Sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus with antibody induction in kidney transplantation: preliminary results of a pilot study

A comparative, randomized trial of concentration-controlled sirolimus combined with reduced-dose tacrolimus or standard-dose tacrolimus in renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

The clinical safety and efficacy of sirolimus plus reduced-dose tacrolimus was evaluated in de novo renal allograft recipients enrolled in a comparative, open-label study.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight renal allograft recipients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive reduced-dose tacrolimus plus sirolimus (rTAC) or standard-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus (sTAC) for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was calculated creatinine clearance values at 6 months.

RESULTS

Demographic variables were similar between groups. At 6 months, mean (± standard deviation) calculated creatinine clearance was significantly improved in the rTAC group (63.8 vs 52.7 mL/min, P = .005), although mean serum creatinine values were not significantly different. Patient survival (95.2% and 96.9%) and graft survival (93.7% and 98.5%) were similar between the rTAC and sTAC groups, respectively. Acute rejection rates were 17.5% with rTAC and 7.7% with sTAC (P = .095).

CONCLUSIONS

The rTAC regimen provided effective immunosuppression and was associated with improved creatinine clearance. Adequate immunosuppressant exposure must be achieved in the early postoperative period to minimize the risk of acute rejection.

Conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression in liver transplantation recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Report of an initial experience

AIM: To report a retrospective analysis of preliminary results of 36 patients who received sirolimus (SRL, Rapamune^®, rapamycin) in a consecutive cohort of 248 liver allograft recipients.

METHODS: Thirty-six liver transplant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were switched to SRL-based immunosuppression therapy from tacrolimus were enrolled in this study. The patients who were diagnosed as advanced HCC before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were divided into group A (n = 11), those who were found to have HCC recurrence and/or metastasis after OLT were assigned to group B (n = 18), and those who developed renal insufficiency caused by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) were assigned to group C (n = 7) after OLT.

RESULTS: The patients were followed up for a median of 10.4 mo (range, 3.8-19.1 mo) after conversion to SRL therapy and 12.3 mo (range, 5.1-34.4 mo) after OLT. Three patients developed mild acute cellular rejection 2 wk after initiating SRL therapy, which was fully reversed after prednisolone pulse therapy. In group A, only 1 patient was found to have HCC recurrence and metastasis 12 mo after OLT. In group B, 66.7% (12/18) patients (2 with progressive tumor, 7 with stable tumor and 3 without tumor) were still alive due to conversing to SRL and/or resection for HCC recurrence at the end of a median follow-up of 6.8 mo post conversion and 10.7 mo posttransplant. In group C, no HCC recurrence was demonstrated in 7 patients, and renal function became normal after SRL therapy. Thrombocytopenia (n = 2), anemia (n = 8), and oral aphthous ulcers (n = 7) found in our cohort were easily manageable.

CONCLUSION: The conversion to SRL-based immunosuppression may inhibit the recurrence and metastasis of HCC and improve CNI-induced renal insufficiency in OLT patients with HCC.

Clinical application of sirolimus in renal transplantation: an update

In addition to an analysis of the final results of phase I/II and phase III clinical trials of sirolimus (SRL), this review focuses on the recent results of several studies in renal transplantation, which include diverse combinations of SRL with other immunosuppressive agents. While SRL was initially introduced as an adjunctive agent to calcineurin inhibitors, it is now serving as the base for therapies that spare or avoid these nephrotoxic drugs. However, to optimize the use of SRL as base therapy, further work is necessary to determine target concentrations, requirement for concomitant steroids and/or nucleoside synthesis blockers, and countermeasure therapy to overcome the drug's adverse effects.

