Therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus: its contribution to optimal prescription

Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs: Analytical and clinical practices

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) play a key role in short-term patient survival together with very low acute allograft rejection rates in transplant recipients. Due to the narrow therapeutic index and large inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of ISDs, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed to dose adjustment for each patient (personalized medicine approach) to avoid treatment failure or side effects of the therapy. To achieve this, TDM needs to be done effectively. However, it would not be possible without the proper clinical practice and analytical tools. The purpose of this review is to provide a guide to establish reliable TDM, followed by a critical overview of the current analytical methods and clinical practices for the TDM of ISDs, and to discuss some of the main practical aspects of the TDM.

A simple and robust LC-MS/MS method for measuring sirolimus and everolimus in whole blood

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants sirolimus and everolimus is mandatory and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the preferred technology for the measurement. Due to the high hydrophobicity these analytes bind to reverse-phase columns tightly and need column heating to elute. Column heating not only requires extra instrument preparation but also causes permanent column damage if the heater is left on while elution pumps stop by the end of the run. The primary improvement in the current method was to elute the analytes at room temperature using special buffers. This new LC-MS/MS method has been validated for clinical use and offers improved simplicity and robustness by eliminating column heating yet with high sensitivity, precision and accuracy.

Mycophenolate mofetil enhances the negative effects of sirolimus and tacrolimus on rat kidney cell metabolism

Background and Purpose

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) per se is not known to have negative effects on the kidney. MMF alone or in combination with sirolimus, can be the basis of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free, kidney sparing drug protocols. However, long-term outcomes in patients on MMF/SRL seem to be inferior to those treated with regimens that include the CNI tacrolimus (TAC) due to an increased risk of allo-immune reactions. Interestingly, potential enhancement of the negative effects of SRL and TAC on the kidney by MMF has never been considered.

Experimental Approach

It was our aim to study the effects of TAC, SRL and MMF alone and evaluate their interactions when combined on the rat kidney. For this purpose we used a comprehensive molecular marker approach including measurements of urinary 8-isoprostane concentrations (oxidative stress marker) and changes of urinary metabolite patterns (¹H-NMR spectroscopy) and comparing these markers to renal function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR)) and morphologic alterations (histology).

Key Results

While MMF alone did not impact GFR, its interaction with SRL and TAC led to a significant decrease of rats’ renal function. The decline went in parallel with a significant increase in urinary isoprostane concentrations and an enhancement of negative effects on urinary metabolite patterns.

Conclusions

In broad summary, the present study showed that MMF may enhance the negative effects of TAC on kidney function and may even display nephrotoxic properties when combined with SRL.

Long-term evaluation of analytical methods used in sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring

Results of therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus blood concentrations are assay and laboratory dependent. This study compared performance over time of the IMx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) as part of a proficiency testing scheme. Pooled samples from sirolimus-treated patients and whole-blood samples spiked with known quantities of sirolimus were assayed monthly between 2004 and 2012. When results of pooled patient samples were compared with LC/MS/MS, the MEIA assay showed an overall mean percent bias of -2.3% ± 11.2% that, although initially positive, became increasingly negative from 2007 through 2009. The CMIA, which replaced the MEIA assay, had a mean percent bias of 21.9% ± 12.3%, remaining stable from 2007 through 2012. Similarly, for spiked samples, the MEIA showed an increasingly negative bias over time vs. LC/MS/MS, whereas CMIA maintained a stable positive bias. Based on comparison of immunoassay measurements on individual patient samples, CMIA values were more than 25% higher than MEIA values. These results highlight the importance of continued proficiency testing and regular monitoring of sirolimus assay performance. Clinicians must be aware of the methodology used and adjust target levels accordingly to avoid potential effects on efficacy and toxicity.

