1
|
Usui M, Sugimoto K, Kato H, Murata Y, Tanemura A, Kuriyama N, Azumi Y, Kishiwada M, Mizuno S, Sakurai H, Takei Y, Isaji S. Discontinuation of Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin by Long-term Hepatitis B Vaccine Inoculation in Preventing Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:1179-83. [PMID: 27320582 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.12.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For the patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related diseases, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) should be administered to prevent reinfection. Because HBIG is highly expensive and a blood product, an alternative strategy using HBV vaccination has been made in an attempt to discontinue use of HBIG. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of long-term HBV vaccination for discontinuation of HBIG, paying attention to the status of active immunization using T-cell proliferation assay. PATIENTS AND METHODS Among the 144 recipients who underwent liver transplantation in our hospital, 16 had HBV-related liver diseases; the 14 patients who had received vaccination were subjects in our study. To evaluate the status of active immunization, T-cell proliferation was examined by counting the number of T cells after adding HBV vaccine to the culture supernatant of T cells, and tumor necrosis factor α and interferon γ were measured in the culture supernatant. RESULTS The ratio of male/female was 13/1 (median age: 55 years; range: 37 years to 67 years). The median follow-up time was 102 months (range: approximately 14 months to 148 months). All 14 patients were free of HBV recurrence. HBIG-free status could be achieved in 9 patients (64.3%) during the treatment period for more than 50 months after beginning of HBV vaccination, of whom 5 (35.7%) became HBV vaccine-free. T-cell proliferation was confirmed by fact that the stimulation index ranged from 2.34 to 5.2 in the patients who were HBIG-free. CONCLUSION Long-term HBV vaccination after LT is a useful and effective treatment in preventing HBV recurrence, allowing the discontinuation of HBIG treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Usui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
| | - K Sugimoto
- Hepatogastroenterology, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - H Kato
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Y Murata
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - A Tanemura
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - N Kuriyama
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Y Azumi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - M Kishiwada
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - S Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - H Sakurai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - Y Takei
- Hepatogastroenterology, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - S Isaji
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beckebaum S, Kabar I, Cicinnati VR. Hepatitis B and C in liver transplantation: new strategies to combat the enemies. Rev Med Virol 2012; 23:172-93. [PMID: 23239274 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.1734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2012] [Revised: 10/29/2012] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis B immune globulin-free therapeutic regimens with a nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) or NUC combinations after liver transplantation (LT) are currently being investigated for their efficacy and safety as HBV re-infection prophylaxis in clinical studies. Recurrence rates differ among these studies as most of them are limited by a non-randomised study design, small sample size, lack of long-term data and varying time intervals for the switch from combined to purely virostatic prophylaxis. Post-transplant pre-emptive antiviral therapy with pegylated IFN and ribavirin is associated with low sustained virological response rates and was found to have no advantage over treatment of manifest HCV re-infection. Safety and efficacy of triple antiviral therapy including boceprevir or telaprevir in patients with manifest HCV re-infection are currently under investigation in clinical trials. Relevant drug interactions have been shown to occur during calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and concomitant triple antiviral therapy, which vary with type of CNI and choice of HCV protease inhibitor. Newer direct-acting antivirals with lower or minimal toxicity, when used in combination with immunosuppressives, are worthy of further study in LT patients. This review focuses on hot topics in the management of hepatitis B and C patients before and after LT and offers a critical summarised selection of the corresponding relevant studies published in the current literature or presented at recent liver congresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Beckebaum
