Current surgical management of duodenal ulcers

Evaluation and management of Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The most common causes include peptic ulcer disease, Mallory-Weiss syndrome, erosive gastritis, duodenitis, esophagitis, malignancy, angiodysplasias and Dieulafoy's lesion. Initial assessment and early aggressive resuscitation significantly improves outcomes. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy continues to be the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment. We present a comprehensive review of literature for the evaluation and management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

From esophagus to rectum: a comprehensive review of alimentary tract perforations at computed tomography

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract perforation is a life-threatening condition that can occur at any site along the alimentary tract. Early perforation detection and intervention significantly improves patient outcome. With a high sensitivity for pneumoperitoneum, computed tomography (CT) is widely accepted as the diagnostic modality of choice when a perforated hollow viscus is suspected. While confirming the presence of a perforation is critical, clinical management and surgical technique also depend on localizing the perforation site. CT is accurate in detecting the site of perforation, with segmental bowel wall thickening, focal bowel wall defect, or bubbles of extraluminal gas concentrated in close proximity to the bowel wall shown to be the most specific findings. In this article, we will present the causes for perforation at each site throughout the GI tract and review the patterns that can lead to prospective diagnosis and perforation site localization utilizing CT images of surgically proven cases.

Endoscope-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcers

Laparoscopic repairs for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) are likely to fail in patients with shock, gastric outlet obstruction, or large perforations. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a revised approach of laparoscopic repair with endoscopic assistance to treat these patients. Between April 2001 and February 2002, 30 consecutive patients with PPU were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 43.1 ± 12.2 years. Male to female ratio was 27:2. One patient was excluded from laparoscopic repair due to a gastric outlet obstruction. The other 29 patients were managed according to a protocol of preoperative upper endoscopy and laparoscopic intracorporeal suture repair with an omental patch. The average operative time was 58.1 ± 13.5 minutes (range, 36–96 min). The average diameter of perforation was 4.2 ± 2.0 mm (range, 1–12 mm). The average time to resume oral fluids was 3.2 ± 0.8 days (range, 2–8 days). The average hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.1 days (range, 3–10 days). There was no leakage or mortality. Most patients did not receive parenteral analgesics postoperatively. We conclude that endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair for PPU is safe and effective. This revised technique allows surgeons to exclude patients who are likely to fail the laparoscopic repair.

Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips

BACKGROUND

The omental patch is a standard surgical treatment of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. This is a report of an experimental method for endoscopic repair of anterior gastric perforations with an omental patch developed by using a porcine model.

METHODS

A standardized gastric perforation was created in 10 pigs. The omentum was pulled into the gastric lumen and fixed endoscopically to the muscularis propria layer of the stomach with metallic clips.

RESULTS

The postoperative course was normal in 9 animals. An ulcer was evident at the site of repair at follow-up endoscopy. At autopsy, the omentum was adherent to the external side of gastric wall. One animal died with peritonitis, presumably because the muscularis propria layer could not be seen during the procedure, and the clips attached the omentum only to the mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic repair with an omental patch appears to be an effective procedure for closure of gastric perforations.

Laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal pain

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of unexplained acute abdominal pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients with acute abdominal pain (41 women, 15 men; median age 27) who attended our hospital between July 1996 and July 1999 and in whom a definite diagnosis could not be made by conventional methods underwent diagnostic laparoscopy.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic procedure was performed under general anesthesia in 43 patients and local anesthesia in 13 patients. The median duration of laparoscopy was 16 minutes. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic laparoscopy were found to be 98% and 96%, respectively. The most frequent diagnosis was acute appendicitis (38%). Laparoscopic treatment of the surgical pathology was possible in 36 patients; in seven patients, conversion to laparotomy was necessary. The median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day in the diagnostic laparoscopy group. The median treatment cost was lower in the diagnostic laparoscopy group than in the therapeutic laparoscopy or laparotomy groups. There was no mortality or morbidity in the laparoscopy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is an effective method for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical pathologies in patients in whom the diagnosis cannot be made with physical examination and noninvasive methods.

[Perforated duodenal ulcer: laparoscopic treatment of perforation and ulcerous disease]

STUDY AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to report a continuous series of 44 perforated duodenal peptic ulcers operated on through laparoscopic approach with curative treatment of the peptic ulcer disease for socioeconomic purpose.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From February 1995 to May 1996, 44 patients were operated on laparoscopically. There were 42 men and two women (mean age: 36 years). All patients had peritonitis with pneumoperitoneum in 68%. Duodenal peptic ulcer was known in 12 patients and antecedent of episodic epigastric pain were present in 27. Four trocads were used. The diagnosis was confirmed by abdominal exploration and peritoneal lavage was performed with physiological serum.

