Hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplantation and a pilot study of the effects of interferon-alpha therapy

Interferon-based anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection after renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Currently, interferon-based (IFN-based) antiviral therapies are the standard approach to control HCV infection. In a post-transplantation setting, however, IFN-based therapies appear to have limited efficacy and their use remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IFN-based therapies for HCV infection post RT.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and The Cochrane Library (1997-2013) for clinical trials in which transplant patients were given Interferon (IFN), pegylated interferon (PEG), interferon plus ribavirin (IFN-RIB), or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-RIB). The Sustained Virological Response (SVR) and/or drop-out rates were the primary outcomes. Summary estimates were calculated using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 12 clinical trials (140 patients in total). The summary estimate for SVR rate, drop-out rate and graft rejection rate was 26.6% (95%CI, 15.0-38.1%), 21.1% (95% CI, 10.9-31.2%) and 4% (95%CI: 0.8%-7.1%), respectively. The overall SVR rate in PEG-based and standard IFN-based therapy was 40.6% (24/59) and 20.9% (17/81), respectively. The most frequent side-effect requiring discontinuation of treatment was graft dysfunction (14 cases, 45.1%). Meta-regression analysis showed the covariates included contribute to the heterogeneity in the SVR logit rate, but not in the drop-out logit rate. The sensitivity analyses by the random model yielded very similar results to the fixed-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

IFN-based therapy for HCV infection post RT has poor efficacy and limited safety. PEG-based therapy is a more effective approach for treating HCV infection post-RT than standard IFN-based therapy. Future research is required to develop novel strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy and tolerability, and reduce the liver-related morbidity and mortality in this important patient population.

Is early virological response as predictive of the hepatitis C treatment response in dialysis patients as in non-uremic patients?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA present at week 12 is a good predictor of the response to interferon (IFN) monotherapy in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C.

METHODS

Hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C who were treated between 1997 and 2008 with IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks without dose reduction were included. The predictive value of HCV RNA at week 12 for achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) was determined.

RESULTS

Forty patients (mean age 47±9 years; 75% males and 80% with genotype 1) were included. Septal fibrosis or cirrhosis was observed in 38% of these patients. Twelve (30%) of the 40 patients achieved SVR. HCV RNA was undetectable at week 12 in 68%. The positive predictive value of HCV RNA at week 12 was 45% and the negative predictive value was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HCV RNA at week 12 had a high negative predictive value for SVR in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with IFN for 48 weeks. Therefore, if HCV RNA is detected at week 12, treatment should be discontinued due to the low probability of a sustained response.

Chronic hepatitis C

The goal of antiviral therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is to attain a sustained virologic response (SVR), which is defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA levels at 6 months after the cessation of treatment. Major improvements in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C have occurred in the past decade. The addition of ribavirin to interferon-alfa therapy and the introduction of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) have substantially improved SVR rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The optimization of HCV therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin continues to evolve. Studies are ongoing that use viral kinetics to tailor therapy to an individual's antiviral response and determine the ideal length of treatment to maximize the chance of SVR. Improved SVR can be achieved with new specific inhibitors that target the HCV NS3/4A protease and the NS5B polymerase. Several long-term follow-up studies have shown that SVR, when achieved, is associated with a very low risk of virologic relapse. Furthermore, antiviral therapy can reduce the morbidity and mortality rates associated with chronic hepatitis C by reducing fibrosis progression, the incidence of cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation: a review on historical aspects and current issues

Chronic liver disease has a significant impact on the survival of renal transplant recipients with an incidence rate of 4-38%. Approximately, 8-28% of renal transplant recipients die due to chronic liver disease. Hepatitis C seems to be the leading cause of chronic liver disease in kidney recipients. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a wide range of prevalence (2.6-66%) among renal transplant recipients living in different countries with great genotype diversity in different parts of the world. Nowadays, antiviral drugs are used for the management of hepatitis C. Because of graft-threatening effects of some antiviral drugs used in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients, we specifically focused on HCV treatment after renal transplantation. Treatment of post-renal transplantation chronic liver disease with INF and ribavirin remains controversial. Anecdotal reports on post-renal transplantation hepatitis C demonstrate encouraging findings. This review summarises the most current information on diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, complications as well as the new aspects of treatment in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients. HCV belongs to the family of Flaviviridae, genus Hepacivirus.