- Department of Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dindoost P, Jazayeri SM, Alavian SM. Hepatitis B immune globulin in liver transplantation prophylaxis: an update. HEPATITIS MONTHLY 2012; 12:168-76. [PMID: 22550524 PMCID: PMC3339416 DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Revised: 12/26/2011] [Accepted: 01/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Liver transplantation is the best treatment option for end-stage liver disease following hepatitis B (HBV) infection. However, the high rate of recurrence of HBV infection following transplantation is a disadvantage of this option. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Over the past 2 decades, the gold standard of prophylactic treatment for the prevention of HBV re-infection following liver transplantation has been the administration of low- to high-dose hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) along with an antiviral agent to induce passive immunity. RESULTS The effectiveness of HBIg in preventing the recurrence of HBV depends on the dosage, route of administration, and duration of HBIg treatment, and the viremic status at the time of transplantation. There is currently no consensus on a standardized recommendation for therapeutic options that include HBIg administration. CONCLUSION This review attempts to summarize the available data on the feasibility of such options. Most recent studies support the use of long-term combination therapy of HBIg and antiviral NAs (especially new agents).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Seyed Mohammad Jazayeri
- Hepatitis B Molecular Laboratory, Department of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Seyed Moayed Alavian
- Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
- Corresponding author: Seyed Moayed Alavian, Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran. Tel.: +98-2188945186, Fax: +98-2181262072, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hepatitis B Immune Globulin in Liver Transplantation Prophylaxis: An Update. HEPATITIS MONTHLY 2012. [DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.5124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
|
5
|
Current use of hepatitis B immune globulin for prevention of de novo hepatitis B in recipients receiving anti-HBc-positive livers. Hepatol Int 2011; 5:635-43. [PMID: 21484133 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-010-9250-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2010] [Accepted: 12/31/2010] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Livers from donors positive for antibody against anti-HBc can potentially transmit de novo hepatitis B (DNH) to their recipients. Despite a good outcome, prophylaxis is usually offered to such recipients. There is no consensus on the standard prophylactic regimen and hence prophylaxis varies among different transplant centres. Nonetheless, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is considered the mainstay of such prophylaxis, either alone or in combination with an oral antiviral treatment. We aim to provide a concise review of the current use of HBIG in prevention of DNH. We also address a few important questions regarding HBIG use.
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin, Igantibe, for the prophylaxis of viral B hepatitis after liver transplantation. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42:509-14. [PMID: 19828386 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2009] [Revised: 08/12/2009] [Accepted: 09/11/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) positive liver transplanted subjects with intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is effective, however use of intramuscular HBIG could be as effective with fewer adverse events and lower cost. AIM We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of HBIG from Grifols, Igantibe, for the prophylaxis of HBV reactivation. METHODS Eighteen adult patients submitted to liver transplantation for HBV-related disease more than 18 months earlier were treated with doses of 2000 I.U. intramuscular Igantibe every 14 days for 6 months. RESULTS Mean trough serum HBsAb IgG titers from months 4 to 6 (primary efficacy variable) were protective (>or=150 I.U./L) at each time point. Individual measurements were also protective throughout the study. HBV replication remained negative for all available subjects until study completion. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a half-life of 27 days and extensive exposure to the study drug. Safety and tolerability of intramuscular Igantibe were good, with only one adverse event. CONCLUSION Standard-dose intramuscular Igantibe administration proved efficacious in post-liver transplantation prophylaxis by attaining protective levels for up to 6 months, was safe and well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a long half-life and extensive exposure.
