1
|
Khajeh E, Ramouz A, Aminizadeh E, Sabetkish N, Golriz M, Mehrabi A, Fonouni H. Comparison of the modified piggyback with standard piggyback and conventional orthotopic liver transplantation techniques: a network meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00071-0. [PMID: 37120378 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In conventional orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), the recipient's retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) is completely clamped and replaced with the donor IVC. The piggyback technique has been used to preserve venous return, either via an end-to-side or standard piggyback (SPB), or via a side-to-side or modified piggyback (MPB) anastomosis, using a venous cuff from the recipient hepatic veins with partially clamping and preserves the recipient's inferior vena cava. However, whether these piggyback techniques improve the efficacy of OLT is unclear. To address the low quality of the available evidence, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of conventional, MPB, and SPB techniques. METHODS Literature was searched in Medline and Web of Science databases for relevant articles published until 2021 without any time restriction. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare the intra- and postoperative outcomes of conventional OLT, MPB, and SPB techniques. RESULTS Forty studies were included, comprising 10,238 patients. MPB and SPB had significantly shorter operation times and fewer transfusions of red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma than conventional techniques. However, there were no differences between MPB and SPB in operation time and blood product transfusion. There were also no differences in primary non-function, retransplantation, portal vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury, renal dysfunction, venous outflow complications, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, 90-day mortality rate, and graft survival between the three techniques. CONCLUSION MBP and SBP techniques reduce the operation time and need for blood transfusion compared with conventional OLT, but postoperative outcomes are similar. This indicates that all techniques can be implemented based on the experience and policy of the transplant center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Aminizadeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nastaran Sabetkish
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hamidreza Fonouni
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Z, Ju W, Chen C, Wang T, Yu J, Hong X, Dong Y, Chen M, He X. Application of various surgical techniques in liver transplantation: a retrospective study. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1367. [PMID: 34733919 PMCID: PMC8506559 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Surgical techniques of liver transplantation have continually evolved and have been modified. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center case series and compared the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Methods Six-hundred and seventy-four recipients’ perioperative data were assessed and analyzed stratified by different surgical technics [modified classic (MC), modified piggyback (MPB) and classic piggyback (CPB)]. Results MELD score and Child-Pugh scores was significantly higher in CPB groups (P=0.008 and 0.003, respectively). Anhepatic time in MPB group was longer than those in CPB group (P<0.05). The operation duration in MPB group was significantly longer than those in MC group and CPB group (P=0.003). Three patients had outflow obstruction (P=0.035). The overall survival in MPB group were better than those in MC group and CPB group in general comparison (P<0.001). In patients with preoperative creatine >120 µmol/L, the overall survival in MC group was worst (P<0.001). In patients with a high MELD score (>24), the overall survival in MPB group tended to be the best (P<0.001). Conclusions The advantages and disadvantages are different for these three surgical techniques. A reasonable operation technique should be adopted considering the patient's unique condition to ensure the stability of hemodynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhitao Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Weiqiang Ju
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Chuanbao Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Tielong Wang
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Yu
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xitao Hong
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuqi Dong
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Maogen Chen
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoshun He
- Organ Transplant Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Donation and Transplant Immunology, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology (Organ Transplantation), Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Obed M, Othman MI, Hammoudi S, Chattab MA, Jarrad A, Bashir A, Obed A. Living Donor Liver Transplant in Patients With Budd-Chiari Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience at Our University Hospital. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2020; 18:796-802. [PMID: 33349208 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2020.0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Budd-Chiari syndrome is an infrequent, but potentially fatal, hepatic condition with the clinical manifestation of obstructed venous drainage. This may lead to progressive hepatic congestion, portal hypertension, and, ultimately, liver failure. If medical, interventional, and surgical approaches are not effective, liver transplant offers a rescue modality. The primary objective of this study was to report the perioperative and, above all, the vascular challenges associated with living donor liver transplant in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed demographic and clinical characteristics of 6 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome who underwent living donor liver transplant at our transplant center from April 2004 to July 2020. We also evaluated all data regarding perioperative course, surgical outcome, and the postoperative follow-up period. RESULTS All patients displayed advanced liver disease with a Child-Pugh score C. The mean calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 32. The causes of Budd-Chiari syndrome were factor V Leiden thrombophilia in 1 patient, myeloproliferative disorder in 3 patients, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in 1 patient, and a protein C deficiency in 1 patient. The mean age of patients was 40 years. One of the 6 patients was female. All patients had living donor liver transplant from immediate kin according to Jordanian allocation rules. The mean graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 0.9, and the median follow-up period was 89 months. Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year-survival rates were 84%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Good survival rates are achievable with living donor liver transplant for patients with advanced Budd-Chiari syndrome, particularly by means of posterior cavoplasty for enlargement of the cava orifice. Therefore, in countries with insufficient deceased donor programs, such as Jordan, living donor liver transplant may be a lifesaving therapeutic possibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikal Obed