Everolimus and sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine have different effects on renal metabolism in the rat

Enhancement of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity by sirolimus (SRL) is limiting the clinical use of this drug combination. We compared the dose-dependent effects of the structurally related everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus (SRL) alone, and in combination with cyclosporine (CsA), on the rat kidney. Lewis rats were treated by oral gavage for 28 days using a checkerboard dosing format (0, 3.0, 6.0 and 10.0 CsA and 0, 0.5, 1.5 and 3.0 mg/kg/day SRL or EVL, n = 4/dose combination). After 28 days, oxidative stress, energy charge, kidney histologies, glomerular filtration rates, and concentrations of the immunosuppressants were measured along with ¹H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and gas chromatography- mass spectrometry profiles of cellular metabolites in urine. The combination of CsA with SRL led to higher urinary glucose concentrations and decreased levels of urinary Krebs cycle metabolites when compared to controls, suggesting that CsA+SRL negatively impacted proximal tubule metabolism. Unsupervised principal component analysis of MRS spectra distinguished unique urine metabolite patterns of rats treated with CsA+SRL from those treated with CsA+EVL and the controls. SRL, but not EVL blood concentrations were inversely correlated with urine Krebs cycle metabolite concentrations. Interestingly, the higher the EVL concentration, the closer urine metabolite patterns resembled those of controls, while in contrast, the combination of the highest doses of CsA+SRL showed the most significant differences in metabolite patterns. Surprisingly in this rat model, EVL and SRL in combination with CsA had different effects on kidney biochemistry, suggesting that further exploration of EVL in combination with low dose calcineurin inhibitors may be of potential benefit.

Kinetic nomograms assist individualization of drug regimens

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Therapeutic drug monitoring is applied to a range of drugs. To predict an appropriate dosing regimen, models based on Bayesian techniques have been used. However, this approach requires a well trained professional and sophisticated software. The objectives of this study were first to develop kinetic nomograms as a useful tool to achieve individual drug blood concentrations within the therapeutic window, using few samples and in a short period of time; and second to evaluate the performance of these nomograms in dosage adjustment and compare them with the Bayesian procedure by use of simulation.

METHODS

Kinetic nomograms involve collection of concentration-time profiles following repeated administrations of a fixed identification protocol and targeting of a steady-state concentration. The profiles divide the concentration-time space into several areas, each of them corresponding to a given adjusted drug dose. Kinetic nomograms are grounded on the statistical description of the interindividual variability provided by population pharmacokinetic approaches. To use them, the assayed drug concentration in a blood sample is first located in the kinetic nomogram and then the dose corresponding to the area containing this location is read. Evaluation of performance and comparison with the traditional Bayesian procedure were done by a simulation study using the immunosuppressant drug sirolimus (rapamycin). All calculations were performed by use of Matlab software.

RESULTS

The simulation study confirmed the need for individual dosage adjustment; 71.6% of individuals underwent modification of the identification protocol of 1 mg twice daily in order to reach steady-state trough concentrations of 8 ng/mL. When the regimens were adjusted by kinetic nomograms and the Bayesian procedure, the steady-state trough concentrations of sirolimus showed low variability (coefficients of variation [CVs] of 23.4% and 24.0%, respectively) as compared with those obtained by standard recommended protocols of 4 mg once daily (CV 68.6%). The doses adjusted by kinetic nomograms and the Bayesian procedure were linearly linked and highly correlated (r = 0.96), and both provided simultaneous control of minimum and maximum drug concentrations (63.9% and 68.7% of cases between 6 and 20 ng/mL, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Kinetic nomograms allow rapid and reliable dosage adjustment after the start of drug therapy. They are interesting alternatives to the cumbersome Bayesian procedure, and they provide dosage adjustment even for drugs that exhibit large intraindividual variability. In the clinical context, kinetic nomograms render individual dosage adjustment a simplified bedside application, and they could assist population studies aiming at dose individualization.

Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients

AIMS

This study was aimed at determining the population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and identifying factors that explain pharmacokinetic variability in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively extracted from a formal multicentre clinical trial, which was originally designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cyclosporin dose reduction and cyclosporin elimination in patients receiving sirolimus. All patients received 12-month treatment, i.e. induction therapy with cyclosporin, sirolimus and corticosteroids during the first 3 months followed by either cyclosporin dose reduction or cyclosporin discontinuation thereafter. Eight-hundred and four sirolimus trough blood concentrations (C(0)) from 112 patients were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using the NONMEM program. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was selected as the base model. The influence of demographic characteristics, biochemical and haematological indices, cyclosporin daily dose, cyclosporin C(0) as well as other commonly used co-medications were explored.

