Study of circadian variation of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics

Effects of diurnal variation of bile acids by meal on cyclosporine A absorption

BACKGROUND

Stabilizing blood levels with microemulsified cyclosporine A (CsA), administered in many pediatric kidney diseases, is important for effective immunosuppression and reduced nephrotoxicity. CsA is affected by total bile acids (TBAs); however, no reports have simultaneously measured both. We aimed to elucidate the hypothesized relationship between TBA levels and diurnal variation in CsA in children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children who were taking oral CsA for the treatment of kidney diseases between January 2016 and July 2021. They consumed four balanced meals and snacks during the day. CsA and TBA were measured twice, in pairs, before and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h after oral administration in the morning and evening, and the four-h area under curve (AUC)_0-4 of CsA and trough-to-peak ratio (TPR) of TBA were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight pairs were measured in total; 12 children had idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and 4 children had immunoglobulin A vasculitis with nephritis. The median age at measurement was 7.5 years and the dose of CsA was 3.8 mg/kg/day. The AUC_0-4 (ng·h/mL) was significantly lower in the evening than in the morning (1,669 vs. 1,451, P < 0.001). The TPR of TBA was significantly higher in the evening than in the morning (0.14 vs. 0.25, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The low AUC_0-4 and slow TBA secretion observed in the evening may be due to pediatric-specific dietary rhythms; thus, snack timing should be considered in children for stabilizing CsA levels.

The influence of circadian rhythms on the kinetics of drugs in humans

In clinical practice, it is important to consider circadian rhythms in pharmacokinetics and cell responses to therapy in order to design proper protocols for drug administration. Scientists have arrived at this conclusion after several experiments in animals and in humans have clearly demonstrated that all organisms are highly organised according to circadian rhythms. These temporal cycles influence different physiological functions and, consequently, can influence the pharmacokinetic phases of drugs. A drug's pharmacokinetics can be modified according to the time of drug administration. In fact, the circadian changes of > 100 different compounds have been documented. The results obtained have led several scientific societies to provide guidelines concerning the timing of drug dosing for anticancer, cardiovascular, respiratory, anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and antiepileptic drugs. Absorption may be influenced by circadian rhythms and most lipophilic drugs seem to be absorbed faster when the drug is taken in the morning compared with the evening; for water-soluble compounds, no circadian variation in the absorption of drugs has been found. Concerning drug distribution, the higher the blood flow fraction an organ receives, the higher the rate constant for transferring drugs out of the capillaries. This drug pharmacokinetic phase may be influenced by circadian variations in the protein binding of acidic and basic drugs. Drug metabolism may be influenced by daily modifications of blood flow. For drugs with a high extraction ratio, metabolism depends on hepatic blood flow, while that of drugs with a low extraction ratio depends on liver enzyme activity. Hepatic blood flow has been shown to be greatest at 8 am and metabolism seems to be reduced during the night. Finally, concerning drug elimination, the clearance of 'flow-limited' drugs that present a high extraction rate is affected by the blood flow delivered to the organ, independent of the cardiac output fraction supplied. Chronopharmacokinetics can explain individual differences in drug levels revealed by therapeutic drug monitoring and can be used to optimise the management of patients receiving drug therapy.

Population pharmacokinetics of S(-)-carvedilol in healthy volunteers after administration of the immediate-release (IR) and the new controlled-release (CR) dosage forms of the racemate

