Characterization of glutamate transporter function in the tiger salamander retina

EAAT5 glutamate transporter rapidly binds glutamate with micromolar affinity in mouse rods

Light responses of rod photoreceptor cells in the retina are encoded by changes in synaptic glutamate release that is in turn shaped by reuptake involving EAAT5 plasma membrane glutamate transporters. Heterologously expressed EAAT5 activates too slowly upon glutamate binding to support significant uptake. We tested EAAT5 activation in mouse rods in vivo by stimulating glutamate transporter anion currents (IA(glu)) with UV flash photolysis of MNI-glutamate, varying flash intensity to vary glutamate levels. Responses to uncaging rose rapidly with time constants of 2-3 ms, similar to IA(glu) events arising from spontaneous release. Spontaneous release events and IA(glu) evoked by weak flashes also declined with similar time constants of 40-50 ms. Stronger flashes evoked responses that decayed more slowly. Time constants were twofold faster at 35°C, suggesting that they reflect transporter kinetics, not diffusion. Selective EAAT1 and EAAT2 inhibitors had no significant effect, suggesting IA(glu) in rods arises solely from EAAT5. We calibrated glutamate levels attained during flash photolysis by expressing a fluorescent glutamate sensor iGluSnFr in cultured epithelial cells. We compared fluorescence at different glutamate concentrations to fluorescence evoked by photolytic uncaging of MNI-glutamate. The relationship between flash intensity and glutamate yielded EC50 values for EAAT5 amplitude, decay time, and rise time of ∼10 μM. Micromolar affinity and rapid activation of EAAT5 in rods show it can rapidly bind synaptic glutamate. However, we also found that EAAT5 currents are saturated by the synchronous release of only a few vesicles, suggesting limited capacity and a role for glial uptake at higher release rates.

What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain

Salamanders have been habitual residents of research laboratories for more than a century, and their history in science is tightly interwoven with vision research. Nevertheless, many vision scientists - even those working with salamanders - may be unaware of how much our knowledge about vision, and particularly the retina, has been shaped by studying salamanders. In this review, we take a tour through the salamander history in vision science, highlighting the main contributions of salamanders to our understanding of the vertebrate retina. We further point out specificities of the salamander visual system and discuss the perspectives of this animal system for future vision research.

Comparative electrophysiology of retinal Müller glial cells-A survey on vertebrate species

Müller cells are the dominant macroglial cells in the retina of all vertebrates. They fulfill a variety of functions important for retinal physiology, among them spatial buffering of K⁺ ions and uptake of glutamate and other neurotransmitters. To this end, Müller cells express inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels and electrogenic glutamate transporters. Moreover, a lot of voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels, aquaporin water channels, and electrogenic transporters are expressed in Müller cells, some of them in a species-specific manner. For example, voltage-dependent Na⁺ channels are found exclusively in some but not all mammalian species. Whereas a lot of data exist from amphibians and mammals, the results from other vertebrates are sparse. It is the aim of this review to present a survey on Müller cell electrophysiology covering all classes of vertebrates. The focus is on functional studies, mainly performed using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. However, data about the expression of membrane channels and transporters from immunohistochemistry are also included. Possible functional roles of membrane channels and transporters are discussed. Obviously, electrophysiological properties involved in the main functions of Müller cells developed early in vertebrate evolution. GLIA 2017;65:533-568.

Sigma receptors [σRs]: biology in normal and diseased states

This review compares the biological and physiological function of Sigma receptors [σRs] and their potential therapeutic roles. Sigma receptors are widespread in the central nervous system and across multiple peripheral tissues. σRs consist of sigma receptor one (σ₁R) and sigma receptor two (σ₂R) and are expressed in numerous regions of the brain. The sigma receptor was originally proposed as a subtype of opioid receptors and was suggested to contribute to the delusions and psychoses induced by benzomorphans such as SKF-10047 and pentazocine. Later studies confirmed that σRs are non-opioid receptors (not an µ opioid receptor) and play a more diverse role in intracellular signaling, apoptosis and metabolic regulation. σ₁Rs are intracellular receptors acting as chaperone proteins that modulate Ca²⁺ signaling through the IP₃ receptor. They dynamically translocate inside cells, hence are transmembrane proteins. The σ₁R receptor, at the mitochondrial-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane, is responsible for mitochondrial metabolic regulation and promotes mitochondrial energy depletion and apoptosis. Studies have demonstrated that they play a role as a modulator of ion channels (K⁺ channels; N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors [NMDAR]; inositol 1,3,5 triphosphate receptors) and regulate lipid transport and metabolism, neuritogenesis, cellular differentiation and myelination in the brain. σ₁R modulation of Ca²⁺ release, modulation of cardiac myocyte contractility and may have links to G-proteins. It has been proposed that σ₁Rs are intracellular signal transduction amplifiers. This review of the literature examines the mechanism of action of the σRs, their interaction with neurotransmitters, pharmacology, location and adverse effects mediated through them.

