light of the results, a number of bladder-drained pancreas grafts required conversion to enteric drainage. As a result of technical improvements, outcomes of the varied enteric exocrine drainage techniques (duodenojejunostomy, duodenoduodenostomy or gastric drainage) have also been discussed i.e., assessing specific risks vs benefits. Pancreatic exocrine secretions can be drained to the urinary or intestinal tracts. Until the late 1990s the bladder drainage technique was used in the majority of transplant centers due to ease of monitoring urine amylase and lipase levels for evaluation of possible rejection. Moreover, bladder drainage was associated at that time with fewer surgical complications, which in contrast to enteric drainage, could be managed with conservative therapies. Nowadays, the most commonly used technique for proper driving of exocrine pancreatic secretions is enteric drainage due to the high rate of urological and metabolic complications associated with bladder drainage. Of note, 10% to 40% of bladder-drained pancreata eventually required enteric conversion at no detriment to overall graft survival. Various surgical techniques were originally described using the small bowel for enteric anastomosis with Roux-en-Y loop or a direct side-to-side anastomosis. Despite the improvements in surgery, enteric drainage complication rates ranging from 2%-20% have been reported. Treatment depends on the presence of any associated complications and the condition of the patient. Intra-abdominal infection represents a potentially very serious problem. Up to 30% of deep wound infections are associated with an anastomotic leak. They can lead not only to high rates of graft loss, but also to substantial mortality. New modifications of established techniques are being developed, such as gastric or duodenal exocrine drainage. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option, in which the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main concern of this technique is the challenge of repairing the native duodenum when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary. Identification and prevention of technical failure remains the main objective for pancreas transplantation surgeons. In conclusion, despite numerous techniques to minimize exocrine pancreatic drainage complications e.g., leakage and infection, no universal technique has been standardized. A prospective study/registry analysis may resolve this.

Early intestinal complications following pancreas transplantation: lessons learned from over 300 cases - a retrospective single-center study

Enteric complications remain a major cause of morbidity in the post-transplant period of pancreas transplantation despite improvements surgical technique. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze retrospectively the early intestinal complications and their potential relation with vascular events. From 2000 to 2016, 337 pancreas transplants were performed with systemic venous drainage. For exocrine secretion, intestinal drainage was done with hand-sewn anastomosis duodenojejunostomy. Twenty-three patients (6.8%) had early intestinal complications. Median age was 39 years (male: 65.2%). Median cold ischemia time was 11 h [IQR: 9-12.4]. Intestinal complications were intestinal obstruction (n = 7); paralytic ileus (n = 5); intestinal fistula without anastomotic dehiscence (n = 3); ischemic graft duodenum (n = 3); dehiscence of duodenojejunostomy (n = 4); and anastomotic dehiscence in jejunum after pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1). Eighteen cases required relaparotomy: adhesiolysis (n = 6); repeated laparotomy without findings (n = 1); transplantectomy (n = 6); primary leak closure (n = 3); re-positioning of the graft (n = 1); and intestinal resection (n = 1). Of the intestinal complications, 4 were associated with vascular thrombosis, resulting in two pancreatic graft losses. Enteric drainage with duodenum-jejunum anastomosis is safe and feasible, with a low rate of intra-abdominal complications. Vascular thrombosis associated with intestinal complications presents a risk factor for the viability of pancreatic grafts, so prevention and early detection is vital.

Enteric Conversion of Bladder-drained Pancreas as a Predictor of Outcomes in Almost 600 Recipients at a Single Center

Complications associated with bladder-drained pancreata necessitating enteric conversion are common. Data on the outcomes after enteric conversion are conflicting. We studied the association between enteric conversion and the pancreas graft rejection, loss, and mortality.

Methods

At our center, 1117 pancreas transplants were performed between 2000 and 2016. We analyzed 593 recipients with bladder-drained pancreata, of which 523 received solitary transplants and 70 received simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Kaplan-Meier function was used to estimate time to conversion by transplant type. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate patient survival, death-censored graft survival, and acute rejection-free survival while treating conversion as a time-dependent covariate. Subsequently, we examined the association between timing of conversion and the same outcomes in the conversion cohort.

