Dependencies of motion assimilation and motion contrast on spatial properties of stimuli: spatial-frequency nonselective and selective interactions between local motion detectors

Investigation of center-surround interaction in motion with reaction time for direction discrimination

How motion onset asynchrony (MOA) alters the effects of stimulus size on reaction time (RT) for direction discrimination of a drifting grating was examined. MOA is a delay from the stimulus onset to the onset of motion. Without MOA, RTs were found to increase as the stimulus size was increased at high contrast, but decrease with it at low contrast or at high noise levels. With MOA, however, RTs did not increase as the stimulus size increased even at high contrast. These results suggest that sudden stimulus onset evokes the increase of RTs with the increase of stimulus size at high contrast. RTs for direction discrimination of a drifting Gabor patch (the target) surrounded by a different drifting or a static grating as well as RTs for the target that was not surrounded by an additional grating were measured. The RTs for the target moving in the same or opposite direction as the motion of the surrounding grating were larger than those for the target with the static grating or no additional grating at moderate or high contrast. There was no significant difference between the RTs for the target moving in the same direction as the surrounding grating and the RTs for the target moving in the opposite direction. At low contrast and without MOA, however, the RTs for the target moving in the same direction as the surrounding grating were larger than those for the target moving in the opposite direction. These results suggest surround suppression at low contrast under some conditions. They also suggest that the decrease of RTs for discriminating motion direction of a drifting single Gabor patch with the increase of stimulus size at low contrast does not necessarily mean the absence of surround suppression.

Differential effect of luminance contrast reduction and noise on motion induction

Motion perception in a region is affected by motion in the surround regions. When a physically static or flickering stimulus surrounded by moving stimuli appears to move in the direction opposite to that of the surround motion, it is referred to as motion contrast. When the centre appears to move in the same direction, it is referred to as motion assimilation. We investigated how noise and luminance contrast affect motion induction by employing static and dynamic counterphase flickering targets. The tendency of motion assimilation was found to be stronger at a high noise level than at a low noise level for both static and dynamic targets. On the other hand, a decrease of luminance contrast tended to strengthen the tendency of motion contrast. However, the addition of noise and the decrease of luminance contrast decreased the visibility of motion comparably. These results suggest that the visual system changes the mode of motion induction according to the noise level, but not the visibility.

Contextual effects in speed perception may occur at an early stage of processing

How does nearby motion affect the perceived speed of a target region? When a central drifting Gabor patch is surrounded by translating noise, its speed can be misperceived over a fourfold range. Typically, when a surround moves in the same direction, perceived centre speed is reduced; for opposite-direction surrounds it increases. Measuring this illusion for a variety of surround properties reveals that the motion context effects are a saturating function of surround speed (Experiment I) and contrast (Experiment II). Our analyses indicate that the effects are consistent with a subtractive process, rather than with speed being averaged over area. In Experiment III we exploit known properties of the motion system to ask where these surround effects impact. Using 2D plaid stimuli, we find that surround-induced shifts in perceived speed of one plaid component produce substantial shifts in perceived plaid direction. This indicates that surrounds exert their influence early in processing, before pattern motion direction is computed. These findings relate to ongoing investigations of surround suppression for direction discrimination, and are consistent with single-cell findings of direction-tuned suppressive and facilitatory interactions in primary visual cortex (V1).

Luminance texture increases perceived speed

Previous psychophysical experiments have demonstrated that various factors can exert a considerable influence on the apparent velocity of visual stimuli. Here, we investigated the effects of superimposing static luminance texture on the apparent speed of a drifting grating. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that superimposing static luminance texture on a drifting luminance modulated grating can produce an increase in perceived speed. This supports the hypothesis that texture changes perceived speed by providing landmarks to assess relative motion. In Experiment 2, we showed that contrary to static luminance texture, dynamic luminance texture did not increase perceived speed. This demonstrates that texture must provide reliable spatial landmarks in order to generate an increase in perceived speed. The results of Experiment 3 demonstrate that perceived speed depends on the size of the area covered by texture. This suggests that luminance texture and the motion stimulus interacted with each other over a limited spatial scale and that these local responses are then pooled to determine the speed of the motion stimulus. In Experiment 4, we showed that static texture contrast could produce a greater effect than motion stimulus contrast on perceived speed and that these effects could still be observed at brief presentation times. We discuss these findings in the context of models proposed to account for phenomena in the perception of speed.

