Role of the indirect recognition pathway in the development of chronic liver allograft rejection

Basic Understanding of Liver Transplant Immunology

The liver is a specialized organ and plays an important role in our immune system. The liver constitutes parenchymal cells which are hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (60-80%) and non-parenchymal cells like liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatic satellite/Ito cells, Kupffer cells, neutrophils, mononuclear cells, T and B lymphocytes (conventional and non-conventional), natural killer cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells. The liver mounts a rapid and strong immune response, under unfavorable conditions and acts as an immune tolerance to a variety of non-pathogenic antigens. This delicate and dynamic interaction between different kinds of immune cells in the liver maintains a balance between immune screening and immune tolerance. The liver allografts are privileged immunologically; however, allograft rejection is not uncommon and is classified as cell or antibody-mediated. Advancements in transplant immunology help in the prevention of allografts rejection by immune reactions of the host thus leading to better graft and host survival. Fewer patients may not require immunosuppression due to systemic donor-specific T-cell tolerance. The liver tolerance mechanism is poorly studied, and LSEC and unconventional lymphocytes play an important role that dampens T cell response either by inducing apoptosis of cells or inhibiting co-stimulatory pathways. Newer cell-based therapy based on Treg, dendritic cells, and mesenchymal stromal cells will probably change the future of immunosuppression. Various invasive and non-invasive biomarkers and artificial intelligence have also been investigated to predict graft survival, post-transplant complications, and immunotolerance in the future.

Contributions of direct and indirect alloresponses to chronic rejection of kidney allografts in nonhuman primates

The relative contribution of direct and indirect allorecognition pathways to chronic rejection of allogeneic organ transplants in primates remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated T and B cell alloresponses in cynomolgus monkeys that had received combined kidney/bone marrow allografts and myeloablative immunosuppressive treatments. We measured donor-specific direct and indirect T cell responses and alloantibody production in monkeys (n = 5) that did not reject their transplant acutely but developed chronic humoral rejection (CHR) and in tolerant recipients (n = 4) that never displayed signs of CHR. All CHR recipients exhibited high levels of anti-donor Abs and mounted potent direct T cell alloresponses in vitro. Such direct alloreactivity could be detected for more than 1 y after transplantation. In contrast, only two of five monkeys with CHR had a detectable indirect alloresponse. No indirect alloresponse by T cells and no alloantibody responses were found in any of the tolerant monkeys. Only one of four tolerant monkeys displayed a direct T cell alloresponse. These observations indicate that direct T cell alloresponses can be sustained for prolonged periods posttransplantation and result in alloantibody production and chronic rejection of kidney transplants, even in the absence of detectable indirect alloreactivity.

Alloantibodies and outcomes of deceased donor kidney allografts

Analysis of the anti-HLA antibody status of 100 recipients of kidneys from deceased donors demonstrated that presensitization and the development of alloantibodies after transplantation are associated with the development of antibody mediated as well as cellular rejection. This finding indicates that the humoral arm of the immune response is also involved in cell-mediated rejection and/or that there may be a continuum between these two forms of rejection. Most episodes of rejection were successfully reversed in our population, as shown by the overall 3-year actuarial survival of 98% in nonsensitized and 91% in sensitized recipients, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive antibody studies.

Transplantation immunology: what the clinician needs to know for immunotherapy

The liver is unique among transplanted organs with respect to its interaction with the host immune system. There is evidence, both anecdotal and documented, that some liver recipients who cease taking immunosuppressive drugs maintain allograft function, suggesting robust tolerance is in place. Moreover, recipients of human liver allografts require less immunosuppression than do other organ recipients, and liver transplants confer protection on other organ grafts from the same donor. Hence, the liver shows features of immune privilege. Still, the liver can display destructive immunologic processes such as rejection in approximately one quarter of patients. The understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms operant in tolerance vs allograft rejection is important for developing new agents to improve long-term outcome, minimize infectious complications (including recurrence of hepatotropic viruses), and deliver immunosuppression without long-term toxicity. This review describes the unique aspects of the hepatic immune response, the pathways involved in T-cell activation and alloantigen recognition, effector cells and pathways mediating liver allograft rejection, the role of regulatory T cells, and targets of current and future immunosuppressive agents.

Monitoring of indirect allorecognition: wishful thinking or solid data?

Monitoring of T cells involved in the alloimmune response after transplantation requires the availability of reliable in vitro assays for the detection of T cells with both direct and indirect allospecificity. While generally accepted assays exist to measure helper and cytotoxic T cells involved in direct allorecognition, consensus about an assay for monitoring indirect T-cell allorecognition in clinical transplantation is lacking. Many studies claim a relationship between the reactivity of T cells with indirect allospecificity and graft rejection, but different protocols are used and essential controls are often lacking. In this review, the disadvantages and pitfalls of the current approaches are discussed, in some cases supported by the results of our own in vitro experiments. We conclude that an international workshop is necessary to establish and validate a uniform, robust and reliable assay for the monitoring of transplant recipients and to study the actual role of indirect allorecognition in acute and chronic rejection.

A novel flow assay for the detection of cytokine secreting alloreactive T cells: application to immune monitoring

The direct and indirect allorecognition pathways play an important role in graft rejection. We hypothesized that the presence of alloreactive memory T cells in the recipient's circulation increases the risk of rejection after transplantation. The objective of this study was to develop a noninvasive, immune monitoring tool that simultaneously measures donor-specific responses via both the direct and indirect recognition pathways. Our laboratory developed a whole blood flow cytometric cytokine secretion assay to identify interferon (IFN)-gamma secreting memory T cells in whole blood of renal transplant patients. The assay readily detected IFN-gamma producing CD3+ T cells in response to recall antigens tetanus toxoid, purified protein derivative, and alloantigens in whole blood from healthy controls. Analysis of sequential posttransplant blood samples from 19 renal allograft recipients showed that alloimmune responses were higher in transplant recipients who had undergone acute rejection than in those without acute rejection episodes. In addition, patients showing increased creatinine levels 3 months after transplantation were more likely to exhibit alloimmune responses than recipients with stable graft function. The flow cytokine secretion assay provides a reliable and simple method for identification of patients at risk of acute rejection and early graft dysfunction.

Predominant IL-10 production in indirect alloreactivity is not associated with rejection

In a prospective study of indirect alloresponse in renal transplantation, we detected proliferation and cytokine production to donor and third-party HLA-DR peptides unrelated to rejection. Twenty of 28 patients (71%) presented proliferation, 29% before and 71% after transplantation. Half of the patients also presented proliferation to third-party peptides. Indirect alloresponse was also detected in 75% of healthy individuals (HI). Variability of response was observed in patients and HI for both proliferation and cytokine production. IL-10 predominance was observed in indirect alloresponses to donor peptides pre- and post-Tx, in contrast with more IFN-gamma and TGF-beta being detected in HI. IL-10 production was frequently detected without proliferation, in contrast with more frequent proliferation being found with IFN-gamma and TGF-beta production. The lack of association of either cytokine or proliferation with rejection, together with the predominance of IL-10 unrelated to proliferation, suggests that regulatory cells may be part of the T cell repertoire involved in indirect alloreactivity.