Liver transplantation for fulminant and subfulminant hepatic failure

A new prognostic formula for adult acute liver failure using computer tomography-derived hepatic volumetric analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

King's College Hospital (KCH) criteria and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score are useful and widely-employed prognostic markers for acute liver failure (ALF). We previously reported that liver atrophy is an important prognostic factor for ALF. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of liver volumetry and to generate a new prognostic formula.

METHODS

Computed tomography-derived liver volume (CTLV) and standardized liver volume (SLV) of 30 adult ALF patients were calculated at the time of diagnosis. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: group A consisted of 13 patients who recovered without surgical intervention, and group B consisted of 17 patients who died due to liver failure or who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

RESULTS

The median CTLV/SLV ratios of groups A and B were 1.019 and 0.757, respectively (P = 0.0009). The difference was most significant (P = 0.0002) at the probability cutoff point of 0.80 for CTLV/SLV ratio; the sensitivity and specificity were 76.5% and 92.3%, respectively. Serum total bilirubin (TB) levels and CTLV/SLV ratio were selected as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. A prognostic formula including volumetric analysis was established: Z = -2.3813 - [0.15234 x TB (mg/dl)] + [4.5734 x CTLV/SLV] (AUC = 0.87783, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The CTLV/SLV ratio is a very useful marker for predicting the prognosis of adult ALF. Our prognostic formula including only the CTLV/SLV ratio and TB is simple and useful and awaits validation in a future larger-scale prospective study.

Value of computed tomography-derived estimated liver volume/standard liver volume ratio for predicting the prognosis of adult fulminant hepatic failure in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognosis of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) has been improved but is still unsatisfactory, and liver atrophy has been reported as a poor prognostic factor for this disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of the estimated liver volume (ELV) compared to the standard liver volume (SLV) in patients with FHF.

METHODS

Estimated liver volume of 24 adult patients with FHF receiving artificial liver support (ALS) was measured by using computed tomography. Actual liver weight (ALW) was measured if possible, and the calculated ELV/SLV ratio was compared to the ALW/SLV ratio and the ALW/BW (bodyweight) ratio. Sequential ELV/SLV ratios during the clinical course were analyzed in relation to the prognosis.

RESULTS

The ELV/SLV ratio was significantly correlated with both the ALW/SLV and ALW/BW ratios. The mean ALW/SLV ratio of patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was 0.59 +/- 0.17. The mean ELV/SLV ratio at the time of starting ALS (day 0) in the patients who survived (group 1) was 1.081 +/- 0.183, but that of cases who underwent LDLT or died without LDLT (group 2) was 0.764 +/- 0.255. The mean ELV/SLV ratios were 1.084 +/- 0.222 and 0.650 +/- 0.195 in groups 1 and 2, respectively, 5 days after starting ALS (day 5). Among the group 2 patients, those who had no liver atrophy on day 0 had a significantly decreased ELV/SLV ratio on day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the ELV/SLV ratio is a very useful objective marker to estimate liver atrophy and this marker reflects the prognosis of FHF patients very well.

A review of aprotinin in orthotopic liver transplantation: can its harmful effects offset its beneficial effects?

Blood transfusion can adversely affect patient outcome and graft survival in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). With this respect, prophylactic aprotinin administration decreases blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the hemodynamic changes associated with graft reperfusion in patients undergoing OLT. However, data indicate limiting the use of aprotinin in OLT: (a) clinical, biological, echocardiographic, and postmortem findings recorded in patients with chronic liver disease or undergoing OLT suggest that a continuous prothrombotic state exists in these patients. Whether the inhibition of fibrinolysis associated with aprotinin therapy will expose some patients to untoward thrombosis is questionable; (b) aprotinin does not appear to alter postoperative outcome in patients undergoing OLT; (c) aprotinin decreases blood transfusion requirements only when surgery is associated with significant blood loss. However, at the present time, median transfusion requirements of 2 to 5 red blood cell units are required in OLT.

[Acute liver failure. Current aspects of diagnosis and therapy]

Disturbances of some partial liver functions, such as synthesis, excretion, or biotransformation of xenobiotics, are important for prognosis and ultimate survival in patients presenting with multiple organ dysfunction on the intesive care unit (ICU). The incidence of liver dysfunction is underestimated when traditional "static" measures such as serum-transaminases or bilirubin as opposed to "dynamic" tests, such as clearance tests, are used to diagnose liver dysfunction. Similar to the central role of the failing liver in MODS, extrahepatic complications, such as hepatorenal syndrome and brain edema develop in acute or fulminant hepatic failure and determine the prognosis of the patient. This is reflected in the required presence of hepatic encephalopathy in addition to hyperbilirubinemia and coagulopathy for the diagnosis of acute liver failure. In addition to these clinical signs, dynamic tests, such as indocyanine green clearance, which is available at the bed-side, are useful for the monitoring of perfusion and global liver function. In addition to specific and causal therapeutic interventions, e.g. N-acetylcysteine for paracetamol poisoning or termination of pregnancy for the HELLP-syndrome, new therapeutic measures, e.g. terlipressin/albumin or albumin dialysis are likely to improve the poor prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure. Nevertheless, liver transplantation remains the treatment of choice for fulminant hepatic failure when the expected survival is <20%.