Breast disease in elderly women

Weekly radiotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: a comparison between two hypofractionation schedules

PURPOSE

Weekly irradiation in breast cancer in elderly patients is a treatment option, whose tolerance may be influenced by the fractionation used. The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance and long-term side effects of two different fractionations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

47 elderly patients were recruited after conservative or radical treatment that also received irradiation with a dose per fraction of 6.25 Gy or 5 Gy for one session per week, 6 sessions in total. The long-term tolerance results are compared by assessing toxicity using CTCAE version 5.0 scales for dermatitis, telangectasia, fibrosis and pain of the irradiated breast. In addition, objective parameters of skin status (erythema, hyperpigmentation, elasticity and hydration) by a multi-probe MultiSkin Test-Center system were obtained and compared between groups.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up of 5 years, all patients were free of disease and with complete local control. A total of 20 patients with 6.25 Gy fractionation and 27 patients with 5 Gy fractionation have been included. Patients treated with lower fractionation had a lower incidence of dermatitis, telangectasia, fibrosis, or local pain. The decrease in elasticity measured by the multi-probe system was smaller with the fractionation of 5 Gy. No differences were observed in the other objective parameters.

CONCLUSION

Weekly irradiation with 5 Gy fractionation is better tolerated than with higher fractionation.

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Curettage Mastectomy

Aims and background

Locally advanced breast tumor represents 5–20% of new cases diagnosed every year. The purpose of this study was to report our experience and to compare it with the literature.

Methods

From 1998 to 2003 at the Molinette Hospital in the Turin University Third Division of General Surgery, there were 34 cases of breast cancer in older women (between 70 and 94 years of age), 14 of which (41.18%) were locally advanced breast tumor. We evaluated the type of surgical intervention and anesthesia used, muscular invasion, the presence of receptors positive to estrogens and progesterone, the operative mortality, the percentage of local-regional recurrence, and relapses after a period of time.

Results

Among the patients with locally advanced breast tumor, 21.43% (3/14) were at stage MIA and 78.57% (11/14) at stage IIIB. In 14.29% (2/14) of the cases, Patey's radical mastectomy was performed, in 57.14% (8/14) Halsted's radical mastectomy, and in 28.57% (4/14) a simple mastectomy with the removal of the fascia of the major pectoral muscle. Three (21.43%) patients underwent a second intervention for local-regional disease. None of the patients had distant metastasis in the first 2 years after the operation. Mortality after 2 years was 23.1% (3/13). None of the patients who underwent surgery had adjuvant therapy, usually because it was refused by the patients themselves or their families. All the negative and positive hormone receptor patients received tamoxifen.

Conclusions

Locally advanced breast tumors are frequent in elderly women. In the past, there has been a tendency to surgical under-treatment. As regards locally advanced breast tumor, curettage operations represent the only possibility to improve the quality of life of the elderly. These should be performed after carefully evaluating a series of variables in the general and local condition of the patient, the aggressiveness of the intervention and the life expectancy.

Formestane as Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in Elderly Women

Aims and background

The number of elderly people is increasing, and the proportion of breast cancer in female cancer patients older than 65 years is 26%. In elderly patients, hormone therapy is widely accepted as the treatment of choice, because of its efficacy and good tolerability compared to chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the endocrinologic and clinical activity of formestane (4-hydroxyandrostenedione), a selective aromatase inhibitor, in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Thirty-five patients older than 65 years, selected from a larger group, were given formestane (250 mg or 500 mg i.m. fortnightly). Patients were evaluable for tumor response after 4 doses of formestane. Blood samples were collected to evaluate E2, FSH, LH, SHBG and DHEAS serum levels at baseline and after 2, 4, 8,12 and 24 weeks.

Results

Thirty patients had PS ≤ 1 (ECOG) and only 5 patients had PS = 2. Twenty-six patients were ER positive. Previous hormonal treatment for metastatic disease had been given to 17 patients; only 1 case had received chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 51% (95% C.I. 35–67%) and the median response duration was 9.5 months. Three complete responses were observed on viscera. The best responses were obtained on soft tissues (59%); on bone and viscera the response was respectively 45% and 47%. Local and systemic tolerability was highly satisfactory. Formestane induced prolonged suppression of E2 levels in all of the patients, and a significant reduction in SHBG levels was also observed from month 2 onward. A statistically significant ( P = 0.0001) rise in serum FSH was also observed during the therapy.