[Chronic viral hepatitis and kidney failure]

Chronic viral hepatitis remains a major problem among patients with chronic renal failure. Hepatitis B and C viruses are frequent among dialysis patients and after renal transplantation and may significantly diminish the survival of both the patient and the graft. Hepatitis B and C viral infection in these patients is often characterized by normal transaminase levels despite viremia and progressive liver lesions. Liver biopsy remains essential for assessing the extent of liver disease. Cirrhosis is a contraindication to transplantation of only a kidney, because of elevated morbidity and mortality. A combined as liver-kidney transplantation may be considered. The best treatment of hepatitis infections is preventive: vaccination against the hepatitis B virus and attentive hygiene, especially to prevent nosocomial transmission. Among patients not awaiting transplant, antiviral treatment should be reserved for patients with active or even fibrotic liver disease. For hemodialysis patients awaiting kidney transplant: Alpha interferon is ineffective and poorly tolerated by dialysis patients. Lamivudine is effective and well tolerated, but its long-term efficacy and its optimal effective dose in dialysis patients remain unknown.

Different impacts of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus on the outcome of kidney transplantation

Previous studies had shown that HBV and HCV infections lead to increased morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation when compared with the nonhepatitis group. However, few studies have compared the impact among a population with a high prevalence of HBV and HCV infections. We studied the outcomes of 346 recipients including 23 HBsAg (+) patients (6.6%; group 1), 22 patients with anti-HCV+ (6.3%, group 2), and 301 nonhepatitis patients (group 3) in a single center during a 6-year period. No patient had evidence of precirrhosis or cirrhosis before transplant. The primary end point was graft and patient survival rates. Secondary end point was the rate of progression of chronic allograft, nephropathy. The median follow-up time was 3.7 (0.5-6.8) years. Five-year actuarial graft survival was 80% for group 1, 61% for group 2, and 88 % for group 3 (P = .005). Cox regression showed HCV (hazards ratio 2.96; 95% CI = 1.03-8.51) and acute rejection episode (HR 3.01; 95%CI = 1.86-4.87) to be significant predictors of graft survival. Actuarial 5-year patient survival of group 1 was significantly lower than group 2 or group 3 (79 % vs 89% and 96%; P = .003). Cox regression revealed that the hazards ratio of HBV for death was 7.63 (95%CI = 1.88-30.86; P = .004). In contrast, HCV infection had no significant effect on patient survival (HR 1.59; 95%CI = 0.28-9.02). The rate of chronic allograft nephropathy progression was significantly faster in group 1 (-6.74 mL/min per year) and group 2 (-6.14 mL/min per year) than the controls. We concluded that HBV infection decreased patient survival earlier than HCV and that HCV decreased graft survival more significantly than HBV. Both HBV and HCV were associated with rapid progression of chronic allograft nephropathy. HBV was the strongest risk factor for mortality compared with HCV, with acute rejection episode, with diabetes mellitus, or other hazardous factors.

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in renal transplant: treatment and outcome

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a common cause of liver disease in post-renal transplant period and causes poor patient and graft survival. We analyzed the effects of antiviral therapy using ribavirin monotherapy or ribavirin in combination with interferon (IFN)-alpha in our kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Total of 14 patients received antiviral therapy, all of whom had stable graft function, raised aminotransferases and positive HCV viremia at the start of treatment. Eight patients received ribavirin alone for a period of six months to two yr, in doses of 400-800 mg daily. Five patients received IFN-alpha therapy for a period of two months to 1.5 yr, in doses of 1.5 million units daily or three million units thrice weekly with ribavirin. One patient received pegylated IFN 50 microg once weekly in combination with ribavirin. The response was seen in terms of biochemical and virological improvement at the end of study period.

RESULTS

In patients treated with ribavirin alone (n = 8), mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels before and after treatment were significantly different (198.4 +/- 147.6 and 104.8 +/- 66.5 IU/L respectively; p < 0.05). ALT levels normalized completely in three patients at the end of treatment, improved in three patients and deteriorated in two. Only in one of eight patients on ribavirin alone, HCV-RNA became negative after six months of treatment while in the rest (n = 7) HCV-RNA continued to be positive. In subjects on IFN plus ribavirin (n = 6), the mean ALT levels decreased significantly (from 280.2 +/- 114.9 IU/L at baseline to 71 +/- 49 IU/L at end of therapy; p < 0.05). Two patients had sustained remission (33.3%) on IFN plus ribavirin (persistently negative HCV-RNA), two patients relapsed after initial remission and in two patients treatment was stopped after two months because of graft dysfunction. Totally four patients developed graft dysfunction at some time during the course of IFN therapy (66.6%), but it was discontinued in only two (33.3%). All patients regained normal creatinine levels after discontinuation of IFN, although one patient developed chronic allograft nephropathy as shown by kidney biopsy. Four patients in IFN group developed leucopenia. Two patients developed severe anemia one of whom required blood transfusion and one developed severe flu-like syndrome requiring stoppage of therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ribavirin monotherapy in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C infection results in good biochemical response but is not associated with virological clearance. IFN in combination with ribavirin is effective in two-thirds of patients after a minimum therapy of six months, but it is poorly tolerated, results in graft dysfunction in significant number of patients, and relapse can occur after stopping treatment.

