Non-veridical visual motion perception immediately after saccades

Illusory Motion Produced by Dichoptic Stimuli during Saccades

A new motion illusion is reported in which saccadic eye movements can produce a perceived jump of a static stimulus presented dichoptically. In three experiments, observers made saccades while viewing a stationary stimulus consisting of a disk and random dots presented separately to the two eyes. In experiments 1 and 2, by measuring the strength of the perceived motion and the velocity of binocular eye movements, we found that (a) motion ratings were high for the stimulus that contained a large interocular difference in luminance, and (b) the saccadic strategy of the observer was virtually identical across different stimulus conditions. In experiment 3, by measuring the detectability of a short temporal gap introduced into the stimulus around saccades, we found that saccadic suppression was normal in the dichoptic presentation. We discuss possible mechanisms underlying the illusory motion.

TMS over human frontal eye fields disrupts trans-saccadic memory of multiple objects

We recently showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the right parietal eye fields disrupts memory of object features and locations across saccades. We applied TMS over the frontal eye fields (FEF) as subjects compared the feature details of visual targets presented either within a single eye fixation (Fixation Task) or across a saccade (Saccade Task). TMS pulses were randomly delivered at one of 3 time intervals around the time of the saccade, or at equivalent times in the Fixation Task. A No-TMS control confirmed that subjects could normally retain approximately 3 visual features. TMS in the Fixation Task had no effect compared with No-TMS, but differences among TMS times were found during right FEF stimulation. TMS over either the right or left FEF disrupted memory performance in the Saccade Task when stimulation coincided most closely with the saccade. The capacity to compare pre-and postsaccadic features was reduced to 1-2 objects, as expected if the spatial aspect of memory was disrupted. These findings suggest that the FEF plays a role in the spatial processing involved in trans-saccadic memory of visual features. We propose that this process employs saccade-related feedback signals similar to those observed in spatial updating.

Frame of reference transformations in motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements

Smooth pursuit eye movements change the retinal image velocity of objects in the visual field. In order to change from a retinocentric frame of reference into a head-centric one, the visual system has to take the eye movements into account. Studies on motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements have measured either perceived speed or perceived direction during smooth pursuit to investigate this frame of reference transformation, but never both at the same time. We devised a new velocity matching task, in which participants matched both perceived speed and direction during fixation to that during pursuit. In Experiment 1, the velocity matches were determined for a range of stimulus directions, with the head-centric stimulus speed kept constant. In Experiment 2, the retinal stimulus speed was kept approximately constant, with the same range of stimulus directions. In both experiments, the velocity matches for all directions were shifted against the pursuit direction, suggesting an incomplete transformation of the frame of reference. The degree of compensation was approximately constant across stimulus direction. We fitted the classical linear model, the model of Turano and Massof (2001) and that of Freeman (2001) to the velocity matches. The model of Turano and Massof fitted the velocity matches best, but the differences between de model fits were quite small. Evaluation of the models and comparison to a few alternatives suggests that further specification of the potential effect of retinal image characteristics on the eye movement signal is needed.

Visual Motion Perception at the Time of Saccadic Eye Movements and its Relation to Spatial Mislocalization

The same retinal image motion can be produced by a variety of combinations of eye and target motion. In natural conditions, extraretinal information disambiguates retinal information for motion perception. By controlling the timing of visual motion with respect to saccades, it was possible to appraise the roles for motion perception of the signal related to saccades occurring in the vicinity of visual motion. When a visual motion was seen before or after a saccade, its perceived direction was biased in the direction opposite to the saccade. The magnitude of the bias depended on the timing of the visual motion with respect to the saccade and the meridian of the visual motion. The bias appears to be independent of the deformation of visual space reported to occur before and after saccades.

Localization and motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements

We investigated the relationship between compensation for the effects of smooth pursuit eye movements in localization and motion perception. Participants had to indicate the perceived motion direction, the starting point and the end point of a vertically moving stimulus dot presented during horizontal smooth pursuit. The presentation duration of the stimulus was varied. From the indicated starting and end points, the motion direction was predicted and compared with the actual indicated directions. Both the directions predicted from localization and the indicated directions deviated from the physical directions, but the errors in the predicted directions were larger than those in the indicated directions. The results of a control experiment, in which the same tasks were performed during fixation, suggest that this difference reflects different transformations from a retinocentric to a head-centric frame of reference. This difference appears to be mainly due to an asymmetry in the effect of retinal image motion direction on localization during smooth pursuit.