Carvedilol is a beta(1)-, beta(2)-, and alpha(1)-adrenoreceptor blocker indicated for treatment of hypertension and mild-to-severe congestive heart failure. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a single population model that describes S(-)-carvedilol pharmacokinetics from both the immediate-release (IR) and the new controlled-release dosage forms of the racemate. Carvedilol IR data (1270 measurements) were obtained from 2 open-label studies (50 mg/25 mg Q12 hours for 2 doses). Carvedilol CR data (2058 measurements) were obtained from an open-label, nonrandomized, dose-rising (10, 20, 40, and 80 mg), 4-period balanced crossover study. All data were simultaneously analyzed using NONMEM V. Leverage analysis and internal evaluations were conducted for the final model. A 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination provided the best fit. The model included different absorption rates (KAs) for the CR and IR morning (IR(AM)) and evening (IR(PM)) doses; incorporating change-points at certain times. Estimates of KAs indicated that the absorption was slower at equivalent times and extended for CR relative to IR carvedilol. Oral clearance of S(-)-carvedilol was 149 L/h. The IR(PM) and the CR doses had bioavailability (F(rel)) of 0.80 and 0.76, respectively, relative to the IR(AM) dose. The inter-subject variability in KAs was lower for the CR dosage form than the original IR dosage form. Estimation of interoccasion variability on KAs and F(rel) for the CR dosage form improved the fit. The model performed well in simulation and leverage analysis indicated its robustness. The model will be a useful tool for future simulation studies.

A randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover bioavailability study of two oral formulations of tacrolimus in healthy Korean adults

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a macrolide immunosuppressant used in transplantation. It has been shown to have a comparable therapeutic effect and a low adverse drug reaction profile relative to cyclosporme.

OBJECTIVE

The present study compared the pharmacokinetics of twice-daily doses of 2 tacrolimus formulations used in clinical practice in Korea: a conventional (reference) formulation and a more recently developed (test) formulation. The bioavailability of the 2 formulations was evaluated based on the requirement of 20% deviation at a power of 80%.

METHODS

This study had a randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, non-inferiority design. There was a 96-hour treatment period for each formulation, with a 3-week washout period between formulations. Each healthy adult subject received two 1-mg capsules of the reference or test formulation of tacrolimus twice daily (morning and evening), for a total daily dose of 4 mg. Blood samples were obtained during the 96-hour period after the first dose in each treatment period, with tolerability assessments performed up to 2 weeks after the first dose in each period. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were C(max) and AUC from time 0 to the last measured concentration and extrapolated to infinity. Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were T(max), t(1/2), C(min0-24), AUC(0-24), and C(96).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 29 healthy Korean volunteers (22 men, 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years; age range, 20-51 years; mean weight, 66 [10] kg; mean height, [171 17] cm). All volunteers completed both treatment periods. The 90% Cls for the ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters (test:reference drug) were 119.25-161.29 for C(max), 95.29-129.04 for AUC(0-t), and 95.63-131.42 for AUC(0-infinity). Based on the 80% to 125% bioequivalence criterion, these results indicated that pharmacokinetic exposure to the test drug was not inferior to that of the reference drug. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION

In these healthy Korean adults, there were no statistically significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of the more recently developed oral formulation of tacrolimus and the conventional formulation.

Chronopharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and tacrolimus

The correct use of immunosuppressive drugs has a considerable influence on the prognosis of patients with organ transplants. The appropriate utilisation of the drugs involves the administration of an adequate dosage to reach the blood concentrations that will suppress the alloimmune response, while avoiding secondary toxicities. However, transplanted patients exhibit heterogeneous immunological responses and high inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variabilities. One cause of these variabilities that is rarely considered is circadian rhythms. In vitro and in vivo experiments have clearly demonstrated that all organisms are highly organised according to an internal biological clock that influences various physiological functions. Considering that the absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of drugs is influenced by the physiological functions of the body, it is not surprising that the pharmacokinetic, and consequently the pharmacodynamic, profiles of drugs can be influenced by circadian rhythms. Ciclosporin, a mainstay immunosuppressive drug used following organ transplantation, displays minimum blood concentration (C(min)), maximum blood concentration (C(max)) and area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) in the morning that are generally higher than the corresponding parameters in the evening. These observations are supported by the ciclosporin total body clearance and elimination half-life in the morning, which are, on average, higher and shorter, respectively, than those in the evening. In addition, the disposition of tacrolimus is determined by the time of administration. The tacrolimus C(max) and AUC after the morning dose are significantly higher than those after the evening dose. Finally, the results reported in this review suggest considering more carefully the chronopharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and ciclosporin in order to obtain better results with fewer adverse effects. Significantly, the morning appears to be the best time for therapeutic monitoring using the C(min), C(max), concentration at 2 hours after dosing and AUC to modify dosages of tacrolimus and ciclosporin. Less certain are any conclusions about whether, in order to obtain better immunosuppressive control, higher doses must be administered when these drugs are given in the evening to compensate for the higher levels of interleukin-2.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and ciclosporin or tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: ciclosporin, tacrolimus and levofloxacin in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bacterial infections are common complications after organ transplantation. Fluoroquinolones are frequently used for treatment because of their broad spectrum of activity; but some of them, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, are reported to increase blood concentration of ciclosporin because they are metabolised by the liver through the same enzymatic pathway, the cytochrome P450 system. This study was performed to establish whether levofloxacin, a more recent fluoroquinolone that undergoes limited hepatic metabolism, interferes with metabolism and excretion of either ciclosporin microemulsion or tacrolimus.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in two groups of renal transplant patients, on either ciclosporin or tacrolimus treatment, before and at the sixth day of treatment with levofloxacin.