- From the Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Hepatobiliary/Transplant Unit Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pustavoitau A, Rizkalla NA, Perlstein B, Ariyo P, Latif A, Villamayor AJ, Frank SM, Merritt WT, Cameron AM, Philosophe B, Ottmann S, Garonzik Wang JM, Wesson RN, Gurakar A, Gottschalk A. Validation of predictive models identifying patients at risk for massive transfusion during liver transplantation and their potential impact on blood bank resource utilization. Transfusion 2020; 60:2565-2580. [PMID: 32920876 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative massive transfusion (MT) is common during liver transplantation (LT). A predictive model of MT has the potential to improve use of blood bank resources. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Development and validation cohorts were identified among deceased-donor LT recipients from 2010 to 2016. A multivariable model of MT generated from the development cohort was validated with the validation cohort and refined using both cohorts. The combined cohort also validated the previously reported McCluskey risk index (McRI). A simple modified risk index (ModRI) was then created from the combined cohort. Finally, a method to translate model predictions to a population-specific blood allocation strategy was described and demonstrated for the study population. RESULTS Of the 403 patients, 60 (29.6%) in the development and 51 (25.5%) in the validation cohort met the definition for MT. The ModRI, derived from variables incorporated into multivariable model, ranged from 0 to 5, where 1 point each was assigned for hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL, platelet count of less than 100 × 109 /dL, thromboelastography R interval of more than 6 minutes, simultaneous liver and kidney transplant and retransplantation, and a ModRI of more than 2 defined recipients at risk for MT. The multivariable model, McRI, and ModRI demonstrated good discrimination (c statistic [95% CI], 0.77 [0.70-0.84]; 0.69 [0.62-0.76]; and 0.72 [0.65-0.79], respectively, after correction for optimism). For blood allocation of 6 or 15 units of red blood cells (RBCs) based on risk of MT, the ModRI would prevent unnecessary crossmatching of 300 units of RBCs/100 transplants. CONCLUSIONS Risk indices of MT in LT can be effective for risk stratification and reducing unnecessary blood bank resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliaksei Pustavoitau
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole A Rizkalla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Promise Ariyo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Asad Latif
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - April J Villamayor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Steven M Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - William T Merritt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew M Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Benjamin Philosophe
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shane Ottmann
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Russell N Wesson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Allan Gottschalk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beal EW, Bennett SC, Whitson BA, Elkhammas EA, Henry ML, Black SM. Caval reconstruction techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5:41-57. [DOI: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2014] [Revised: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There are several caval reconstruction techniques currently in use for orthotopic liver transplantation. These include caval replacement or the conventional technique, performed with or without venovenous bypass, piggyback technique with anastomosis with two or three hepatic veins with or without cavotomy and modifications of the piggyback technique including end-to-side and side-to-side cavocaval anastomosis. There are few randomized controlled trials comparing the use of these techniques and our knowledge of their comparability is based on a few multi- and many single-center retrospective and prospective reviews. Although there are advantages and disadvantages for each technique, it is advisable that the surgeon perform the technique with which they have the most the experience and at which they are the most skilled as excellent outcomes can be obtained with any of the caval reconstruction options discussed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, Kashfi A, Hillebrand N, Müller SA, Encke J, Büchler MW, Schmidt J. A single-center experience of 500 liver transplants using the modified piggyback technique by Belghiti. Liver Transpl 2009; 15:466-74. [PMID: 19399735 DOI: 10.1002/lt.21705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Over the past 4 decades, the surgical techniques of liver transplantation (LTx) have permanently evolved and been modified. Among these, the modified piggyback (MPB) technique by Belghiti offers specific advantages. The objective of this study was to present our single-center experience with the MPB technique in 500 cases. Recipients' perioperative data were prospectively collected and evaluated. Postoperative and specific complications, stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit, and the mortality rate with cause of death were analyzed. Most recipients were classified as Child C (49.1%). For the patients who underwent LTx for the first time, alcoholic (23.9%) and viral (22.2%) cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (15.1%) were the prevalent indications. The overall median warm ischemia time, anastomosis duration, and operative time were 45, 108, and 320 minutes, respectively. The median intraoperative blood loss was 1500 mL. A venovenous bypass was never needed to maintain hemodynamic stability. Only in a few cases was temporary inferior vena cava clamping necessary. Most prominent surgical complications were hemorrhage, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Renal failure occurred in 6.2% of patients. The overall median stay in the intensive and intermediate care unit was 14 days. The mortality rates within 30 and 90 days were 6.3% and 13.3%, respectively. No