Effects of the noise level on induced motion

Motion in a part of the field induces motion in an adjoining region. In this study, it was investigated how the noise level affects induced motion of a counterphase flickering (target) grating due to adjacent drifting (inducer) gratings. It was shown that at low noise levels, motion contrast occurred, and at high noise levels, motion assimilation occurred. When the noise level was randomly set for each trial, the adaptive change with the noise level was also observed. The result suggests that the adaptive change occurs for a short period. It was also found that noise for the target as well as noise for the inducers contributes to the effect of noise on motion induction. It suggests that the overall noise level is crucial for the effect. The study provided evidence that motion integration changes from a spatially band-pass operation to a low-pass operation as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) decreases.

On the perceived location of global motion

We measured the effects of coherent motion of one set of dots on the perceived location of Gaussian envelopes formed by luminance modulation of a second set of dots. Perceived shifts in envelope location in the direction of coherent motion were obtained even when the dots forming the envelopes did not physically move in the direction of coherent motion. In such cases, perceived shifts coincided with stimulus configurations that permitted motion integration of the envelope dots with the coherently moving dots, for example, when envelope dots moved in random directions as opposed to being static. In subsequent experiments we explored the type of motion integration underlying the positional shifts obtained. We discounted the possibility that the visual system incorrectly attributes motion signals associated with coherently moving dots to envelope dots by demonstrating that positional shifts could be obtained even when the coherent dots were laterally displaced to either side of the envelope dots such that the regions occupied by the dots did not overlap. We also discounted spatio-temporal summation within the receptive fields of low-spatial-frequency motion-sensitive mechanisms by demonstrating that positional shifts persisted even when the dot displays were high-pass filtered. These results, coupled with the observation that the proportion of coherently moving dots required to produce positional shifts correlated well with global motion thresholds measured for the same dot configurations, suggests that visual processes which underlie motion-dependent positional shifts are based at least in part on cooperative interactions of the type implicated in global motion.

Direction-specific changes of sensitivity after brief apparent motion stimuli

Direction-specific losses in sensitivity were found for a test grating which was superimposed on a stationary contrast pedestal and which moved either in the same or opposite direction as a prior biasing stimulus. Three types of biasing stimuli were employed: a grating swept through 270 degrees in 45 degrees steps, a single 90 degrees step of a grating, and a single 90 degrees step of a grating which contained a blank IFI and whose perceived direction was reversed. For the biasing sweep and the single 90 degrees step, the response of directionally selective mechanisms (directional motion energy) is greatest for the direction which corresponds to the actual physical displacement of the stimulus. For the biasing step with an IFI, the response is maximum for the opposite direction. For all three types of biasing stimuli, directional sensitivity for a test stimulus was reduced most when it moved in the biasing direction, i.e. the direction which produced the strongest signal in directionally selective mechanisms. Unlike the effects of the same types of biasing stimuli on the perceived direction of a suprathreshold 180 degrees step of a grating [Pinkus, A., & Pantle, A. (1997). Probing motion signals with a priming paradigm. Vision Research, 37, 541-52; Pantle, A., Gallogly, D.P., & Piehler, O.C. (2000). Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 1979-91], all the direction-specific losses of sensitivity can be explained by changes in the response characteristics of directionally selective mechanisms.