RESULTS

The typical values with interindividual variability for apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V/F) were 10.1 l h(-1) (23.8%) and 3670 l (56.7%), respectively. The residual variability was 29.9%. CL/F decreased significantly with silymarin or glycyrrhizin co-therapy in hepatically impaired patients, and with increasing total cholesterol levels or cyclosporin C(0). Moreover, CL/F increased nonlinearly with increasing sirolimus daily dose. The median parameter estimates from a nonparametric bootstrap procedure were comparable and within 5% of the estimates from NONMEM.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide important information for clinicians to optimize sirolimus regimens in Chinese renal transplant patients.

[Comparison of high-resolution liquid chromatography versus microparticle enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus levels in renal transplantation]

OBJECTIVE

To compare sirolimus levels measured in whole blood using two analytical techniques: high-resolution liquid chromatography and microparticle enzyme immunoassay, and to evaluate whether hemoglobin, hematocrit, and time from kidney transplantation influence results obtained using the immune-enzymatic technique.

METHOD

A retrospective, observational study in which all transplanted patients with at least one measurement of sirolimus levels using high-resolution liquid chromatography or microparticle enzyme immunoassay from October 2004 to May 2005 were consecutively included. For statistical comparisons simple linear regression, ANCOVA, intra-class correlation coefficient, and the method of agreement limits were all used.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were assessed for a total of 307 measurements (median: 2, inter-quartile range: 1-4, range: 1-15) of sirolimus levels. The straight-line equation using the linear regression analysis was as follows: MEIA = 0.70 (95% CI: 0.39-1.01) + 1.14 (95% CI: 1.10-1.17) x HPLC/UV. The intra-class correlation coefficient between both measurements was 0.955 (95% CI 0.944-0.964). Mean overestimation using enzyme immunoassay was 24.8% +/- 19.4%. Difference in means between both measurements was 1.9 +/- 1.3 ng/mL. Agreement limits were established between -0.8 ng/mL (95% CI: -1.05; -0.55) and +4.6 ng/mL (95% CI: 4.35; 4.85). Factors such as post-transplant time, hemoglobin, and hematocrit did not influence overestimates obtained using enzyme immunoassays. These results were not influenced by non-independence in measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enzyme immunoassay overestimates in establishing sirolimus levels in whole blood, its correlation with chromatography is acceptable. Added to its benefits versus chromatographic techniques, this renders enzyme immunoassay a good alternative for the measurement of sirolimus levels in whole blood.

Multi-center evaluation of analytical performance of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay for sirolimus

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the analytical characteristics of the new Abbott microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for sirolimus.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The protocol consisted of nine sections: evaluation of antibody specificity, linearity, detection limit, quantification limit, endogenous interferents, exogenous interferents, precision, proficiency testing panel, and method comparison.

RESULTS

The mean analytical detection limit was 0.68 microg/L. The sirolimus concentration corresponding to a total CV of 20% was 1.5 microg/L. Linearity of response was demonstrated across the dynamic range of the assay. Total precision (CVs) at QC control levels from 5 to 22 microg/L ranged from 5.7 to 12.6%. Assay standardization was found to be in good agreement with LC/MS/MS as compared with target values for spiked sirolimus proficiency samples from an international sirolimus proficiency testing program. Good correlations (R values) of the immunoassay were observed in comparisons to LC/MS/MS. R values tended to be lower in comparisons with LC/UV methods. Across both LC-based methods and all study sites, there was approximately 25% overall positive slope bias due to cross reactivity of the MEIA antibody to metabolites of sirolimus. The assay cross-reactivity to metabolites of sirolimus parent drug ranged from 6 to 63%. Assay interferences were minimal with the exception of hematocrit, which presented a negative relationship to measured sirolimus concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

The MEIA demonstrated acceptable analytical characteristics for use for routine monitoring of sirolimus immunosuppressive therapy, and is a viable alternative to HPLC-based methods for sirolimus monitoring.