De Novo Immunosuppression With Sirolimus and Tacrolimus in Heart Transplant Recipients Compared With Cyclosporine and Mycophenolate Mofetil: A One-Year Follow-Up Analysis

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of sirolimus in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

From January 2001 to June 2002, 31 de novo heart transplant recipients (treatment group) received a combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus, low-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin, and glucocorticoids. Outcomes, such as actuarial survival, rate of rejection, incidence of infection, probability of developing diabetes mellitus, renal function, platelet and white blood cell counts, and incidence of coronary artery disease at 1 year, were compared with a cohort of 25 patients (control group) who underwent transplantation primarily in 2000 and in early 2002 treated with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier actuarial 1-year survival rates were equivalent between groups (97% for the treatment group and 88% for the control group), as was freedom from allograft rejection (48% and 42% for treatment and control groups, respectively). No cases of transplant arteriopathy were noted within the first posttransplantation year. Renal function was not significantly affected in either group. There was a striking increased incidence of mediastinitis in the treatment group (19%) versus 0% in the control group (P = .02). Tacrolimus-sirolimus therapy was associated with a nearly 11-fold increased incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus as well (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus, sirolimus, and steroids (following low-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin) were associated with an increased incidence of mediastinitis and posttransplantation diabetes mellitus. No obvious long-term benefit on survival, arteriopathy, or renal function was noted.

Pilot randomized study of early tacrolimus withdrawal from a regimen with sirolimus plus tacrolimus in kidney transplantation

We performed a randomized trial to compare two regimens of low-risk kidney allograft recipients in the first year after transplantation. Both regimens initially included sirolimus, tacrolimus and steroids; one with long-term maintenance with these drugs vs. tacrolimus withdrawal. Group I: sirolimus levels of 4-8 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 8-12 ng/mL for 3 months, and 5-10 ng/mL after month 3. Group II: sirolimus concentration of 8-16 ng/mL, plus tacrolimus 3-8 ng/mL with tacrolimus elimination from month 3 onwards. Owing to difficulties in achieving target levels, the protocol was amended to increase the doses. Eighty-seven patients were recruited. In the intention-to-treat analysis, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 12 months, adjusted to zero for graft loss, was similar in both groups (58.8 and 59.9 mL/min). Analysis of patients remaining on protocol showed that GFR was higher in group II only in the patients postamendment (58.4 and 72.9 mL/min, p = 0.03). Rates of biopsy-confirmed rejection (BCAR) were 9.3% and 22.7% in groups I and II, respectively (p = NS). After amendment, BCAR rates were 10.3% and 11.1% (p = NS). Diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in patients who eliminated tacrolimus (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg) (p = 0.03). Combining sirolimus and tacrolimus with adequate loading doses was associated with a low incidence of BCAR, and allowed tacrolimus elimination in a high proportion of patients, which may be followed by amelioration in renal function and blood pressure.

Comparison of sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor-sparing and calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens in cadaveric renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the efficacy and toxicity of sirolimus used as primary immunosuppression in combination with reduced dose tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitor [CI]-sparing regimen) or mycophenolate mofetil (CI-free regimen) in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation.

METHODS

Seventy subjects were treated in a quadruple sequential protocol in which 41 were treated with a CI-sparing regimen and 29 were treated with a CI-free regimen. The efficacy and toxicity profiles of these regimens were prospectively monitored and compared.

RESULTS

The study consisted of African Americans (71%), cadaveric donors (100%), donors aged more than 50 years (30%), and patients with delayed graft function (47%). At 1 year, patient survival, graft survival, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 98%, 80%, and 10%, respectively, in the CI-sparing group and 100%, 89%, and 7%, respectively, in the CI-free group. Three-month protocol biopsies were performed in 41% (17/41) and 67% (20/29) of the subjects in the CI-sparing and CI-free groups, respectively. Subclinical rejection was detected in 6% (1/17) and 15% (3/20) of the subjects in the CI-sparing and CI-free groups, respectively. Histologic evidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was more prevalent in the CI-sparing group. At 1 year, the mean estimated creatinine clearance was higher in the CI-free group than in the CI-sparing group (72.4 +/-20.0 mL/min vs. 50.5 +/-20.8 mL/min, P <0.01). The two regimens had similar toxicity profiles (hospital readmission, infection, wound complications, and metabolic complications).

CONCLUSIONS

Both sirolimus-based CI-sparing and CI-free regimens are safe and effective in a population with high immunologic risk. The CI-free regimen is associated with better renal function at 1 year post-transplant. Long-term follow-up will aid in determining the risk and benefit ratio of these regimens.