Results

At 10 y posttransplant, 48.8% of the solitary pancreas recipients and 44.3% of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients had undergone enteric conversion. The enteric conversion was associated with 85% increased risk of acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001). However, the conversion was not associated with graft loss or mortality. In the conversion cohort, a longer interval from engraftment to conversion was associated with an 18% lower rejection rate (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.708-0.960; P = 0.013) and a 22% better graft survival (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.646-0.946; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Enteric conversion was associated with increased risk of rejection, but not increased risks of graft loss or mortality. The decision to convert should consider the increased rejection risk. A longer interval from engraftment to conversion appears favorable.

Enteric conversion after bladder-drained pancreas transplantation is not associated with worse allograft survival

In the early experience of pancreas transplantation, bladder drainage was favored, but it often caused urologic, metabolic, and infectious complications that necessitated conversion to enteric drainage. Long-term graft survival after enteric conversion and the impact of time interval from transplantation to enteric conversion on graft survival is poorly understood. We studied all bladder-drained first-time pancreas transplantations performed at the University of Wisconsin from 1985 to 2000. Time to conversion was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier technique, whereas risk factors associated with conversion were estimated via a time-varying Cox proportional hazards model. Of 386 bladder-drained pancreata, 162 (41.9%) eventually required enteric conversion, 29 (17.9%) within the first year. Median time to conversion varied by indication: 0.68 years for surgical, 3.1 years for urologic, and 2.7 years for metabolic disorders. In a time-varying Cox model adjusting for donor and recipient factors, enteric conversion did not affect the risk of pancreas graft loss (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, P = .26). Kidney survival was not associated with enteric conversion. When necessary due to symptoms or complications, enteric conversion of bladder-drained pancreata is safe and does not affect overall graft survival. This relationship appears to be true no matter when the conversion is performed.

Delayed Bleeding of the Transplant Duodenum After Simultaneous Kidney-pancreas Transplantation: Case Series

BACKGROUND

In simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients, the majority of complications described in the literature, are early postoperative complications. However, there is growing attention for late complications associated with SPK transplantation.

METHODS

In this case series, we present 3 cases, 2 enterically and 1 bladder-derived SPK transplant patients, with anastomotic hemorrhage of the donor duodenum as a very late complication, >10 years after transplantation (11, 22, and 18 y later, respectively).

RESULTS

In our center, 122 SPK transplantations have been performed between January 1992 and June 2018. The 3 cases reported here are the only patients in our cohort presenting with delayed anastomotic hemorrhage of the donor duodenum (2.5%). In the first 2 patients, reintervention with reconstruction of the anastomosis was performed. A congestive and friable mucosa was seen, and the resection specimen showed enlarged and congestive submucosal veins in both patients. There was no recurrence of bleeding after reintervention. In the third patient, enteric derivation was not possible because of the extremely fragile intestinal tissue perioperatively, and a conservative approach was taken. As possible precipitating factors are concerned, all 3 of our patients were taking low-dose aspirin and/or clopidogrel as secondary cardiovascular prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding of the transplanted donor duodenum can present as a late complication, several years after SPK transplantation. The development of enlarged, congestive submucosal veins could play a role in these late bleedings, and antiplatelet therapy could be a precipitating factor. Further research is necessary to investigate the pathophysiology, the prevalence, optimal treatment, and the consequent influence on mortality, morbidity, and graft loss after SPK transplantation.

Enterovesical Fistula After Enteric Conversion of a Bladder-Drained Pancreatic Allograft: A Case Report

Since the inception of pancreas transplant as a treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus, there has been considerable debate about the best way to manage exocrine secretions and monitor patients for graft rejection. For patients who undergo bladder exocrine drainage of a pancreatic allograft, a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion can serve as a rescue procedure in case of anastomotic leaks or other complications. However, this procedure is associated with its own complications, including a rarely described enterovesical fistula. Here we report on a 45-year-old man who underwent a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant with bladder drainage to the latter. He developed a pancreatic allograft duodenal leak (duodenal-vesical anastomosis) requiring a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion. The patient returned 2 weeks after discharge with an enterovesical fistula. He was treated nonsurgically with intravenous antibiotics, bowel rest, and parenteral nutrition, and the fistula successfully closed in approximately 2 weeks. Overall, enterovesical fistula formation is a rare but treatable complication that can occur after a bladder-to-enteric drainage conversion of a pancreatic transplant allograft. It can be managed nonsurgically, which is preferable in these immunocompromised patients.