Treatment of hepatitis C in special populations

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver disease worldwide and is the most common chronic blood-borne infection in the United States. Experience has shown that the epidemiology and the response to treatment of HCV vary in certain patient groups. Differences have been observed in people from different racial and ethnic groups and in patients who have HIV and end-stage renal disease. These groups generally were not included in the early large clinical trials of HCV treatment. This article reviews recent findings in these patients groups and examines future directions.

Acute renal allograft rejection following pegylated IFN-alpha treatment for chronic HCV in a repeat allograft recipient on hemodialysis: a case report

Interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) can be effective therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease who have chronic hepatitis C (HCV). However, acute allograft rejection has been reported in association with IFN-alpha following kidney transplantation, and therefore IFN therapy is recommended prior to, rather than after, kidney transplantation whenever feasible. The special case of repeat allograft recipients who contract HCV after the first transplantation presents special difficulties. This report features the case of a repeat allograft recipient who presented with neutropenic fevers after 5 months of pegylated IFN-alpha therapy, initiated 6 months following the functional loss of his third graft and the reinitiation of hemodialysis (HD). Physical exam, radiographic and laboratory findings led to allograft nephrectomy. The pathologic findings supported a diagnosis of acute-on-chronic rejection. This represents a rare case of IFN-alpha induced rejection following allograft failure and return to HD in a repeat allograft recipient. It also calls attention to the need for a high index of suspicion for the development of allograft rejection, which may require allograft nephrectomy even after allograft 'failure'.

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Fibrotest in Hemodialysis and Renal Transplant Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus

BACKGROUND

An accurate diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver lesions is mandatory in dialysis patients and kidney recipients to better define the treatment of and contraindications to kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the fibrotest (a noninvasive method to assess liver fibrosis in HCV on a scale from 0 to 1) in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients infected by chronic HCV.

METHODS

In all, 110 patients with biopsy-proven HCV (60 renal transplant recipients and 50 hemodialysis patients), determined using the METAVIR scoring system, were studied.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of patients had fibrosis > or =F2. A positive predictive value of a score >0.6 for the presence of significant fibrosis by comparison with liver biopsy was 71%, and an negative predictive value of < 0.2 for excluding significant fibrosis was 77%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis were 0.66, 0.47, and 0.71 in the global population, hemodialysis patients, and renal transplant patients, respectively. In all, 75% of patients were correctly classified using the fibrotest. If biopsy was restricted to scores in the intermediate range (< 0.6 and >0.2), the index could reduce the indication for biopsy by 47%. The results did not differ significantly in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients.

CONCLUSION

The fibrotest has a diagnostic value in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients which is similar to that reported in the general population (75%) and its use could avoid 32% of liver biopsies if it were interpreted in detail in nephrology patients.

Treatment of hepatitis C in special populations

Treatment options for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have improved significantly in recent years, however, treatment recommendations came from large clinical trials of highly selected patient populations. HCV infection has increased prevalence in African Americans and also in patients who have HIV infection, end-stage renal disease, and hemophilia. This article reviews recent findings from research in these patient groups and examines future directions and treatment trials.

Histopathologic efficacy of ribavirin monotherapy in kidney allograft recipients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The deterioration of chronic hepatitis C is frequent in kidney recipients and results in a decrease in survival of patients and allografts. Interferon is contraindicated because of the risk of rejection and its low efficacy. The aim of this study was to analyze the biologic, virologic, and histopathologic efficacy of ribavirin alone in kidney allograft recipients with hepatitis C.

METHODS

Thirteen kidney recipients (eight men and five women, 46+/-11 years of age) with severe Metavir score of fibrosis (eight F3 and five F4) were treated with ribavirin alone during 22.4+/-13.9 months. Liver biopsy was performed before and during therapy, with a mean interval time of 5.7+/-9.3 years.

RESULTS

The transaminase level decreased significantly (128+/-77 vs. 53+/-28, P=0.001) without significant change of serum quantitative hepatitis C virus load. The comparison of pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy specimens showed a significant decrease in the activity Metavir score (1.23+/-1.01 vs. 2.46+/-0.78, P=0.05) and a nonsignificant trend for a decrease in the fibrosis score. Ribavirin tolerance was fair, and only one patient required erythropoietin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin alone in kidney allograft recipients results in biologic and histologic improvement without a virologic response and is reasonably well tolerated.

Impact of HCV infection on first cadaveric renal transplantation, a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Controversy still persists regarding the impact of HCV infection on renal transplant recipients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of anti-HCV antibody status on patients and grafts of renal transplants at a single center.