Sirolimus: the evidence for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring

This review seeks to apply a decision-making algorithm to establish whether clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring (CPM) of sirolimus (rapamycin) in solid organ transplantation is indicated in specific patient populations. The need for CPM of sirolimus, although a regulatory requirement in Europe, has not yet been firmly established in North America and other parts of the world. Sirolimus has demonstrated immunosuppressive efficacy in renal, pancreatic islet cell, liver and heart transplant recipients. The pharmacological response of immunosuppressive therapy with sirolimus cannot be readily evaluated; however, a relationship between trough blood sirolimus concentrations, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the incidence of rejection has been proposed. Furthermore, sirolimus can be measured in whole blood by several assays--high-performance liquid chromatography with detection by tandem mass spectrometry, or with ultraviolet detection, radioreceptor assay or microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Both experimental animal and clinical data suggest that adverse events and their associated severity are correlated with blood concentrations. To prevent rejection and minimise toxicity, a therapeutic range of 4-12 microg/L (measured via chromatographic assays) is recommended when sirolimus is used in conjunction with ciclosporin. If ciclosporin therapy is discontinued, a target trough range of 12-20 microg/L is recommended. Sirolimus pharmacokinetics display large inter- and intrapatient variability, which may change in specific patient populations due to disease states or concurrent immunosuppressants or other interacting drugs. Due to the long half-life of sirolimus, dosage adjustments would ideally be based on trough levels obtained more than 5-7 days after initiation of therapy or dosage change. Once the initial dose titration is complete, monitoring sirolimus trough concentrations weekly for the first month and every 2 weeks for the second month appears to be appropriate. After the first 2 months of dose titration, routine CPM of sirolimus is not necessary in all patients, but may be warranted to achieve target concentrations in certain populations of patients, but the frequency of further monitoring remains to be determined and should be individualised.

Sirolimus: Its role in nephrology (Review Article)

Sirolimus (Rapamycin, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd, Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia) (SRL) has received increasing attention as an immunosuppressant in renal and other solid organ transplantation. Sirolimus is the first marketed agent in a new class of drugs with a novel mechanism of action. Sirolimus binds, like tacrolimus, to a member of the FK binding protein (FKBP) family. The SRL/FKBP complex binds to the protein kinase mTOR. Binding to mTOR blocks activation of signal transduction pathways causing arrest of the cell cycle in the G1 phase. It is now known that mTOR is a central regulator of cell growth and proliferation. The immunosuppressive properties of SRL are due primarily to blockade of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-induced proliferation of T cells. There is still much to be learnt about how best to use the drug. The key advantage over the current choice of immunosuppressive agents is the ability to preserve renal function and pathology while producing excellent rejection-free, graft survival rates. Thus, SRL may find its pivotal role as a calcineurin inhibitors replacement in patients whose grafts are affected by chronic allograft nephropathy. A second major driver for use may prove to be the impact of SRL on cancer incidence and prognosis. Studies still need to be performed to evaluate the best timing for commencement of SRL and the optimal dosage to minimize side-effects.

Immunosuppressive drug monitoring - what to use in clinical practice today to improve renal graft outcome

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressive therapy is becoming an increasingly complex matter as the number of compounds and their respective combinations are continuously expanding. Unfortunately, in clinical practice, monitoring predose trough blood concentrations is often not sufficient for guiding optimal long-term dosing of these drugs. The excellent short-term results obtained nowadays in renal transplantation confer a misleading feeling of safety despite the fact that long-term results have not substantially improved, definitely not to a point where longer graft survival could counteract the increasing need for transplant organs and less toxicity and side-effects could ameliorate patient survival. It is therefore a challenging task to try to tailor immunosuppressive drug therapy to the individual patient profile and this in a time-dependent manner. For the majority of currently used immunosuppressive drugs, measurement of total drug exposure by determination of the dose-interval area under the concentration curve (AUC) seems to provide more useful information for clinicians in terms of concentration-exposure and exposure-response as well as reproducibility. To simplify this laborious way of measuring drug exposure, several validated abbreviated AUC profiles, accurately predicting the dose-interval AUC, have been put forward. Together with an increasing knowledge of the time-related pharmacokinetic behaviour of immunosuppressive drug and their metabolites, studies are focusing on how to apply abbreviated AUC sampling methods in clinical transplantation, taking into account the numerous factors affecting drug pharmacokinetics. Eventually, TDM using abbreviated AUC profiles has to be prospectively tested against classic methods of drug monitoring in terms of cost-effectiveness, feasibility and clinical relevance with the ultimate goal of improving patient and graft survival.