[Role of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the treatment of diabetes mellitus]

The life expectancy of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus is inferior to that of patients with some malignancies. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the procedure providing the best survival results among all options of renal replacement therapy. The operative techniques and immunosuppresion have been standardized in the last decade. Although the number of transplantable organs falls behind the need, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the method of choice for the eligible patients. The results of the two Hungarian simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation programs are in accordance with data published in the international literature.

Pancreatic transplant in diabetes

Whole organ pancreas transplantation is increasingly being performed for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. To date, over 32,000 pancreas transplants have been performed worldwide. The procedure is associated with significant mortality and morbidity in early transplant period. However, the successful pancreas transplantation has the potential to render patients insulin-independent and halt the progression of complications of diabetes, thereby improving both quality of life and patient survival.

Transplantation of the pancreas

Pancreas transplantation consistently induces insulin-independence in beta-cell-penic diabetic patients, but at the cost of major surgery and life-long immunosuppression. One year after grafting, patient survival rate now exceeds 95 % across recipient categories, while insulin independence is maintained in some 85 % of simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients and in nearly 80 % of solitary pancreas transplant recipients. The half-life of the pancreas graft currently averages 16.7 years, being the longest among extrarenal grafts, and substantially matching the one of renal grafts from deceased donors. The difference between expected (100 %) and actual insulin-independence rate is mostly explained by technical failure in the postoperative phase, and rejection in the long-term period. Death with a functioning graft remains a further major issue, especially in uremic patients who have undergone prolonged periods of dialysis. Refinements in graft preservation, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and prophylactic treatments are expected to further improve the results of pancreas transplantation.

Pancreas transplantation

SPK transplant is the definitive treatment of type 1 diabetes combined with end-stage renal disease. Long-term graft function can lead to improvement in diabetes-related complications and, in patients younger than 50 years, can lead to improved overall survival. PAK transplant and PA transplant do not result in similar improvements in patient survival, but with appropriate patient selection, they can improve quality of life by rendering patients insulin-free. Pancreas transplant is associated with more surgical complications and higher perioperative morbidity and mortality than KTA. Therefore, careful donor and recipient selection along with meticulous surgical technique are mandatory for optimal outcomes.

Evolution of pancreas transplant surgery

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Enteric conversion after pancreatic transplantation: resolution of symptoms and long-term results

PURPOSE

Bladder drainage (BD) of pancreatic transplants is associated with a unique set of complications. We intended to analyze the incidence, indications, complications and long-term results of enteric conversion procedures (EC).

METHODS

Using a prospective database, 32 EC patients out of 433 simultaneous pancreas-kidney-transplant (SPK) recipients were identified. Graft and patient survival rates were compared with those after primary enteric drainage (ED).

RESULTS

The mean SPK-EC interval was 5.0 yr, and the mean patient follow-up was 13.8 yr. Indications for EC were genitourinary symptoms (62.5%), duodenal complications (15.6%), graft pancreatitis (12.5%), pyelonephritis (6.3%), and metabolic acidosis (3.1%). All patients reported significant long-term resolution of symptoms. Surgical complications, reoperations, early graft loss, and 30-d mortality occurred in 31.3%, 25.0%, 6.3%, and 3.1% of cases, respectively. Pancreatic graft and patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 yr after SPK were comparable between EC patients and ED patients at the same institution.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of symptoms associated with BD, EC results in excellent long-term graft function and significant resolution of symptoms even years after SPK. Postoperative morbidity after EC including early reoperation and graft loss, however, has to be considered.

Surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pancreas transplantation reproducibly induces insulin independence in beta-cell penic diabetic patients. The difference between full insulin independence, partial graft function, and graft loss, mostly results from technical failure, graft rejection, and patient death with function graft. The purpose of this review is to examine recent surgical advances and discuss their contribution to improved graft function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few actual surgical innovations were described in the period reviewed. Duodenoduodenostomy is an interesting option for drainage of digestive secretions, when the pancreas is placed behind the right colon and is oriented cephalad. The main advantage of this technique is easy endoscopic assessment of donor duodenum but, when allograft pancreatectomy is necessary, repair of native duodenum may be troublesome. Selective revascularization of the gastroduodenal artery, at the back-table, possibly improves blood supply to the head of the pancreas graft and duodenal segment. There is no proof that this additional maneuver is always beneficial, although it can be graft saving in case of poor segmental graft perfusion.

