HLA-DR matching defined by DNA typing in heart transplantation

Analysis of the Influence of HLA-A Matching Relative to HLA-B and -DR Matching on Heart Transplant Outcomes

Background

There are conflicting reports on the effect of donor-recipient HLA matching on outcomes in heart transplantation. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of HLA-A matching relative to HLA-B and -DR matching on long-term survival in heart transplantation.

Methods

A total of 25 583 patients transplanted between 1988 and 2011 were identified from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry. Transplants were divided into 2 donor-recipient matching groups: HLA-A–compatible (no HLA-A mismatches) and HLA-A–incompatible (1-2 HLA-A mismatches). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were graft failure-, cardiovascular-, infection-, or malignancy-related deaths.

Results

The risk of all-cause mortality 15 years after transplantation was higher for HLA-A–compatible (vs HLA-A–incompatible) grafts in patients who had HLA-B–, HLA-DR–, or HLA-B,DR–incompatible grafts (P = 0.027, P = 0.007, and P = 0.002, respectively) but not in HLA-B– and/or HLA-DR–compatible grafts. This was confirmed in multivariable Cox regression analysis where HLA-A compatibility (vs HLA-A incompatibility) was associated with higher mortality in transplants incompatible for HLA-DR or HLA-B and -DR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.11-2.28; P = 0.012 and HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.17-2.43; P = 0.005, respectively). In multivariable analysis, the largest compromise in survival for HLA-A compatibility (vs HLA-incompatibility) was for chronic rejection in HLA-B– and -DR–incompatible grafts (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22-3.01; P = 0.005).

Conclusions

Decreased long-term survival in heart transplantation was associated with HLA-A compatibility in HLA-B,DR–incompatible grafts.

Human leukocyte antigen matching in heart transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Allocation of donors with regard to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is controversial in heart transplantation. This paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for studies that addressed the effects of HLA matching on outcome after heart transplantation. Fifty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria. 34 studies had graft rejection as outcome, with 26 of the studies reporting a significant reduction in graft rejection with increasing degree of HLA matching. Thirteen of 18 articles that reported on graft failure found that it decreased significantly with increasing HLA match. Two multicenter studies and nine single-center studies provided sufficient data to provide summary estimates at 12 months. Pooled comparisons showed that graft survival increased with fewer HLA-DR mismatches [0-1 vs. 2 mismatches: risk ratio (RR) = 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.19; P = 0.04)]. Having fewer HLA-DR mismatches (0-1 vs. 2) reduced the incidence of acute rejection [(RR = 0.81 (0.66-0.99; P = 0.04)]. Despite the considerable heterogeneity between studies, the short observation time, and older data, HLA matching improves graft survival in heart transplantation. Prospective HLA-DR matching is clinically feasible and should be considered as a major selection criterion.

HLA compatibility index: does it have a role in patients after heart transplantation?

AIMS

To determine the impact of HLA compatibility measured by the Compatibility Index, on survival, rate of rejections, malignancies and infections in patients after heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of 182 consecutive patients who underwent heart transplantation in our center from January 2001 to April 2010. According to degree of HLA-A, B and DR matching (Compatibility Index, CI) the patients were divided in two groups, Group A (n=83) with an IC 0-17 and group B (n=99) with an IC 18-26. There was no significant difference in demographic parameters between recipients and donors.

RESULTS

We found no difference in rates of rejections or infections between Group A and Group B (AR: 22 (26.5%) vs. 34 (34.3%), P=0.2539; infections: 21 (25.3%) vs. 27 (27%) P=0.7637). The distribution of infections in terms of type (bacterial, viral, fungal, including Aspergillus) was similar in both groups. The incidence of malignant tumours was infrequent (3 (3.6%) vs. 4 (4.0%), P=0.8817). We found trend toward lower level of tacrolimus in Group A. Long term survival was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of our single-center trial, we found no impact of higher degree of HLA-A,-B, and -DR matching on survival, rejection episodes or infection. Further large studies are necessary to confirm our hypothesis that subjects with better HLA compatibility could require lower dose immunosuppression.

