Liver transplantation in patients with portal thrombosis: results in 76 patients

Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PVT in LT outcomes and analyze the types of surgical techniques used for dealing with PVT during LT. A systematic review was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, selecting articles from January 1990 to December 2019. The MESH-terms used were ("Portal Vein"[Mesh] AND "Thrombosis"[Mesh] NOT "Neoplasms"[Mesh]) AND ("Liver Transplantation"[Mesh]). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendation was used, and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3 software. A total of 1,638 articles were initially found: 488 in PubMed, 289 in Cochrane Library, and 861 in EMBASE, from which 27 were eventually selected for the meta-analysis. Surgery time of LT in patients with PVT was longer than in patients without LT (p<0.0001). Intraoperative red blood cell (p<0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (p=0.01), and platelets (p=0.03) transfusions during LT were higher in patients with PVT. One-year (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; p=0.002) and 5-year (OR 1.12; p=0.01) patient survival after LT was worse in the PVT group. Total occlusive PVT presented higher mortality (OR 3.70; p=0.00009) and rethrombosis rates (OR 3.47 [1.18-10.21]; p=0.02). PVT Yerdel III/IV classification exhibited worse 1-year [2.04 (1.21-3.42); p=0.007] and 5-year [0.98 (0.59-1.62); p=0.93] patient survival. Thrombectomy with primary anastomosis was associated with better outcomes. LT in patients with non-tumoral PVT demands more surgical time, needs more intraoperative transfusion, and presents worse 1- and 5-year patient survival. Total occlusive PVT and Yerdel III/IV PVT classification were associated with higher mortality. (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020132915).

Liver transplantation in adults with portal vein thrombosis: Data from the China Liver Transplant Registry

OBJECTIVES

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. During liver transplantation (LT), PVT may complicate the procedure and lead to a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients enrolled in the China Liver Transplant Registry, to understand the influence of PVT to the LT recipients.

METHODS

We collected data from patients who underwent LT and were entered into the China Liver Transplant Registry. All data of medical records and follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative condition, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative early and late PVT, and survival rates were compared between patients with PVT and those without PVT. Multivariate Cox analysis and survival analysis were used to determine the influence of PVT.

RESULTS

A total of 20,524 cases were recruited into the study. In all, 1810 (8.82%) patients were diagnosed with preoperative PVT of various severities. All patients were followed up for an average of 30.25±33.25months (up to a maximum of 171.68months). Patients with PVT had a significantly longer operating time, more intraoperative blood loss and a higher rate of post-LT PVT (P<0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PVT did not reduce the recipients' survival rate (HR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.774-1.024, P=0.103). There was no significant difference in cumulative survival rate (P=0.059) between patients without PVT, and patients with PVT.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT increases the difficulty of LT, but doesn't reduce the survival rate. Therefore, PVT is not an absolute contraindication for LT in experienced transplantation centers.

Management of nonneoplastic portal vein thrombosis in the setting of liver transplantation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Nonneoplastic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is frequent in patients with cirrhosis who undergo liver transplantation (LT); however, data on its impact on outcome and strategies of management are sparse.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by analyzing studies that report on PVT in LT recipients and were published between January 1986 and January 2012.

RESULTS

Of 25,753 liver transplants, 2004 were performed in patients with PVT (7.78%), and approximately half presented complete thrombosis. Thrombectomy/thromboendovenectomy was employed in 75% of patients; other techniques included venous graft interposition and portocaval hemitransposition. Overall, the presence of PVT significantly increased 30-day (10.5%) and 1-year (18.8%) post-LT mortality when compared to patients without PVT (7.7% and 15.4%, respectively). However, only complete PVT accounted for this increased mortality. Rethrombosis occurred in up to 13% of patients with complete PVT and in whom no preventative strategies were used, and was associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT is common in patients with cirrhosis undergoing LT, and it affects survival when it is complete, at least in the short term after transplant. Therefore, screening for this condition is essential, alongside adequate treatment strategies to attempt repermeation of the PV and prevent thrombosis extension.

Long-term survival after portal vein arterialization for portal vein thrombosis in orthotopic liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis is a relatively common finding during liver transplantation. The management of portal vein thrombosis during liver transplantation is technically demanding and ensures adequate portal flow to the liver graft. Eversion thromboendovenectomy and bypass using a patent splanchnic vein and cavoportal hemitransposition are the most often used procedures to treat portal vein thrombosis. There have been anecdotal reports of portal vein arterialization. We report a case of portal vein arterialization during orthotopic liver transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis. When thromboendovenectomy failed to restore sufficient portal flow and completion of arterial anastomosis between the recipient hepatic artery and the donor celiac trunk, a calibrated end-to-side anastomosis between the donor splenic artery and the donor portal vein was performed. With a 6-year follow-up, there are no symptoms related to portal hypertension, liver function is normal. However, an aneurismal dilatation of the portal branches has progressively developed. Calibrated portal vein arterialization is a possible option for portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation, allowing long-term patient and graft survival.