Conclusions

The study showed that formestane induced a long-lasting suppression of E2 levels and a satisfactory overall response. In our opinion, the drug is an effective and well-tolerated approach in the management of advanced breast cancer in elderly patients.

Breast cancer at extreme ages--a comparative analysis in Chile

BACKGROUND

Young onset breast cancer (BC) has a worse outcome as compared to in the elderly. However, some studies have shown that BC in the elderly, despite indolent features, does also cause increase in mortality. In an attempt to compare clinic-pathological characteristics, BC subtypes and survival in patients with BC presenting at extremes of age, we performed a retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were either ≤40 or ≥70 years old. Subtypes were defined using immunohistochemistry and histological grade. Chi-Square test was used for evaluation of categorical variables, and Kaplan-meier and log-rank for disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease free survival (DFS) .

RESULTS

We analyzed 256 patients ≤40 and 366 patients ≥70. Younger patients presented with more aggressive disease, with less luminal A but more luminal B and triple negative (TN) subtype. With a median follow-up of 57.5 months, DFS at 5 years in younger patients was 72.3% vs 84.6% in the elderly (p=0.007). Luminal A and B disease presented with worse DFS in younger patients. The opposite was seen in the TN subgroup. Although we found no significant differences in DSS, older patients with TN tumors died of BC more frequently. This group also received less chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients present with more aggressive disease, this translating into worse DFS. However, elderly patients with TN disease represent a particular subpopulation with worse DFS and DSS, suggesting that chemotherapy should not be withheld only because of age.

The impact of age on outcome in early-stage breast cancer

Multiple studies have shown that breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy have equivalent outcomes for large populations of women with early-stage breast cancer. For individual treatment decisions, however, it is important to appreciate the heterogeneity of disease. Recent molecular studies have suggested that "breast cancer" includes biologically distinct classes of disease; although these molecular distinctions are important, other patient-related factors also affect outcome and influence prognosis. One of the most important of these patient factors is the age of the patient at diagnosis. Numerous studies have shown very different breast cancer outcomes based on patient age; younger women typically have more aggressive tumors that are more likely to recur both locoregionally and distantly, and older women more commonly have less aggressive disease. The overall disease-specific outcomes, techniques, and doses for adjuvant radiation therapy and toxicity of treatments should be discussed within the context of age because breast cancer is a very different disease based on this factor. Arguments can be made that more aggressive locoregional therapy is warranted in populations of young women with breast cancer and perhaps less aggressive therapy in the elderly.

Elderly patients with painful bone metastases should be offered palliative radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (RT) in relieving metastatic bone pain in elderly patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The response to RT for palliation of metastatic bone pain was evaluated from a prospective database of 558 patients between 1999 and 2008. The pain scores and analgesic intake were used to calculate the response according to the International Bone Metastases Consensus Working Party palliative RT endpoints. Subgroup analyses for age and other demographic information were performed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the response rate in patients aged >or=65, >or=70, and >or=75 years compared with younger patients at 1, 2, or 3 months after RT. The response was found to be significantly related to the performance status.

CONCLUSION

Age alone did not affect the response to palliative RT for bone metastases. Elderly patients should be referred for palliative RT for their painful bone metastases, regardless of age, because they receive equal benefit from the treatment.

Common Gynecologic Problems in Geriatric-aged Women

Gynecologic concerns in postmenopausal women are common. Although various conditions may affect all women in this age group, the prevalence of certain disorders, and also diagnostic approaches and treatment options, may vary significantly when considering very elderly women compared with those early in the sixth decade. The focus of this chapter is to address several commonly encountered gynecologic issues in postmenopausal women, with particular attention given to aspects that must be considered when caring for women in the geriatric age group.

Aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer therapy: a variety of treatment strategies

Until recently, standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in the preoperative neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant settings was the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen. An alternate therapeutic approach is to suppress total-body estrogen synthesis using an aromatase inhibitor. The highly potent and specific third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole) have consistently demonstrated improved efficacy over tamoxifen in large randomised neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials. As neoadjuvant therapy, compared with tamoxifen, all three aromatase inhibitors significantly improved breast-conserving surgery rates, but only letrozole achieved a significantly higher overall response rate. These agents have also been evaluated in three adjuvant strategies: instead of tamoxifen for 5 years, sequenced after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following a full 5-year course of tamoxifen. In all cases, the aromatase inhibitor was significantly more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence, compared with tamoxifen in the first two approaches and with placebo or no treatment as extended therapy. Long-term aromatase inhibitor treatment is associated with less endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events and strokes than tamoxifen, but more musculoskeletal disorders and bone loss. Further investigation is focusing on identification of the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from each of these adjuvant therapy options.

Is breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping valuable for patients in their seventies and beyond?

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is performed less commonly for the axillary staging of elderly patients because it is felt to uncommonly alter therapy. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection can accomplish axillary staging with less morbidity, but it is unclear if it alters subsequent therapy.

METHODS

Review of a prospectively collected breast cancer SLN mapping database. Medical records were reviewed to supplement the database.

RESULTS

Among 730 breast cancer SLN mapping patients, 261 (35.8%) were >or=70 years of age (range 70 to 95). The overall SLN identification rate was 98.8% among those <70 and 97.1% for those >or=70 (P=.11) and 100% and 99.4%, respectively (P=.25), among the most recent 500 patients. SLN metastases were detected by hematoxalin and eosin staining (H&E) in 24.2% of those <70 and 13.4% of those >/=70 (P<.01) and by immunohistochemistry staining (IHC) only in 4.6% and 5.0% of patients, respectively. No elderly patients with histologically negative SLNs underwent ALND, but 88.9% of patients with H&E metastases and 84.6% with IHC metastases underwent ALND. Of the H&E-positive women, 88% underwent adjuvant systemic therapy versus 55% of H&E-negative women (P<.01). Hormonal therapy was administered to 86.9% of SLN-positive women and 54.3% of SLN-negative women (P<.01) and cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered to 24% of SLN-positive patients versus 2.8% of SLN-negative patients (P<.01). SLN status was associated with significantly different rates of systemic therapy for patients with tumors <1 cm and 1 to 2 cm, but not with tumors >2 cm. Mean follow-up was 15.4 months. No patient experienced local or regional recurrence. Distant metastases occurred in 8.2% of patients with SLN metastases and in no patients with negative SLNs (P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of SLN mapping and biopsy in elderly patients significantly influences subsequent therapy decisions, including ALND, hormonal therapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. SLN biopsy should be recommended to elderly breast cancer patients.

The natural history of breast carcinoma in the elderly: implications for screening and treatment

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated the two indicators of metastatic proclivity (namely, virulence [V; the rate of appearance of distant metastases] and metastagenicity [M; the ultimate likelihood of developing distant metastases]) of breast carcinoma in elderly women. The authors then compared these characteristics with the corresponding characteristics in a cohort of younger women to determine whether breast carcinoma was more indolent in women age > 70 years, as is commonly believed in the medical community.

METHODS

The authors examined 2136 women who underwent mastectomy without adjuvant systemic therapy at The University of Chicago Hospitals (Chicago, IL) between 1927 and 1987. The median follow-up period was 12.3 years. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was determined for women who did not receive systemic therapy. V and M were obtained from log-linear plots of DDFS.

RESULTS

No significant difference in tumor size at presentation was observed among women age < 40 years, women ages 40-70 years, and women age > 70 years (P = 0.86), whereas significantly fewer women age > 70 years presented with positive lymph nodes compared with younger women (P = 0.05). In women with negative lymph node status, there was a higher DDFS rate among patients ages 40-70 years (81% at 10 years) compared with patients age > 70 years (65% at 10 years; P = 0.018). There was no significant age-related difference among women with lymph node-positive disease (P = 0.2). For example, the 10-year DDFS rate for women ages 40-70 years was 33%, compared with 38% for women age > 70 years. Among those with lymph node-negative disease, V was 3% per year for women ages 40-70 years as well as women age > 70 years. Among women with lymph node-negative disease, M was 0.20 for patients ages 40-70 years and 0.35 for patients age > 70 years. In women with positive lymph node status, both V (11% per year vs. 10% per year) and M (0.70 vs. 0.65) were similar in both age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer women age > 70 years had lymph node involvement at presentation. However, when this finding was taken into account, the authors found no evidence that breast carcinoma was more indolent in women age > 70 years. These results support the use of similar diagnostic and therapeutic efforts for elderly women and younger women, with modification for elderly women based only on comorbidity.

