1
|
Frutos MÁ, Crespo M, Valentín MDLO, Alonso-Melgar Á, Alonso J, Fernández C, García-Erauzkin G, González E, González-Rinne AM, Guirado L, Gutiérrez-Dalmau A, Huguet J, Moral JLLD, Musquera M, Paredes D, Redondo D, Revuelta I, Hofstadt CJVD, Alcaraz A, Alonso-Hernández Á, Alonso M, Bernabeu P, Bernal G, Breda A, Cabello M, Caro-Oleas JL, Cid J, Diekmann F, Espinosa L, Facundo C, García M, Gil-Vernet S, Lozano M, Mahillo B, Martínez MJ, Miranda B, Oppenheimer F, Palou E, Pérez-Saez MJ, Peri L, Rodríguez O, Santiago C, Tabernero G, Hernández D, Domínguez-Gil B, Pascual J. Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia 2022; 42 Suppl 2:5-132. [PMID: 36503720 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Juana Alonso
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Esther González
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Guirado
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jorge Huguet
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Musquera
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplantation Coordination Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ignacio Revuelta
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alonso
- Regional Transplantation Coordination, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Gabriel Bernal
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- RT Surgical Team, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Joan Cid
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Nephrology and RT Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Espinosa
- Paediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carme Facundo
- Nephrology Department, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Miquel Lozano
- Apheresis and Cell Therapy Unit, Haemotherapy and Haemostasis Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eduard Palou
- Immunology Department, Hospital Clinic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lluis Peri
- Urology Department, Hospital Clinic Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Domingo Hernández
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Nephrology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Recomendaciones para el trasplante renal de donante vivo. Nefrologia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
3
|
Wang W, Leichtman AB, Rees MA, Song PXK, Ashby VB, Shearon T, Kalbfleisch JD. Kidney Paired Donation Chains Initiated by Deceased Donors. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:1278-1288. [PMID: 35685310 PMCID: PMC9171627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Rather than generating 1 transplant by directly donating to a candidate on the waitlist, deceased donors (DDs) could achieve additional transplants by donating to a candidate in a kidney paired donation (KPD) pool, thereby, initiating a chain that ends with a living donor (LD) donating to a candidate on the waitlist. We model outcomes arising from various strategies that allow DDs to initiate KPD chains. Methods We base simulations on actual 2016 to 2017 US DD and waitlist data and use simulated KPD pools to model DD-initiated KPD chains. We also consider methods to assess and overcome the primary criticism of this approach, namely the potential to disadvantage blood type O-waitlisted candidates. Results Compared with shorter DD-initiated KPD chains, longer chains increase the number of KPD transplants by up to 5% and reduce the number of DDs allocated to the KPD pool by 25%. These strategies increase the overall number of blood type O transplants and make LDs available to candidates on the waitlist. Restricting allocation of blood type O DDs to require ending KPD chains with LD blood type O donations to the waitlist markedly reduces the number of KPD transplants achieved. Conclusion Allocating fewer than 3% of DD to initiate KPD chains could increase the number of kidney transplants by up to 290 annually. Such use of DDs allows additional transplantation of highly sensitized and blood type O KPD candidates. Collectively, patients of each blood type, including blood type O, would benefit from the proposed strategies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Krupic F, Westin O, Hagelberg M, Sköldenberg O, Samuelsson K. The Influence of Age, Gender and Religion on Willingness to be an Organ Donor: Experience of Religious Muslims Living in Sweden. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2019; 58:847-859. [PMID: 30006834 PMCID: PMC6522646 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-018-0670-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The transplantation of organs is one of the most successful medical advances in recent decades, and transplantation is the treatment of choice for severe organ failure worldwide. Despite this situation and the general acknowledgment of organ donation (OD) as a global priority, the demand for organs outstrips the supply in virtually every country in the world. The study aims to elucidate whether age, gender and religion influence decision-making about organ donation in religious Muslims living in Sweden Data were collected through three group interviews using open-ended questions and qualitative content analysis. Twenty-seven participants, 15 males and 12 females from four countries, participated in the focus group interviews. The analysis of the collected data resulted in three main categories: "Information and knowledge about organ donation," "The priorities when deciding about organ donation" and "The religious aspects of organ donation," including a number of subcategories. Good information about and knowledge of OD, priorities in OD, importance of the fact that religion must be studied and taught daily and religious education were only a few of the factors informants emphasized as predictors of the total and successful donation of organs. Age, gender or religion did not have an impact on organ donation. High levels of education through religious education and good information via various media, as well as a good knowledge of the Swedish language, are predictors of improved OD. In order to overcome religious ideology as a source of misinformation relating to OD and to promote increased OD in the future, specific intervention studies and the improved involvement of religious communities and education in schools and the healthcare system are vital and must be a starting point for improved OD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferid Krupic
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden.