A microparticle enzyme immunoassay to measure sirolimus

Measurement of sirolimus as a guide to therapy is widely accepted. Since the commercial introduction of the drug, the only method available to measure blood concentrations has been high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Only a limited number of centers have the facilities to perform this technique and, as a result, the measurement of the drug has been performed in central laboratories, often some distance from the clinical centers. This article describes a single-center assessment of a new immunoassay to measure sirolimus, including a comparison between immunoassay results and a chromatographic technique. Calibration accuracy was good, reproducibility at 11 ng/mL was better than 6%, and sensitivity was better than 2 ng/mL; all these parameters are appropriate for routine clinical use. There was a mean positive bias of almost 20% for the measurement of sirolimus in clinical samples from kidney transplant patients receiving the drug, compared with HPLC. This bias was most likely due to cross-reactivity with metabolites of the drug and was of the order noted when an earlier configuration of this immunoassay was used in clinical practice. We conclude that, despite the analytical bias, this immunoassay offers a viable alternative to the use of HPLC and would be an assay suitable for implementing at local centers.

Determination of rapamycin: quantification of the sodiated species by an ion trap mass spectrometer as an alternative to the ammoniated complex analysis by triple quadrupole

Rapamycin is a potent immunosuppressive drug capable of significantly reducing acute graft rejection in kidney, liver and heart transplant patients. Its immunosuppressive activity and adverse effects have been related to rapamycin concentration, and therapeutic drug monitoring of the drug is deemed appropriate. This work was aimed at developing a new quantification method based on the isolation of the [M+Na]+ ion as precursor and its further fragmentation through an ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source. A limit of detection (LOD) of 0.7 ng/mL was obtained, while the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 2.4 ng/mL. The accuracy and reproducibility of the responses were evaluated and compared with results obtained when the [M+NH4]+ ion was chosen as the precursor in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. In this case the LOD was 0.5 ng/mL and the LLOQ 1.7 ng/mL. Data showed that it would be possible to use the quantification of the sodiated species for the routine determination of rapamycin, as an alternative to the commonly adopted method based on the ammoniated complex.

The relative proportions of sirolimus metabolites in blood using HPLC with mass-spectrometric detection

Measurement of sirolimus in blood as a guide to dose adjustment is an accepted practice. To date, most data have resulted from the use of a chromatographic technique. With the imminent introduction of an immunoassay into this field, there is a need to know whether metabolites that could interfere with the performance of this assay, causing a bias compared with measurements made by a chromatographic assay, vary over a period of time or with changes in concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. This preliminary study measured several sirolimus metabolites in blood samples from a variety of clinical settings, using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass-spectrometric detection. Two metabolites known to cross-react in one immunoassay system, single hydroxylation products and 41-O-demethyl rapamycin, were found to constitute the bulk of the metabolic products. They were also found to form a remarkably stable proportion of all metabolites measured, both with respect to the time since transplantation and the concomitant use of cyclosporine or tacrolimus. It is concluded that the analytical bias due to cross-reactivity with metabolites, inherent in this immunoassay, should be consistent across a wide spectrum of patients receiving the drug.

Therapeutic monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs. Where are we?

The emergence of specific immunosuppressive drugs (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus) during the last two decades has contributed dramatically to the success of organ transplantation. However, optimum balance between therapeutic efficacy and the occurrence of side effects has been a real challenge for physicians, mainly due to inter- and intra-patient variability arising from pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic individual properties. Therapeutic drug monitoring, defined as the measurement and interpretation of concentrations of these drugs in biological fluids, with as a final objective the prediction of organ responses, became an integral part of transplant protocols. New analytical techniques became available with different performances in terms of specificity and sensitivity. In addition, there has been progress in understanding the mechanisms of action of these drugs that have implications for the development of better monitoring strategies and for their coprescription. The purpose of this review is to examine the current strategies in use for the therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs and to discuss some of the factors that impinge on the monitoring of these drugs.