Immunoablative therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of poor risk multiple sclerosis

The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is gaining traction as a valuable treatment option for patients affected by severe multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly the relapsing–remitting form. We describe the current literature in terms of clinical trials, observational and retrospective studies, as well as immune reconstitution following transplantation, with a focus on the conditioning regimens used for transplantation. The evidence base predominantly consists of non-randomised, uncontrolled clinical trials or data from retrospective or observational cohorts, i.e. very few randomised or controlled trials. Most often, intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens are used, with promising results from both myeloablative and lymphoablative strategies, as well as from regimens that are low and high intensity. Efficacy of transplantation, which is likely secondary to immune reconstitution and restored immune tolerance, is, therefore, not clearly dependent on the intensity of the conditioning regimen. However, the conditioning regimen may well influence the immune response to transplantation. Heterogeneity of conditioning regimens among studies hinders synthesis of the articles assessing post-aHSCT immune system changes. Factors associated with better outcomes were lower Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapsing–remitting MS, younger age, and shorter disease duration at baseline, which supports the guidance for patient selection proposed by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Interestingly, promising outcomes were described for patients with secondary progressive MS by some studies, which may be worth taking into account when considering treatment options for patients with active, progressive disease. Of note, a significant proportion of patients develop autoimmune disease following transplantation, with alemtuzumab-containing regimens associated with the highest incidence.

A review of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease. Position paper of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation

Autoimmune diseases are an important field for the development of bone marrow transplantation, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Europe alone, almost 3000 procedures have been registered so far. The Brazilian Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation (Sociedade Brasileira de Transplantes de Medula Óssea) organized consensus meetings for the Autoimmune Diseases Group, to review the available literature on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases, aiming to gather data that support the procedure for these patients. Three autoimmune diseases for which there are evidence-based indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease. The professional stem cell transplant societies in America, Europe and Brazil (Sociedade Brasileira de Transplantes de Medula Óssea) currently consider hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a therapeutic modality for these three autoimmune diseases. This article reviews the evidence available.

Discordant functional and inflammatory parameters in multiple sclerosis patients after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

This article describes outcomes in four patients with advanced multiple sclerosis up to two years after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a total-body irradiation-based preparative regimen. MRI and C SF analyses demonstrated clear suppression of the inflammatory processes. The results demonstrate however, a dissociation of inflammation parameters and functional disability findings raising questions about optimal future stem cell transplantatio n strategies for this disease.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases: From basic science to clinical practice

Based on animal studies and serendipitous clinical cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used since 1995 as a specific treatment for patients with severe treatment-resistant autoimmune disease (ADs). Despite other clinical developments for autoimmune diseases, including biological therapies, there has been an ongoing requirement for HSCT in some diseases and several thousand procedures have been registered in databases for a wide variety of diseases, predominantly for treatment with autologous HSCT. Currently, the main indications are multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and Crohn's disease, which are supported by large series and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), whereas retrospective registry analyses support benefit in a range of rarer indications. Research into mechanisms of action has provided insight into how tolerance may be achieved with an intensive one-off treatment. In addition to the profound anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects provided by the cytotoxic regimen, long-term responses in some diseases may be explained by 'resetting' the immune system through thymic reprocessing and generation of increased T-regulatory cell activity. This review aims to summarise the gradual evolution of HSCT in severe autoimmune diseases over the last 20 years, focussing on the recent publication of clinical and scientific studies, as well as evidence-based guidelines and recommendations.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis

It is widely accepted that the main common pathogenetic pathway in multiple sclerosis (MS) involves an immune-mediated cascade initiated in the peripheral immune system and targeting CNS myelin. Logically, therefore, therapeutic approaches to the disease include modalities aiming at downregulation of the various immune elements that are involved in this immunological cascade. Since the introduction of interferons in 1993, more specific immunoactive drugs have been introduced, but still most of them can, at best, effectively modulate only the early relapsing phases of MS. The more progressed phases of the disease are not efficiently amendable by the existing immunomodulatory drugs. Moreover, localized and compartmentized inflammation in the CNS, which seems to be mostly responsible for the chronic axonal damage and resulting progression of disability, is less affected by the current drugs. A more radical approach to suppress all the inflammation in MS, including that into the CNS, could theoretically be achieved with high-dose immunosuppression using strong cytotoxic medications and resetting of the immune system by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT, both allogeneic and autologous, has been tried as a novel therapeutic approach in various autoimmune diseases. During the last 15 years several (mostly open) clinical studies evaluated the effect of HSTC on MS patients; the published papers showed that a high proportion of the HSCT-treated MS patients were stabilized, or even improved after the transplantation and have generally indicated a beneficial effect on disease progression. In this review, the rationale of HSCT and the summary of the results of the existing clinical trials are presented. Despite the fact that it is difficult to collectively summarize the results of all the trials, due to lack of uniformity in the conditioning and treatment protocols and of completed controlled studies, these clinical studies have provided a strong 'proof of concept' for HSCT in MS and have significantly contributed to our understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and HSCT protocol.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) refractory to conventional medical treatment.

