Induction therapy for adult small bowel transplant with Campath-1H

Intestinal Transplantation With Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) Induction for Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H [C1H]) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the CD 52 antigen that is present on the surface of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells and monocytes. We studied its application in intestinal transplantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of adult patients who underwent intestinal transplantation between December 1994 and May 2005. Group 1: non-C1H group (n = 39); group 2: C1H group (n = 37). C1H was administered as an induction immunosuppression in four doses (0.3 mg/kg), or in two doses (30 mg/kg). Tacrolimus levels were maintained at low level (5-10 ng/dL). No maintenance steroids were given.

RESULTS

One-year survival of group 1 and group 2 patients were 57% and 70%, respectively. This difference is not statistically significant. Of 37 patients in group 2, 21 are alive. The incidence of rejection was lower in group 2 (P < .005). Average current tacrolimus level is 6.97 +/- 3.98 ng/dL. Seventeen patients (81%) are steroid free, and 15 (71%) are maintained solely on tacrolimus. There was no graft versus host disease in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data suggest that C1H can provide effective immunosuppression for intestinal transplantation. Incidence of rejection was less with this regimen using low maintenance tacrolimus and minimal steroids.

Abrogation of the Alloreactive Responses of Cadaveric Donor Intestinal Lymphocytes by Intraoperative Campath-1H Exposure

A number of recent reports in clinical and experimental intestinal transplantation have suggested that the donor lymphocytes present in and around the gastrointestinal system are potent mediators of graft-versus-host (GvH) reactivity and that GvH responses may contribute to posttransplant morbidity. Therefore, we have tested the proliferative and cytotoxic capabilities of gut-associated lymphocytes from cadaveric donors obtained prerevascularization (pre-r) and about 6 hours postrevascularization (post-r) in recipients pretreated with Campath-1H antibody (alemtuzumab). Mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) were performed with lymphoid cells isolated from intestinal epithelial mucosa, lamina propria, and lymph nodes. The pre-r lymphocytes responded strongly to both the recipient and third-party alloantigenic stimulating cells. However, similar preparations from the post-r samples responded in MLR at significantly lower levels (P < .01). This post-r decrease in responsiveness was not observed in similar lymphocyte samples obtained from donors of recipients not treated with Campath-1H. Both the pre-r and post-r samples had similar flow cytometric profiles, suggesting that there was no receptor loss in these lymphoid tissues by the short-term 6-hour exposure to Campath-1H given to the recipient. Conversely, in preliminary experiments where the donor were treated with Campath-1H, it was observed that very few lymphocytes could be obtained from intestinal tissues (n = 3). These results suggested that Campath-1H treatment of the recipient could bring about a drastic reduction in an otherwise strong GvH reactivity by the donor intestinal immune cells.

Campath-1H immunosuppressive therapy reduces incidence and intensity of acute rejection in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Campath-1H, an anti-CD52 antibody, is being used at our institution as immunosuppression in multivisceral and intestinal transplantation. We reviewed the pathologic findings of 1696 small bowel allograft biopsies obtained in the first 250 days posttransplant from 78 patients who underwent isolated intestinal or multivisceral transplantation and received induction immunosuppression with Campath (n = 30) or Zenapax (n = 57). We found an overall reduced incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in patients receiving Campath (19.1%) compared with those on Zenapax (32.8%). The majority of Campath patients showed no rejection or was indeterminate for rejection over the period of measurement. The frequencies of mild and moderate ACR were approximately twice and three times more common, respectively, in Zenapax-treated patients. The mean grade of ACR in Campath patients compared with Zenapax patients was significantly lower (P <.01) during the first 6 weeks posttransplant. Thereafter, the grade of rejection in both patient groups showed fluctuation, with Zenapax patients sometimes having lower values (eg, at 2 to 4 months) than Campath patients. Patient and graft survival was not significantly different between the two groups. These data suggest that the incidence of ACR is significantly reduced with Campath during the first 2 months posttransplant, when compared with Zenapax. However, the incidence and intensity of ACR following this initial time period shows vacillation with both types of immunosuppression.

Transplantation of the abdominal wall

BACKGROUND

Closure of the abdomen in patients undergoing intestinal transplantation can be extremely difficult, if not impossible. We describe our initial experience with abdominal wall allotransplantation to facilitate abdominal closure.

METHODS

We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants in eight patients. The graft's blood supply was based on the inferior epigastric vessels left in continuity with the donor femoral and iliac vessels. Skin biopsies were undertaken randomly and when rejection was suspected. Vessel patency was monitored by doppler ultrasound.

FINDINGS

Six patients have survived, five of whom have intact, viable abdominal wall grafts. Two patients have had a clinically mild episode of acute rejection of the skin of the abdominal wall that resolved with corticosteroid therapy. No clinically apparent graft-versus-host disease has been noted.

INTERPRETATION

Transplantation of an abdominal wall composite allograft can facilitate reconstruction and closure of the abdominal compartment in intestinal transplant recipients with complex abdominal wall defects.