SUMMARY

Transplant surgeons should be familiar with all techniques for pancreas transplantation. Long-term graft function is possible only after technically successful pancreas transplantation. There is clearly a need for more objective assessment and standardization of surgical techniques for pancreas transplantation.

Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is some controversy concerning the choice of best technique for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation. We compared patients with bladder drainage (BD) versus those with enteric drainage (ED).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From March 1995 to September 2008, 118 patients (68 men and 50 women) of overall mean age of 37.8 +/- 7.8 years underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 109 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, and 9 pancreas after kidney procedures. Recipients were divided in a BD (n = 66 patients) and an ED group (n = 52).

RESULTS

Donor characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) of the BD group versus none in the ED group experienced urinary tract infections (UTI; P < .001), and 16 patients (24.2%) BD versus 15 (29.4%) ED developed intraabdominal infections (P = NS). The overall rate of relaparotomies was 33.9% (n = 40): 34.8% (n = 23) in the BD versus 32.7% (n = 17) in the ED group (P = NS). Thirty patients (25.4%) lost their pancreas grafts: 21 (31.8%) in the BD group versus 9 (17.3%) in the ED group (P = .055). The acute rejection rates were 12.7%; namely, 15.2% in the BD versus 9.8% in the ED (P = NS). Three-year patient and graft survivals were equivalent in both groups: 96.1% and 65.3% in the BD versus 89.0% and 74.0% in the ED group, respectively (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

ED is a good alternative to BD for drainage of pancreatic graft exocrine secretions because both techniques have the same patient and graft survival, but BD is associated with a significantly higher rate of UTI and urologic complications.

Acute urinary retention secondary to a urethral calculus in a bladder-drained kidney pancreas transplant patient - a metallic clip nidus

Urological expertise is usually required for the management of any urological complications of bladder-drained pancreatic allografts whether they are the result of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, pancreas after kidney transplants, or pancreas transplants alone. This study presents a case of urinary retention secondary to prostatic urethra calculus impaction, the nidus of which was found to be metallic staples from the donor duodenal segment of a pancreatic allograft. Knowledge of the pre-transplant benchwork gave a high index of suspicion to the urological sequelae of this case and, in particular, the presence of calculi should suggest a metal clip nidus. We examine the methods of exocrine pancreatic drainage, donor duodenum preparation and case management.

Pancreas-kidney transplantations with primary bladder drainage followed by enteric conversion: graft survival and outcomes

BACKGROUND

In the Leiden University Medical Centre, a two-step approach is routinely used in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations: primary bladder drainage (BD) followed by elective enteric conversion. The rationale for this approach is to prevent the short-term disadvantages of primary enteric drainage (intra-abdominal abscesses, pancreas graft loss) and the long-term urological complications related to bladder drainage. Aim of the present study is to evaluate survival and (urological) complications of this approach compared to enteric drainage (ED).

METHODS

Patient records of all 98 SPK transplantations in the period 1997-2004 were reviewed for complications during the initial hospitalization until 30 days after discharge, and to assess urological complications and graft survival until the last hospital visit. Median duration of follow-up was 4.3 years for pancreas graft survival, 4.7 years for kidney graft survival, and 4.8 years for patient survival.

RESULTS

Patient survival was significantly better in BD patients than in ED patients (chi2=9.89 P<0.01). Pancreas graft survival was also better in BD patients after adjustment for the longer pancreas warm ischemia time in BD patients (P=0.05). The survival rates in our patient population seem higher than reported by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry, particularly in BD patients. Urological complications occurred in nine BD patients (10.3%), comparable to the rates reported for enteric-drained grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

This two-step approach of SPK transplantation results in excellent survival rates, with urological complication rates comparable to those reported for enteric-drained grafts, and may thus be viewed as a safe and effective procedure of SPK transplantation.

Pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplantation for the treatment of diabetes mellitus

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage diabetic nephropathy, but the ultimate treatment today for type 1 diabetes mellitus is the whole vascularized pancreas transplant. Although its use is increasing, pancreas transplantation remains an uncommonly used therapeutic option that normalizes glucose levels and results in stabilization or improvement in secondary complications far better than any other strategy available for treatment of type 1 diabetes. These documented benefits of a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant are the basis for its acceptance as an appropriate therapy for patients who have type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease.

Bladder vs enteric drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

As a valid therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and secondary diabetic nephropathy, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains more undeveloped than other solid organ transplantations due to restrictions of surgical techniques, especially modes of exocrine pancreatic secretion. Enteric drainage (ED) has recently been increasingly popular due to the long-term complications with bladder drainage (BD). Objectives. Compare results of SPK transplants with enteric vs bladder exocrine drainage since the beginning of our experience with this type of transplantation.

METHODS

From March 1998 to October 2004, 53 SPK transplants were performed, consisting of 30 with bladder drainage (BD) and 23 with enteric drainage (ED). Induction therapy included antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) or anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody. Maintenance regimen consisted of tacrolimus (TAC)/cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids.

RESULTS

Mean age of recipients was 39+/-7 in both groups. No anastomosis leakage occurred in either group. Surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups. Incidence of acute rejection, major infections and cytomegalovirus disease were also similar. However, the BD group was characterized by a slight increase in number of urologic complications, metabolic acidosis and dehydration. The length of initial hospital stay was likewise comparable. All patients with a functional graft no longer required exogenous insulin. BD actuarial patient survival and graft three-year survival were 96 and 86%, respectively. For ED, the respective results were 97 and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with BD, perioperative morbidity is not increased by ED, and ED is not associated with increased long-term pancreas graft failure. These data suggest that ED is superior to BD and should be considered as the preferred technique for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants.

Establishment of a pig model with enteric and portal venous drainage of pancreatoduodenal transplantation

AIM: To establish the pig model of pancreatoduodenal transplantation with enteric drainage (ED) and portal venous drainage (PVD).

METHODS: Forty-six hybrid Landrace pigs were divided into two groups (donors and recipients) randomly, and pancreatoduodenal allotransplantation was performed. Donors were perfused via abdominal aorta without clamping the portal venous outflow with UW solution at 80100 cm H2O after heparinization. Whole pancreato-duodenal grafts were harvested with segments of abdominal aorta and portal vein, and shaped under 4 °C UW solution. Then, end-to-end anastomosis was performed with the donor iliac artery bifurcation Y graft to the recipient superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery. Furthermore, type I diabetes model was made by removal of the recipient pancreas. The venous anastomosis was reconstructed between the donor portal vein and the recipient superior mesentery vein. Meanwhile, end-to-side anastomosis was performed with the donor common iliac artery bifurcation Y graft to the recipient abdominal aorta, and side-to-side intestinal anastomosis was performed between the donor duodenum and the recipient jejunum. External jugular vein was intubated for transfusion. Levels of plasma glucose, insulin and glucagon were measured during the operation and on the 1^st, 3^rd, 5^th, and 7^th d after operation.

RESULTS: Pancreatoduodenal allotransplantation was performed on 23 pigs of which 1 died of complication of anesthesia. The success rate of operation was 95.6%. Complications of operation occurred in two cases in which one was phlebothrombosis with an incidence of 4.6%, and the other was duodenojejunal anastomotic leak with an incidence of 4.6%. The level of plasma glucose decreased within 30 min, after removal of pancreas and recovered on the 2^nd d after operation. The level of plasma insulin and glucagon increased within 30 min after removal of pancreas and recovered on the 2^nd d after operation. Rejection occurred on the 1st d and reached the worst level on the 7^th d after transplantation, without change of plasma insulin and glucagon or clinical symptoms of rejection.

CONCLUSION: Pancreatoduodenal transplantation in pigs can treat type I diabetes. ED and PVD can keep the function of endocrine in normal. The technique of pancreatoduodenal transplantation with ED and PVD may pave the way for the further application of pancreas transplantation in clinic.

Management of de novo nonneurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyscoordination in a bladder-drained pancreas and kidney transplantation case

Pancreas transplantation is associated with significant urological complications. Urological complications can jeopardize the graft survival. We present a de novo nonneurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyscoordination in a pancreas and kidney transplanted case. We also report follow-up under conservative treatment.