RESULTS

The procedures were: suture of perforated ulcer associated with posterior vagotomy and anterior seromyotomy (n = 6), with troncular vagotomy and pyloroplasty (n = 24) and single suture (n = 1). A conversion into laparotomy was necessary in 13 patients (29.5%). There was no mediastinitis, no postoperative death. Peritonitis by leakage occurred in two patients who were reoperated by laparotomy; mean duration of hospital stay was 5.5 days. With a one-year follow-up, all patients were in good condition, free of pain.

CONCLUSION

With laparoscopic surgery, diagnosis of peptic ulcer perforation was confirmed, peritoneal lavage was perfectly done, duodenal perforation was sutured and surgical treatment of the peptic ulcer disease was performed, which is important in poor countries.

Surgical management of gastrointestinal bleeding

Severe gastrointestinal bleeding has historically been a clinical problem primarily under the purview of the general surgeon. Diagnostic advances made as the result of newer technologies, such as fiberoptic and video endoscopy, selective visceral arteriography, and nuclear scintigraphy, have permitted more accurate and targeted operations. More importantly, they have led to safe, effective nonoperative therapeutic interventions that have obviated the need for surgery in many patients. Today, most gastrointestinal bleeding episodes are initially managed by endoscopic or angiographic control measures. Such interventions are often definitive in obtaining hemostasis. Even temporary cessation or attenuation of massive bleeding in an unstable patient permits a safer, more controlled operative procedure by allowing an adequate period of preoperative resuscitation. Despite the less frequent need for surgical intervention, traditional operative approaches, such as suture ligation, lesion or organ excision, vagotomy, portasystemic anastomosis, and devascularization procedures, continue to be life-saving in many instances. The proliferation of laparoscopic surgery has fostered the application of minimally invasive techniques to highly selected patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Intraoperative endoscopy has greatly facilitated the accuracy of laparoscopic surgery by endoscopic localization of bleeding lesions requiring excision. It is anticipated that the evolving technologies pertinent to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bleeding will continue to promote collaboration and cooperation between gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons.

Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic techniques have been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for therapy of peptic ulcer perforation. They provide better postoperative comfort and absence of parietal complications, but leakage occurs in 5% of cases. We describe a new method combining laparoscopy and endoluminal endoscopy, designed to ensure complete closure of the perforation.

METHODS

Six patients with anterior ulcer perforations (4 duodenal, 2 gastric) underwent a concomitant laparoscopy and endoluminal endoscopy with closure of the orifice by an omental plug attracted into the digestive tract.

RESULTS

All perforations were sealed. The mean operating time was 72 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 5.5 days. There was no morbidity and no mortality. At the 30-day evaluation all ulcers but one (due to Helicobacter pylori persistence) were healed.

CONCLUSIONS

This method is safe and effective. Its advantages compared with open surgery or laparoscopic patching as well as its cost-effectiveness should be studied in prospective randomized trials.

Traumatic and nontraumatic perforation of hollow viscera

Hollow viscus injuries are usually managed with few complications. However, if their diagnosis is delayed, or if reparative suture closure should fail, the patient is placed at risk of multiple organ failure. This article presents diagnostic approaches, emphasizing imaging modalities, and therapeutic strategies for three clinical scenarios of hollow viscus perforation: 1) acute appendicitis, 2) gastroduodenal peptic ulcer disease, and 3) trauma.

The relationships of the bile duct and the retroduodenal arteries and their importance in the surgical treatment of hemorrhagic duodenal ulcer

The anatomic relationships of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (PSPD) with the bile duct in their retroduodenal courses were studied in 35 bloc specimens from normal cadavers, injected after removal. The distances between the GDA, the pylorus, and the bile duct were measured in the sagittal plane. The origin and course of the PSPD in relation to the bile duct were studied. The relation of the GDA and the bile duct were divisable into four types: in Type 1 (n = 22) the two structures separated progressively, the artery being on the left of the bile ducts; in Type 2: (n = 7) the structures approached each other without crossing, Type 3: (n = 5) the GDA crossed in front of the bile duct at the level of the first part of the duodenum (D1), Type 4: (n = 1) the GDA crossed the bile duct below D1 and ran along its right border. The PSPD originated at the posterior face of D1 in 20% of cases (n = 7) and crossed the anterior surface of the bile duct at the posterior surface of D1. In four cases there was no pancreatic tissue between the PSPD and the bile ducs. It follows that the risk of injury to the bile duct when securing hemostasis by transfixing a bleeding duodenal ulcer in the D1 segment is great when the arterial structures (GDA and PSPD) cross the bile duct. This risk is increased when there is no pancreatic tissue between them.