Simultaneous bilateral breast and high-resolution axillary MRI of patients with breast cancer: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to develop a standardized one-step procedure for simultaneous high-resolution MRI of the axilla and bilateral breast MRI and to identify nodal features suggestive of metastatic involvement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We studied 16 women undergoing axillary lymph node dissection after combined bilateral breast MRI and high-resolution MRI of the axilla with a maximum in-plane resolution of 0.6 x 0.4 mm. MRI was performed using a standard double breast coil and a 15-cm round flexible surface coil adapted to the axilla. High-resolution axillary sequences, including inversion recovery T2- and spin-echo T1-weighted sequences, were performed before and after gadolinium chelates bolus injection. Axillary image analysis focused on nodal morphology including size, contour regularity, cortex and hilar appearance, signal intensity, and enhancement parameters. Axillary MRI findings were compared with the final pathogic results from axillary lymph node dissection in all patients. Patients were divided into groups according to the final pathologic axillary status. Differences in MRI lymph node features across the groups were tested using a t test for quantitative data and the chisquare test or Fisher's exact test for binary data.

RESULTS

The features of the axilla on high-resolution MRI that best discriminated between patients with positive pathologic findings and those with negative pathologic findings were the presence of nodes with irregular contours (p < 10(-4)), high signal intensity on T2 sequences (p < 10(-3)), marked gadolinium enhancement (p < 10(-3)), and round hila and abnormal cortexes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Breast tissue and axillary lymph nodes both can be analyzed on MRI in a one-step process using a bilateral breast coil combined with a surface coil. Morphologic features observed on high-resolution MRI of the axilla can improve the identification of metastatic nodes.

Adjuvant radiotherapy after conservative surgery for breast cancer: is it always necessary?

Breast irradiation is used to reduce the risk of within-breast recurrence following conservative surgery. This review examines factors--particularly patient age--that may be used to select patients at low risk of local failure where radiotherapy may not be necessary.

Treatment of invasive breast carcinoma with ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive thermal ablation technique. This study reports the safety and efficacy of RFA as a minimally invasive strategy for breast cancers <3 cm diameter in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Twenty-two postmenopausal women (aged 60 years or older) with clinical T-1N0 core biopsy proven breast cancers were studied. Thermocoagulation was undertaken using a sonographically guided RF probe under local anesthesia and sedation. The ablated tumor was resected between 1 and 2 weeks later. Endpoints were technical success, completeness of tumor kill, marginal clearance, skin damage, and patient reports of pain and procedural acceptability.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated and cosmesis was excellent. Pathology revealed a central ablation zone surrounded by hyperemia. Coagulative necrosis was complete in 19 of 22 patients. Disease at the ablation zone margin was found in 3 patients and 5 patients had disease distant to the ablation zone consisting of multifocal tumors (2), in-transit metastasis (1), and extensive ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasive carcinoma (2). Ninety-five percent of patients would be willing to have RFA again.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation can be safely applied in an outpatient setting with acceptable patient tolerance. By itself, RFA cannot be considered effective local therapy. Trials to evaluate RFA complemented with breast irradiation are justified.

Audit of compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy guidelines in breast cancer in a cancer network

The North Trent Cancer Network Breast Group in the United Kingdom revised its adjuvant treatment guidelines in breast cancer management in 1998. We aimed to check the compliance to the guidelines, 8 months after their introduction. Data were collected, retrospectively, from the medical records of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent definitive surgery (in a 3-month period) in different cancer units and the cancer centre within the North Trent Cancer Network. The overall compliance to treatment guidelines was 82% (90% and 74% for chemotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively), which was similar across the network. In 5% of cases, compliance could not be determined. On case review, 22% of the non-compliant incidents were justified and 16% seemed to be due to variation in guideline interpretation. We discuss the possible reasons for non-compliance and show a need to periodically monitor compliance to adjuvant treatment guidelines.

