Correlation of angiographic and immunohistochemical findings in graft vessel disease after heart transplantation

Coronary Microcirculatory Dysfunction and Acute Cellular Rejection After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection is a major determinant of mortality and retransplantation after heart transplantation. We sought to evaluate the prognostic implications of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction assessed by index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) for the risk of acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

METHODS

The present study prospectively enrolled 154 heart transplant recipients who underwent scheduled coronary angiography and invasive coronary physiological assessment 1 month after transplantation. IMR is microcirculatory resistance under maximal hyperemia. By measuring hyperemic mean transit time using 3 injections (4 mL each) of room-temperature saline under maximal hyperemia, IMR was calculated as hyperemic distal coronary pressure×hyperemic mean transit time. The primary end point was biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection of grade ≥2R during 2 years of follow-up after transplantation and was compared by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression according to IMR. The incremental prognostic value of IMR, in addition to the model with clinical factors, was evaluated by comparison of C-index, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination index.

RESULTS

The mean age of recipients was 51.2±13.1 years (81.2% male), and the cumulative incidence of acute cellular rejection was 19.0% at 2 years. Patients with acute cellular rejection had significantly higher IMR values at 1 month than those without acute cellular rejection (23.1±8.6 versus 16.8±11.1, P=0.002). IMR was significantly associated with the risk of acute cellular rejection (per 5-U increase: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.04-1.34], P=0.011) and the optimal cutoff value of IMR to predict acute cellular rejection was 15. Patients with IMR≥15 showed significantly higher risk of acute cellular rejection than those with IMR<15 (34.4% versus 3.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 15.3 [95% CI 3.6-65.7], P<0.001). Addition of IMR to clinical variables showed significantly higher discriminant and reclassification ability for risk of acute cellular rejection (C-index 0.87 versus 0.74, P<0.001; net reclassification index 1.05, P<0.001; integrated discrimination index 0.20, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction assessed by IMR measured early after heart transplantation showed significant association with the risk of acute cellular rejection. In addition to surveillance endomyocardial biopsy, early stratification using IMR could be a clinically useful tool to identify patients at higher risk of future acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02798731.

Coronary flow reserve measurement detects transplant coronary artery disease in pediatric heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in patients who have undergone heart transplantation leads to graft dysfunction and is still the major concern for long-term survival. Evaluation of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) has been established for diagnosis of CAV. Systemic application of adenosine vs intracoronary testing for CFR has been validated in adults; however, its accuracy in pediatric patients has not yet been proven.

METHODS

CFR was prospectively measured in 33 clinically asymptomatic pediatric heart transplant recipients. CFR measurements were made in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery using a 0.014-inch Doppler FloWire (Cardiometrics). CFR was defined as the ratio of hyperemic (after adenosine injection) to basal (before adenosine) average peak velocity (APV). Adenosine (Adrekar) was administered by intracoronary (15 or 30 mug bolus) and systemic (0.1 mg/kg) injection in each patient. Epicardial CAV was evaluated in coronary angiograms (Stanford criteria) and microvasculopathy was diagnosed in endomyocardial biopsies (evidence of luminal stenosis) blinded to clinical data.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included in this study. Their median age (range) was 11.9 (1.4 to 17) years and median post-transplant time 4.3 (1 to 11.7) years. Seventeen of the 33 patients had epicardial CAV (mainly peripheral obliterations or B1 and B2 lesions) and microvascular CAV. Epicardial CAV only was found in 4 patients and microvasculopathy only was present in only 1 patient. CFR was significantly reduced in patients with epicardial CAV and microvasculopathy when compared with patients without any signs of CAV: 206 +/- 53 vs 276 +/- 39 (p < 0.001) for the systemic application and 213 +/- 50 vs 271 +/- 45 (p = 0.004) for the intracoronary application.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR and coronary vasoreactivity to adenosine are decreased in pediatric patients with CAV and correlate with histopathologic and angiographic evidence of microvascular disease. Measurement of CFR with intracoronary and systemic application of adenosine is comparable, while systemic application is necessary for non-invasive measurement of CFR in pediatric patients.

Prognostic impact of microvasculopathy on survival after heart transplantation: evidence from 9713 endomyocardial biopsies

BACKGROUND

Epicardial vasculopathy has been shown to be associated with poor outcome after heart transplantation. We demonstrate that histologically proven stenotic microvasculopathy is a novel prognostic factor for long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 9713 biopsies harvested within the first posttransplantation year from 873 patients (83% male; mean age, 49.1+/-0.6 years), light microscopic evaluations (x200) were performed for microvasculopathy, defined as stenotic endothelial and/or medial disease. Prevalence of severe epicardial vasculopathy was defined by presence of > or = 75% luminal stenosis in coronary angiography (available in 611 of 873 patients), which was present in 118 of 611 patients (19%). For Kaplan-Meier analysis, we defined fatal cardiac events as lethal acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, and graft failure. Stenotic microvasculopathy was present in 379 of 873 patients (43%) and was due to medial (345/379; 91%) rather than endothelial disease (2/379; 1%) or a combination of both (31/379; 8%; P<0.001). Endothelial disease (median [95% CI], 12.07 [10.69 to 13.44] versus 12.73 years [10.16 to 15.30]; P=0.3329) and nonstenotic medial disease (12.44 [11.14 to 13.74] versus 12.43 years [10.51 to 14.35]; P=0.4047) did not decrease overall survival or time to fatal cardiac event. Stenotic microvasculopathy was associated with poor overall survival (10.90 [9.16 to 12.60] versus 13.40 years [11.79 to 15.07]; P=0.0374) and decreased freedom from fatal cardiac events (1, 5, 10 years, 95.6+/-1.4%, 86.9+/-2.3%, 75.5+/-3.1% versus 99.1+/-0.5%, 96.8+/-1.0%, 89.8+/-1.9%; P<0.0001). This finding was independent of epicardial transplant vasculopathy (P=0.0031).

CONCLUSIONS

Stenotic microvasculopathy is frequent in routinely processed biopsies and a new prognostic factor for long-term survival after heart transplantation.

Treatment of allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation, although its impact is becoming somewhat smaller as prophylactic measures are implemented. Advances in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the genesis and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy are opening ways for new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Successful prophylaxis of the early stages of the disease has been demonstrated with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus and everolimus, that will probably be included in future protocols. For most patients with established cardiac allograft vasculopathy, currently available revascularisation methods and retransplantation are not appropriate options. Antiproliferative agents could provide significant improvement in terms of symptom relief and prognosis, but their definite value must be proven in well-designed trials.

Small vessel disease after heart transplantation: impact of immunologic and nonimmunologic risk factors*

To determine risk factors for small vessel disease after heart transplantation (HTx), characteristics of donors and organ harvesting were evaluated in 246 HTx patients (205 male, 41 female, mean survival 5.4 years). In right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies (EMB, n = 5421) evidence of microvascular disease [endothelial cell (EC) swelling/vessel wall thickening] was evaluated by light microscopy (hematoxylin and eosin staining, x 200). Mild EC swelling/vessel wall thickening were found in 204 and 213 patients, severe EC swelling/vessel wall thickening were present in 23 and 142 patients respectively. Evidences of mild and severe acute cellular rejection were found in 2064 and 421 EMB respectively. Microvascular disease was positively correlated with mild acute rejection episodes (P < 0.05). EC swelling was more frequent in patients with donors dying of craniocerebral trauma. No correlations were present to further demographical data. Microvascular alterations after HTx seem to be the result of an immunologic conflict rather than to depend on nonimmunologic factors.