Collapse
|
7
|
Beckebaum S, Sotiropoulos GC, Gerken G, Cicinnati VR. Hepatitis B and liver transplantation: 2008 update. Rev Med Virol 2009; 19:7-29. [DOI: 10.1002/rmv.595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
8
|
Hooman N, Rifai K, Hadem J, Vaske B, Philipp G, Priess A, Klempnauer J, Tillmann HL, Manns MP, Rosenau J. Antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen trough levels and half-lives do not differ after intravenous and intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin administration after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2008; 14:435-42. [PMID: 18383078 DOI: 10.1002/lt.21343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration remains an essential component of standard reinfection prophylaxis after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related liver disease. Previous studies have suggested that intramuscular (IM) HBIG administration compared to intravenous (IV) HBIG administration may be cost-effective and dose-saving. To compare antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) kinetics after IV HBIG administration versus IM HBIG administration, 24 patients received 2000 IU of HBIG every 6 weeks over a study period of 48 weeks in a crossover design. HBIG was started intravenously in 12 patients (group A) and intramuscularly in 12 patients (group B). After 4 doses, at week 24 HBIG administration was switched from IM to IV and vice versa. Anti-HBs kinetics of 22 patients were evaluated. Mean anti-HBs levels measured 2, 4, and 6 weeks after each HBIG administration did not differ significantly (480 +/- 166, 319 +/- 126, and 221 +/- 106 IU/L after IV administration versus 457 +/- 166, 310 +/- 147, and 218 +/- 112 IU/L after IM administration). Half-lives of anti-HBs decline (IV, 25.5 +/- 6.0 days, versus IM, 24.7 +/- 6.2 days) and area under the curve values from week 2 to 6 (IV, 9.4 +/- 3.6 IU*day/mL, versus IM, 9.0 +/- 3.9 IU*day/mL) also showed no significant difference. Variation of anti-HBs levels after IV HBIG administration versus IM HBIG administration was neither significantly different within patients (intraindividual variance) nor between patients (interindividual variance). However, intraindividual variance was lower than interindividual variance after IV (P < 0.05) and IM (P < 0.05) HBIG administration at every time point (2, 4, and 6 weeks). In conclusion, IV HBIG administration and IM HBIG administration are equally effective with respect to the crucial pharmacokinetic parameters. That is, IM HBIG is not dose-saving; however, it may be cost-effective if the price per unit is lower. Individualized dosing intervals should be further evaluated as a cost-effective alternative to fixed dosing schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazanin Hooman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prada Lobato J, Garrido López S, Catalá Pindado MA, García Pajares F. [The prophylaxis against post-liver-transplant hepatitis B re-infection]. FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2007; 31:30-7. [PMID: 17439311 DOI: 10.1016/s1130-6343(07)75708-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the prophylaxis against post-liver transplantation hepatitis B reinfection with anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin and nucleoside analogues. METHOD A bibliographic search was carried out using Pubmed, entering the following key words: hepatitis B and liver transplantation and (hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin and lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil) up to June 2006. The initial search was filtered using the terms clinical trial, randomized clinical trial and review. The data contained in selected studies were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 53 works were found. Prophylaxis with anti-HB immunoglobulin and lamivudine is the best strategy for avoiding recurrence of the hepatitis B virus in patients undergoing hepatic transplants; achieving very low reinfection rates (0-10%) with follow up periods of between 1-5 years. There is a great degree of variability (dose, duration and method of HBIg administration) in the prophylactic protocols reviewed. The use of low doses of anti-HB immunoglobulin (administered intravenously followed by intramuscular administration, or administered intramuscularly from the anhepatic stage), and lamivudine in patients who receive transplants with a low risk of recurrence, shows prophylactic efficacy comparable to the use of high doses of anti-HB immunoglobulin. Furthermore, it implies a considerable reduction in costs. CONCLUSIONS The availability of suitably designed clinical trials is required to design a more cost-effective protocol and reduce variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Prada Lobato
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Montalbano M, Neff GW. Management of recurrent viral hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2006; 8:60-6. [PMID: 16510036 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-006-0065-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplant teams are often faced with the challenges of managing viral recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains the most challenging viral disease in the transplant community. Strategies to prevent and delay viral recurrence have slowly developed over the past 5 years. Hepatitis B virus (HBV), previously a contraindication for liver transplantation due to recurrence and cholestasis with allograft failure, is now one of the more favorable indications for liver transplantation as a result of current therapeutic options. This review investigates the up-to-date information on treatment outcomes for HCV and HBV in the period following liver transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Montalbano
- University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, MSB Room 6560, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0595, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Curry
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Beckebaum S, Cicinnati VR, Gerken G, Broelsch CE. Management of chronic hepatitis B in the liver transplant setting. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2004.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|