Synthesis of acid and two of its conformationally-restricted analogs

Synthesis of 2-amino-6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6-phenethyl-3H-pyrimido[4,5-e][1,4]diazepin-4(5H)-one: a model for a potential pyrimido[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-based folate anti-tumor agent

Reductive cyclization of 2-{N-[(2-amino-4,6-dichloropyrimidin-5-yl)methyl]-N-phenethylamino}acetonitrile (5) with Raney nickel and hydrogen gave the chloropyrimido[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine 3 which could not be converted to 2 via an attempted nucleophilic aromatic substitution with hydroxide. The title compound (2) was prepared, however, by the reductive cyclization of 2-{N-[(2-amino-4-chloro-6-methoxypyrimidin-5-yl)methyl]-N-phenethylamino}acetonitrile (13) followed by treatment with trimethyliodosilane.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 10-CF3CO-DDACTHF analogues and derivatives as inhibitors of GAR Tfase and the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway

The synthesis and evaluation of analogues and key derivatives of 10-CF3CO-DDACTHF as inhibitors of glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GAR Tfase) and aminoimidazole carboxamide transformylase (AICAR Tfase) are reported. Polyglutamate analogues of 1 were evaluated as inhibitors of Escherichia coli and recombinant human (rh) GAR Tfase, and AICAR Tfase. Although the pentaglutamate 6 was found to be the most active inhibitor of the series tested against rhGAR Tfase (Ki=0.004 microM), little distinction between the mono-pentaglutamate derivatives was observed (Ki=0.02-0.004 microM), suggesting that the principal role of the required polyglutamation of 1 is intracellular retention. In contrast, 1 and its defined polyglutamates 3-6 were much less inactive when tested against rhAICAR Tfase (Ki=65-0.120 microM) and very selective (> or =100-fold) for rh versus E. coli GAR Tfase. Additional key analogues of 1 were examined (7 and 8) and found to be much less active (1000-fold) highlighting the exceptional characteristics of 1.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of simplified alpha-keto heterocycle, trifluoromethyl ketone, and formyl substituted folate analogues as potential inhibitors of GAR transformylase and AICAR transformylase

A series of simplified alpha-keto heterocycle, trifluoromethyl ketone, and formyl substituted folate analogues lacking the benzoylglutamate subunit were prepared and examined as potential inhibitors of glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GAR Tfase) and aminoimidazole carboxamide transformylase (AICAR Tfase).

10-Formyl-5,10-dideaza-acyclic-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid (10-formyl-DDACTHF): a potent cytotoxic agent acting by selective inhibition of human GAR Tfase and the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway

The synthesis of 10-formyl-DDACTHF (3) as a potential inhibitor of glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GAR Tfase) and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase (AICAR Tfase) is reported. Aldehyde 3, the corresponding gamma- and alpha-pentaglutamates 21 and 25 and related agents were evaluated for inhibition of folate-dependent enzymes including GAR Tfase and AICAR Tfase. The inhibitors were found to exhibit potent cytotoxic activity (CCRF-CEM IC(50) for 3=60nM) that exceeded their enzyme inhibition potency [K(i) (3)=6 and 1 microM for Escherichia coli GAR and human AICAR Tfase, respectively]. Cytotoxicity rescue by medium purines, but not pyrimidines, indicated that the potent cytotoxic activity is derived from selective purine biosynthesis inhibition and rescue by AICAR monophosphate established that the activity is derived preferentially from GAR versus AICAR Tfase inhibition. The potent cytotoxic compounds including aldehyde 3 lost activity against CCRF-CEM cell lines deficient in the reduced folate carrier (CCRF-CEM/MTX) or folylpolyglutamate synthase (CCRF-CEM/FPGS(-)) establishing that their potent activity requires both reduced folate carrier transport and polyglutamation. Unexpectedly, the pentaglutamates displayed surprisingly similar K(i)'s versus E. coli GAR Tfase and only modestly enhanced K(i)'s versus human AICAR Tfase. On the surface this initially suggested that the potent cytotoxic activity of 3 and related compounds might be due simply to preferential intracellular accumulation of the inhibitors derived from effective transport and polyglutamation (i.e., ca. 100-fold higher intracellular concentrations). However, a subsequent examination of the inhibitors against recombinant human GAR Tfase revealed they and the corresponding gamma-pentaglutamates were unexpectedly much more potent against the human versus E. coli enzyme (K(i) for 3, 14nM against rhGAR Tfase versus 6 microM against E. coli GAR Tfase) which also accounts for their exceptional cytotoxic potency.