Changes in visual motion perception before saccadic eye movements

Execution of a saccadic eye movement influences subsequent motion perception [Park, J., Lee, J., & Lee, C. (2001). Non-veridical visual motion perception immediately after saccades. Vision Research, 41, 3751-3761]. In the current study, we determined the pattern of perceptual changes for visual motion presented before saccades. The accuracy of judging the direction of a moving target was variable depending on the direction of target motion. Based on the pattern of judgment errors, the direction associated with no error, or DNE, could be defined. When a moving target was seen by stationary eyes, the DNE was roughly vertical, and the perceptual judgment for adjacent directions was biased away from the vertical direction. When the same visual motion was seen before horizontal saccades, the DNE shifted in the direction of the impending saccade, and the perceptual judgment of adjacent directions was shifted away from the new DNE, thus, shifting the perceived direction of the vertical in the direction opposite to the saccade. These changes improved the accuracy of direction judgment for visual motion in the visual field ipsiversive to impending saccades. In addition to shift of the DNE, perceptual judgment for oblique directions became near veridical before saccades, which we call the anti-oblique effect. These results suggest that motion perception is dynamically and anisotropically modulated at the time of saccades, and the DNE shift may be a part of processes dynamically reallocating computational resources, improving perceptual performance in advance for sensory events to be acquired by impending saccades.

Perceived motion direction during smooth pursuit eye movements

Although many studies have been devoted to motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements, relatively little attention has been paid to the question of whether the compensation for the effects of these eye movements is the same across different stimulus directions. The few studies that have addressed this issue provide conflicting conclusions. We measured the perceived motion direction of a stimulus dot during horizontal ocular pursuit for stimulus directions spanning the entire range of 360 degrees. The stimulus moved at either 3 or 8 degrees/s. Constancy of the degree of compensation was assessed by fitting the classical linear model of motion perception during pursuit. According to this model, the perceived velocity is the result of adding an eye movement signal that estimates the eye velocity to the retinal signal that estimates the retinal image velocity for a given stimulus object. The perceived direction depends on the gain ratio of the two signals, which is assumed to be constant across stimulus directions. The model provided a good fit to the data, suggesting that compensation is indeed constant across stimulus direction. Moreover, the gain ratio was lower for the higher stimulus speed, explaining differences in results in the literature.

Anticipating the three-dimensional consequences of eye movements

Rapid eye movements called saccades give rise to sudden, enormous changes in optic information arriving at the eye; how the world nonetheless appears stable is known as the problem of spatial constancy. One consequence of saccades is that the directions of all visible points shift uniformly; directional or 2D constancy, the fact that we do not perceive this change, has received extensive study for over a century. The problems raised by 3D consequences of saccades, on the other hand, have been neglected. When the eye rotates in space, the 3D orientation of all stationary surfaces undergoes an equal-and-opposite rotation with respect to the eye. When presented with a an optic simulation of a saccade but with the eyes still, observers readily perceive this depth rotation of surfaces; when simultaneously performing the corresponding saccade, the 3D orientations of surfaces are perceived as stable, a phenomenon I propose calling 3D spatial constancy. In experiments presented here, observers viewed ambiguous 3D rotations immediately before, during, or after a saccade. The results show that before the eyes begin to move the brain anticipates the 3D consequences of saccades, preferring to perceive the rotation opposite to the impending eye movement. Further, the anticipation is absent when observers fixate while experiencing optically simulated saccades, and therefore must be evoked by extraretinal signals. Such anticipation could provide a mechanism for 3D spatial constancy and transsaccadic integration of depth information.

Spatial localization precedes temporal determination in visual perception

The temporal order of two spots of light successively appearing in the dark, just before a saccade, influences their perceived spatial relation. Both spots are mislocalized in the saccade direction--the second more so than the first--because mislocalization grows as time elapses from stimulus to saccade onset. On the other hand, the perceived order of the two spots may be altered if the second spot is at the focus of spatial attention. How would these illusory perceptions of space and time interact when they are brought to play together? Could they be independent or could one perception depend on the other? Here we show that perceived location of stimuli is not affected by illusory temporal order, whereas perceived temporal order is affected by misperceived location. The results suggest that the brain processes spatial location of visual stimuli before processing their temporal order.

Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression

In normal vision our gaze leaps from detail to detail, resulting in rapid image motion across the retina. Yet we are unaware of such motion, a phenomenon known as saccadic suppression. We recorded neural activity in the middle temporal and middle superior temporal cortical areas during saccades and identical image motion under passive viewing conditions. Some neurons were selectively silenced during saccadic image motion, but responded well to identical external image motion. In addition, a subpopulation of neurons reversed their preferred direction of motion during saccades. Consequently, oppositely directed motion signals annul one another, and motion percepts are suppressed.