Factors influencing renal transplantation in a developing country

[Immunological monitoring in kidney transplantation: 13 years experience of a Moroccan histocompatibility laboratory]

PURPOSE OF STUDY

The quality of the immunological monitoring is crucial because it determines the success of the kidney transplantation. The scope of this work is to describe the experience of the department of immunological unity of the Ibn Sina university hospital in Rabat regarding the immunological monitoring of patients transplanted between 2001 and 2014.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient samples were collected from nephrology services of different public and private hospitals of Morocco. The tests conducted in the context of immunological monitoring are ABO typing, HLA-A, B, DR, DQ typing, anti-HLA antibodies detection and identification and cross-match.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen benefited from a pre- and post-transplant immunological monitoring in our laboratory. The percentage of recipients having between 2 and 5 stored sera is 60.5 before transplantation and 56.1 after transplantation. Immunized patients account for 22.8% before the transplant and 17.6% after transplantation. Ninety-seven patients still have a functional graft, while 4 of them had DSA of low intensity before transplantation. Five immunological rejections were reported while the cross-match were negative and no DSA was identified before transplantation. Patient survival and graft at 1 year was 98.2% and 92.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conducting regular immunological monitoring is sometimes difficult in our context, however, the results are satisfactory in terms of graft and patients survival.

Health status and renal function evaluation of kidney vendors: a report from Pakistan

Unrelated kidney transplants have lead to commerce and kidney vending in Pakistan. This study on 104 vendors reports demographics, history, physical and systemic examination, ultrasound findings, renal and liver function and GFR by Cockcroft-Gault. Results were compared with 184 age, sex and nephrectomy duration matched living-related donors controls. Comparison of vendors versus controls showed mean age of 30.55 +/- 8.1 versus 30.65 +/- 7.85 (p = 0.91) years, M:F of 4.5:1 versus 4.2:1 and nephrectomy period of 33.89 +/- 30 versus 32.01 +/- 29.71 (p = 0.60) months respectively. Of the vendors 67% were bonded laborers earning <50 $/month as compared to controls where 68% were skilled laborers and self-employed earning >100 $/month. History of vendors revealed jaundice in 8%, stone disease in 2% and urinary tract symptoms in 4.8%. Postnephrectomy findings between vendors versus donors showed BMI of 21.02 +/- 2.8 versus 23.02 +/- 4.2 (p = 0.0001), hypertension in 17% versus 9.2% (p = 0.04), serum creatinine (mg/dL) of 1.17+/-0.21 versus 1.02 +/- 0.27 (p = 0.0001), GFR (mL/min) of 70.94 +/- 14.2 versus 95.4 +/- 20.44 (p = 0.0001), urine protein/creatinine of 0.150 +/- 0.109 versus 0.10 +/- 0.10 (p = 0.0001), hepatitis C positivity in 27% versus 1.0% (p = 0.0001) and hepatitis B positive 5.7% versus 0.5% (p = 0.04), respectively. In conclusion, vendors had compromised renal function suggesting inferior selection and high risk for developing chronic kidney disease in long term.