Comparison of tacrolimus with cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression in patients with hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in hepatitis C virus-infected patients after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Most liver transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), especially tacrolimus and cyclosporine, as immunosuppressant agents to prevent rejection. A controversy exists as to whether the outcomes of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant patients differ based on the CNIs used. This meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, especially cases of HCV recurrence in liver transplant patients with end-stage liver disease caused by HCV infection.

Methods

Related articles were identified from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase. Meta-analyses were performed for the results of homogeneous studies.

Results

Nine randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were included. The total effect size of mortality (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77–1.25, P = 0.87) and graft loss (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83–1.33, P = 0.67) showed no significant difference between the two groups irrespective of duration of immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation. In addition, the HCV recurrence-induced mortality (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.66–1.89, P = 0.69), graft loss (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.64–4.07, P  = 0.31) and retransplantation (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.48–4.09, P = 0.54), as well as available biopsies, confirmed that histological HCV recurrences (RR =  0.92, 95% CI: 0.71–1.19, P = 0.51) were similar.

Conclusion

These results suggested no difference in posttransplant HCV recurrence-induced mortality, graft loss and retransplantation, as well as histological HCV recurrence in patients treated with tacrolimus-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppresion.

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post liver transplantation: impact of choice of calcineurin inhibitor

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C is universal. After LT, hepatitis C is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. Furthermore, responses to antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are consistently sub-optimal. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) like cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus continue to dominate immunosuppressive regimens in this population; however, there is still uncertainty as to whether either offers an advantage in terms of patient outcomes. Although tacrolimus demonstrates improved efficacy in the general LT population, differences have begun to emerge between these agents regarding diabetogenic potential, antiviral activity, and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C. This review critically evaluates the existing literature, providing an overview of the reported differences, concluding that despite conflicting evidence, a potential benefit of CsA in patients with hepatitis C is supported by the data and warrants further investigation. Future studies examining the role of CNIs in hepatitis C virus-positive LT recipients are required to accurately examine the effects of CNIs on outcomes such as fibrosis progression, survival, and effects on response to antiviral therapy, to provide robust information that allows clinicians to make an informed choice concerning which CNI is best for their patients.

Hepatic stellate cell activation in liver transplant patients with hepatitis C recurrence and in non-transplanted patients with chronic hepatitis C

The pathogenic mechanisms of accelerated graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are not well established. The aim of the study was to assess whether a greater activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC), the major collagen-producing cells in the liver, can occur in these patients as compared to non-LT patients with chronic hepatitis C. We determined the amount of activated HSC by computer-based morphometric analysis of alpha-smooth muscle actin (alphaSMA)-positive cells and the hepatic TGFbeta(1) expression by immunohistochemistry in 46 LT patients with hepatitis C recurrence, 35 non-LT patients with chronic hepatitis C, and 16 controls. Hepatic alphaSMA and TGFbeta(1) expression was higher in LT patients with hepatitis C recurrence than in controls and was correlated with fibrosis stage and progression rate. No significant difference in alphaSMA and TGFbeta(1) expression was observed between LT and non-LT patients with hepatitis C, with the exception of a higher transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGFbeta(1)) expression in non-LT patients in the early stages of fibrosis. LT patients receiving cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus (FK) had a similar fibrosis progression rate and alphaSMA and TGFbeta(1) expression. In conclusion, the accelerated fibrosis observed in LT patients with hepatitis C recurrence does not seem to be related to a greater amount of activated HSC and TGFbeta(1) expression in the grafts of these patients as compared to non-LT patients with chronic hepatitis C. In LT patients, the amount of activated HSC and TGFbeta(1) expression correlated with fibrosis stage and progression, without any apparent influence of the type of calcineurin inhibitor administered.

Long-term outcomes in liver transplant patients with hepatic C infection receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine

Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may be a contributing factor to deteriorating patient and graft survival following liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV). In our multicenter, open-label LIS2T study, de novo liver transplant patients stratified by HCV status were randomized to cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Follow-up data were obtained in an observational study of 95 patients. Mean follow-up was 34 and 37 months, respectively, for cyclosporine-treated (n = 47) and tacrolimus-treated (n = 48) patients. In patients not receiving antiviral therapy, 22 of 31 given cyclosporine (72%) and 24 of 29 given tacrolimus (83%) had biochemical recurrence of HCV. In 68 patients with at least one biopsy, histological evidence of HCV-related hepatitis was present in 27 of 31 (87%) cyclosporine-treated patients and 37 of 37 (100%) tacrolimus-treated patients (P = .02, chi-square test). Three-year actuarial risk of fibrosis stage 2 was 66% with cyclosporine and 90% with tacrolimus; for fibrosis stage 3 or 4 it was 46% and 80%, respectively. Three graft losses were attributed to HCV recurrence in cyclosporine-treated patients and six in tacrolimus-treated patients. Tacrolimus may be associated with increased risk of histological HCV disease recurrence compared to cyclosporine.