Fast glutamate uptake via EAAT2 shapes the cone-mediated light offset response in bipolar cells

Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) are responsible for extracellular glutamate uptake within the retina, and are expressed by retinal neurons and Müller cells. Their role within glutamatergic synapses is not completely understood. In the salamander retina, five distinct EAAT-encoding genes have been cloned, making the amphibian retina an excellent system to study EAAT function. This study focused on sEAAT2, which is expressed in photoreceptor terminals and Off-bipolar cells in two isoforms, sEAAT2A and sEAAT2B. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recording, florescence imaging and antibody labelling methods, we systematically studied the functions of these two isoforms at the synapse between photoreceptors and bipolar cells, both in dark and with photic stimulation. Both sEAAT2A and sEAAT2B were sensitive to dihydrokainic acid (DHKA), a known EAAT2-specific inhibitor. Each isoform of sEAAT2 was found to play a role in tonic glutamate uptake at the cone synapse in darkness. Furthermore, presynaptic sEAAT2A strongly suppressed the rapid, transient glutamate signal from cones following light-offset. This was achieved by quickly binding exocytosed glutamate, which subsequently limited glutamate spillover to adjacent receptors at postsynaptic sites. Since the intensity and duration of photic stimulation determine the magnitude of these cone transient signals, we postulate that presynaptic cone EAATs contribute to the encoding of contrast sensitivity in cone vision.

Mesopic state: cellular mechanisms involved in pre- and post-synaptic mixing of rod and cone signals

At least twice daily our retinas move between a light adapted, cone-dominated (photopic) state and a dark-adapted, color-blind and highly light-sensitive rod-dominated (scotopic) state. In between is a rather ill-defined transitional state called the mesopic state in which retinal circuits express both rod and cone signals. The mesopic state is characterized by its dynamic and fluid nature: the rod and cone signals flowing through retinal networks are continually changing. Consequently, in the mesopic state the retinal output to the brain contained in the firing patterns of the ganglion cells consists of information derived from both rod and cone signals. Morphology, physiology, and psychophysics all contributed to an understanding that the two systems are not independent but interact extensively via both pooling and mutual inhibition. This review lays down a rationale for such rod-cone interactions in the vertebrate retinas. It suggests that the important functional role of rod-cone interactions is that they shorten the duration of the mesopic state. As a result, the retina is maintained in either in the (rod-dominated) high sensitivity photon counting mode or in the second mode, which emphasizes temporal transients and spatial resolution (the cone-dominated photopic state). Experimental evidence for pre- and postsynaptic mixing of rod and cone signals in the retina of the clawed frog, Xenopus, is shown together with the preeminent neuromodulatory role of both light and dopamine in controlling interactions between rod and cone signals. Dopamine is shown to be both necessary and sufficient to mediate light adaptation in the amphibian retina.

Sodium-dependent glutamate transport in Müller glial cells: regulation by phorbol esters

The regulation of the Na(+)-dependent high affinity glutamate/aspartate transporter system expressed in cultured Müller glia cells from chick retina was studied. Treatment of the cells with the Ca(2+)/diacylglycerol dependent protein kinase C (PKC) activator, phorbol 12-tetradecanoil-13-acetate (TPA) produced a decrease in [(3)H]D-aspartate uptake which was reversed by staurosporine and partially by H7 [1-(5-isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine dihydrochoride], two PKC inhibitors. Long-term treatment with TPA resulted in a drastic decrease in the uptake activity, correlated with a substantial fall in the expression of the transporter protein. These findings suggest that PKC is involved in transport modulation at two different levels: phosphorylation and transporter expression in retinal Müller glial cells.

Glutamate uptake limits synaptic excitation of retinal ganglion cells

EPSCs of retinal ganglion cells decay more slowly than do those of most other CNS neurons, in part because of the long time course of glutamate release from bipolar cells. Here we investigated how glutamate clearance and AMPA receptor desensitization affect ganglion cell EPSCs in the salamander retinal slice preparation. Inhibition of glutamate uptake greatly prolonged ganglion cell EPSCs evoked by light or monosynaptic electrical stimuli but had little effect on spontaneous miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). This suggests that single quanta of glutamate are cleared rapidly by diffusion but multiple quanta can interact to lengthen the postsynaptic response. Some interaction between quanta is likely to occur even when glutamate uptake is not inhibited. This seems to depend on quantal content, because reducing glutamate release with low Ca2+, paired-pulse depression, or weak stimuli shortened the EPSC decay. High quantal content glutamate release may lead to desensitization of postsynaptic receptors. We reduced the extent of AMPA receptor desensitization by holding ganglion cells at positive potentials. This increased the amplitude of the late phase of evoked EPSCs but did not affect the decay rate after the first 50 msec of the response. In contrast, the holding potential had little effect on mEPSC kinetics. Our results suggest that desensitization limits the late phase of AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs, whereas glutamate uptake controls the duration of both AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated responses.

