Vitamin D deficiency in liver transplant patients in Israel

Update: Solar UV Radiation, Vitamin D, and Skin Cancer Surveillance in Organ Transplant Recipients (OTRs)

Although great progress has been achieved during the last decades, the clinical management of organ transplant recipients (OTRs) remains a challenge. OTRs need in general lifelong immunosuppressive therapy that is associated with an increased risk to develop skin cancer and with an unfavorable clinical outcome of these malignancies. Skin cancer prevention measures, including regular full-body examinations, are therefore necessary in OTRs to detect and treat suspicious lesions at an early stage. The frequency of aftercare depends on the individual risk factors of the patient. Patients should apply consistent sun protection with sunscreens and clothing, as well as a monthly self-examination. On the other hand, the need of UVR avoidance increases the risk of vitamin D deficiency, which itself is associated with an increased risk for many diseases, including malignancies. OTRs should therefore be monitored for 25(OH)D status and/or should take vitamin D supplements. It has to be emphasized that an interdisciplinary approach, coordinated by the transplant center, that includes regular skin examinations by a dermatologist, is needed to ensure the best care for the OTRs.

The Role of Vitamin D and Omega-3 PUFAs in Islet Transplantation

Recurrence of autoimmunity and allograft rejection represent major challenges that impact the success of islet transplantation. Despite the remarkable improvements achieved in immunosuppression strategies after the publication of the Edmonton protocol, long-term data of intra-hepatic islet transplantation show a gradual decline in beta-cell function. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the investigation of novel, safe and effective anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory strategies able to promote long-term islet graft survival and notable improvements in clinical outcomes of islet transplant recipients. Vitamin D has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Pre-clinical studies investigating the use of vitamin D and its analogs (alone or in combination with immunosuppressive agents and/or other anti-inflammatory agents, such as omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) showed beneficial results in terms of islet graft survival and prevention of recurrence of autoimmunity/allograft rejection in animal models of syngeneic and allogeneic islet transplantation. Moreover, epidemiologic studies demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent after solid organ transplantation (e.g., heart, liver or kidney transplantation). However, studies that critically assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among islet transplant recipients have yet to be conducted. In addition, prospective studies aimed to address the safety and efficacy of vitamin D supplementation as an adjuvant immunomodulatory strategy in islet transplant recipients are lacking and are therefore awaited in the future.

Seasonal Variation of Vitamin D Status in Long-Term Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

There is little information about circannual rhythm of vitamin D level in kidney transplantation (KTx) patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 71 patients (27 females; 44 males) in the long term after KTx (5.5 ± 2.6 years) during the winter and summer months plasma concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathormone (PTH), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), calcium, and phosphorus were assessed. Vitamin D status was classified according to 25(OH)D level (ie, insufficiency, ≤30 ng/mL; deficiency, <15 ng/mL).

RESULTS

In this study, 96% of KTx patients had vitamin D insufficiency including 37% deficiency during winter and 89% of KTx patients had vitamin D insufficiency and 24% had vitamin D deficiency, respectively, during summer. Mean 25(OH)D level during winter was lower than in summer (17.4 ± 7.1 vs 20.2 ± 7.2 ng/mL; P = .02), similar to calcitriol (163.6 ± 37.4 vs 284.5 ± 77.8 pmol/L; P = .001). There were no significant differences in winter and summer levels of calcium, phosphorus, and PTH. The 25(OH)D level was significantly higher in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m² compared with those with lower eGFR (21.6 ± 7.5 vs 17.6 ± 6.0; P = .02) only in the summer time.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the KTx patients have vitamin D insufficiency during both winter and summer with higher concentration of vitamin D metabolites in summer. Other factors than graft function may have an impact on vitamin D levels in KTx patients.

Brazilian consensus on photoprotection

Brazil is a country of continental dimensions with a large heterogeneity of climates and massive mixing of the population. Almost the entire national territory is located between the Equator and the Tropic of Capricorn, and the Earth axial tilt to the south certainly makes Brazil one of the countries of the world with greater extent of land in proximity to the sun. The Brazilian coastline, where most of its population lives, is more than 8,500 km long. Due to geographic characteristics and cultural trends, Brazilians are among the peoples with the highest annual exposure to the sun. Epidemiological data show a continuing increase in the incidence of non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancers. Photoprotection can be understood as a set of measures aimed at reducing sun exposure and at preventing the development of acute and chronic actinic damage. Due to the peculiarities of Brazilian territory and culture, it would not be advisable to replicate the concepts of photoprotection from other developed countries, places with completely different climates and populations. Thus the Brazilian Society of Dermatology has developed the Brazilian Consensus on Photoprotection, the first official document on photoprotection developed in Brazil for Brazilians, with recommendations on matters involving photoprotection.

Review article: the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D in chronic hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND

Recent interest has focused on the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D, in particular, in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

AIMS

To review data in the literature regarding the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D in patients with chronic hepatitis C, with and without liver transplantation.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed for relevant studies up to August 2011 using the terms 'vitamin D' 'chronic liver disease' and 'hepatitis C'.