| | - Olof Westin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Mårten Hagelberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Sköldenberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborgsvägen 31, 431 80, Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on living donors from the donors' perspective show that the donation process involves both positive and negative feelings involving vulnerability. Qualitative studies of living kidney, liver, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donors have not previously been merged in the same analysis. Therefore, our aim was to synthesize current knowledge of these donors' experiences to deepen understanding of the meaning of being a living donor for the purpose of saving or extending someone's life. METHODS The meta-ethnography steps presented by Noblit and Hare in 1988 were used. RESULTS Forty-one qualitative studies from 1968 to 2016 that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The studies comprised experiences of over 670 donors. The time since donation varied from 2 days to 29 years. A majority of the studies, 25 of 41, were on living kidney donors. The synthesis revealed that the essential meaning of being a donor is doing what one feels one has to do, involving 6 themes; A sense of responsibility, loneliness and abandonment, suffering, pride and gratitude, a sense of togetherness, and a life changing event. CONCLUSIONS The main issue is that one donates irrespective of what one donates. The relationship to the recipient determines the motives for donation. The deeper insight into the donors' experiences provides implications for their psychological care.
Collapse
|
6
|
McDonald M, Veale J. The Onus for Altruism in Kidney Transplantation. Eur Urol Focus 2018; 4:206-207. [PMID: 30057344 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Ideally, all programs performing living donor kidney transplantation should educate patients on all contemporary exchange options. They should be strongly encouraged to participate in multicenter exchange, or at least refer those with a willing yet incompatible donor to a center that does, and to preferentially allocate altruistic donor kidneys towards chain initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle McDonald
- Division of Renal Transplantation, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jefferey Veale
- Division of Renal Transplantation, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ross LF, Rodrigue JR, Veatch RM. Ethical and Logistical Issues Raised by the Advanced Donation Program "Pay It Forward" Scheme. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY 2018; 42:518-536. [PMID: 28922906 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhx018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The advanced donation program was proposed in 2014 to allow an individual to donate a kidney in order to provide a voucher for a kidney in the future for a particular loved one. In this article, we explore the logistical and ethical issues that such a program raises. We argue that such a program is ethical in principle but there are many logistical issues that need to be addressed to ensure that the actual program is fair to both those who do and do not participate in this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James R Rodrigue
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachussetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barnieh L, Collister D, Manns B, Lam NN, Shojai S, Lorenzetti D, Gill JS, Klarenbach S. A Scoping Review for Strategies to Increase Living Kidney Donation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:1518-1527. [PMID: 28818845 PMCID: PMC5586566 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.01470217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The literature on strategies to increase the number of potential living kidney donors is extensive and has yet to be characterized. Scoping reviews are a novel methodology for systematically assessing a wide breadth of a given body of literature and may be done before conducting a more targeted systematic review. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We performed a scoping review and summarized the evidence for existing strategies to increase living kidney donation. RESULTS Our review identified seven studies that tested interventions using rigorous methods (i.e., randomized, controlled trials) and outcome measures, all of which focused on using education targeted at potential recipients to increase living donation. Of these, two studies that targeted the potential recipients' close social network reported statistically significant results. Other interventions were identified, but their effect was assessed through quasiexperimental or observational study designs. CONCLUSIONS We identified an important gap in the literature for evidence-based strategies to increase living kidney donation. From the limited data available, strategies directed at potential recipients and their social networks are the most promising. These results can inform transplant programs that are considering strategies to increase living kidney donation and highlight the need for conduct of high-quality study to increase living donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Barnieh
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David Collister
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Braden Manns
- Department of Community Health Sciences and
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - Ngan N. Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Soroush Shojai
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane Lorenzetti
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Foothills Medical Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and
| | - John S. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Scott Klarenbach
- Division of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krupic F, Sayed-Noor AS, Fatahi N. The impact of knowledge and religion on organ donation as seen by immigrants in Sweden. Scand J Caring Sci 2016; 31:687-694. [DOI: 10.1111/scs.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ferid Krupic
- Department of Orthopaedics; Institute of Clinical Sciences; Sahlgrenska Academy; University of Gothenburg; Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Arkan S. Sayed-Noor
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences; Umeå University; Umeå Sweden
| | - Nabi Fatahi
