Experimental tracheal transplantation for possible clinical application

Cryopreservation of the tracheal grafts: Review and perspective

Transplantation of the trachea may become the preferred method for the reconstruction of extensive tracheal defects, however, several unresolved problems must be addressed, such as immunosuppression, preservation and donor shortage. In this manuscript, the cryopreservation of tracheal grafts is reviewed, which potentially is associated with a lessened immunological response. Cryopreservation may be used clinically for long-term preservation and may solve the donor shortage. It is very important to confirm the immunomodulatory effect of cryopreservation on tracheal allografts in order to expand the potential clinical application of tracheal transplantation in the future. The cartilage as well as the epithelium and lamina propria serve as targets for rejection. However, the effect of cryopreservation on chondrocytes could be associated with reduced allogenicity of the trachea. The long-term cryopreservation of cartilage must be investigated in basic research models of chondrocyte viability. Growth of cryopreserved tracheal allografts is less well understood. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of synergistic effects of both cryopreservation and adequate immunosuppression for tracheal xenografts.

Cryopreserved Tracheal Grafts: A Review of the Literature

Cryopreserved tracheal grafts have been used in several experimental models of long segment replacement. The clinical application of the procedure has been limited due to the fact that contradictory results have been reported. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the literature on tracheal cryopreservation. Despite the fact that most authors indicate that cryopreserved tracheal allografts retain viability and have a low immunological response, though they continue to function after transplantation with good epithelialization and patency, cryopreservation leads to significant damage to cartilage, the degree of which is based on the freezing-storage methods that affect the function and durability of a graft. The long-term storage of cartilage must therefore be investigated in more detail in basic research models of cartilage viability: the evaluation of chondrocyte apoptosis, and the use of different solutions for tracheal cryopreservation other than RPMI-1640, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's, Eurocollins, and TC-199. Furthermore, problems that involve improving the blood supply to the graft after extensive resection and immunosuppression must be resolved before tracheal cryopreservation can become a clinically established method for tracheal grafts.

Successful allotransplantation of cryopreserved tracheal grafts with preservation of the pars membranacea in nonhuman primates

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to confirm the feasibility of cryopreserved tracheal allotransplantation in primates, the anatomy and immunology of which are considered to be more closely related to those of humans than those of other animals.

METHODS

Cryopreserved tracheal allotransplantations were performed in 3 recipient primates. In the control group fresh tracheal allotransplantations were performed in 2 primates (control A), and a tracheal allotransplantation with a simply frozen tracheal graft was performed in 1 primate (control B). Monthly bronchoscopic examinations, histologic examinations, electron microscopic examinations, and immunohistochemical investigations were performed in each of the primates.

RESULTS

In the cryopreserved tracheal allotransplantation group, 3 recipient monkeys were killed on the 35th, 144th, and 387th postoperative days, respectively. All grafts were incorporated by the recipient trachea without stenosis in the cryopreserved group. In the control group 2 recipient monkeys were killed on the 93rd postoperative day (control A), and one was killed on the 84th postoperative day (control B). Severe stenosis was observed after the transplantation in all of the control monkeys. Immunologic reactions appeared to be attenuated by the cryopreservation, whereas T cell-mediated immunologic rejection (control A) and loss of cartilage viability (control B) were considered to be the causes of graft failure in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The immunogenicity of the tracheal allografts was reduced by cryopreservation, and cryopreserved tracheal allotransplantation was successful in our primate model. Further investigation of cryopreserved tracheal allotransplantation with regard to proper clinical applications and the limitations of the procedure should be performed.