Therapeutic monitoring of cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: the Halifax experience

Appropriate dosing of an immunosuppressive agent is critical to its efficacy and tolerability. Finding a simple and effective method of monitoring cyclosporine (CsA/CyA) has been formidable despite a long history of widespread usage. Earlier reports linked CsA dosing to trough levels (C0), whereas later more elaborate systems have evaluated efficacy linked to 12-hour area-under-the-curve (AUC(0-12)) as a measure of total drug exposure. Recent work done at our center and elsewhere has shown that the 2-hour postdose concentration (C2) to be simple and more effective than the C0 or the AUC. With C2 monitoring as a guide to CsA dosing, acute rejection (AR) and nephrotoxicity (NT) can be effectively reduced. Furthermore, absorption profile as per C2 levels further emphasizes the importance of achieving the targeted peak concentration in the first week of transplantation. The C2 concentration strategy is discussed in light of newer induction agents and other immunosuppression.

Rapamycin in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation

A 10-year experience with the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin that begins in the laboratory then extends through multicentre trials in combination with cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients, exploration of its use as a single agent and in combination with tacrolimus, and its potential in nonrenal organs is described. Rapamycin is a potent inhibitor of endothelial injury in rat aortic allografts. When added to full-dose cyclosporine it achieves low rejection rates, but it augments the nephrotoxicity and hyperlipidemia of cyclosporine. On the other hand, it allows discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors in stable kidney and liver patients suffering from nephrotoxicity late posttransplant. At least in Caucasian patients, discontinuation of cyclosporine is possible as early as 3 months post-kidney transplant. In combination with low-dose tacrolimus, exceptionally low rates of rejection were seen in recipients of kidney, pancreas, and liver recipients with preservation of excellent renal function. These pilot studies have been confirmed in several single-centre and, more recently, multicentre trials in kidney and pancreas transplantation. The side-effect profile of hyperlipidemia, lymphocoeles, delayed wound healing, and possible liver effects are coming into focus, and ways of minimizing these problems being introduced. The lessons learned include the need for early adequate blood levels, the lack of correlation between dose and drug exposure, and the potency that allows marked dose reductions in calcineurin inhibitors and steroids.

Ten years of sirolimus therapy in orthotopic liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus therapy has been used in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients diagnosed with a variety of diseases; chronic graft rejection (CR), calcineurin associated renal toxicity, preemptive immune suppression, calcineurin related neurotoxicity, preemptive therapy in transplant recipients with history of hepatocellular carcinoma, and steroid resistant allograft rejection.

METHODS

A search for the medical literature and experiences involving sirolimus was done.

RESULTS

Several animal and human reports evaluating the use sirolimus in liver transplant recipients are found and discussed.

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus has been used for multitude of indications, primarily based on anecdotal experiences. However, reports of sirolimus related side effects have decreased the transplant communities' enthusiasm towards promoting this agent as a safe immune suppression agent.

Improved freedom from rejection after a loading dose of sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus (SIR) in combination with cyclosporine reduces the incidence of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. Limited data are available regarding SIR in combination with tacrolimus (TAC).

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of renal transplant recipients receiving SIR, TAC, and corticosteroids postoperatively was conducted. A total of 118 consecutive renal transplant recipients were included on the basis of availability of day 1 SIR dose information. Seventy-seven patients received an SIR loading dose (SIR-LD) immediately posttransplantation, and 41 patients did not (SIR no loading dose [SIR-NLD]).

RESULTS

The two groups showed similar demographic and transplant characteristics. SIR doses and trough levels were significantly higher in the SIR-LD patients at 1 and 7 days posttransplantation; however, no differences occurred beyond day 7. Patients receiving an SIR-LD experienced significantly better freedom from rejection at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation (P<0.05). This rejection benefit in the SIR-LD group was independent of donor source and use of antibody induction. SIR-LD patients experienced fewer serious infections (12% SIR-LD vs. 27% SIR-NLD, P=0.04) and a lower incidence of delayed graft function (21% SIR-LD vs. 39% SIR-NLD, P<0.05). No significant differences in serum creatinine, hemoglobin, and platelet counts occurred in the first 180 days posttransplantation, but the patients in the SIR-NLD group experienced lower hemoglobin levels at day 30 than those in the SIR-LD group (10.8 g/dL SIR-LD vs. 9.7 g/dL SIR-NLD, P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

SIR-LD significantly improves early posttransplantation freedom from rejection in renal transplant recipients without increasing other complications.