RESULTS

Levofloxacin significantly increased the mean area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and the other pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin and tacrolimus by about 25%. The interference of levofloxacin on the hepatic metabolism of these drugs was demonstrated by the concomitant decrease by 5% of polyclonal ciclosporin concentration, which is the expression of parent drug and its metabolites. Both before and during levofloxacin treatment we observed trough concentrations of monoclonal and polyclonal ciclosporin significantly lower in the evening (C(12)) than in the morning (C(0)); this observation suggests a circadian variation in the metabolism of this drug. However, no difference between C(0) and C(12) was observed with tacrolimus, confirming its more predictable bioavailability.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that levofloxacin partially inhibits the metabolism of both ciclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus, and therefore close therapeutic monitoring of these two drugs should be recommended during levofloxacin therapy.

Large within-day variation in cyclosporine absorption: circadian variation or food effect?

With the recent focus of monitoring cyclosporine (CsA) therapy using measures of CsA absorption, it is important to understand published reports of diurnal variation in CsA exposure. In 10 renal transplant patients, CsA concentrations were measured 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after both the morning and the evening doses and in a repeat session at least 1 wk later. Both area under the curve for the final 4 h after cyclosporine dose and cyclosporine concentrate 2 h after the cyclosporine dose were more than two-fold higher after the morning dose in both sessions. Because the morning levels were collected in a fasted condition and the evening ones in a fed condition, the study was extended to collect evening levels after fasting. The area under the curve for the final 4 h after cyclosporine dose and cyclosporine concentrate 2 h after the cyclosporine dose values observed now were comparable to the morning fasted values. That the large diurnal variation was due to variation in food consumption, as opposed to a biologic circadian rhythm affecting CsA absorption, has significant implications for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Is Absorption Profile of Cyclosporine Really Important for Effective Immunosuppression?

The clinical significance of cyclosporine (CsA) concentration 2 h postdose (C(2)) monitoring is widely recognized in organ transplantation, because C(2) value is considered to be a predictable surrogate marker of full area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and/or a peak concentration value exhibits potent inhibition of calcineurin activity. However, the pharmacological advantage of absorption profile (AP) has not been fully elucidated. In a rat skin allotransplantation model, the authors evaluated the efficacy of AP by different dosage regimens (20, 25 or 30 mg/kg/d, once or twice daily) and routes (p.o. or i.v.), and examined whether high C(2) or AUC(0-4) is intrinsically valuable for effective immunosuppression. Graft survival was CsA dose-dependent and correlated with full AUC(0-24), rather than AP. The difference between the once and twice daily administrations did not influence full AUC(0-24) or immunosuppressive effect. Continuous intravenous infusion with flat pharmacokinetics also produced adequate immunosuppression as was observed in enteral administration at the same level of total exposure. The impact of high peak concentration in AP on immunosuppressive effect could not be found. It was suggested that AP would not have intrinsic pharmacodynamic value. However, absorption profiling was considered to be clinically useful in that C(2) value is a good surrogate marker of total exposure (AUC(0-24)).

