Evaluation of the acoustic intensity of new ultrasound therapy equipment

Laser light sources for photobiomodulation: The role of power and beam characterization in treatment accuracy and reliability

Purpose

Daily clinical use of therapeutic light sources can lead to changes in light emission stability with potentially significant consequences for usage in photomedicine treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the average and maximum power and to describe the beam diameter of different low-power laser photobiomodulation devices in clinical use in Brazil.

Methods

The power and light-emitting beam diameter of twenty-four therapeutic devices with an average age of 11±5 years, with an average weekly use of fewer than thirty minutes, were measured.

Results

The analyzed power varied between 2% to 134% of the values declared by the manufacturers. Differences in beam diameter of between 38% and 543% of the nominal values were also observed. It is also noteworthy that even between the same brand and model, differences in diameter were obtained. Finally, differences were observed in the power output after one and three minutes of sequential emission for 830 nm and 904 nm (p < 0.05), but not when comparing the difference between wavelengths in factor time.

Conclusion

There is a need for a shared effort on the part of laser manufacturers to improve standardization and consistency of laser output power and beam diameters. At the same time, medical laser operators should also consider development of standardized protocols for maintenance and monitoring equipment performance over time to correct for fluctuations that could ultimately impact on treatment outcomes.

Linear Relationship between the Effective Radiation Area and Thermal Images on a Thermochromatic Test Body with 1-MHz Ultrasonic Transducers

The performance of therapeutic ultrasonic (TUS) devices has a high degree of variability because of the fragility of the equipment (its transducer in particular) and its handling. These facts raise doubts about the effectiveness and safety of treatments employing such devices. Currently there is no simple way to adequately verify the performance of these devices. In our first experiments, we used a thermochromatic test body (typically a cylindrical plate 3.7 cm in diameter and 5.8 mm high) irradiated with therapeutic transducers driven by a standard radiofrequency (RF) generator. Results revealed a linear relationship between the thermal image areas, generated by the transducer's irradiation, and their respective effective radiation areas (ERAs), suggesting a good correlation. With five 3-MHz transducers, our group also observed the linear relationship using commercial TUS RF driving devices. In the present work, we used four 1-MHz transducers with their respective TUS RF driving devices and verified that there is a linear relationship between the thermal images and the ERAs at intensities of 1.0 ± 0.1 and 0.5 ± 0.05 W/cm². The linear relationship obtained at both intensities confirms the suggestion that these thermochromatic test bodies can be used as the first evaluation of the ERAs and can monitor their changes with use. Moreover, if a previous assessment of the ERA and transducer intensities is performed, it is possible to follow the variation in ERA simply by monitoring the test body thermal stain.

Thermochromic Phantom and Measurement Protocol for Qualitative Analysis of Ultrasound Physiotherapy Systems

Thermochromic test bodies are promising tools for qualitatively evaluating the acoustic output of ultrasound physiotherapy systems. Here, a novel phantom, made of silicone mixed with thermochromic powder material, was developed. Additionally, a procedure was developed to evaluate the stability and homogeneity of the phantom in a metrologic and statistical base. Twelve phantoms were divided into three groups. Each group was insonated by a different transducer. An effective intensity of 1.0 W/cm(2) was applied to each phantom; two operators performed the procedure three times in all phantoms. The heated area was measured after image processing. No statistical difference was observed in the heated areas for different samples or in the results for different operators. The heated areas obtained using each transducer were statistically different, indicating that the thermochromic phantom samples had sufficient sensitivity to represent the heated areas of different ultrasonic transducers. Combined with the evaluation procedure, the phantom provides an approach not previously described in the literature. The proposed approach can be used to quickly assess changes in ultrasonic beam cross-sectional shape during the lifetime of ultrasound physiotherapy systems.

The effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound for musculoskeletal conditions of the lower limb: A literature review

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is suggested as one of the treatment options available for soft tissue musculoskeletal conditions of the lower limb and to this end, the objective was to review the literature and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound for musculoskeletal conditions of the lower limb.

METHODS

A search of the literature published between 1975 and February 2009 was carried out. All studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were quality assessed and scored using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) appraisal tool [1] for randomised controlled trials.