[Pancreatic Transplantation: 2. Surgical technique and post-operative complications]

Since the first pancreatic allograft in 1966, pancreatic transplantations have been performed by numerous surgical teams throughout the world. Initial results were disappointing with a high percentage of technical failures and rejection. Over-optimistic enthusiasm for islet-cell allografts also retarded the development of pancreatic transplantation. Despite this slow start, results of pancreatic transplantation from 1995 onward have been very satisfactory and equivalent to or even better than the results of other solid organ transplants. This success has been due to better graft selection, improved surgical techniques and preservation solutions, and especially to improvements in immunosuppressive protocols. More than 19,000 pancreatic transplantations have now been performed throughout the world including both combined kidney-pancreas transplantations and pancreas-only transplantations. The most satisfactory results occur in the setting of dialysis-dependent renal failure due to diabetes; simultaneous combined kidney and pancreas transplantation is performed with the total pancreas implanted into the bowel and with venous drainage into the portal system. The long-term risks and constraints of chronic diabetes with renal failure must be weighed against the risks of a complex surgical procedure, significant post-operative complications, and the need for long-term immunosuppressive therapy.

Enteric conversion after bladder drained pancreas transplantation experience of 14 cases

The method of exocrine diversion in pancreas allograft continues to be controversial due to the advantages versus disadvantages of bladder versus enteric techniques. Bladder drainage (BD) exposes the patient to urological and metabolic problems that may require conversion to enteric drainage (ED). The purpose of this study was to review our initial experience of conversion from BD to ED for patients who underwent pancreas transplantation originally with bladder diversion. Among 114 pancreas transplantation performed with BD, from January 1996 to April 2003, 60 were simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), 35 were pancreas transplantation alone (PA), and 19 were pancreas after kidney transplantations (PAK). Twenty-three (20.2%) cases were excluded due to early death of the patient or the graft, yielding an analyses of 91 patients. Enteric conversion (EC) was performed in 14 (15.4%) patients with a mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 3-51 months) after transplantation including 8 (8.8%) SPKT, 4 (4.4%) PAK, and 2 (2.2%) PA. No surgical morbidity or mortality was observed related to EC. All patients had complete resolution of the initial problem with preservation of pancreatic function. EC represents an easy, safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality rates, representing the option of choice for patients with persistent urological or metabolic disturbances.

Cystoenteric Conversion and Reduction Cystoplasty for Treatment of Bladder Dysfunction After Pancreas Transplantation

PURPOSE

Bladder drainage of pancreatic exocrine secretions during pancreas transplantation can lead to significant urological complications. Our experience with cystoenteric conversion (CEC) is reviewed with respect to safety and efficacy. Select patients underwent concurrent reduction cystoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 255 pancreas transplantations were performed at the University of Washington between 1990 and 2001, of which 236 were bladder drained and 33 required enteric conversion of bladder drainage. An additional patient from an outside institution required conversion. These cases were reviewed retrospectively. Of the patients 21 with large capacity (greater than 500 ml) bladders underwent concurrent reduction cystoplasty.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 20 male and 14 female patients was 44 years (range 33 to 60) and mean interval between transplantation and CEC was 4.3 years (0.6 to 9). The most frequent indication for CEC was recurrent urinary tract infections (15 of 34 cases, 44%). Mean followup after CEC was 2.5 years (range 0.3 to 6.5). Six complications requiring reoperation were seen in 5 of the 34 patients (15%), one of which led to death (3%). Normal pancreatic graft function persisted in 30 of the 34 cases (88%). After reduction cystoplasty mean bladder capacity in all 34 cases decreased from 900 to 465 ml intraoperatively (p <0.0001) and from 650 to 362 ml in 9 according to urodynamics (p <0.015). Of the patients 30 (88%) experienced resolution of symptoms, while 3 (9%) experienced improvement and 1 (3%) continued to have recurrent infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we advocate maximal conservative treatment of the urological complications of pancreas transplantation, CEC offers safe and effective management of these complications, and can easily be combined with reduction cystoplasty in select cases to optimize postoperative voiding function.

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.

METHODS

From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.

