Role of acute rejection in chronic rejection

[Modern immunosuppression following renal transplantation. Standard or tailor made?]

Renal transplantation is by far the best therapeutic option for end-stage kidney disease with respect to quality of life, psychosocial rehabilitation, and even patient survival. Optimal immunosuppressive therapy should provide effective prophylaxis of both acute rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction. Thus immunosuppressive therapy should help to maintain good renal function and could help to prevent premature death of the recipient. With the introduction of new immunosuppressants over the last decade a dramatic reduction of acute rejection rates from approximately 50% to 15-30% could be achieved. However, the search for novel immunosuppressive drugs continues, drugs which not only lead to effective prevention of acute rejection, but also have an impact on chronic allograft dysfunction and prevent further deterioration of this multifactorial process. Based on a short presentation of the "three signal model" of immunoactivation, the most important mechanisms and characteristics of the presently available immunosuppressants are described. Because the immunosuppressive objectives change over time, a phase-dependent adaptation is necessary. At present, most centers in Germany use an immunosuppressive combination therapy, consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI; cyclosporine or tacrolimus), a glucocorticoid (prednisolone or methylprednisolone), and mycophenolic acid (MPA), which is eventually combined with an antibody (e.g., IL-2R antibody) for induction. In contrast to the clear situation 10 years ago, highly specialized knowledge is required today with respect to mechanism of action, side effects, and potential interactions. This may enable the physician to adopt patient-oriented optimal immunosuppression. In the near future more individualized treatment options will be employed, which are adapted to the characteristics and side effects of the immunosuppressant, as well as to the characteristics of the donor, the recipient, and the transplanted organ such as immunology and ischemia. Another aspect is the reduction or elimination of some immunosuppressants at the earliest possible time. With new diagnostic and genetic markers the relationship between recipient and transplanted organ will be characterized better in the future and therapy will become more individualized. Altogether, these measures as well as optimized supportive therapy will help to further improve the longevity of the transplanted organ.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results

BACKGROUND

Comparison studies of calcineurin inhibitors as cornerstone immunosuppressants in renal transplantation have demonstrated that tacrolimus consistently reduces acute rejection rates and, in some studies, also improves long-term renal outcome in comparison to cyclosporin A (CsA). The aim of the present 2 year follow-up of the European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was to investigate long-term clinical outcome in terms of rate of acute rejection, graft and patient survival and graft function.

METHODS

The European Tacrolimus vs Cyclosporin A Microemulsion Renal Transplantation Study was a randomized, comparative 6 month trial of the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and CsA in combination with both azathioprine and steroids. The intent-to-treat population (ITT) consisted of 286 patients in the tacrolimus arm and 271 in the CsA microemulsion (CsA-ME) arm. Whereas whole blood level targets were 10-20 and 5-15 ng/ml for tacrolimus and 100-400 and 100-200 ng/ml for CsA during months 0-3 and 4-6, respectively, during the investigator-driven follow-up after termination of the main study (months 7-24) no specific calcineurin inhibitor target levels were required. Follow-up data were collected at 2 years post-transplantation from 237 (82.9% of the ITT population) patients who received tacrolimus and 222 (81.9% of the ITT population) patients who received CsA-ME.

