Treatment with rabbit antithymocyte serum permits a cyclophosphamide-free approach to prevention of hDAF transgenic porcine kidney xenograft rejection in baboons

Xenotransplantation of solid organs in the pig-to-primate model

Xenotransplantation using pig organs could solve the significant increasing shortage of donor organs for allotransplantation. In the last two decades, major progress has been made in understanding the xenoimmunobiology of pig-to-nonhuman primate transplantation, and today we are close to clinical trials. The ability to genetically engineer pigs, such as human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF), CD46 (membrane cofactor protein), or alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GT-KO), has been a significant step toward the clinical application of xenotransplantation. Using GT-KO pigs and novel immunosuppressant agents, 2 to 6 months' survival of heterotopic heart xenotransplants has been achieved. In life-supporting kidney xenotransplantation, promising survival of close to 3 months has been achieved. However, liver and lung xenotransplantations do not have such encouraging survival as kidney and heart xenotransplantation. Although the introduction of hDAF and GT-KO pigs largely overcame hyperacute rejection, acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR) remains a challenge to be overcome if survival is to be increased. In several studies, when classical AHXR was prevented, thrombotic microangiopathy and coagulation dysregulation became more obvious, which make them another hurdle to be overcome. The initiating cause of failure of pig cardiac and renal xenografts may be antibody-mediated injury to the endothelium, leading to the development of microvascular thrombosis. Potential contributing factors toward the development of the thrombotic microangiopathy include: 1) the presence of preformed anti-non-Gal antibodies, 2) the development of very low levels of elicited antibodies to non-Gal antigens, 3) natural killer cell or macrophage activity, and 4) inherent coagulation dysregulation between pigs and primates. The breeding of pigs transgenic for an 'anticoagulant' or 'anti-thrombotic' gene, such as human tissue factor pathway inhibitor, hirudin, or CD39, or lacking the gene for the prothrombinase, fibrinogen-like protein-2, is anticipated to inhibit the change in the endothelium to a procoagulant state that takes place in the pig organ after transplantation. A further limitation for organ xenotransplantation is the potential for cross-species infection. As far as exogenous viruses are concerned, porcine cytomegalovirus has been detected in the tissues of recipient non-human primates, although no invasive disease was reported. Until today, no formal evidence has been presented from in vivo studies in non-human primates or from humans exposed to pig organs, tissues, or cells that porcine endogenous retroviruses infect primate cells. Xenotransplantation is a potential answer to the current organ shortage. Its future depends on; 1) further genetic modification of pigs, 2) the introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents that target the innate immune system and plasma cells, and 3) the development of clinically-applicable methods to induce donor-specific tolerance.

The Influence of Baseline Expression of Human Decay Accelerating Factor Transgene on Graft Survival and Acute Humoral Xenograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Transgenic pigs expressing human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) have been widely used as donors in various non-human primate transplant models. Despite the use of similar immunosuppressive protocols, there is marked variation in graft survival among centres. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the level of hDAF expression in the pig kidney correlates with the degree of rejection and duration of graft survival.

METHODS

hDAF transgenic pigs were provided from two suppliers: Guelph Imutran Centre (G) and Harlan Sprague Dawley (H). Following a bilateral nephrectomy, a single hDAF pig kidney was implanted in the baboon, which was subsequently treated with conventional immunosuppressive protocols. The pig's contralateral kidney was collected to provide baseline data. The severity of acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR) was graded as stage I-III. hDAF expression was measured using morphologic analysis comparing the contralateral and grafted kidneys at the endpoint.

RESULTS

Baseline hDAF expression in kidneys from pigs provided by supplier G was significantly higher than that from supplier H (P<0.01). Furthermore, the survival of baboons receiving grafts from G pigs was significantly longer than those receiving grafts from H pigs (P<0.05). In addition, reduction of hDAF expression at the endpoint was associated with a higher degree of AHXR. Severe apoptosis or necrosis was found in grafts with AHXR II-III.

CONCLUSIONS

Pig kidneys from different suppliers have variable baseline hDAF expression, which may have an influence on graft survival. Reduced expression of hDAF in the terminal graft was associated with the severity of rejection.

Administration of GAS914 in an orthotopic pig-to-baboon heart transplantation model

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of transgenic cardiac xenografts is currently limited by a form of humoral rejection named acute vascular rejection. Preformed and elicited cytotoxic antibodies against Galalpha(1,3)Gal terminating carbohydrate chains, known as the primary cause of hyperacute rejection, are crucial for this process. We investigated whether GAS914, a soluble, polymeric form of a Galalpha(1,3)Gal trisaccharide would sufficiently minimize xenograft rejection of hDAF-transgenic pig hearts orthotopically transplanted into baboons.

METHODS

Orthotopic heart transplantations were performed using hDAF transgenic piglets as donors and four non-splenectomized baboons as recipients. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, sirolimus, ATG, steroids. In addition two animals received low-dose GAS914, and two animals high-dose GAS914. One of these baboons received high dose GAS914 and cyclophosphamide induction therapy. Serum levels of anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal IgM and IgG antibodies, and anti-pig antibodies were controlled daily by anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay and anti-pig hemolytic assays. Histomorphological (hematoxylin and eosin, elastic van Gieson) and immunohistochemical (IgM, IgG) evaluations were performed on tissue specimens.

RESULTS

Following low-dose GAS914 therapy survival time was 1 and 9 days, respectively. In baboons treated with high dosages of GAS914 a survival of 30 h and 25 days could be obtained. GAS914 caused an immediate and significant reduction of both anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal IgM and IgG antibodies. However, sufficient antibody reduction was independent of dosage and form of application of GAS914. A pre-transplant GAS914 treatment was not necessary to effectively reduce antibody levels and prevent hyperacute rejection. In the early postoperative period preformed anti-pig antibodies corresponded predominantly to anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal antibodies making them susceptible to GAS914. Subsequently, while anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal antibodies remained low, anti-pig antibodies increased despite of GAS914 application. Corresponding to increased anti-pig antibody titers depositions of IgM and IgG immunoglobulins were detected, which were possibly non-Galalpha(1,3)Gal-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Following orthotopic transplantation of hDAF-transgenic pig hearts into baboons, GAS914 is able to maintain a sufficient reduction of Galalpha(1,3)Gal-specific cytotoxicity to the graft. GAS914 therefore is able to prevent not only hyperacute rejection, but also acute vascular rejection at its beginning, when serum cytotoxicity to the pig heart appears to be predominantly Galalpha(1,3)Gal-specific. A sustained prevention of acute vascular rejection, however, still requires the identification of antibody specificities other than to Galalpha(1,3)Gal.