Pre-existent portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: influence of pre-operative disease severity

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a surgical challenge in liver transplantation (LTx). In contrast to LTx in decompensated liver disease, which are associated with a higher morbidity and mortality, PVT influence on outcome is still under debate. To evaluate this influence at different stages of liver decompensation, we compared the outcome of patients suffering from PVT to patients with patent portal vein within different score ranges.

METHODS

We included 193 LTx (24 with PVT) in our study, transplanted between 2004 and 2007 at our institution. Patients were divided into four Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score groups, and outcome was compared between PVT- and non-PVT patients.

RESULTS

In non-decompensated liver disease (MELD <15), we found a significantly decreased survival in patients suffering from PVT (one-yr survival 57% vs. 89%). By contrast, MELD score >15 (decompensated liver disease) leads to an equal or even better survival in PVT-patients compared with patients without PVT (one-yr survival 91% vs.75%), with an only slightly increased morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Outcome in patients with PVT seems to be dependent on pre-operative disease severity. In contrast to compensated liver disease, no influence of PVT on outcome could be found in decompensated liver disease, and should therefore not be considered as a contraindication in LTx.

Liver transplantation in adult patients with portal vein thrombosis: risk factors, management and outcome

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a well recognized complication of patients with end-stage cirrhosis and its incidence ranges from 2 to 26%. The aim of this study was to analyze the results and long-term follow-up of a consecutive series of liver transplants performed in patients with PVT and compare them with patients transplanted without PVT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1995 and June 2006, 26 liver transplants were performed in patients with PVT (8.7%). Risk factors and variables associated with the transplant and the post-transplant period were analyzed. A comparative analysis with 273 patients transplanted without PVT was performed.

RESULTS

The patients comprised 53.8% males, average age 40, 7 years. PVT was detected during surgery in 65%. Indications for transplantation were: post-necrotic cirrhosis 73%, cholestatic liver diseases 23%, and congenital liver fibrosis 4%. Child-Pugh C: 61.5%. Techniques were trombectomy in 21 patients with PVT grades I, II, IV, and extra-anatomical mesenteric graft in 5 with grade III. Morbidity was 57.7%, recurrence of PVT was 7.7%, and in-hospital mortality was 26.9%. Greater operative time, transfusion requirements, and re-operations were found in PVT patients. One-year survival was 59.6%: 75.2% for grade 1 and 44.8% for grades 2, 3, and 4.

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrated a PVT prevalence of 8.7%, a higher incidence of partial thrombosis (grade 1), and successful management of PVT grade 4 with thrombectomy. Liver transplant in PVT patients was associated with an increased operative time, transfusion requirements, re-interventions, and lower survival rate according to PVT extension.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with and without cavernous transformation

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with portal vein thrombosis are limited.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with/without cavernomatous transformation.

METHODS

A survey of such patients, referred for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt between 1994 and 2005, was performed. Success rates, complications, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency and clinical progression were examined.

RESULTS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was attempted in 28 patients (13 cirrhotics). Indications were: presurgery/transplantation (2), worsening of ascites (2), variceal bleeding (15 - 8 elective), refractory ascites (3), portal biliopathy (3) and portal vein thrombosis complicating Budd-Chiari syndrome (2). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was placed successfully in 19 of 28 (73%); 23 of 28 had complete portal vein thrombosis and 9 of 23 had cavernous transformation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was successfully placed in six of these. In the 19 patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, the mean follow-up was 18.1 months (range 5-70): six patients had stent revisions; three had liver transplantation, one died of bleeding. Most cirrhotic patients had an improvement in the Child-Pugh score. In the failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group, two of nine died, and three had further bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt should be considered for selected patients with symptomatic complete portal vein thrombosis with/without cavernous transformation, as clinical improvement and less rebleeding occur when transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement is successful.

Portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation

In the initial experience of liver transplantation, complete thrombosis and portal vein occlusion were considered to be absolute contraindications for liver transplantation. The incidence of portal thrombosis in patients being prepared for transplantation varies between 5% and 15% according to published series. There are 2 surgical techniques to solve absent or low portal vein flow due to thrombosis. The most widely used technique is thrombectomy and the second technique is insertion of a shunt with a venous graft in the permeable portion of the superior mesenteric vein or in a vein in the splanchnic territory. Portal thrombosis recurrence rates vary among series, ranging from 0% to 25% or even 30%, depending on its extension and severity and also on time the transplantation was performed. Although overall survival is somewhat lower, there are no significant differences in most of the series when patients with portal thrombosis who underwent transplantation are compared with those without.

Portal vein arterialization for liver transplantation with extensive portomesenteric vein thrombosis: a case report

We report herein a case of extensive thrombosis of portal venous system including mesenteric vein in a 70-year-old man who suffered from end-stage post-hepatitis C cirrhosis and who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. There was no way to divert portal blood flow to the new liver because such an extensive thrombosis of portomesenteric venous system. There are some case reports of portocaval hemitransposition with some success but high mortality. We decided to arterialize the portal vein of the liver allograft with the recipient hepatic artery and the donor hepatic artery was anastomosed to the supraceliac aorta. He recovered slowly from the operation. At 1 year after the transplantation, he is doing well with perfect liver function tests. This case challenges our belief that portal blood flow is essential for the liver because of hepatotrophic factors.