Updates in surgical oncology for elderly patients

Elderly patients affected by solid tumours are frequently encountered on the surgical ward. Prejudice regarding operative risks and long term outcomes may alter their surgical management. Large series of elderly cancer subjects have been analysed and conclusive data are now available, to better tailor their management. Specific epidemiological data are presented in this review, screening programs critically considered, treatment procedures discussed, and the effectiveness of follow-up protocols is analysed together with cost effectiveness issues. Quality of life issues should not be neglected, and a continuous educational endeavour targeted at specialists and general practitioners is desirable.

Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the (i) benefits, (ii) harms and (iii) costs of continuing mammographic screening for women 70 years and over.

DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS

(i) We conducted a MEDLINE search (1966 - July 2000) for decision-analytic models estimating life-expectancy gains from screening in older women. The five studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically appraised using standard criteria. We estimated relative benefit from each model's estimate of effectiveness of screening in older women relative to that in women aged 50-69 years using the same model. (ii) With data from BreastScreen Queensland, we constructed balance sheets of the consequences of screening for women in 10-year age groups (40-49 to 80-89 years), and (iii) we used a validated model to estimate the marginal cost-effectiveness of extending screening to women 70 years and over.

RESULTS

For women aged 70-79 years, the relative benefit was estimated as 40%-72%, and 18%-62% with adjustment for the impact of screening on quality of life. For women over 80 years the relative benefit was about a third, and with quality-of-life adjustment only 14%, that in women aged 50-69 years. (ii) Of 10,000 Australian women participating in ongoing screening, about 400 are recalled for further testing, and, depending on age, about 70-112 undergo biopsy and about 19-80 cancers are detected. (iii) Cost-effectiveness estimates for extending the upper age limit for mammographic screening from 69 to 79 years range from $8119 to $27 751 per quality-adjusted life-year saved, which compares favourably with extending screening to women aged 40-49 years (estimated at between $24,000 and $65,000 per life-year saved).

CONCLUSIONS

Women 70 years and over, in consultation with their healthcare providers, may want to decide for themselves whether to continue mammographic screening. Decision-support materials are needed for women in this age group.

Breast cancer surgery--historical evolution, current status and future perspectives

The diagnosis and management of breast cancer have changed dramatically over the past two decades in response not only to new technologies but also to cultural and social aspects of the discase. Mastectomy (either radical or modified radical) was the historical mainstay of the treatment of breast cancer for decades. Although mastectomy continues to be appropriate for some patients, breast conservation has become the preferred method of treatment for many patients. Meeting the dual goal of optimum cosmesis and minimal rates of in-breast recurrences after breast-conservation therapy requires the selection and integration of appropriate diagnostic methods (including breast imaging techniques and breast biopsy techniques) its well as therapeutic methods (breast irradiation techniques, and systemic cytotoxic and hormonal therapy). To achieve optimal breast-conservation treatment, a multidisciplinary approach is neccessary. Mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction is a valuable alternative for patients who require or choose mastectomy. After tumor downstaging with induction chemotherapy, a large percentage of patients with large or locally advanced tumors will be able to undergo breast-conservation therapy Partial (levels I and II) axillary lymph node dissection remains the standard of care in the surgical management of patients with invasive breast cancer. Recently there has been intense interest in selective axillary lymph node dissection, focused mainly on the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from axillary lymph node dissection, using sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer--current status and controversies, alternative strategies and future perspectives

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has traditionally been considered as a standard procedure in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. The goals of ALND in breast cancer surgery are: (a) to provide accurate prognostic information, (b) to maintain local control of the disease in the axilla and (c) to provide a rational basis for decisions about adjuvant therapy. Although controversial, ALND may also be associated with a small therapeutic benefit. Recently, the question of whether ALND is needed for every patient with invasive breast cancer has been the subject of ongoing debate in the literature. This is mainly due to the widespread use of adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with node-negative breast cancer and to the increasingly frequent detection of small invasive cancers by mammographic screening; the majority of these patients have negative axillae. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new, promising, minimally invasive procedure, which accurately predicts nodal status with minimal morbidity, and reserves ALND for patients with positive SLN biopsies. However, this method is still investigational. Partial (levels I and II) ALND remains the gold standard in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer.

