Comparison of C0 and C2 cyclosporine monitoring in long-term renal transplant recipients

Association Between Blood and Lymphocyte Levels of Cyclosporin A and Infectious Complications in Renal Transplant Patients

Objectives

This study aims to investigate a potential association between whole blood and lymphocyte Cyclosporin A (CyA) levels and the occurrence and frequency of infectious complications in kidney transplant patients.

Methods

The study involves 130 kidney transplant recipients who received CyA in addition to Mycophenolate Mofetil and steroids. CyA whole blood trough and maximum level (CyA BL₀ and CyA BLm) as well as the corresponding levels in the lymphocytes (CyA L₀ and CyA Lm) were measured for 6 months post-transplantation.

Results

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) as well as urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most commonly diagnosed with an incidence of 24.6% and 26.2%, respectively. Only CyA L₀ showed a significant association with CMV infection occurrence (adjusted OR = 1.051, 95% CI .997–1.025, P-value 0.046). A positive linear correlation was found between CyA BL₀, CyA BLm and CyA Lm and the number of CMV episodes per patient.

Conclusion

We showed an association between the CMV infections occurrence and the trough lymphocyte level of CyA (CyA L₀). Both lymphocyte CyA levels also correlated with the frequency of CMV infections. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal range of both CyA blood and lymphocyte levels and decrease the risk of opportunistic infections in high risk patients.

Association of MDR1, CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms with cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of MDR1, CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on cyclosporine A (CsA) pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant patients during the first month after transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 103 renal transplant recipients receiving CsA were genotyped for MDR1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, and C3435T), CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3. The predose and 2-h postdose concentrations of CsA (C(0) and C(2), respectively) were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and their relationships with corresponding genotypes and haplotypes were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients with a CYP3A4*1/*1 genotype were found to have a higher dose-adjusted concentration compared with those with CYP3A4*18B/*18B, as follows: for C(2), 19.3% (P = 0.008) during days 8-15, 35.2% (P = 0.008) during days 16-30, and for C(0), 39.7% (P = 0.012) during days 16-30. The dose-adjusted C(0) was higher in patients with MDR1 1236CC compared with those with 1236TT in the first month postoperation. The dose-adjusted C(0) in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype was 25.5% and 30.7% higher than those with the wild-type genotype during days 8-15 (P = 0.011) and days 16-30 (P = 0.015), respectively. Haplotype analysis revealed that the dose-adjusted C(0) was higher in the first month following surgery in carriers of haplotype MDR1 CAC than in noncarriers. Polymorphisms of MDR1 and CYP3A5*3 did not affect dose-adjusted C(2.)

CONCLUSION

The data suggests that the CYP3A4*18B genotype affects CsA pharmacokinetics during the first month following surgery in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Patients with CYP3A4*18B alleles may require higher doses of CsA to reach the target levels. Large prospective studies may be needed to further explore the impact of MDR1 and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on CsA pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.

Association of MDR1, CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms with cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of MDR1, CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3 genetic polymorphisms on cyclosporine A (CsA) pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant patients during the first month after transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 103 renal transplant recipients receiving CsA were genotyped for MDR1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, and C3435T), CYP3A4*18B, and CYP3A5*3. The predose and 2-h postdose concentrations of CsA (C(0) and C(2), respectively) were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and their relationships with corresponding genotypes and haplotypes were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients with a CYP3A4*1/*1 genotype were found to have a higher dose-adjusted concentration compared with those with CYP3A4*18B/*18B, as follows: for C(2), 19.3% (P = 0.008) during days 8-15, 35.2% (P = 0.008) during days 16-30, and for C(0), 39.7% (P = 0.012) during days 16-30. The dose-adjusted C(0) was higher in patients with MDR1 1236CC compared with those with 1236TT in the first month postoperation. The dose-adjusted C(0) in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype was 25.5% and 30.7% higher than those with the wild-type genotype during days 8-15 (P = 0.011) and days 16-30 (P = 0.015), respectively. Haplotype analysis revealed that the dose-adjusted C(0) was higher in the first month following surgery in carriers of haplotype MDR1 CAC than in noncarriers. Polymorphisms of MDR1 and CYP3A5*3 did not affect dose-adjusted C(2.)

CONCLUSION

The data suggests that the CYP3A4*18B genotype affects CsA pharmacokinetics during the first month following surgery in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Patients with CYP3A4*18B alleles may require higher doses of CsA to reach the target levels. Large prospective studies may be needed to further explore the impact of MDR1 and CYP3A5*3 polymorphisms on CsA pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.

Clinical outcome after cyclosporine dose reduction based on C2 levels in long-term liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that cyclosporine dose adjustment based on C2 levels results in improvement of renal function. This study investigates the effect on renal function after dose reduction based on the C2 levels in long-term liver transplant patients.

METHODS

In 60 patients (>1 yr after transplantation), C2 levels were assessed (target 600 ng/mL +/- 20%). Dose reduction was performed when C2 >720 ng/mL. Serum creatinine concentrations were measured and creatinine clearance was calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (38%) had C2 values >720 ng/mL. After dose reduction, mean cyclosporine dose decreased by 25% (p < 0.01). Mean C2 value decreased by 42% (p < 0.01). Serum creatinine concentrations remained stable. After dose reduction two patients experienced recurrence of PBC, in one patient AIH recurred and rejection was diagnosed in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Cyclosporine C2 concentrations above 720 ng/mL are common in long-term liver transplant patients. Dose reduction of 25% did not improve kidney function and was accompanied by immune activation.