RESULTS

Vitamin D deficiency is very frequent before liver transplantation ranging between 51% and 92%, whereas, in the liver transplantation setting, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is also high. Severe liver disease may increase the risk of vitamin D deficiency and vice versa, as there may be a relationship between vitamin D deficiency and fibrosis. In patients with chronic hepatitis C and those with recurrent of hepatitis C after liver transplantation, recent clinical data shows that a higher serum vitamin D level is an independent predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) following anti-viral therapy, and that a higher SVR is achieved with vitamin D supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger randomised clinical studies with adequate statistical power are needed to confirm these potentially very important nonskeletal effects of vitamin D in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Vitamin D in organ transplantation

Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among patients with end-stage organ failure awaiting transplant. Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels in these patients may be related to many disease-specific factors, as well as decreased sunlight exposure and limited intake of foods containing vitamin D. Low serum 25-OHD levels are also extremely common following solid organ transplantation, both during the immediate postoperative period and in long-term graft recipients. Demographic and lifestyle factors are important in determining D status in transplant recipients. Worse vitamin D status is associated with poorer general health, lower albumin, and even decreased survival among these patients. Although several studies have demonstrated that active forms of vitamin D and its analogues prevent bone loss following transplantation, the data do not show consistent benefit. These therapies may have particular utility after renal transplantation. However, given the narrow therapeutic window with respect to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, and the demonstrated efficacy of bisphosphonates to prevent post-transplantation bone loss, we regard these agents as adjunctive rather than primary therapy for transplantation osteoporosis. The effects of 1,25(OH)(2)D on the immune system, which are still being elucidated, may have potential for reducing infections and preventing allograft rejection after transplantation.

Effects of ambient sunlight and photoprotection on vitamin D status

Ultraviolet B radiation exposure is responsible for the majority of natural vitamin D stores in humans. The physiologic role of vitamin D in health and disease is continually expanding, and at the same time the population that is vitamin D deficient is increasing. The environmental characteristics and personal physical traits that contribute to vitamin D3 synthesis from sun exposure are discussed, and the effects of photoprotection on vitamin D status are examined. It is concluded that sunscreen, in the manner used by the general public, does not cause vitamin D insufficiency. Implementing guidelines suggesting sun exposure duration for sufficient vitamin D3 production is limited by the complex interaction of contributory factors, and no recommendation can be made that is both safe and accurate enough for general public usage.

Dermatologic management, sun avoidance and vitamin D status in organ transplant recipients (OTR)

It is well known that skin cancer, especially cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) has higher incidence rates, behaves more aggressively and has higher rates of metastasis. OTRs who have been treated for many years with immunosuppressive medication are at the highest risk for developing malignant skin tumors. Protection against solar and artificial UV-radiation is crucial to prevent skin cancer in OTRs. However, investigations have revealed that solar UV-B-exposure and serum 25(OH)D levels positively correlate with decreased risk for various internal malignancies (e.g. breast, colon, prostate, and ovarian cancer) and other severe diseases. Therefore, it is important to detect and treat vitamin D deficiency in OTRs. This review discusses guidelines for the optimal management of these patients, that require communication between the transplant teams, the treating dermatologist and other clinicians.

Severe vitamin D deficiency among heart and liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Although patients with end-stage organ failure are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency because of limited sunlight exposure and hepatic dysfunction, few studies have measured 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25OHD) at the time of transplantation.

METHODS

We measured serum 25OHD immediately after transplantation in 69 heart and liver transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Forty-six heart and 23 liver transplant recipients were evaluated (mean age 53 yr). Mean 25OHD was well below the lower limit of the normal range (43.2 +/- 21.2 nmol/L). Ninety-one percent had levels below 75 nmol/L, the threshold commonly used to denote sufficiency, and 71% had levels below 50 nmol/L. Severe deficiency (25OHD <25 nmol/L) was found in 16%. Vitamin D levels did not differ by race, age, gender, or season. Mean 25OHD was lower among liver than heart transplant recipients (34.4 +/- 17.5 vs. 47.7 +/- 20.7 nmol/L; p < 0.03). Among liver transplant recipients, 22% had undetectable levels (<17 nmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among heart and liver transplant recipients; those with liver failure are at greatest risk. As vitamin D deficiency has many serious skeletal and extra-skeletal sequelae, physicians who treat transplant patients should maintain a high degree of vigilance for this problem.

Evaluation and management of bone disease and fractures post transplant

Bone disease is common in recipients of kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplants and results in fractures in 20-40% of patients, a rate much higher than expected for age. Fractures occur because of the presence of bone disease as well as other factors such as neuropathy, poor balance, inactivity, and low body or muscle mass. Major contributors to bone disease include both preexisting bone disease and bone loss post transplant, which is greatest in the first 6-12 months when steroid doses are highest. Bone disease in kidney transplant recipients should be considered different from that which occurs in other solid organ transplant recipients for several reasons including the presence of renal osteodystrophy, which contributes to low bone mineral density in these patients; the location of fractures (more common in the legs and feet in these patients than in spine and hips as in other solid organ recipients); and the potential danger in using bisphosphonate therapy, which may cause more harm than good in kidney transplant recipients with low bone turnover. Evaluation in all patients should preferably occur in the pretransplant period or early post transplant and should include assessment of fracture risk as well as metabolic factors that can contribute to bone disease. Bone mineral density measurement is recommended in all patients even if its predictive value for fracture risk in the transplant population is unproven. Management of bone disease should be directed toward decreasing fracture risk as well as improving bone density. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment strategies are discussed in this review. Although there have been many studies describing a beneficial effect of bisphosphonates and vitamin D analogues on bone density, none have been powered to detect a decrease in fracture rate.