Managing hepatitis B reactivation in renal transplant recipients: a 12-year review with emphasis on early detection and early use of lamivudine

Lamivudine in the Treatment of HBV-related Liver Disease after Renal Transplantation: An Update

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

Hepatitis B virus infection and renal transplantation

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), it remains a relevant clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality in long-term follow up. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy as well as assessment of HBV replication in serum (i.e. hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV DNA) is required before transplantation. Interferon should not be used in this setting because of low efficacy and precipitation on acute allograft rejection. The advent of effective antiviral therapies offers the opportunity to prevent the progression of liver disease after renal transplantation. However, as far as we are aware, no studies have compared prophylactic and preemptive strategies. To date, the majority of RTRs with HBV-related liver disease have had a high virological and biochemical response to lamivudine use. However, lamivudine resistance is frequent with a prolonged course of therapy. Considering long-term treatment, antiviral agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance and lack of nephrotoxicity are suggested. The optimal strategy in RTRs with HBV infection remains to be established in the near future.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

Reactivation of hepatitis and lamivudine therapy in 11 HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) renal allograft recipients, the mortality associated with liver disease reaches 37-78%. An antiviral agent, lamivudine, has recently been reported to be safe and effective for preventing hepatic damage in these patients, although either resurgence of HBV-DNA levels after discontinuation or emerging resistant HBV mutants caused by long-term administration are still unsettled.

METHODS

Between July 1976 and December 2003, 555 renal transplantations were performed in our centre. Of these, 11 patients who were HBsAg (+) at the time of transplantation (2.0%) were selected for this study. We investigated the incidence of hepatitis reactivation for three yr after transplantation and their clinical courses, including the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in seven of the 11 patients.

RESULTS

Six episodes of hepatitis reactivation developed in five of the 11 patients (45.5%) within three yr after transplantation. Five episodes of six occurred within four months after transplantation. The patient who underwent the most severe reactivation needed intensive care including lamivudine administration and plasma exchange. Lamivudine caused no severe adverse effects and HBV-DNA levels dropped to under measurable levels within four months after lamivudine administration in all patients. Resistant HBV mutant emerged in only one patient, who had the longest lamivudine administration of 49 months.

CONCLUSIONS

For HBsAg (+) renal allograft recipients, careful monitoring of HBV-DNA levels and timely administration of lamivudine could prevent hepatic damage caused by reactivation of hepatitis.

Lamivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients

Chronic liver disease due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Administration of immunosuppressive drugs facilitates viral replication and may lead to increased frequency of progressive chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic HBV infection adversely affects both patient and graft survival. Because of increased risk of death HBV-seropositive renal graft recipients require prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B. Interferon due to its immunomodulating effects, risk of activation of rejection is not recommended for transplant recipients. Lamivudine seems to be efficacious and useful for treating hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients. The main disadvantages of lamivudine are relapse after withdrawal of the agent and emergence of lamivudine resistant strains due to mutations in the YMDD locus of the HBV polymerase gene during prolonged lamivudine therapy. Optimal lamivudine treatment regimen for HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients should be defined. It seems better to initiate lamivudine therapy before or immediately after transplantation to prevent viral replication. The clinical course of hepatitis in most patients with lamivudine resistant HBV mutants seems relatively benign and long-term resistance was well tolerated. Discontinuation of lamivudine in order to minimize the emergence of drug resistant HBV mutants is safe in selected groups of patients. Lamivudine therapy has become the treatment of choice in HBV positive renal transplant recipients and improves prognosis and outcome of infected patients.

Lamivudine for the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related liver disease after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Numerous reports have appeared on lamivudine use for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation (RT). However, the efficacy and safety of lamivudine after RT remain unclear.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of initial lamivudine monotherapy in RT recipients with hepatitis B by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. The primary outcomes were hepatitis B (HB) e antigen (Ag) and HBV-DNA clearance (as measures of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were biochemical response (as measures of efficacy), dropout rate, and lamivudine resistance (as measures of tolerability). The authors used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, and outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

The authors identified 14 clinical trials (184 patients); all of these were prospective cohort studies. The mean overall estimate for HBV-DNA and HBeAg clearance, alanine aminotransferase normalization, and lamivudine resistance was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-96%), 27% (95% CI, 16%-39%), 81% (95% CI, 70%-92%), and 18% (95% CI, 10%-37%), respectively. HBeAg seroconversion rate was assessed in four (28%) trials and ranged between 0% and 46%. The P value was greater than 0.05 for our test of study homogeneity. There was no association between rate of patients who were male patients or had cirrhosis, race, age, lamivudine dose, and HBV-DNA or HBeAg clearance. Increased duration of lamivudine therapy was positively associated with frequency of HBeAg loss (r =0.51, P =0.039) and lamivudine resistance (r =0.620, P =0.019). Only 2 (14%) of 14 studies reported a dropout rate greater than 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that the majority of RT recipients with hepatitis B had high virologic and biochemical response with lamivudine. Tolerance to lamivudine was good. However, lamivudine resistance was frequent with prolonged therapy, potentially limiting its long-term efficacy after RT.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation after kidney transplantation and new onset lymphoma

A case of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after kidney transplantation is reported. The presence of antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) before transplantation indicated previous infection with HBV. Eight years after transplantation, a diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma occurred, and the patient was positive for HBsAg and hepatitis B e antigen, in association with normal activity of serum aminotransferases. Postmortem liver histology did not show any sign of portal tract or lobular inflammation despite the presence at immunostaining of extensive intranuclear and cytoplasmic positivity for HBcAg, indicating active viral replication. Natural immunity to HBV may not protect against reactivation in patients with a suppressed immune system. In this setting, periodic follow-up of HBV serology in patients at highest risk for HBV reactivation to allow for early diagnosis and prompt treatment with lamivudine is highly recommended.

Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive kidney transplant recipients have increased liver-related mortality. The impact of lamivudine treatment on patient survival, the optimal time to start treatment, and the feasibility of discontinuing treatment have not been determined. This study examined these issues with a novel management protocol. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured serially in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients, and lamivudine was administered preemptively to patients with increasing HBV DNA levels with or without elevation of aminotransferase levels. Outcomes of patients who underwent transplantation before or after institution of this preemptive management strategy (in January 1996) were compared. Eleven de novo patients (91.7%) who underwent transplantation between 1996 and 2000 and 15 existing patients (39.5%) who underwent transplantation between 1983 and 1995 received preemptive lamivudine therapy for 32.6 +/- 13.3 months. The treatment criteria were met by de novo patients at 8.4 +/- 6.2 months (range, 1-18 months) after transplantation. Suppression of HBV DNA and normalization of aminotransferase levels were achieved in all treated patients, and 21.4% had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The survival of preemptively managed de novo transplant patients was similar to that of HBsAg-negative controls, whereas HBsAg-positive patients who underwent transplantation before January 1996 had inferior survival (relative risk of death, 9.7 [P <.001]; relative risk of liver-related mortality, 68.0 [P <.0001]). Eleven patients (40.7%) developed lamivudine resistance. Discontinuation of lamivudine was attempted in 12 low-risk patients after stabilization and was successful in 5 (41.7%). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine therapy based on serial HBV DNA levels and clinical monitoring improved the survival of HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients. Treatment can be discontinued safely in selected patients after stabilization to minimize the selection of drug-resistant HBV mutants.