Temporal analysis of the topographic ERG: chromatic versus achromatic stimulation

The clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography: a systematic review

Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) is an investigation that can simultaneously measure multiple electroretinographic responses at different retinal locations by cross-correlation techniques. mfERG therefore allows topographic mapping of retinal function in the central 40-50 degrees of the retina. The strength of mfERG lies in its ability to provide objective assessment of the central retinal function at different retinal areas within a short duration of time. Since the introduction of mfERG in 1992, mfERG has been applied in a large variety of clinical settings. This article reviews the clinical applications of mfERG based on the currently available evidence. mfERG has been found to be useful in the assessment of localized retinal dysfunction caused by various acquired or hereditary retinal disorders. The use of mfERG also enabled clinicians to objectively monitor the treatment outcomes as the changes in visual functions might not be reflected by subjective methods of assessment. By changing the stimulus, recording, and analysis parameters, investigation of specific retinal electrophysiological components can be performed topographically. Further developments and consolidations of these parameters will likely broaden the use of mfERG in the clinical setting.

Central and peripheral vision loss associated with nefazodone usage

A 35-year-old woman who reported persistent significant vision loss for 3 years after taking the antidepressant nefazodone was referred for electrophysiological assessment of vision. The vision changes included reduced acuities, reduced colour vision and visual field constriction in both eyes and were thought to be associated with the use of nefazodone for 6 - 8 weeks, 3 years earlier. Multifocal electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials were recorded using the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System (VERIS) to investigate the nature and site of the neural deficit. The summed retinal response showed a normal a- and b-wave latency and amplitude, however, the retinal topographic mfERGs showed a severe depression of the macular response in both eyes. The cortical topographic multifocal VEP mapping also showed a central depression in the right eye compared with the left. Two-frame motion and pattern custom mfVEP were also measured to assess different forms of cortical processing and especially of motion as nefazodone has previously been associated with image persistence with moving stimuli. The responses to two frame-motion showed signs of abnormality. Thus these results suggest that the primary locus of neural damage is retinal and is likely to have resulted from neurotoxicity. Other competing hypotheses such as hysterical blindness must be ruled out.