Blocking of costimulatory pathways using monoclonal antibodies as a new strategy to prevent transplant rejection in a non-human primate model

Primate models in organ transplantation

Large animal models have long served as the proving grounds for advances in transplantation, bridging the gap between inbred mouse experimentation and human clinical trials. Although a variety of species have been and continue to be used, the emergence of highly targeted biologic- and antibody-based therapies has required models to have a high degree of homology with humans. Thus, the nonhuman primate has become the model of choice in many settings. This article will provide an overview of nonhuman primate models of transplantation. Issues of primate genetics and care will be introduced, and a brief overview of technical aspects for various transplant models will be discussed. Finally, several prominent immunosuppressive and tolerance strategies used in primates will be reviewed.

Crossing the bridge: large animal models in translational transplantation research

Many methods for reducing the immunosuppressive requirements of allotransplantation have been proposed based on a growing understanding of physiological and allospecific immunity. As these regimens are developed for clinical application, they require validation in models that are reasonably predictive of their performance in humans. This article provides an overview of the large animal models commonly used to test immunomodulatory organ transplant protocols. The rationale for the use of large animals and the effects of common immunosuppressants in the dog, pig, and non-human primate are reviewed. Promising methods for the induction of allospecific tolerance are surveyed with references to early human trials where appropriate.

Tolerance: is it achievable in pediatric solid organ transplantation?

Significant advances have been made in the understanding of allograft rejection. There is growing awareness that allograft acceptance, or tolerance, is also an active process rather than a passive absence of rejection. Mechanistic awareness of this process has spawned many preclinical strategies for the prevention of allograft rejection without the need for chronic immunosuppression. These therapies are currently entering clinical trials. This article reviews the prevailing therapies that hold promise for future clinical application. In particular, their application in children is discussed, as are biologic aspects of childhood immunity that may play a role in the success or failure of these strategies.

Co-stimulatory blockade and tolerance induction in transplantation

Recipients of organ and tissue transplants require lifelong immunosuppression to prevent rejection. Better understanding of the processes culminating in allograft rejection has led to novel approaches to modulating the immune response. Co-stimulatory signals between antigen-presenting and -responding cells are essential for a normal alloimmune response, and blockade of these pathways during initial graft-host interaction may be used to ameliorate or prevent a destructive response from proceeding. A large number of experimental studies now support this concept, and early clinical trials have been initiated. Despite some early difficulties and many unanswered questions, co-stimulatory blockade has major potential as a future immune-modulating mechanism for use in clinical transplantation.

Coadministration of either cyclosporine or steroids with humanized monoclonal antibodies against CD80 and CD86 successfully prolong allograft survival after life supporting renal transplantation in cynomolgus monkeys

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown some efficacy using monotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against CD80 and CD86 receptors after life-supporting renal transplantation in non-human primates. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of combinations of the same mAbs with either microemulsion cyclosporine (CsA) or steroids.

METHODS

Unilateral renal transplantation was performed in 16 blood group-matched and MLR-mismatched cynomolgus monkeys that were assigned to four different treatment groups. All monkeys in groups I, II, and IV were treated with the combination of a CD80 (h1F1) and CD86 (h3D1) mAb given at 20 mg/kg each preoperatively, then 5 mg/kg at weekly intervals starting postoperative (po) day 0 until poday 56 (9 doses). In group I the animals (n=4) were treated with mAbs only. In group II (n=4) mAbs were combined with a CsA regimen adjusted daily to maintain target 24 hr trough levels of 150-300 ng/ml CsA for poday 0 to poday 56. In group III (n=4) the animals received CsA monotherapy according to the same regimen as group II. In group IV methylprednisone was administered at 2 mg/kg IV on poday 0-2, then at 0.5 mg/kg/day prednisone per gavage that was and tapered to 0.2 mg/kg/day on which they were maintained until poday 56. All animals were off all immunosuppressive treatment after poday 56 and were then followed until poday 119.

RESULTS

The mean survival of groups I-IV was 74 (range 9-119 days), 113 (96-119 days), 39 (22-71 days), and 79 days (6 to 119), respectively. All animals in group I showed clinical evidence of acute severe rejection (fever, creatinine increase, anuria) within the first week posttransplant, including those that retained renal function until poday 119. Only one animal in group II had a moderate clinical rejection during the treatment period and three of four animals survived the intended follow-up period. All animals in group III had multiple biopsy proven or severe clinical rejection episodes within the first 21 days and only one animal survived beyond poday 40. Moderate or severe acute rejection was diagnosed in three of four animals of group IV within the first 28 days post transplant and only one animal survived until poday 119.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that combining a calcineurin inhibitor or prednisone with mAbs designed to block costimulatory signals does not antagonize the immunosuppressive efficacy of these mAbs. In addition, combining CsA with mAbs directed against the CD80 and CD86 receptors significantly prolongs graft survival when compared to CsA monotherapy. Therefore clinical trials of humanized mAbs to CD80 and CD86 used in combination with conventional immunosuppression can be considered.

Expression and purification of monospecific and bispecific recombinant antibody fragments derived from antibodies that block the CD80/CD86-CD28 costimulatory pathway

The development of recombinant techniques for rapid cloning, expression, and characterization of cDNAs encoding antibody (Ab) subunits has revolutionized the field of antibody engineering. By fusion to heterologous protein domains, chain shuffling, or inclusion of self-assembly motifs, novel molecules such as bispecific Abs can be generated that possess the subset of functional properties designed to fit the intended application. We describe the engineering of Ab fragments produced in bacteria for blocking the CD28-CD80/CD86 costimulatory interaction in order to induce tolerance against transplanted organs. We designed single-chain Fv antibodies, monospecific and bispecific diabodies, and a bispecific tetravalent antibody (BiTAb) molecule directed against the CD80 and/or CD86 costimulatory molecules. These recombinant Ab molecules were expressed in Escherichia coli, followed by purification and evaluation for specific interaction with their respective antigen in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A specific sandwich ELISA confirmed the bispecificity of the bispecific diabodies and the BiTAb.

Prevention of renal allograft rejection in primates by blocking the B7/CD28 pathway

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence that blockade of the costimulatory pathways offers a valid approach for immune suppression after solid organ transplantation. In this study, the efficacy of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to prevent renal allograft rejection was tested in non-human primates.

METHODS

Rhesus monkeys were transplanted with a partly major histocompatibility complex-matched kidney on day 0. Anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs were administered intravenously daily for 14 days starting at day - 1. CsA was given intramuscularly for 35 days starting just after transplantation. The kidney function was monitored by determining serum creatinine levels.

RESULTS

The combination of anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs completely abrogated the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Untreated rhesus monkeys rejected the kidney allograft in 5-7 days. Treatment with anti-CD80 plus anti-CD86 mAbs resulted in a significantly prolonged graft survival of 28+ 7 days (P=0.025). There were no clinical signs of side effects or rejection during treatment. Kidney graft rejection started after the antibody therapy was stopped. The anti-mouse antibody response was delayed from day 10 to 30 after the first injection. No difference in graft survival was observed between animals treated with CsA alone or in combination with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs. However, treatment with anti-CD80 and anti-CD86 mAbs reduced development of vascular rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination, anti-CD80 and antiCD86 mAbs abrogate T-cell proliferation in vitro, delay the anti-mouse antibody response in vivo, and prevent graft rejection and development of graft vascular disease in a preclinical vascularized transplant model in non-human primates.