Two-Hour Postdose Concentration: A Reliable Marker for Cyclosporine Exposure in Adolescents With Stable Renal Transplants

In pediatric renal transplant recipients, most patients receive maintenance treatment with cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Until now, the 2-hour postdose CsA target level for combined maintenance treatment with MMF has not been defined. This prospective pilot study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of CsA under the influence of MMF to determine a reliable single CsA concentration time that correlates with the area under the curve (AUC(0-6h)) estimates for adolescents who were additionally treated with MMF during the late posttransplant period. The study included 13 adolescents (mean posttransplantation time, 3.5 +/- 2.55 years) with stable renal transplant function (S-Crea 121 +/- 40 micromol/L). CsA pharmacokinetic absorption profiles over a 6-hour dose interval (n = 26) were evaluated for the optimal single peak concentration using the CsA concentrations predose (C0) and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours postdose (C1-6). Whereas C2 (mean 743.2 +/- 221.8 ng/mL) was the single point with the closest correlation to AUC(0-6h) (r2 = 0.86; P < .001), C0 (mean 120.5 +/- 35.2 ng/mL) showed the weakest correlation (r2 = 0.61, P = .002). C2 appears to be an accurate predictor of CsA exposure in adolescent kidney transplant recipients under maintenance immunosuppression in combination with MMF. Average values achieved with current dosing practices cluster around the target C2 ranges recommended for adults. The data provide a foundation for initiation of prospective clinical trials to assess the long-term risk for chronic allograft dysfunction among pediatric stable renal transplant patients in combination protocols.

Spanish experience with cyclosporine

Our experience with cyclosporine (CsA) in de novo renal transplantation (RT) may be systematized in four consecutive periods. From February 1986 to December 1989, patient survival was higher among 128 consecutive CsA-prednisone-treated cadaver allograft recipients than in previous patients on azathioprine. One-year graft survival was significantly higher in CsA patients, a difference that was thereafter progressively reduced: at 10 years graft survivals were 50% versus 45%, and at 15 years 37% versus 35%, respectively. The most frequent cause of graft loss was death with a functioning graft. Acute rejection caused more graft losses among Aza-treated patients than CsA-treated ones. However, chronic allograft nephropathy produced more graft losses in CsA patients. After this initial experience with CsA-based immunosuppression we developed a second phase in which better results were obtained in 209 first cadaveric RT recipients. The use of lower initial CsA doses, more rapid steroid tapering, and a better approach to CsA nephrotoxicity or chronic nephropathy by substantial reductions in CsA exposure and delayed azathioprine addition, lead to these improvements. From March 1995 through 2000, we used the new microemulsion CsA formulation (Neoral) with steroids or azathioprine in 110 first de novo RT recipients. Mean donor and recipient ages were significantly higher in this phase than in previous ones; consequently, survival and function results were slightly worse. Blood CsA concentrations measured 2 hours after administration represent a more precise predictor of exposure than trough concentrations. The last step in optimizing Neoral use in RT on our service was application of reduced-dosage with C2 monitoring instead of classical C0 testing. Acute rejection and treatment failure rates were low and renal allograft function improved with respect to previous full-dose C0 experiences. CsA use has evolved in these two decades in four consecutive phases. Short-term results have improved or been maintained from phase to phase, even with expanded-criteria donors until excellent features during last years with C2 monitoring and combination with potent drugs such as MMF or everolimus. During the coming years, new drugs and protocols will allow even more optimized use.

Immunosuppression for Long-Term Maintenance of Renal Allograft Function

The incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes was markedly reduced by the introduction of new immunosuppressive drug regimens for renal transplantation, resulting in improved graft survival at 1 year. However, only modest improvement has been shown in long-term graft function rates. This overview evaluates the efficacy of currently used immunosuppressive drugs and drug combinations for long-term maintenance therapy. Prospective controlled trials rarely extend beyond 5 years; therefore, registry data and retrospective reports have also been employed. From currently available data it may be concluded that the initial beneficial effect of ciclosporin (cyclosporin) is lost 10 years after transplantation. Tacrolimus is an alternative to ciclosporin with a different profile of adverse effects and a higher efficacy in acute rejection treatment. For long-term maintenance, projected half-lives of kidney graft function are in favour of tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of early rejections. However, the improved long-term graft survival reported in retrospective studies has still to be confirmed in controlled trials. There is no convincing evidence for superiority of triple therapy including prednisone (or prednisolone), calcineurin inhibitors and azathioprine/MMF over dual therapy without azathioprine/MMF with respect to long-term outcome. Withdrawal of corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors clearly reduces adverse drug effects but carries the risk of acute rejection episodes. Avoidance of corticosteroids by using new immunosuppressive drug combinations may be an option to minimise toxic adverse effects in the future. At present, it seems unjustified to convert renal transplant recipients with stable graft function and tolerable adverse effects from one drug to another solely in expectation of future benefits. Acute early or late rejection episodes and intolerable adverse effects are good reasons for conversions between calcineurin inhibitors or cytotoxic agents. Chronic allograft nephropathy with slowly deteriorating graft function remains an unresolved problem.