Postsynaptic responses of horizontal cells in the tiger salamander retina are mediated by AMPA-preferring receptors

The postsynaptic responses of sign-preserving second-order retinal neurons (horizontal cells (HCs) and off-bipolar cells) are mediated by CNQX-sensitive AMPA/KA glutamate receptors. In this study we used receptor-specific allosteric regulators of desensitization and selected antagonists to determine the glutamate receptor subtypes in tiger salamander horizontal cells. Two approaches were employed in this study. The first was to measure postsynaptic currents induced by exogenously applied glutamate under voltage clamp conditions in living retinal slices; and the second was to record voltage responses controlled by endogenous glutamate released from photoreceptors in whole retinas. Application of 100 microM cyclothiazide (a specific AMPA receptor desensitization blocker) enhanced the glutamate-induced current by about 5 fold. In contrast, 300 microgram ml-1 Co nA (a specific kainate receptor desensitization blocker), had no effect. GYKI 52466 (a specific AMPA receptor antagonist) at 30 microM almost completely suppressed the glutamate-induced inward current in HCs. Cyclothiazide at 100 microM depolarized the HC dark membrane potential by about 5 mV and reduced the amplitudes of the voltage responses to dim lights, but enhanced the voltage responses to bright lights. Cyclothiazide had no effect on either the dark potential or the light responses of rods and cones. Con A at 300 microgram ml-1 had no effect on either the dark potential or the light responses of the HC. GYKI 52466 (30 microM) hyperpolarized the HC dark membrane potential by about 55 mV and almost completely suppressed the light responses. We conclude from these results that the postsynaptic glutamate- and light-induced responses in the tiger salamander retinal horizontal cells are mediated by AMPA-preferring, and not kainate-preferring glutamate receptors. The functional roles of AMPA receptors and their desensitization kinetics in visual information processing are discussed.

Amino acid neurotransmitters in the retina: a functional overview

Physiological and pharmacological mechanisms of glutamatergic, GABAergic and glycinergic synapses in the tiger salamander retina were studied. We used immunocytochemical and autoradiographic methods to study localizations of these neurotransmitters and their uptake transporters; and electrophysiological methods (intracellular, extracellular and whole cell patch electrode recordings) to study the light responses, miniature postsynaptic currents and neurotransmitter-induced postsynaptic currents in various retinal neurons. Our results are consistent with the following scheme: Glutamate is used by the photoreceptor and bipolar cell output synapses and the release of glutamate is largely mediated by calcium-dependent vesicular processes. The postsynaptic glutamate receptors in DBCs are L-AP4 receptors, in HBCs, HCs and ganglion cells are the kainate/AMPA and NMDA receptors. Subpopulations of HCs make GABAergic synapses on cones and gate chloride condunctance through GABAA receptors. GABAergic HCs do not make feedforward synapses on bipolar cell dendrites and the neurotransmitter identity of the HCs making feedforward synapses is unknown. Subpopulations of amacrine cells make GABAergic synapses on bipolar cell synaptic terminals, other amacrine cells and ganglion cells and GABA gates chloride conductances in theses cells. Glycinergic amacrine cells make synapses on bipolar cell synaptic terminals, other amacrine cells and ganglion cells and glycine opens postsynaptic chloride channels. Glycinergic interplexiform cells make synapses on bipolar cells in the outer retina and glycine released from these cells open chloride channels in bipolar cell dendrites.

Postsynaptic response kinetics are controlled by a glutamate transporter at cone photoreceptors

We evaluated the role of the sodium/glutamate transporter at the synaptic terminals of cone photoreceptors in controlling postsynaptic response kinetics. The strategy was to measure the changes in horizontal cell response rate induced by blocking transporter uptake in cones with dihydrokainate (DHK). DHK was chosen as the uptake blocker because, as we show through autoradiographic uptake measurements, DHK specifically blocked uptake in cones without affecting uptake in Mueller cells. Horizontal cells depolarized from about -70 to -20 mV as the exogenous glutamate concentration was increased from approximately 1 to 40 microM, so horizontal cells can serve as "glutamate electrodes" during the light response. DHK slowed the rate of hyperpolarization of the horizontal cells in a dose-dependent way, but didn't affect the kinetics of the cone responses. At 300 microM DHK, the rate of the horizontal cell hyperpolarization was slowed to only 17 +/- 8.5% (mean +/- SD) of control. Translating this to changes in glutamate concentration using the slice dose response curve as calibration in Fig. 2, DHK reduced the rate of removal of glutamate from approximately 0.12 to 0.031 microM/s. The voltage dependence of uptake rate in the transporter alone was capable of modulating glutamate concentration: we blocked vesicular released glutamate with bathed 20 mM Mg2+ and then added 30 microM glutamate to the bath to reestablish a physiological glutamate concentration level at the synapse and thereby depolarize the horizontal cells. Under these conditions, a light flash elicited a 17-mV hyperpolarization in the horizontal cells. When we substituted kainate, which is not transported, for glutamate, horizontal cells were depolarized but light did not elicit any response, indicating that the transporter alone was responsible for the removal of glutamate under these conditions. This suggests that the transporter was both voltage dependent and robust enough to modulate glutamate concentration. The transporter must be at least as effective as diffusion in removing glutamate from the synapse because there is only a very small light response once the transporter is blocked. The transporter, via its voltage dependence on cone membrane potential, appears to contribute significantly to the control of postsynaptic response kinetics.