METHODS

We examined 299 first cadaveric renal transplants performed between July 1981 and May 2000 at our hospital, including 129 patients with anti-HCV antibody positive (HCV+ group) and 170 patients with anti-HCV antibody negative (HCV- group). The HBsAg of the 299 patients were all negative throughout the follow-up period. Causes of graft failure and patient death were analyzed. Patient and graft cumulative survival were compared between HCV+ and HCV- groups. Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model were calculated for risk hazards of outcome.

RESULTS

Overall cumulative patient survival was 97.72, 85.63 and 71.31% at 1, 10, and 15 yr, respectively, in the HCV+ group, compared with 95.02, 67.85 and 59.83% at 1, 10 and 15 yr, respectively, in the HCV- group (p = 0.014). The major cause of patient death in both groups was infection with 26.67% in HCV+ group and 60.87% in HCV- group. Cumulative graft survival in the HCV+ group revealed 92.26, 55.97 and 26.16% at 1, 10 and 15 yr, respectively, compared with 88.07, 58.34 and 58.32% at 1, 10 and 15 yr, respectively, in the HCV- group (p = 0.700). The major cause of graft failure was chronic allograft dysfunction (56.82%) in HCV+ group, and patient death (32.43%) in the HCV- group. Multivariate analysis of patient survival revealed anti-HCV antibody+ had lesser risk hazard (aRR: 0.30, p = 0.002), chronic hepatitis had higher risk hazard (aRR: 1.90, p = 0.135), male recipient had higher risk hazard (aRR: 2.18, p = 0.051), and older recipients (age >55) also had higher risk hazard (aRR: 4.21, p = 0.063). Analysis of graft survival revealed only older donors (age >35) had higher risk hazard (aRR: 1.90, p = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that patients with anti-HCV antibody had higher incidence of chronic hepatitis, chronic allograft dysfunction and post-transplantation nephrotic syndrome. Graft survival tended lower in the very long time. However, patients with anti-HCV antibodies had better patient survival when compared with patients without HCV antibodies up to 15 yr follow up. Patients of hepatitis C group without clinical chronic hepatitis was associated with best patient survival.

Hepatitis C and renal disease: an update

Hepatitis C is both a cause and a complication of chronic renal disease. Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to the immune complex syndromes of cryoglobulinemia and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN). The pathogenetic mechanisms for these conditions have not been defined, although they are clearly caused by the chronic viral infection. Management of HCV-related cryoglobulinemia and MPGN is difficult; antiviral therapy is effective in clearing HCV infection in a proportion of patients, but these conditions can be severe and resistant to antiviral therapy. Hepatitis C also is a complicating factor among patients with end-stage renal disease and renal transplants. The source of HCV infection in these patients can be nosocomial. Screening and careful attention to infection control precautions are mandatory for dialysis units to prevent the spread of hepatitis C. Prevention of spread is particularly important in these patients because HCV infection is associated with significant worsening of survival on dialysis therapy, as well as after kidney transplantation. Furthermore, therapy for hepatitis C is problematic, only partially effective, and associated with significant side effects in this population. There are significant needs in both basic and clinical research in the pathogenesis, natural history, prevention, and therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal disease.

Long-term ribavirin therapy in hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant patients: effects on renal function and liver histology

BACKGROUND

Long-term renal transplant (RT) recipient mortality and graft loss increase significantly in hepatitis C virus positive (HCV-[+]ve) patients. Treatment with alpha-interferon in this population is associated with a high rate of acute rejection. The aims of this study were the evaluation of the efficacy and the safety of ribavirin monotherapy in 16 HCV-(+) RT patients (group A) matched to 32 HCV-(+) RT patients (group B) who did not receive ribavirin.

METHODS

Ribavirin was started at a daily dose of 1,000 mg and then adapted to hemoglobin level. The study was scheduled for 1 year.

RESULTS

Ribavirin monotherapy was associated with a decrease in liver enzymes and serum creatinine levels. When proteinuria was present, this decreased or disappeared. There were no significant changes in HCV viremia. There was a significant progression in liver fibrosis with no improvement in inflammation scores. Hemoglobin levels fall dramatically, despite an important support by recombinant erythropoeitin (median, 20,000 IU/wk). In 3 cases, ribavirin therapy had to be stopped. In the control group, after 1 year of follow-up, there was a significant increase in serum alanine aminotransferase and creatinine values. Proteinuria decreased in only 2 of 12 patients (P = 0.03 as compared with group A).

CONCLUSION

One year of ribavirin monotherapy seems to have, at best, no beneficial effect on liver histology, although it improves liver enzyme levels. Despite its efficiency to dramatically decrease proteinuria, its impact on renal function remains unknown.