Review article: hepatitis C virus and calcineurin inhibition after renal transplantation

The impact of hepatitis C virus on patient and graft survival after renal transplantation remains controversial. However, recent studies have given emphasis on the detrimental role of hepatitis C on long-term patient and graft survival after renal transplantation. Various mechanisms can promote the lower survival in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients, i.e. post-transplant diabetes mellitus, liver disease and infections. Novel evidence has been accumulated showing the inhibitory activity of ciclosporin on the hepatitis C virus replication rate in human hepatocytes; ciclosporin has been shown in vitro to suppress hepatitis C virus replication as effectively as interferon alpha. This effect has not been seen with tacrolimus and is separate from its immunosuppressive activity. Data from patients with normal kidney function or after bone marrow transplantation show that ciclosporin inhibits hepatitis C virus replication. It appears that the progression of liver fibrosis is slower in hepatitis C virus-positive liver transplant recipients treated with ciclosporin than tacrolimus. In contrast, the clinical outcome of hepatitis C in hepatitis C virus-positive patients after liver transplantation treated with ciclosporin vs. tacrolimus has given mixed results. No information after renal transplantation is available. Various parameters can promote the worsening of hepatitis C after renal transplantation but choice of calcineurin inhibition is one of the few risk factors that can potentially be modified by the physician. Prospective, comparative trials of ciclosporin and tacrolimus with large size and adequate follow-up after renal transplantation are in progress.

Infectious complications in organ transplant recipients with the use of calcineurin-inhibitor agent-based immunosuppressive regimens

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The rates and types of infections associated with conventional immunosuppression regimens comprising calcineurin-inhibitor agents, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine could be used to compare similar data with the use of novel immunosuppressive regimens in organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tacrolimus appears to be superior to cyclosporine in preventing rejection. The frequency and spectrum of infections in organ transplant recipients does not appear to be notably modified by the choice of calcineurin-inhibitor agents per se. A higher risk of cytomegalovirus and poorer outcomes associated with hepatitis C virus with cyclosporine in some studies may be related to a greater requirement of adjunctive immunosuppression with cyclosporine-based regimens. Potent immunosuppression with tacrolimus, however, particularly when combined with mycophenolate mofetil, is believed to be a significant contributor to a higher incidence of BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in recent years. Calcineurin-inhibitor agents possess in-vitro activity against a number of fungal pathogens. In the clinical setting, however, the immunosuppressive effect outweighs their antifungal activity.

SUMMARY

Calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens have been the mainstay of immunosuppression after organ transplantation for almost two decades. However, suboptimal long-term outcomes in transplant recipients have led to a growing interest in the use of calcineurin inhibitor agent-sparing regimens. Whether novel immunosuppressive agents with a more selective mechanism of action would lead to a further reduction in the risk of posttransplant infections remains to be discerned.

Retrospective analysis of the impact of immunosuppression on the course of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

In a substantial proportion of patients, recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (OLT) rapidly progresses to graft cirrhosis. The role of different immunosuppressive schemes is not well evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical course of 130 patients with recurrent hepatitis C after OLT was retrospectively analyzed. Mean trough levels of calcineurin inhibitors and cumulative doses of the remaining immunosuppressants were calculated. The results were compared with liver function tests, histological fibrosis progression, and survival.

RESULTS

Survival and fibrosis progression were similar in patients with tacrolimus and cyclosporine and did not correlate with mean trough levels. In contrast, the application of azathioprine (mean dose of more than 25 mg/d during the first 3 months after OLT) was associated with significantly less progression of fibrosis (P = .01). Administration of azathioprine after the early postoperative phase was not related to the long-term outcome. The dose of prednisolone in the long-term course after OLT significantly correlated with the rate of fibrosis progression (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical course of recurrent hepatitis C was variable. Survival and fibrosis progression did not correlate with the type or trough level of calcineurin inhibitors. Azathioprine early in the course after OLT and prolonged administration of prednisolone were associated with less fibrosis progression.

Immunosuppression and donor age with respect to severity of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation

In HCV cirrhotic patients after liver transplantation, survival and recurrence of HCV appears to be worsening in recent years. Donor age has been suggested as a cause. However, it is not clear if early and/or late mortality is affected and whether donor age is a key factor, as opposed to changes in immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to assess impact of donor age and other factors with respect to the severity of HCV recurrence posttransplant. A consecutive series of 193 HCV cirrhotic patients were transplanted with cadaveric donors, median age 41.5 years (13-73) and median follow-up of 38 months (1-155). Donor age and other factors were examined in a univariate/multivariate model for early/late survival, as well as fibrosis (grade 4 or more, Ishak score) with regular biopsies, 370 in total, from 1 year onwards. Results of the study indicated that donor age influenced only short-term (3 months) survival, with no significant effect on survival after 3 months. Known HCC independently adversely affected survival, as did the absence of maintenance azathioprine. Severe fibrosis (stage > or = 4) in 51 patients was related to neither donor age nor year of transplantation, but it was independently associated with combined biochemical/histological hepatitis flare (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.76-4.9) whereas maintenance steroids were protective (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23-0.83). In conclusion, in this cohort donor age did not influence late mortality in HCV transplanted cirrhotic patients or development of severe fibrosis, which was related to absence of maintenance steroids and a hepatitis flare. Maintenance azathioprine gave survival advantage.