Direction repulsion in unfiltered and ring-filtered Julesz textures

Perceived directions of motion were measured for each of two superposed two-dimensional dynamic random patterns consisting of unfiltered or ring-filtered dense random-check (Julesz) textures. One pattern always moved in a cardinal direction (up, down, left, or right), and the other texture always moved in an oblique direction separated from the cardinal component by 20 degrees-80 degrees. Several cardinal/oblique speed ratios were tested. In Experiment 1, the textures were unfiltered. In Experiment 2, the textures were ring filtered and had the same center frequency (1, 2, or 4 cpd). In Experiment 3, a 1-cpd ring-filtered texture was paired with a 2-, 4-, or 8-cpd texture. Subjects consistently misperceived the directions of component motion in these experiments; the angular separation of movement of the two textures was perceptually exaggerated, a phenomenon referred to as direction repulsion (Marshak & Sekuler, 1979). The results show that (1) direction repulsion occurs across at least a fourfold range of spatial frequencies and a sixfold range of speed ratios, (2) direction repulsion varies systematically with speed ratio, and (3) across most conditions, direction repulsion is anisotropic--direction repulsion is more evident in the oblique directions than in the cardinal directions. These findings suggest that the spatiotemporal range of inhibitory interactions involved in motion transparency is much greater than previously appreciated.

Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli

The perceived direction of a motion step (probe stimulus) can be influenced by an earlier motion step or a brief motion sweep containing a series of steps (biasing stimulus). Depending upon experimental conditions, the biasing of the direction of the probe step (a phase shift of 180 degrees +/-Phi) by a biasing stimulus which precedes it by approximately 250 ms can either increase (positive filter biasing) or decrease (negative filter biasing) the tendency to see the probe move in the biasing direction as computed with a motion filter with a biphasic temporal impulse response. In a series of experiments it was found that biasing motions traversing 90 degrees of phase angle in fewer than six steps in less than 100 ms produced positive filter biasing. Also, biasing of the probe direction could be dissociated from the consciously reported direction of the biasing stimulus, and it did not occur when the probe preceded rather than followed the biasing stimulus. A biasing sweep containing more than six steps traversing 90 degrees or a sweep traversing 270 degrees produced negative filter biasing. Perceptual fusion of the steps of the sweep was not a necessary condition for obtaining negative filter biasing. In general, the negative filter biasing effects were found to be the most pervasive for the conditions investigated, and they are suggestive of a direction-specific, adaptation-like (gain-control) process in first-order motion filters. The exception to the negative biasing rule was found only with biasing stimuli which were short in duration or distance spanned.

Summation between nearby motion signals and facilitative/inhibitory interactions between distant motion signals

To explain the finding that motion assimilation was dominant between nearby motion signals while motion contrast between distant ones, a center-surround antagonistic mechanism was proposed [Nawrot & Sekuler (1990). Vision Research, 30, 1439-1451]. However, motion assimilation occurred not only between nearby signals but also between distant ones, suggesting the existence of a center-surround non-antagonistic mechanism [Ido. Ohtani & Ejima (1997). Vision Research, 37, 1565-1574]. The present study was designed to provide direct evidence for the non-antagonistic mechanism, and to examine further the motion interactions which operate in different spatial scales. The nature of motion interaction between the test and the inducer was examined by varying the size, the number of frames, the frame duration and the inter-frame displacement of random-dot kinematograms. The results were consistent with the notion that there are three types of interactions in human motion processing; one is a summation process effective within nearby regions, and the other two are facilitative and inhibitory induction processes operating over larger spatial scales. Analysis of the results in terms of the Fourier components suggests that the facilitative and the inhibitory induction processes may be sensitive, respectively to the lower and the higher temporal frequency components of the stimulus.

Motion assimilation for expansion/contraction and rotation and its spatial properties

In a two-frame apparent motion display, a test grating was displaced horizontally or vertically in the presence of an inducer of which component gratings made up expanding/contracting or rotational motion as a whole. In the first experiment, we demonstrated that motion assimilation did occur for the test accompanied by the two-dimensional motion of the inducer. In the second experiment, we showed that the spatial limit of motion assimilation for expansion/contraction or rotation was large, extending over at least a visual angle of 14-21 deg in diameter, but spatial summation did not occur within the limit. The results were discussed in terms of the interaction between local motion detectors and higher-order detectors which monitor global motion of the whole stimulus pattern.