technique-related death occurred. The MPB technique by Belghiti is a feasible and simple LTx technique. The caval flow is preserved during the anhepatic phase, and this minimizes the need for venovenous bypass or portocaval shunt. This technique requires only 1 caval anastomosis, which is easy to perform with a short anhepatic phase. To minimize the risk of outflow obstruction, attention should be paid by doing a wide cavocavostomy cranially to the donor inferior vena cava in a door-lock manner. This technique can be applied in almost all patients undergoing LTx for the first time and liver retransplantation as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mangus RS, Kinsella SB, Nobari MM, Fridell JA, Vianna RM, Ward ES, Nobari R, Tector AJ. Predictors of blood product use in orthotopic liver transplantation using the piggyback hepatectomy technique. Transplant Proc 2008; 39:3207-13. [PMID: 18089355 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2007] [Accepted: 09/02/2007] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has historically been associated with massive blood loss and hemodynamic instability related to the coexistence of varices, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and portal hypertension. Piggyback hepatectomy (PGB) is a technique increasingly utilized in OLT to avoid veno-venous bypass and vena cava clamping. This study evaluated the factors associated with blood loss and blood product requirement in PGB. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of the anesthesia preoperative and operative notes and computerized lab values for all adult cadaveric liver transplants over a 42-month period. These data were combined with the liver transplant database for analysis. Approximately 98% of the transplants were performed using a standard piggyback approach with no use of veno-venous bypass. RESULTS Data were included for all 526 transplants performed during this time period. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 1000 cc. Median transfusion requirement was 3 units packed red blood cells, 7 units fresh frozen plasma, and 6 units platelets. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that predictors of EBL were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, initial central venous pressure, and total anesthesia time. Predictors of PRBC useage were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, and anesthesia time. Postoperatively increased transfusion requirement was associated with increased length of hospital stay and lower 90-day and 1-year graft and patient survivals. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that PGB can be safely accomplished in nearly all liver transplant patients without venovenous bypass or vena cava clamping and with less warm ischemia, which may ultimately be associated with less perioperative morbidity and improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Mangus
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Section, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5250, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
[Significance and specificity of vascular anastomosis in liver transplantation -- our experience]. SRP ARK CELOK LEK 2007; 135:407-13. [PMID: 17929532 DOI: 10.2298/sarh0708407n] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transplantation is the method of choice in the treatment of terminal liver diseases with acute and structural damage of liver tissue and congenital liver diseases. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to determine specificity and significance of vascular anastomosis in liver transplantation by postoperative evaluation of vascular anastomosis function. METHOD The study included 16 patients with 16 liver transplantations and one re-do liver transplantation. In all patients, preoperative angiography and postoperative duplex sonographic and angiographic evaluation of vascular anastomosis were performed. RESULTS Preoperative angiographic evaluation did not reveal anomalies in liver blood vessels of transplant candidates. In one patient, we identified and angiographically confirmed stenosis on anastomosis of the hepatic artery on the 7th postoperative day. In another patient, we had artificial thrombosis of the hepatic artery branch due to the liver biopsy. CONCLUSION The successful performance of vascular anastomosis in liver transplantation is significant for adequate liver graft perfusion, good postoperative graft function and overall outcome of the liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Nyckowski P, Dudek K, Skwarek A, Zieniewicz K, Pawlak J, Patkowski W, Michałowicz B, Alsharabi A, Wróblewski T, Leowska E, Paczkowska A, Ołdakowska-Jedynak U, Paczek L, Krawczyk M. Results of liver transplantation according to indications for orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2003; 35:2265-7. [PMID: 14529909 DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00790-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the results of liver transplantation in patients with a variety of different indications. METHODS From 1989 to April 2003, 209 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTx) were performed on 196 patients, including 178 cases. The diagnoses were: PBC (n = 34); PSC (n = 13); elective postinflammatory cirrhosis in the course of hepatitis C (n = 29); hepatitis B (n = 16); postalcoholic cirrhosis (n = 23), autoimmune cirrhosis (n = 11); Wilson's disease (n = 6); cirrhosis of unknown etiology (n = 10); secondary biliary cirrhosis (n = 5); Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 6); and benign liver neoplasms (n = 7). RESULTS The 3-year survival rate in the group of patients transplanted electively was 74.1%. In other groups it was: PBC, 91.4%; PSC, 69.2%; hepatitis C, 69.6%; hepatitis B, 55.5%; postalcoholic cirrhosis, 80%; autoimmune cirrhosis, 81.8%; Wilson's disease, 57.1%; secondary biliary cirrhosis, 40%; Budd-Chiari syndrome, 66.6%; hemochromatosis, 100%; benign neoplasms of the liver, 87.5%; and liver cysts, 100%. CONCLUSIONS Results of liver transplantation were closely related to the urgency of the procedure. Better results were achieved in patients operated upon routinely compared with in those operated upon emergently (74.1% vs 50%). The best results of liver transplantation were achieved in patients transplanted on a routine basis with a diagnosis of PBC (91.4%), autoimmunologic cirrhosis (81.1%), postalcoholic cirrhosis (80%), or hemochoromatosis (100%). Patients with liver insufficiency due to hepatitis B and Wilson's disease have an increased risk of graft destruction, and the rate of survival in these patients is significantly lower than in other patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Nyckowski
- Department of General, Transplantation, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|