Risk factors for restenosis after balloon angioplasty in focal iliac stenosis

Patient-specific risk factors for reintervention following primary endovascular treatment of iliac artery disease

OBJECTIVE

Predictive models for reintervention may guide clinicians to optimize selection, education, and follow-up of patients undergoing endovascular iliac revascularization. Although the impact of lesion- and device-related characteristics on iliac restenosis and reintervention risk is well-defined, data on patient-specific risk factors are scarce and conflicting. This study aimed to explore the value of patient-related factors in predicting the need for clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) in patients undergoing primary endovascular treatment of iliac artery disease.

METHODS

Consecutively enrolled patients undergoing endovascular revascularization for symptomatic iliac artery disease at a tertiary vascular referral center between January 2008 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary and secondary outcomes were CD-TVR occurrence within 24 months and time to CD-TVR, respectively. Patients who died or did not require CD-TVR within 24 months were censored at the date of death or at 730 days, respectively. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data in primary analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1538 iliac interventions were performed in 1113 patients (26% females; 68 years). CD-TVR occurred in 108 limbs (74 patients; 7.0%) with a median time to CD-TVR of 246 days. On multivariable analysis, increasing age was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.83; P = .001) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P = .001). Similarly, a lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95; P = .017) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P = .009) were observed with higher glomerular filtration rates. Lastly, revascularization of common vs external iliac artery disease was associated with lower likelihood of CD-TVR (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.24-0.93; P = .030) and decreased risk of CD-TVR at any given time (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92; P = .027). No associations were observed between traditional cardiovascular risk factors (sex, hypertension, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher hemoglobin A1c, smoking) and CD-TVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, younger age, impaired kidney function, and external iliac artery disease were associated with CD-TVR. Traditional markers of cardiovascular risk were not seen to predict reintervention.

The influence of gender on patency rates after iliac artery stenting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of gender on the long-term outcome after iliac artery stenting and to assess gender-specific differences of the influence of risk factors on treatment success and patency rates.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2006, 404 percutaneous transluminal angioplasties with primary stent deployment for symptomatic iliac artery occlusive disease were performed at our center. These included 128 interventions in women and 276 interventions in men.

RESULTS

Whereas average age was significantly higher (65.9 ± 12.9 years; P = .007) and arterial hypertension more frequent (60.9% vs 49.3%; P = .032) in women, hyperuricemia (7.0% vs 14.1%; P = .047) and a positive smoking status (61.7% vs 74.3%; P = .014) were more frequently observed in men. Fontaine stage was more advanced (stages III and IV) in women than in men (P = .028; P < .001). Technical success was 97.7% in women and 99.3% in men. Overall complication rate was higher in women compared with men (P = .002), mostly caused by access site hematomas (4.7% vs 0.4%) and pseudoaneurysms (8.6% vs 2.5%). Patients were followed up for 45.0 ± 33.3 months. Restenosis developed in 16.8% of cases in women and in 14.6% of cases in men and was treated in 73.7% by an endovascular approach. Primary patency rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 90.3%, 77.2%, 60.2%, and 46.4% in women and 89.9%, 71.5%, 63.6%, and 59.7% in men, respectively (P = .524; log-rank, .406). Secondary patency rates were 97.2%, 91%, 81.5%, and 70.3% in women and 97.1%, 89.1%, 82.6%, and 78% in men, respectively (P = .959; log-rank, .003). Multivariate analysis identified lower age as the only independent risk factor for recurrent disease in both groups. Age-defined subgroup analysis showed a restenosis/reocclusion rate of 23.9% in men and 22.1% in women older than 63.5 years (P = .861) but 32.1% in men and 49.1% in women younger than that (P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that although women are older and present with a more advanced stage of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, endovascular therapy is equally effective irrespective of gender. Surprisingly, the subgroup of young female patients had a specifically poor outcome.

Results of iliac artery stent placement in patients younger than 50 years of age

PURPOSE

To determine long-term outcome in patients 50 years of age or younger treated with iliac artery stent placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 412 patients who underwent iliac artery stent placement during a 62-month study period were reviewed retrospectively. Forty-two patients younger than age 50 (mean age = 45 y) at the time of stent placement were included in the study population. Presenting symptoms included claudication (47%), rest pain (17%), ulceration/tissue loss (31%), and blue toe syndrome (5%). Anatomic, hemodynamic, and clinical success rates of the stent placement procedure were assessed. Stent patency rates were calculated by life-table methods.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine iliac lesions were treated with stents; 62% of patients underwent treatment of a single lesion whereas 38% had multiple lesions treated. Thirty-one percent were treated after a failed angioplasty procedure and 69% were treated with stent placement primarily. After stent placement, 34 patients (82%) experienced symptomatic relief, although eight of these patients (19%) underwent a planned ipsilateral infrainguinal bypass procedure during the same hospitalization. During follow-up, five patients (12%) required a bypass procedure as a result of stent failure and two patients (5%) required below-knee amputation. Seven patients (17%) required endovascular stent revision, with none requiring additional surgery. At 1, 2, and 3 years, the primary patency rates were 86%, 72%, and 65%, and the secondary patency rates were 90%, 88%, and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliac stent placement successfully addresses the presenting symptoms of young patients with peripheral vascular disease and results in patency rates that are similar to those reported in a more general population. With appropriate postprocedural surveillance, restenosis can be addressed in many patients with use of endovascular techniques, limiting the need for surgical revision.