Preoperative endocrine therapy for older women with breast cancer: renewed interest in an old idea

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen as sole therapy (primary tamoxifen therapy) was investigated in the 1970s and 1980s as an alternative to surgery for older patients with breast cancer. While the majority of primary breast tumors responded to tamoxifen, long-term local disease control was poor. The use of primary tamoxifen therapy is therefore restricted to frail, elderly, and infirm patients who cannot tolerate surgery. In contrast, short-term preoperative endocrine therapy to downstage estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors is under increasing scrutiny as a nontoxic neoadjuvant approach for older women.

METHODS

The literature on primary tamoxifen therapy and preoperative endocrine therapy was reviewed to construct an opinion piece on the feasibility and safety of preoperative endocrine therapy.

RESULTS

A review of nine phase II trials and a meta-analysis of two randomized trials suggest that the initial response rates to preoperative endocrine therapy will exceed 50% to 60% for patients with ER+ disease. A short delay in surgery to administer 3 to 4 months of preoperative endocrine therapy is unlikely to compromise long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative endocrine therapy is a logical approach for older patients with ER+ disease as a well-tolerated means to increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery. Several clinical trials comparing tamoxifen with selective aromatase inhibitors in the preoperative setting have been conducted, and the results are expected soon. These studies will determine if a large multicenter national trial of preoperative endocrine therapy should be conducted.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.

Breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment

The incidence of breast cancer in US women remains disturbingly high, and unfortunately primary care physicians still frequently encounter patients in whom the disease is suspected or, even worse, confirmed. Fortunately, however, the body of knowledge surrounding the disease has grown dramatically during the past decade, and major advances have been made in the understanding of breast cancer risk, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Controversies persist, particularly those concerning the screening of younger women, but consensus now exists regarding many clinical issues relevant to primary care practice. Although multidisciplinary subspecialty expertise must be made available to all women with known or suspected breast cancer, the primary care physician has an important role to play when dealing with patients with this condition. The following article focuses on what primary care practitioners need to know to expertly contribute to the diagnosis, counseling, and initial treatment of women with this disease.

Time trends in systemic adjuvant treatment for node-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a population-based study in Quebec, Canada, to assess longitudinal changes in systemic adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A stratified random sample was selected among women with newly diagnosed node-negative breast cancer in 1988, 1991, and 1993. Information on the patient, her tumor, source of care, and treatment was abstracted from medical charts. Patients were classified as being at minimal, moderate, or high risk of recurrence on the basis of criteria proposed at the 4th International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer (St. Gallen, Switzerland, 1992), and systemic adjuvant treatment received was dichotomized as being consistent or not consistent with consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,578 cases of invasive breast carcinoma were reviewed. The proportion of patients who were given hormonal or cytotoxic treatment increased from 51.7% to 73.1% from 1988 to 1993. Virtually all women at minimal risk were treated in 1991 and 1993 according to the consensus statement. The proportions of women so treated were 75.0% and 65.4% in the moderate- and high-risk categories, respectively, in 1991. In 1993, these proportions were 71.4% and 67.0%, respectively. Omission of chemotherapy, especially in high-risk women with estrogen receptor-negative tumors who were 50 to 69 years of age, was the most frequent inconsistency with guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Systemic adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer has gained acceptance. Better understanding of the decision-making process, of the perception of the risks and benefits involved, and of the impact of alternative strategies for the dissemination of consensus recommendations are needed to promote the use of chemotherapy in specific categories of women who are at high risk of recurrence.

Analysis of three decision-making methods: a breast cancer patient as a model

PURPOSE

To compare three decision making techniques using a common clinical problem.

METHODS

Two recently developed methods, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the analytic network process (ANP), were compared with a Markov process in the evaluation of the optimal post-lumpectomy treatment strategy for an elderly woman with a mammographically detected, nonpalpable early-stage breast cancer. The following treatment alternatives were considered: observation, radiation, tamoxifen, combination radiation and tamoxifen, and simple mastectomy. All three decision methods incorporated patient preferences.

