Lung transplantation in patients under mechanical ventilation

Experience of the Reina Sofia hospital in lobar lung transplantation

The number of patients awaiting lung transplantation has steadily increased over the past decade, but the number of donors has remained relatively stable. Owing to the increasing scarcity of donor lungs, especially for pediatric and small adult recipients, advanced operative strategies for the use of larger grafts for smaller recipients have been developed. Size matching between donors and recipients represents one of the organ distribution criteria widely accepted by lung transplantation teams. However, in some cases it is not possible to allocate a donor to the corresponding size-compatible recipient. To avoid possible complications derived from the implantation of oversized lungs into smaller recipients, various methods of downsizing are applied for cadaveric donor lungs, such as lobar transplantation. We review our experience in 6 patients undergoing volume reduction of the lung graft by lobar resection at the time of transplantation. Graft volume reduction by anatomic resection (lobar transplantation) is a reliable and safe procedure to overcome size disparities between the donor and the recipient of a lung transplant, and thus to maximize the number of donors.

Lung transplantation for ventilator-dependent respiratory failure

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation of patients on mechanical ventilation is controversial, but successful transplantation of these patients has been reported. This report describes our institutional experience with lung transplantation of mechanically ventilated patients since 2003.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all adult patients who underwent transplantation between October 2003 and October 2007. The patients on mechanical ventilation before transplantation were compared with patients without mechanical ventilation before transplantation. Survival, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, post-transplant mechanical ventilation days, and primary graft function were analyzed.

RESULTS

Before transplantation, 15 patients received mechanical ventilation for a median of 20 days (range, 5-90 days); of these, 13 underwent transplantation, and 2 died waiting for transplantation. The control group comprised 70 patients. Time on the transplantation waiting list was significantly shorter for the study group vs the control group. The 2 groups did not differ in survival, post-transplantation hospital time, and primary graft dysfunction scores at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours after transplantation. Median time of mechanical ventilation after transplantation and median length of stay in the intensive care unit stay were longer in the study group.

CONCLUSION

The survival rate and post-operative clinical course of patients undergoing transplantation while receiving mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure suggest that these patients can be considered for lung transplantation. Despite a longer time on post-operative mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay, outcome is similar to that of other lung transplant candidates.

Pediatric Lung Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric lung transplantation (LT) was started in Spain in 1996 at our institution. We compare the results of pediatric LT with those in adult patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of LT patients from 1993 to 2003 included demographic donor and recipient data, pulmonary function, gas exchange parameters, complications, episodes of rejection and pneumonia, as well as survival. Patients were divided into 2 groups: pediatric (<16 years) and adult (>16 years) LT patients.

RESULTS

Of 165 LTs performed, 23 recipients were pediatric patients (10 boys, 13 girls; mean age, 11.9 +/- 2.9 years [range, 5-16 years]). The indications were cystic fibrosis (n = 21), pulmonary fibrosis (n = 1), and Kartagener syndrome (n = 1). The actuarial survival rate was 73%, 67%, and 62% at 1, 3, and 8 years post-LT in children, versus 67%, 56%, and 41% at 1, 3, and 8 years post-LT in adult patients (P = NS). Of the pediatric patients, 35% required mechanical ventilation preoperatively (P < .001). Pediatric patients showed a higher incidence of pneumonia (P < .01) and acute rejection episodes (P = .02) during the first month post-LT, and longer stays in the intensive care unit (P = .02). Pediatric patients displayed more immunosuppression-related adverse effects: diabetes (P = .04), neuropathy (P < .01), and hirsutism (P < .001). In children, arterial oxygen tension improved, from 51 mm Hg pre-LT to 93 mm Hg at 5 years post-LT. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved from 28% pre-LT to 84% at 5 years post-LT.

CONCLUSION

In children, LT is a high-risk procedure because of the critical status of these patients. However, the results of pediatric LT are similar to those in adults, but with better long-term survival.

Pulmonary Tailoring and Lobar Transplantation to Overcome Size Disparities in Lung Transplantation

Size matching between donors and recipients represents one of the organ distribution criteria widely accepted by lung transplant teams. However, in some cases it is not possible to allocate a donor to the corresponding size-compatible recipient. To avoid possible complications derived from the implantation of oversized lungs into smaller recipients, surgical procedures such as pulmonary tailoring and lobar transplantation have been advocated. We review our experience in 13 patients undergoing volume reduction of the lung graft at the time of transplantation, either by nonanatomical lung volume reduction or by lobar transplantation. There were no significant differences between lung-downsized patients and standard lung transplantation patients in terms of donor characteristics, surgical and postoperative complications, functional outcome, and survival. We conclude that downsizing the lung graft either by nonanatomical resection or lobar transplantation is safe and reliable to overcome size disparities between donor and recipients, with no additional morbidity and with similar early and midterm outcomes to those in standard lung transplants.

Long-Term Results of Lung Transplantation for Emphysema

INTRODUCTION

We sought to assess the differences between lung transplantation (LT) to treat emphysema, versus other pulmonary diseases.

METHODS

This retrospective review of lung transplantations (LTs) performed from October 1993 to September 2003, included donor and recipient demographic data, pulmonary function, oxygenation, postoperative complications, incidence of rejection and pneumonia, and survival.

RESULTS

Of 159 LTs performed the 39 transplanted to treat emphysema (24.4%), were in 33 men and 6 women of age 50.9 +/- 8.7 years (men, 25 to 65 years). There were differences between the emphysema vs other groups in terms of age (P < .001), gender (P = .001), need for bypass (P = .004), and immediate posttransplantation oxygenation index (P = .001). Perioperative mortality tended to be lower among patients with emphysema (2.7% vs 10.8%; P = .131). The incidences of complications and acute rejections was similar. Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, arterial oxygen tension, and arterial carbon dioxide tension improved significantly post-Tx. Actuarial survivals were 82%, 68%, and 63%, respectively, at 1, 3, and 7 years posttransplantation for emphysema patients vs 60%, 53%, and 42%, respectively, at 1, 3, and 7 years posttransplantation for non-emphysema patients (P = .049).

CONCLUSION

Lung transplantation in patients with emphysema offers good long-term survival, with significant improvement in functional status and low morbidity. The older age of emphysema patients was not associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.