RESULTS

Ten studies out of a possible fifteen were included in the review. Only one trial was considered to be high quality (score 16+), three medium quality trials (score 11-15) were identified and six trials were considered to be low or poor quality (score≤10). None of the six placebo-controlled trials found any statistically significant differences between true and sham ultrasound therapy.

CONCLUSION

This literature review found that there is currently no high quality evidence available to suggest that therapeutic ultrasound is effective for musculoskeletal conditions of the lower limb.

Evaluation of therapeutic ultrasound equipment performance

The therapeutic ultrasound (US) is one of the resources mostly used by physiotherapists; however the use of uncalibrated equipment results in inefficient or even harmful therapies to the patient. In this direction, the objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and the procedures of utilization and maintenance of US in use in clinics and Physical-therapy offices. A questionnaire with questions related to the procedures applied in service during the use of therapeutic ultrasound was applied to physiotherapists. The performance of 31 equipment of 6 different brands and 13 different models was evaluated according to the IEC 61689 norm. The parameters measured were: acoustic power; effective radiating area (AER); non-uniformity ratio of the beam (RBN); maximum effective intensity; acoustic frequency of operation, modulation factor and wave form on pulsate mode. As for the questionnaires, it was evident that the professionals are not concerned about the calibration of the equipment. The results demonstrated that only 32.3% of the equipment were in accordance with the norms for the variables power and effective radiation area. The frequency analysis indicated that 20% of the 3MHz transducers and 12.5% of the 1MHz contemplated the norms. In the pulsate mode, 12.7% presented relation rest/duration inside allowed limits. A great variation of the ultrasonic field was observed on the obtained images, which presented beams not centered, sometimes with bifurcation of its apex. The results allow concluding that, although used in therapeutic sessions with the population, none of the equipment presents all the analyzed variables inside technical norms.

Radiant power determination of low-level laser therapy equipment and characterization of its clinical use procedures

OBJECTIVE

The main objectives of this study were to characterize low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the physical therapy clinical procedures for its use.

BACKGROUND DATA

There are few scientific studies that characterize the calibration of LLLT equipment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty lasers at 36 physical therapy clinics were selected. The equipment was characterized through data collected from the owner manuals, direct consultation with the manufacturers, and a questionnaire answered by the users. A digital potency analyzer was used to calibrate released mean potency. Qualitative data were presented throughout the descriptive statistics and quantitative data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher tests (significance, p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The laser equipment was either AsGa (70.5%) or HeNe (23.5%), and 60% was analog and acquired over 5 years ago. The majority of the equipment was used 10-15 times per week and the most frequent density level used was 2 to 4 J/cm(2). Protective goggles were available in only 19.4% of the clinics evaluated. The association between the analyzed categories demonstrated that a lower mean potency was correlated both with equipment acquired over 5 years ago and analog technology. The determined mean potency was lower than the one claimed by the manufacturer (p < 0.05). In 30 cases, the analyzed equipment presented a potency between 3 microW and 5.6 mW; in three cases, the potency was >25 mW; and in seven cases, potency was nonexistent.

CONCLUSION

The analyzed equipment was out-dated and periodical maintenance was not conducted, which was reflected in the low irradiated potency.

The effect of back reflections on the acoustic power delivered by physiotherapy ultrasound machines

Physiotherapy ultrasound is used widely for the treatment of soft tissue injuries. The ultrasonic treatment heads are all highly resonant devices and may therefore be sensitive to the levels of acoustic back reflection that they experience. However, the extent to which reflections affect acoustic power during clinical use has not been reported in the literature and is not addressed in current technical standards. This study investigated the effect of physiological levels of acoustic reflection on 29 physiotherapy treatment heads from a total of 21 machines and 6 manufacturers. A range of membranes were constructed and used to mimic the levels of acoustic reflections that occur during treatment. The results obtained showed that almost half of the heads tested (45%) had deviations in acoustic power of more than 15% compared with free-field measurements. Four heads (17%) had deviations in power of more than 25%. We recommend that the susceptibility of physiotherapy ultrasound machines to acoustic reflections be addressed in the relevant technical standards. Also, it is appropriate for tests to be carried out during design and manufacture, and by the purchaser during their acceptance testing.