RESULTS

Calculated on ITT populations, mortality (2.0% vs 3.3%; P<0.05 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was lower, but rate of graft loss (9.3% vs 11.2%; P = 0.12 in Kaplan-Meier analysis) was not significantly different after 2 years with tacrolimus- vs CsA-ME-based immunosuppression. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly lower (19.6%) with tacrolimus than with CsA-ME (37.3%) during months 0-6 (P<0.0001), but was not significantly different during months 7-12 and 13-24 of follow-up (1.7% and 0.8% with tacrolimus and 4.7% and 0.9% with CsA-ME, respectively). A composite endpoint consisting of graft loss, patient death and biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred significantly more frequently in CsA-ME patients than in tacrolimus patients (42.8% vs 25.9%; P<0.001) during 24 months follow-up. Renal function 2 years post-transplant, measured by serum creatinine concentrations, was significantly better in tacrolimus-based compared with CsA-ME-based immunosuppression (136.9 vs 161.6 micromol/l; P<0.01). Cornerstone immunosuppression remained unchanged in 82.5% and 66.2% of patients treated with tacrolimus and CsA-ME, respectively. At 2 years, more patients in the tacrolimus arm were off steroids and received calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy, and fewer tacrolimus patients remained on a triple immunosuppressive regimen. The cardiovascular risk profile was affected favourably in the tacrolimus arm, with lower cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations (despite less use of cholesterol-lowering drugs); no significant difference in requirement for antidiabetic medication was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2 year study results confirm that tacrolimus is a highly efficacious cornerstone immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may induce long-term benefits with regard to graft function and graft survival. The overall side-effect profile is considered to be favourable.

Expression of multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein in kidney allografts from cyclosporine A-treated patients

BACKGROUND

The multidrug resistance (MDR) gene product P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is a transmembrane efflux pump for hydrophobic, potentially toxic compounds, including the immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CsA). We have previously shown that CsA increases P-gp expression in proximal tubule and endothelial cells in vitro. The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vivo relevance of these observations in renal allograft biopsies from CsA-treated patients.

METHODS

P-gp expression was determined by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections using two different monoclonal antibodies (UIC2 and MRK16). Biopsies were taken from CsA-treated renal transplant patients with different histopathological diagnoses (N = 79) and were compared with biopsies from normal human kidneys (N = 13) or with allograft biopsies from patients under a CsA-free immunosuppression (N = 15). Moreover, biopsies from 10 donor kidneys before implantation and during rejection episodes ("zero biopsies") were investigated.

RESULTS

P-gp expression in biopsies with acute tubular necrosis (ATN; N = 10) after CsA treatment was significantly higher in arterial endothelia, proximal tubules, and epithelial cells of Bowman's capsule (BC), whereas P-gp was sparsely induced in CsA nephrotoxicity (N = 19) compared with controls. Acute cellular (N = 30) and vascular rejection (N = 10) or chronic allograft nephropathy (N = 10) after CsA was associated with strong P-gp expression in infiltrating leukocytes and increased P-gp expression in arterial endothelia, proximal tubules, and BC. In contrast, biopsies of patients treated with a CsA-free immunosuppression regimen did not show increases in P-gp expression compared with controls. Zero biopsies showed a weak, homogeneous, nonpolarized expression of P-gp in tubules and an increased expression of P-gp after CsA therapy in the brush border, arterial endothelia, and BC.

CONCLUSIONS

CsA treatment was associated with increased P-gp expression in parenchymal cells of kidney transplants with ATN, acute or chronic transplant rejection, but P-gp was not increased in patients with CsA nephrotoxicity. This indicates that CsA induces its own detoxification by P-gp and that inadequate up-regulation of P-gp in renal parenchymal cells contributes to CsA nephrotoxicity. Increased expression of P-gp in infiltrating leukocytes correlated with the severity of allograft rejection, suggesting that P-gp may decrease the immunosuppressive efficacy of CsA. Thus, individual differences in the P-gp induction response of CsA-exposed renal parenchymal cells and/or infiltrating leukocytes may predispose to either CsA nephrotoxicity or rejection, respectively.

Which calcineurin inhibitor is preferred in renal transplantation: tacrolimus or cyclosporine?

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are potent inhibitors of the calcineurin-dependent cytokine synthesis in activated lymphocytes. In renal transplant patients tacrolimus is more powerful in preventing severe and refractory rejections, even when compared with the new cyclosporine microemulsion formulation. Both drugs are equally nephrotoxic, but tacrolimus induces less hypertension and less pronounced hyperlipidaemia. Especially in some categories of patients, a higher incidence of de-novo diabetes mellitus is seen with tacrolimus therapy.