- University of Gothenburg; Institute of Health and Caring Sciences; Gothenburg Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrari P, Weimar W, Johnson RJ, Lim WH, Tinckam KJ. Kidney paired donation: principles, protocols and programs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30:1276-85. [PMID: 25294848 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 08/30/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the ongoing shortage of deceased-donor organs, novel strategies to augment kidney transplantation rates through expanded living donation strategies have become essential. These include desensitization in antibody-incompatible transplants and kidney paired donation (KPD) programs. KPD enables kidney transplant candidates with willing but incompatible living donors to join a registry of other incompatible pairs in order to find potentially compatible transplant solutions. Given the significant immunologic barriers with fewer donor options, single-center or small KPD programs may be less successful in transplanting the more sensitized patients; the optimal solution for the difficult-to-match patient is access to more potential donors and large multicenter or national registries are essential. Multicenter KPD programs have become common in the last decade, and now represent one of the most promising opportunities to improve transplant rates. To maximize donor-recipient matching, and minimize immunologic risk, these multicenter KPD programs use sophisticated algorithms to identify optimal match potential, with simultaneous two-, three- or more complex multiway exchanges. The article focuses on the recent progresses in KPD and it also reviews some of the differences and commonalities across four different national KPD programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Ferrari
- Department of Nephrology, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, WA, Australia School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Organ and Tissue Authority, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Dutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wai H Lim
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Kathryn J Tinckam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and HLA Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada Canadian Blood Services, Organ Donation and Transplantation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paired and Altruistic Kidney Donation in the UK: Algorithms and Experimentation. EXPERIMENTAL ALGORITHMS 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30850-5_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
12
|
Ferrari P, Fidler S, Wright J, Woodroffe C, Slater P, Van Althuis-Jones A, Holdsworth R, Christiansen FT. Virtual crossmatch approach to maximize matching in paired kidney donation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11:272-8. [PMID: 21070601 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03313.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We developed and tested a new computer program to match maximal sets of incompatible live donor/recipient pairs from a national paired kidney donation (PKD) registry. Data of 32 incompatible pairs included ABO and 4 digit-high-resolution donor and recipient HLA antigens and recipient's HLA antibodies. Three test runs were compared, in which donors were excluded from matching to recipients with either donor-specific antibodies (DSA) >8000MFI (mean fluorescent intensity) at low-resolution (Run 1) or >8000MFI at high-resolution (Run 2) or >2000MFI and high-resolution (Run 3). Run 1 identified 22 703 possible combinations, with 20 pairs in the top ranked, Run 2 identified 24 113 combinations, with 19 pairs in the top ranked and Run 3 identified 8843 combinations, with 17 pairs in the top ranked. Review of DSA in Run 1 revealed that six recipients had DSA 2000-8000MFI causing a possible positive crossmatch resulting in breakdown of two 3-way and three 2-way chains. In Run 2, four recipients had DSA 2000-8000MFI, also potentially causing breakdown of three 2-way chains. The more prudent approach of excluding from matching recipients with DSA with >2000MFI reduces the probability of matched pairs having a positive crossmatch without significantly decreasing the number of possible transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Ferrari
- Department of Nephrology, Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kane F, Clement G, Kane M. Live kidney donations and the ethic of care. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2008; 29:173-188. [PMID: 18642067 DOI: 10.1007/s10912-008-9059-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we seek to re-conceptualize the ethical framework through which ethicists and medical professionals view the practice of live kidney donations. The ethics of organ donation has been understood primarily within the framework of individual rights and impartiality, but we show that the ethic of care captures the moral situation of live kidney donations in a more coherent and comprehensive way, and offers guidance for practitioners that is more attentive to the actual moral transactions among donors and recipients. A final section offers guidelines for the practice of live kidney transplants that emerge from an ethic of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Kane
- Philosophy Department, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD 21801, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In developing countries such as India, extending donor-swap transplantation (DSTx) to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched patient-donor pairs would increase well-matched living donor kidney transplantation rates, resulting in use of less immunosuppression and less expenses, lower infective morbidity, and better survival. A model for DSTx based on HLA matching is presented. METHODS Consecutive HLA class 1 antigen (A, B) tests of prospective renal allograft recipients and their related donors, performed at a single center in India was analyzed retrospectively using an HLA matching program to determine the proportion of prospective recipients with poorly matched related donors who could have benefited by DSTx based on HLA matching. RESULTS Over the past 17.5 years, 2,129 prospective renal allograft recipients and 2,890 donors were tested for HLA class I (A and B) antigens. Of the prospective recipients, 33% did not have well-matched donors (defined as blood group compatible and sharing > or =2 of 4 HLA class I antigens). Among such recipients, 19.2% could have found a well-matched donor-swap pair within a year at a single center. This number would increase to 38% if four major national centers were involved with a shared HLA registry. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 40% of prospective recipients without well-matched donors would find a donor-swap pair based on HLA matching within a year, with coordination among four national centers and a shared HLA registry, increasing the well-matched living donor renal transplant rates and improving transplant outcomes. This finding is relevant in the context of Indian government amending the Transplantation of Human Organs Act to encourage DSTx.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Kidney paired donation (KPD) is an exchange of organs between two live donors, who are otherwise ABO incompatible or cross-match positive, and their intended recipients. The outcome is the generation of compatible transplants conferring an improvement in quality of life and longevity.