RESULTS

The models agreed on the ranking of the preferred treatment, radiation and tamoxifen, but there were variations in the rankings of the other treatment choices. Individual differences between the three models were uncovered. The Markov process provided estimates of quality-adjusted life expectancy and distribution of health events. Both AHP and ANP required less development time than the Markov process.

CONCLUSION

All three methods may be useful tools to the clinician in analyzing complex medical problems. The Markov is the most labor-intensive method but provides detailed results, whereas the AHP and the ANP give only rank orders of the alternatives. The most important considerations in choosing between these methods are time to project completion and the detail of information sought.

Radiotherapy in the elderly

Older patients with cancer are frequently victims of discriminatory treatment strategies according to parameters unrelated to the tumour itself. The general approach is influenced by the belief that good tolerance to radiotherapy might be compromised in older patients and that the course of cancer might be less aggressive in this age group. Substandard treatment is therefore often offered to older patients, although this attitude is supported neither by clinical nor by scientific evidence, but rather stems from a lack of specific knowledge of the actual cancer prognosis and the tolerance to radiotherapy in the elderly. In clinical practice advanced age may result in undertreatment, even though patients may have no other medical illness and no functional impairment. Some comorbid conditions which are more frequent in older patients may complicate the outcome of treatment. However, these impaired vital functions are not an intrinsic feature of the elderly. Overall, noncompliance in radiotherapy, related to comorbidity or technical condition, is rare. Short-term radiotherapy using a large daily fraction is often advocated in elderly patients; however, this should only be considered if a palliative treatment option has previously been selected due to the high risk of late side-effects. Acute side-effects often result in decreasing doses of radiotherapy. Data on acute tolerance of radiotherapy for different types of tumours did not demonstrate a radical difference in occurrence of toxicities. 'Reducing' radiotherapy is never a solution, unless the life expectancy of the patient is obviously so short that the tumour recurrence is unlikely to occur or at least to produce substantial morbidity before the patient has died from other causes.

Treatment of early-stage breast cancer in the elderly: a health-outcome-based approach

PURPOSE

To evaluate the post-lumpectomy treatment of a nonpalpable, stage I, T1b tumor, mammographically detected, in a 74-year-old woman without comorbidities.

METHODS

A Markov process, through 120 monthly cycles, was used to model patient progression through a treatment program, employing literature data and a health-outcome utility. Treatments considered were: observation; radiation totaling 5,000 cGy over six weeks; tamoxifen, 20 mg/day, for five years; simple mastectomy; and radiation therapy plus tamoxifen. Health states included absence of disease (NED), loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, age-sex-race (ASR)-adjusted death, cancer mortality, treatment complications, and post-mastectomy death. Transition probabilities were established from the literature. Health-state utilities were determined from the responses of health care professionals to a basic reference gamble.

RESULTS

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were determined to be 8.19 for radiation plus tamoxifen, decreasing to 8.04 for mastectomy, a difference of only a 0.15 years (1.8 months). Sensitivity analysis, however, showed relative stability in the ranking among treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Although the model showed little difference between QALYs with the treatments, the combination of radiation and tamoxifen provides the optimal therapy for this case.

Identification and management of the woman at increased risk for breast cancer development

Multiple factors which increase a women's breast cancer risk have been identified. These range from conditions such as lobular carcinoma in situ which increase risk to relatively high levels, to reproductive factors such as nulliparity which are associated with only a small increase in risk. When determining an individual's risk, all her potential breast cancer risk factors must be considered. In order for risk information to be meaningful to a woman, risk must be expressed as absolute risk over a defined time interval since there is no uniform agreement on what risk level is high enough to require intervention. At present, careful follow-up or prophylactic mastectomy are the management options available for the woman at increased risk. The efficacy of follow-up including breast self exam, physician exams, and screening mammography for early detection of cancer in a high risk population is unknown. Prophylactic mastectomy, while highly effective, does not provide complete protection from breast cancer and is more radical than the surgery done for established cancer in many cases. Which of these options is chosen by an individual woman is dependent on how much risk she is willing to assume.