METHODS

Eight case series met our a priori inclusion criteria for the primary outcome of progression-free survival. Individual study quality was rated using an 11-item scale for case series. The strength of the overall body of evidence for each outcome was rated using a system developed by the ECRI Institute. Data from different studies were statistically combined using meta-analysis. An additional six studies were included for a summary of mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

For secondary progressive MS, immunoablative therapy with autologous bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was associated with higher progression-free survival (up to 3 years following treatment) when using intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens compared with high-intensity conditioning regimens. The evidence was insufficient to determine whether the treatment was effective in patients with other types of MS. Treatment-related mortality was about 2.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with secondary progressive MS refractory to conventional medical treatment have longer progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation with intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens than with high-intensity conditioning regimens.

Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis: perspective on mechanisms of action

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a frequent demyelinating immune-mediated disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects principally young adults and leads to severe physical and cognitive impairment. The current standard treatment makes use of the immune modulators beta-interferon, glatiramer acetate and natalizumab, or immunosuppressants such as mitoxantrone. However, these agents are only partially effective and in a number of patients fail to achieve satisfactory disease control. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is being explored in the treatment of severe MS as a means of delivering high-dose immunosuppression followed by 'rescue' of the immuno-hematopoietic system with autologous HSC. The potential therapeutic benefit is based on the concept of so-called 'resetting' the immune system. The use of allogeneic HSCT as a possible therapeutic approach for severe MS is inspired by case reports of MS patients that underwent allogeneic HSCT for a concomitant hematological malignancy, and subsequently is supported by data from rodent models of MS. Allogeneic HSCT may offer specific therapeutic effects, such as the replacement of the autoreactive immune compartment by healthy allogeneic cells and the development of a graft-versus-autoimmunity (GVA) effect. Here, we review the currently available experimental and clinical evidence to support the role of autologous and allogeneic HSCT in MS.

Bone marrow transplantation: Does it stop MS progression?

Based upon the theory that MS is an acquired autoimmune disease and not purely genetically defined, complete ablation of the defective immune system and replacement with a naive non-disease-causing system de novo from stem cells autologously-obtained should lead to a long-lasting remission of disease. The rationale and methodology are discussed along with recommendations for patient selection. Results of several small studies are presented along with some preliminary results from the ongoing Canadian effort.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: evidence for a graft-versus-autoimmunity effect

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is being explored in the treatment of severe multiple sclerosis (MS), and is based on the concept of "resetting" the immune system. The use of allogeneic HSCT may offer additional advantages, such as the replacement of the autoreactive immune compartment by healthy allogeneic cells and development of a graft-versus-autoimmunity (GVA) effect. However, in clinical practice, the genetic susceptibility to MS of allogeneic stem cell donors is generally unknown, and GVA may therefore be an important mechanism of action. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)-susceptible and -resistant mouse strains were used to determine the roles of genetic susceptibility, level of donor-chimerism, and alloreactivity in the therapeutic potential of syngeneic versus allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) for EAE. After transplantation and EAE induction, animals were evaluated for clinical EAE and ex vivo myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-specific proliferation. Early after BMT, both syngeneic and allogeneic chimeras were protected from EAE development. On the longer term, allogeneic but not syngeneic BMT conferred protection, but this required high-level donor-chimerism from EAE-resistant donors. Importantly, when EAE-susceptible donors were used, robust protection from EAE was obtained when active alloreactivity, induced by donor lymphocyte infusions, was provided. Our findings indicate the requirement of a sufficient level of donor-chimerism from a nonsusceptible donor in the therapeutic effect of allogeneic BMT. Importantly, the data indicate that, independently of genetic susceptibility, active alloreactivity is associated with a GVA effect, thereby providing new evidence to support the potential role of allogeneic BMT in the treatment of MS.

Haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in autoimmune diseases: a European perspective

The potential of haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases was originally supported by almost three decades of animal experiments and by the serendipitous remissions of autoimmune disease observed in patients undergoing transplantation for haematological disorders. Improved safety of both autologous and allogeneic HSCT over the last decade has been followed by increasing acceptance of HSCT as an experimental treatment for severe autoimmune diseases that are resistant to conventional treatment. International databases have collated over 700 procedures performed specifically for a variety of autoimmune diseases. Phase III clinical trials are in progress for some diseases. This review provides a comprehensive update on the efficacy and toxicity of HSCT in severe autoimmune disease. Future directions in the context of other evolving therapies are discussed.

Autologous haematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis

Intense immunosuppression followed by autologous haematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is being assessed as a potential treatment for patients with severe multiple sclerosis (MS). The treatment was developed from research that showed autologous HSCT was as effective as allogeneic HSCT in the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. The treatment is thought to eradicate the defective immune system, and the infused haematopoietic stem cells reconstitute an immune system that is more tolerant to the nervous system. About 250 patients with MS have been treated with autologous HSCT as part of phase I and phase II open trials. Autologous HSCT seems feasible in MS and assessment with clinical and MRI measures suggests it induces a profound and long-lasting suppression of inflammation. The course of MS seems to be stabilised after autologous HSCT, especially in ambulatory patients with evidence of active disease. Autologous HSCT deserves further study in randomised controlled trials.

Differentiation of multiple sclerosis subtypes: implications for treatment

There has been tremendous progress in the immunomodulatory treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) during recent years. With the introduction of interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate and mitoxantrone (recently registered for MS in the US), there are at least three therapeutic strategies that have proven effective in large phase III studies. However, not all patients with MS respond well to treatment with these drugs. This may largely be a consequence of disease heterogeneity. From a clinical perspective, patients with different disease courses show different treatment responses. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS are more likely to respond to immunomodulatory therapy than those with a progressive disease course. Studies of patients with secondary progressive MS have yielded inconsistent results and, so far, there has been no positive phase III study of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with primary progressive MS. Pathological evidence indicates that subtyping based on clinical findings alone does not reflect actual disease heterogeneity. In a large series of biopsy and autopsy specimens, at least four subtypes could be identified with respect to oligodendrocyte/myelin pathology and immunopathology. As long as the only method of identifying subtypes of disease is histopathology, differential therapy will remain a future goal. Thus, there is an urgent need for in vivo markers of immunopathogenesis in an individual patient that would allow treatment to be specifically directed towards a given pathological focus. However, at least from a theoretical point of view, some therapeutic approaches appear very attractive. Plasmapheresis and/or intravenous immunoglobulins could most plausibly be the best approach for the immunopathological subtype of MS, which is characterised by antibody and complement deposition next to demyelinated axons, in order to remove antibodies. The subtype of MS that is associated with heavy macrophage activation, T cell infiltration and expression of inflammatory mediator molecules, including tumour necrosis factor-alpha, may be most likely to respond to immunomodulation with interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate. There are other subtypes of MS in which viral infection or oligodendrocyte degeneration, rather than autoimmunity, appear to play a role. It is possible that these could benefit from antiviral therapy, oligodendrocyte protection or oligodendrocyte transplantation, although therapies based on these latter approaches have yet to be developed.

Multiple sclerosis and anesthetic implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple sclerosis remains prevalent among young women in the United States of America. It is a disease of the central nervous system that possesses many anesthetic implications. Anesthesia providers need to understand this disorder and its multiple anesthetic ramifications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent work has provided more insight into the etiology of multiple sclerosis, its pathogenesis, diagnosis and natural history. A number of new medications have also been added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Optimal anesthetic care entails a thorough preoperative evaluation, medication history and neurologic examination, intraoperative awareness of conditions that may precipitate attacks and lead to potentially life-threatening complications, as well as postoperative attention to respiratory and other risks. Recommendations for management are based on information from small retrospective studies and anecdotal reports.

SUMMARY

In summary, our aim is to provide an updated view of multiple sclerosis from the perspective of perioperative care, emphasizing interactions between the disease, surgery and anesthesia.