Methods
Medline was searched for articles on KPD using a combination of keywords. Publications focusing on protocols and policy, mathematical modelling, ethical controversies, and legal and logistical barriers were identified.
Results
Many are precluded from transplantation because of incompatibilities with their intended donors. KPD has the potential to increase the rate of transplantation by facilitating exchange transplants between otherwise incompatible donor–recipient couples. Ethical controversies surrounding paired donation include confidentiality, conditionality of donation, synchronicity of operations and the possibility of disadvantaging blood group O recipients. Logistical barriers hampering KPD programmes involve the location of donor surgery and organ transport.
Conclusion
Paired donation may expand the living donor pool by providing an alternative successful strategy for incompatible donor–recipient couples. Its widespread implementation will depend on resolving ethical and logistical constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A O Mahendran
- Renal Transplantation Unit, Royal Free Hospital and University College London Medical School, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim BS, Kim YS, Kim SI, Kim MS, Lee HY, Kim YL, Kim CD, Yang CW, Choi BS, Han DJ, Kim YS, Kim SJ, Oh HY, Kim DJ. Outcome of Multipair Donor Kidney Exchange by a Web-Based Algorithm. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18:1000-6. [PMID: 17267737 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2006101071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor kidney exchange is an established method to overcome incompatibility of donor-recipient pairs (DRP). A computerized algorithm was devised to exchange donor kidney and was tested in a multicenter setting. The algorithm was made according to the consensus of participating centers. It makes all possible exchange combinations not only between two incompatible DRP but also circularly among three DRP and selects an optimum set of exchange combinations, considering several factors that can affect the outcome of the exchanged transplant. The algorithm was implemented as a web-based program, and matching was performed five times. Fifty-three DRP were enrolled from five transplant centers. The numbers of DRP that were enrolled in each matching were 38 (25:13), 39 (34:5), 33 (31:2), 32 (28:4), and 34 (30:4) (carryover:newcomer). The numbers of generated exchange combinations were 4:11, 3:17, 2:12, 2:3, and 2:3 (two-pair exchange:three-pair exchange), and the numbers of DRP in selected exchange combinations were six, 12, six, five, and four in each matching. The numbers of DRP with blood type O recipient or AB donor were five and one, respectively, in selected exchange combinations. Six DRP of two-pair exchange combinations and six DRP of three-pair exchange combinations underwent transplantation successfully. Computerized algorithm of donor kidney exchange was tried not only between two incompatible DRP but also circularly among three DRP. It showed that the algorithm has potential to improve the outcome of donor kidney exchange, especially for disadvantaged DRP with blood type O recipients or AB donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beom Seok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Kidney Desease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Baid-Agrawal S, Frei UA. Living donor renal transplantation: recent developments and perspectives. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 3:31-41. [PMID: 17183260 DOI: 10.1038/ncpneph0383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2005] [Accepted: 10/31/2006] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients of all ages with end-stage renal disease. Life expectancy of the population in general is increasing consistently, as is the age of the dialysis population. Consequently, the average ages of kidney donors and recipients are rising. The combination of a growing number of patients with end-stage renal disease and a shortage of organs poses a significant challenge to the transplant community. Donor shortage is associated with unfavorable consequences (e.g. prolonged waiting time, and compromised graft and patient survival). As such, multidirectional efforts are required to expand the donor pool. Increasing the frequency of living donation seems to be an efficient solution. Living donation is associated with superior results for the recipient, and relatively benign long-term outcomes for donors. Reluctance to use organs from living donors whose eligibility was previously considered marginal (e.g. elderly donors) is declining. Although increased donor age is associated with reduced graft survival rates, this should not preclude use of older living donors; transplantation is definitely superior to remaining on dialysis. Thorough, standardized evaluation and careful screening for premorbid conditions in both elderly donors and elderly recipients are essential. Here, we present various options for expanding the living donor pool, with emphasis on the utilization of elderly living donors and transplantation in elderly recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema Baid-Agrawal
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Ramos
- Nephrology Division, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thiel G, Vogelbach P, Gürke L, Gasser T, Lehmann K, Voegele T, Kiss A, Kirste G. Crossover renal transplantation: hurdles to be cleared! Transplant Proc 2001; 33:811-6. [PMID: 11267078 DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02802-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G Thiel
- University of Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- A J Matas
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Klein T, Or H, Zakai C, Shapira Z, Yussim A. Successful interspousal swap of ABO incompatible living donor kidneys. Transplant Proc 2000; 32:688-9. [PMID: 10856543 DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)00941-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Klein
- Tissue Typing Laboratory and Department of Transplantation, Rabin Medical Center and Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|