Gastric outlet obstruction

Acquired gastric outlet obstruction is more commonly owing to malignancy than ulcer disease. Endoscopy is the preferred method for diagnosis. Surgical palliation for malignant disease has poor results and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Initial experiences with endoscopic palliation with expandable metallic endoprostheses appear promising. Peptic ulcer-induced gastric outlet obstruction can be treated safely with endoscopic balloon dilation. About 65% of patients have sustained symptom relief, but many require more than one dilation session. Outcomes may be improved with effective ulcer therapy with acid reduction and eradication of H. pylori. Surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and should be reserved for endoscopic treatment failures.

Laparoscopic management of peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery has heralded a new era for the operative management of peptic ulcer disease. With a mean hospital stay of 3.5 days,22 a recurrence rate of 4% to 11%,1,3 and a morbidity from dumping and diarrhea of 1% to 2%,21 laparoscopic proximal gastric vagotomy can truly provide a good alternative to medical therapy. Despite the high cost of medical care and surgical equipment, a laparoscopic vagotomy should be cost effective compared with life-long pharmacologic management of peptic ulcer disease. Several different operative procedures have been discussed, with similar outcomes. The surgeon has a choice of several approaches, depending on his or her training and level of skill. As surgeons gain experience with laparoscopic surgery, we are able to offer consistently good results with low recurrence rates and negligible morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive surgery has rekindled the operative treatment of peptic ulcer disease.

Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic ulcer disease

This study examined a possible aetiological agent, namely, Helicobacter pylori, in perforated peptic ulcer disease and its relationship to persisting ulcer. Twenty-nine patients with perforated peptic ulcer underwent simple closure of the perforation at laparotomy. A 13C urea breath test carried out on the eighth day after operation was positive in 24 patients. Fourteen of 17 patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy 6 weeks after discharge from hospital had a positive 13C urea breath test. The biopsy urease test performed on mucosal samples taken at endoscopy was positive in 12 of these 14 patients, indicating continuing active infection with H. pylori. Seven patients with positive 13C urea breath and biopsy urease tests had persisting duodenal ulceration. None of the three patients with a negative 13C urea breath test had evidence of duodenal ulceration at endoscopy. The association between a high rate of duodenal ulcer persistence and a high incidence of H. pylori infection suggests that antibiotic therapy to eradicate this microorganism should be given to all patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Lester R. Dragstedt and his role in the evolution of therapeutic vagotomy in the United States

The date October 22, 1993, marks the centenary of the birth of Lester R. Dragstedt. He emerged from humble roots of Swedish immigrant parents to become one of the pre-eminent surgical innovators of the twentieth century. Early in his scientific career, Dragstedt was profoundly influenced by another Swede, A. J. Carlson, who was initially employed as a Lutheran minister in Dragstedt's hometown of Anaconda, Montana. Carlson left the ministry for graduate school and later became chairman of The Department of Physiology at the University of Chicago. When Dragstedt finished his schooling, Carlson convinced him to attend the University of Chicago. In addition to Carlson, Dragstedt's research was influenced by many prominent physiologists and surgeons, including Pavlov and Latarjet. Their work, along with his own investigations, helped him both to formulate his hypotheses on the regulation of gastric acid secretion and to formalize the operation of truncal vagotomy. In 1943, Dragstedt initiated the clinical use of this procedure in North America. Although he studied his patients carefully and documented his results meticulously, the operation initially met with considerable resistance from both his medical and surgical colleagues. Over time, many other surgeons accepted vagotomy as a viable procedure and further modified his technique. The unique ability of Dragstedt to transfer his research studies to the development and implementation of rational surgical therapy remains an enduring example for the surgical profession.

Duodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer: vagotomy, drainage and resection

Laparoscopic adaptation of highly selective vagotomy procedures associated with no mortality, low morbidity and no reports of diarrhoea and dumping syndrome has been reported. Although experience to date with these procedures is limited, they hold the promise of being a viable alternative for patients refractory to medical therapy or for those non-complaint with long-term maintenance pharmacologic treatment. Simple closure of an acute perforated ulcer has also been accomplished laparoscopically. In performing laparoscopic surgical procedures for duodenal ulcer disease, the relief of symptoms appears similar to that reported following comparable open procedures but with the advantages of diminished postoperative pain and disability. Moreover, the use of angled endoscopes and the magnification afforded by laparoscopy greatly facilitate the identification and transection of small vagal fibres adjacent to the oesophagus.