Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil for minimizing acute rejection risk in renal transplant recipients--a single center experience

Sirolimus and tacrolimus coefficient of variation is associated with rejection, donor-specific antibodies, and nonadherence

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppression medication nonadherence has been associated with donor-specific antibodies and treatment-refractory rejection. Drug-level monitoring is a practical direct marker for nonadherence, as variations indicate erratic ingestion of medication. We previously reported that high variability in tacrolimus trough levels determined by the percent coefficient of variation (CV %) and standard deviation (SD) were associated with biopsy-proven rejection. We hypothesized that the CV % and SD in patients on a sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus regimen may associate with self-reported medication nonadherence, rejection and donor-specific antibodies.

METHODS

In this pilot feasibility study, we studied 37 biopsies in 23 pediatric renal transplant patients on both sirolimus and tacrolimus immunosuppression; CV %, SD, de novo donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and self-reported adherence were examined.

RESULTS

A cut-off sirolimus CV % of 25 maximized the percentage of biopsies correctly classified as rejection (32 of 37, or 86 %, p = 0.001). A cut-off tacrolimus CV % of 31 maximized the percentage of correctly classified biopsies (25 of 37, or 68 %, p = 0.09). Among patients with both high sirolimus and tacrolimus CV %, 67 % developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (p = 0.002) with a DQ predominance and 71 % reported nonadherence (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric renal transplantation, sirolimus and tacrolimus CV % is a potential tool for monitoring patients at risk for allograft rejection and donor-specific antibodies secondary to medication nonadherence.

mTOR inhibitors in pediatric kidney transplantation

The mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus are increasingly being used in pediatric kidney transplantation in different combinations and doses. Several studies have shown beneficial effects of using mTOR inhibitors in children after pediatric renal transplantation. A switch to a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mTOR inhibitor has been proven to stabilize the glomerular filtration rate. Additionally, de novo studies using a low-dose CNI and an mTOR inhibitor have shown good graft survival and a low number of rejections. Side effects of mTOR inhibitors, such as hyperlipidemia, wound healing problems, and proteinuria, mainly occur if high doses are given and if treatment is not combined with a CNI. Lower doses of mTOR inhibitors do not result in growth impairment or reduced testosterone levels. Treatment with mTOR inhibitors is also associated with a lower number of viral infections, especially cytomegalovirus. Due to their antiproliferative effect, mTOR inhibitors could theoretically reduce the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. mTOR inhibitors, especially in combination with low-dose CNIs, can safely be used in children after kidney transplantation as de novo therapy or for conversion from CNI- and mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens.

Sirolimus in pediatric renal transplantation

SRL, an mTOR inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression, represents an important alternative to CNIs, which are still the cornerstones of pediatric solid organ tx. Because there are still limited data on SRL use among pediatric solid organ recipients, further studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of SRL. It has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics concerning dosing intervals and reduction of the dose in combination with other immunosuppressants. SRL also has antineoplastic, antiviral, and antiatherogenic advantages over other immunosuppressive agents. The adverse effects of SRL including thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, proteinuria, impaired wound healing, mouth ulcers, edema, male hypogonadism, TMA, and interstitial pneumonitis must be considered carefully in pediatric population. This article reviews the most recent data on SRL application in the field of pediatric renal tx.

Tacrolimus combined with two different dosages of sirolimus in kidney transplantation: results of a multicenter study

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective regimen in kidney transplantation. This study compared the efficacy of combining tacrolimus and two different dosages of sirolimus with an established tacrolimus-MMF regimen. Each day in addition to tacrolimus, 325 patients received 2 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL2 mg), 325 patients received 0.5 mg sirolimus (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 327 patients 1 g MMF (TAC-MMF). The initial tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day. Sirolimus patients received loading doses of 6 or 1.5 mg, and daily doses of 2 or 0.5 mg thereafter. Steroid administration was identical for all groups. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (15.7%) compared with the TAC-SRL0.5 mg (25.2%, p = 0.003) and the TAC-MMF groups (22.3%, p = 0.036). Six-month graft survival was 91.0% (TAC-SRL2 mg), 92.6% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 92.4% (TAC-MMF); the respective values for patient survival were 98.1%, 97.8% and 97.9%. Thirty-four patients (10.5%), 19 patients (5.8%) and 16 patients (4.9%) in the TAC-SRL2 mg, TAC-SRL0.5 mg and TAC-MMF groups, respectively, discontinued the study because of adverse events. Hyperlipemia was reported more often in the TAC-SRL2 mg group (24.0%) compared with 19.4% (TAC-SRL0.5 mg) and 11.0% (TAC-MMF; p < 0.05). Combining 2 mg sirolimus/day with tacrolimus results in lower rates of acute rejection, but a higher incidence of adverse events.

Outcome of renal transplants from pediatric donors <5 yr of age

AIM

Outcomes of single renal transplants from donors <5 yr old have traditionally been inferior to those from older donors. We retrospectively studied our experience with patients who received renal transplants, either individually or en bloc, from young donors (<5 yr of age) to determine the utility of these organs. We also compared the outcomes of these transplant patients maintained on either cyclosporine- (CyA) or tacrolimus-based (TRL) immunosuppression regimens.

PATIENTS

Ninety-eight patients received transplants at our center from donors <5 yr of age between August 1993 and August 2003. They were followed-up from 12 months to 11 yr. Patients were divided into four groups based on whether they received single or en bloc transplants, and whether CyA or TRL was the base immunosuppressive agent. Patients in group I (n = 13) received single pediatric kidneys and were treated with CyA regimens; group II patients (n = 26) also received single pediatric kidneys, but were treated with TRL regimens; group III patients (n = 31) were transplanted en bloc and were treated with CyA; and group IV patients (n = 28) received en bloc transplants and were treated with TRL.

RESULTS

One-year patient and death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between recipients of en bloc vs. single grafts (i.e. 88 and 85% vs. 90 and 87%, respectively), or between the four treatment groups (group I: 85 and 85%, group II: 92 and 88%, group III: 87 and 84%, and group IV: 89 and 86%, respectively). The overall 1-yr rejection rate was 30% (29 of 98), which was significantly higher in the CyA-treated patients 19 of 44; i.e. 43%, than in TRL-treated patients 10 of 54, i.e. 19%, p = 0.03). In the en bloc recipients, seven grafts (12%) were lost as a result of vascular thrombosis. Notably, none of the single kidneys were lost because of vascular thrombosis. At the end of follow-up the creatinine levels of both groups were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric donor kidneys transplanted individually provide for equal patient and graft survival when compared with en bloc transplants. TRL can be used reduce the detrimental effect of acute rejection on graft growth and function when compared with CyA. Single use of such kidneys can safely and efficaciously be transplanted into adult recipients, greatly expanding the donor pool.