Pharmacokinetic differences between morning and evening administration of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy

We performed 24-hour monitoring of cyclosporine (NEO) and tacrolimus (TAC) blood concentrations, evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters and characterizing circadian variations. The monitoring was performed in 10 instances on nine patients administered NEO and 12 out of 11 patients administered TAC. All cases were administered equally divided doses of drugs twice daily orally. Blood samples were taken before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12 hours after NEO or TAC administration in the morning and evening. The pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between morning and evening administrations of both drugs. AUC0-12, AUC0-4, C(max), C2, and C(max)/C(min) of NEO and TAC were significantly lower during the evening compared with morning administrations. C(min) values were significantly higher in the evening. T(max) of NEO was longer in evening, although there was not a significant difference; T(max) of TAC was significantly longer in the evening. We found that NEO and TAC administrations in the evening resulted in reduced bioavailability and delayed absorption when compared with drug administrations in the morning. It was thought that the difference in bioavailability between morning and evening administrations was smaller with TAC, because TAC shows lower peak levels and a flatter blood concentration curve than NEO. C(min) was higher after evening administration than morning because of delayed absorption, though the bioavailability of both drugs decreased in the evening. These results suggest that we have to appreciate apparently high trough levels.

Circadian variations in cyclosporine C2 concentrations during the first 2 weeks after liver transplantation

The strategies currently used to monitor concentrations of cyclosporine (CsA) in transplanted patients include whole blood trough (C0), total or abbreviated area under the curve (AUC) concentration and population pharmacokinetic approaches. Recently, a single blood concentration measurement at 2 hours (C2) after CsA administration has been shown to be helpful to predict clinical effects during the first weeks after transplantation of liver and kidney grafts. However, this approach has raised multiple questions about pharmacokinetic variability, analytical methods, and organizational requirements. From a pharmacokinetic point of view, the variability of CsA blood concentrations may relate to circadian variations. The present study sought to characterize the circadian variation in C0 and C2 CsA levels among 20 liver transplant recipients during the first 2 weeks posttransplant. All patients received two equal oral doses of CsA microemulsion formulation every 12 hours. Blood samples were collected before and 2 hours after CsA administration in the morning (AM) and in the evening (PM). Whole blood concentrations of CsA were assayed using the monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay system. During the first 2 weeks posttransplant, C2 AM mean levels were significantly higher than C2 PM levels (542 +/- 241 vs 383 +/- 182 ng/mL, P =.005), while the C0 AM mean level was not statistically different from the C0 PM (285 +/- 174 vs 223 +/- 124 ng/mL, P =.367). Our results suggest that morning CsA blood samples may afford a better approach to optimize the CsA dosage, especially based on C2 values.

Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations

Immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant recipients is changing as a consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. Generic and other new formulations are now emerging onto the market, clinical experience is growing, and it is expected that clinicians should tailor immunosuppressive protocols to individual patients by optimising dosages and drugs according to the maturation and clinical status of the child. Most information about the clinical pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in paediatrics is centred on cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal and liver transplant recipients; data regarding other immunosuppressants and transplant types are limited. Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates irrespective of the organ transplanted or drug used. Another important factor that frequently affects clearance in this patient population is the post-transplant time. In accordance with these findings, and in contrast with the usual under-dosage in children, the need for higher dosages in younger recipients and during the early post-transplant period seems evident. To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This approach is particularly useful to ensure the cost-effective management of paediatric transplant recipients in whom the pharmacokinetic behaviour, target concentrations for clinical use and optimal dosage strategies of a particular drug may not yet be well defined. Although TDM may be a tool for improving immunosuppressive therapy, there is little information concerning its positive contribution to clinical events, including outcomes, for paediatric patients. Substantial information to support the use of TDM exists for cyclosporin and, to a lesser extent, for tacrolimus, but a diversity of options affects their implementation in the clinical setting. The role of TDM in therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus has yet to be defined regarding both methods and clinical indications. Pharmacodynamic monitoring appears more suited to other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, corticosteroids and monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. If coupled with pharmacokinetic measurements, such monitoring would allow earlier and more precise optimisation of therapy. Very few population pharmacokinetic studies have been carried out in paediatric transplant patients. This type of study is needed so that techniques such as Bayesian forecasting can be applied to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant patients.