RESULTS

Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Trends and perspectives in pancreas and simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

Pancreas transplantation is still the best option to achieve normoglycaemia and insulin independence in patients with type I diabetes. As a result of improvements in surgical techniques, immunosuppression and patient selection, one year survival rates of 95, 83, and 88% for patient, pancreas, and kidney survival, respectively, are reported for patients with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. The main goals for the future are to reduce postoperative morbidity, to identify the relevant indications for single pancreas transplantation, to adopt the best surgical technique for individual patients' needs (bladder versus enteric drainage with or without portal venous delivery of insulin), and to develop immunosuppressive strategies with low nephrotoxic and diabetogenic potential.

Portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage versus systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage of pancreas grafts: clinical outcome of 40 consecutive transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that pancreas transplantation using the more physiologic method of portal venous-enteric (PE) drainage could be performed without compromising patient and graft outcome, compared with the standard method of systemic venous-bladder (SB) drainage.

METHODS

Between November 1995 and November 1998, the authors prospectively followed up 20 consecutive patients with SB drainage followed by 20 consecutive patients with PE drainage. All patients underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, and all were immunosuppressed with antilymphocyte serum, cyclosporin, azathioprine, and steroids.

RESULTS

The actuarial patient survival rate at 1 year was 95% in the SB group and 100% in the PE group. Death-censored kidney graft survival was 100% in both groups; pancreas graft survival was 95% in the SB group and 100% in the PE group. The mean initial hospital stay was 15 days for both groups. However, during the first 6 months after transplantation, the SB group required more medical day-unit visits, mostly for treatment of metabolic acidosis and dehydration. The incidence of urinary tract infections was similar in both groups. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infections was significantly less in the PE group. The incidence of acute rejection was 37% in the SB group and 15% in the PE group. Mean serum creatinine levels 6 months after transplantation were significantly lower in the PE group than in the SB group. Glycemic control was excellent in both groups, but fasting serum insulin levels were significantly lower in the PE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PE method of pancreas transplantation can be performed with excellent patient and graft outcomes.

Immunologic Aspects of Transplant Management: Pharmacotherapy and Rejection

The intensivist caring for the critically ill transplant patient must be knowledgeable in the management of immunosuppression or have expert help. Critical illness often has a major impact on the absorption and metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs, increasing or decreasing net immunosuppression. Too little immunosuppression brings the risk of graft loss, while too much increases the morbidity and mortality of serious infection. Optimum management often requires the skillful manipulation of dosage and/or routes of drug delivery. In many cases of life-threatening infection, immunosuppression must be discontinued altogether and restarted prior to significant graft injury. The cost of miscalculation is very high. Loss of a renal, pancreas, or small bowel transplant is tragic, while loss of a heart, lung, or liver is usually fatal. Unfortunately the management of immunosuppression is becoming more complex. As the field of transplantation matures, new immunosuppressants are being introduced. Also, more experience and growing numbers of clinical trials are making the required knowledge base ever larger. Each type of transplant has its own set of evolving immunosuppression strategies. This review presents the basic mechanisms of the most widely used drugs and the dangers of immunosuppression. The drugs are then discussed in the context of liver, small bowel, kidney, pancreas, heart, and lung transplantation. Finally, a brief section on the practical pharmacokinetics of the drugs is presented.

A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Most pancreas transplants are performed with systemic venous delivery of insulin and bladder drainage of the exocrine secretions (systemic-bladder [S-B]). To develop a more physiologic procedure, we performed pancreas transplantations with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]).

METHODS

During an 11-month period, we prospectively alternated 32 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients to either S-B (n = 16) or P-E (n = 16) drainage with standardized immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, and 82% S-B versus 92% P-E, respectively. Pancreas graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplantation were 80% S-B versus 75% P-E. There were no graft losses either to immunologic or infectious complications in either group, but the incidence of acute rejection was slightly higher in the S-B group (44% S-B vs 31% P-E, P = NS). The cost and length of the initial hospital stay were similar between groups. The incidence of operative complications, major infections, and cytomegalovirus infections were likewise comparable. However, the S-B group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions, urinary tract infections, and urologic complications. Furthermore, metabolic acidosis and dehydration were more common in the S-B group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas transplantation with P-E drainage can be performed with short-term results comparable to those of transplantation with S-B drainage.