The impact of delayed graft function on graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation

Ten-year graft survival of deceased-donor kidney transplantation: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease that restores the patients' quality of life and reduces the morbidity and mortality rates induced by renal failure and its complications. However, after transplantation the organ and patient survival rates are important issues of interest in many centers worldwide.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This is a historical cohort study planned to determine the organ survival rate after kidney transplantation from deceased donor during a period of 10 years (March 1999-March 2009) in Shiraz Transplant Center, Namazi Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. We tried to clarify the probable contributory risk factors implicating in graft loss. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the survival rate. Log-rank test was used to compare survival curves, and Cox regression model to define the hazard ratio and for modeling of factors implicating in survival rate.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 37.54 +/- 28.6 months. Allograft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 9 years after kidney transplantation from deceased donor (calculated by Kaplan-Meier method) was found to be 93.7, 89.1, 82.1, and 80.1%, respectively. Duration of dialysis before operation and creatinine level at discharge were showed to be the most important factors influencing survival rate of renal allograft.

CONCLUSION

Overall long-term graft survival in our cohort is satisfactory and comparable with reports from large centers in the world. Duration of dialysis before operation and creatinine level at discharge are the only independent factors that could correlate with long-term graft survival in our cohort.

Maintaining urine production and early allograft function during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative oliguria and its impact on early postoperative allograft function have been expressed as potential concerns of laparoscopic kidney donation. We evaluated our ability to maintain adequate diuresis during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and its potential impact on early graft function compared with open donation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 98 laparoscopic and 80 open donor nephrectomies from 1999 to 2002. All laparoscopic donors received infusions of mannitol (grams of mannitol equaled patient weight in kilograms) and dopamine (2 to 3.0 microg/kg/min) throughout the pneumoperitoneum. All open donors received a single dose of mannitol (12.5 g). Multiple donor variables were compared, including operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative fluid administration (in milliliters per kilogram per hour), intraoperative urine production (milliliters per kilogram per hour), and change in creatinine at discharge. The postoperative recipient data were compared, including initial 24-hour urine output, 1-week creatinine level, 1-month creatinine level, and need for postoperative hemodialysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted in the donor groups with respect to age, weight, intraoperative fluid administration, or change in creatinine at discharge. The mean operative urine production was greater in the laparoscopic group at 5.22 mL/kg/hr than in the open group at 2.43 mL/kg/hr (P = 0.0001). The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower (P = 0.0001) for the laparoscopic donors (106.7 mL) than for the open donors (184.7 mL). No significant differences were seen among the recipient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mannitol and dopamine infusions during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provided superior intraoperative urine production in the donor and equivalent early graft function in the recipient compared with the open approach.