Influence of HLA Matching on Survival in Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In renal transplantation, the degree of HLA matching has been reported to be negatively correlated with graft loss, with the number of rejections with complications. This association is less clear in heart transplantation, where there are contradictory studies, although most are consistent with those in renal transplantation. The objective of this study was to analyze differences in the probability of survival and the incidence of complications during follow-up according to the degree of HLA-A, -B, and -DR matching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-three consecutive patients transplanted over a 13-year period were analyzed for age, gender, pretransplant factors associated with mortality, number of rejections and infections, incidence of acute graft failure, arterial hypertension, diabetes, and survival time with cause of death with reference to the number of HLA matches (zero to six). Exclusion criteria included retransplants, heart-lung transplants, pediatric transplants, and perioperative mortality. Groups were compared using the chi(2) and ANOVA (Bonferroni posthoc test) tests. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log rank test. The significance level was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The overall probability of survival of our series at 1, 5, and 10 years was 85%, 77%, and 60%, respectively. HLA-A, -B, and -DR compatibility: No significant differences were found when the curves were compared (log-rank: .005). The best survival rates were obtained with lower degrees of matching. No significant differences were found in the number of rejections or infections, although survival rates (P = .007) were higher among those with the lower degrees of matching.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher degree of HLA-A, -B, and -DR matching did not have a positive effect on heart transplant patient survival, rejection episodes or infections.

The influence of conventional and cross-reactive group HLA matching on cardiac transplant outcome: an analysis from the United Network of Organ Sharing Scientific Registry

BACKGROUND

The short tolerable cold ischemia time and the importance of other risk factors have generally superseded the role of HLA matching in the allocation of donor hearts. Recent advances in the accuracy and time required to perform HLA typing and crossmatching, however, have led us to re-examine the United Network of Organ Sharing Transplant Registry for the effects of the HLA incompatibility on outcome in relation to other possible risk factors.

METHODS

These include conventional HLA-A, -B, and cross-reactive group (CREG) mismatching (mm), HLA-DR mm, pretransplantation panel-reactive antibody (PRA), recipient and donor race and donor age, cold ischemia time, and the pretransplantation use of either a left ventricular assist device or an intra-aortic balloon pump.

RESULTS

Three-year survival was clearly inferior in non-white (0.6921) as compared with white (0.7632) recipients, but this difference could not be accounted for by the degree of donor-recipient HLA mm that had occurred by chance. Nevertheless, the degree of mm that did occur seemed to have an impact on survival. The importance of HLA-DR mm was confirmed, and it ranked only behind the use of an assist device and recipient race in the multivariate analysis. HLA-A and B mm exerted an additional effect, but this was only true in white recipients. Of these, HLA-A achieved statistical significance as an independent risk factor. In general, CREG mm was not a significant variable. However, more than twice as many 0-1 or 0-2 CREG, 0 DR mm as compared with 0-1 or 0-2 A,B, 0 DR mm transplants enjoyed approximately equal and very good 1- and 3-year survival. Assuming no change is cold ischemia time, the potential number of 0 CREG, 0 DR mm, ABO-compatible transplants that could be achieved when an Organ Procurement Organization had 50-100 patients on their waiting list was calculated. The surprisingly high frequency of approximately 24-36% suggests that this favorable match could be considered along with other important factors in the local allocation process. When pretransplantation PRA was analyzed as a continuous variable from 0 to 100%, it was a highly significant risk factor, but this effect was more strikingly evident when the PRA was analyzed in 20% increments above zero. Recently, left ventricular assist device usage has become increasingly common, and it has been associated with strikingly increased pretransplantation PRA levels. When they occur together, the data indicates that these patients are at a very high risk for graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that newer typing and crossmatching techniques make it possible to add HLA criteria to the allocation protocol of donor cardiac organs and would lead to improved long-term survival.