Analysis of hematologic diseases using conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)

Challenging conventional karyotyping by next-generation karyotyping in 281 intensively treated patients with AML

Although copy number alterations (CNAs) and translocations constitute the backbone of the diagnosis and prognostication of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), techniques used for their assessment in routine diagnostics have not been reconsidered for decades. We used a combination of 2 next-generation sequencing-based techniques to challenge the currently recommended conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA), comparing the approaches in a series of 281 intensively treated patients with AML. Shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) outperformed CCA in detecting European Leukemia Net (ELN)-defining CNAs and showed that CCA overestimated monosomies and suboptimally reported karyotype complexity. Still, the concordance between CCA and sWGS for all ELN CNA-related criteria was 94%. Moreover, using in silico dilution, we showed that 1 million reads per patient would be enough to accurately assess ELN-defining CNAs. Total genomic loss, defined as a total loss ≥200 Mb by sWGS, was found to be a better marker for genetic complexity and poor prognosis compared with the CCA-based definition of complex karyotype. For fusion detection, the concordance between CCA and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) was 99%. WTS had better sensitivity in identifying inv(16) and KMT2A rearrangements while showing limitations in detecting lowly expressed PML-RARA fusions. Ligation-dependent reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used for validation and was shown to be a fast and reliable method for fusion detection. We conclude that a next-generation sequencing-based approach can replace conventional CCA for karyotyping, provided that efforts are made to cover lowly expressed fusion transcripts.

Inhibition of the AKT/mTOR and erbB pathways by gefitinib, perifosine and analogs of gonadotropin-releasing hormone I and II to overcome tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells

Endocrine resistance in breast cancer remains a major clinical problem and is caused by crosstalk mechanisms of growth factor receptor cascades, such as the erbB and PI3K/AKT pathways. The possibilities a single breast cancer cell has to achieve resistance are manifold. We developed a model of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (OHT)‑resistant human breast cancer cell lines and compared their different expression patterns, activation of growth factor receptor pathways and compared cells by genomic hybridization (CGH). We also tested a panel of selective inhibitors of the erbB and AKT/mTOR pathways to overcome OHT resistance. OHT‑resistant MCF-7-TR and T47D-TR cells showed increased expression of HER2 and activation of AKT. T47D-TR cells showed EGFR expression and activated MAPK (ERK-1/2), whereas in resistant MCF-7-TR cells activated AKT was due to loss of CTMP expression. CGH analyses revealed remarkable aberrations in resistant sublines, which were predominantly depletions. Gefitinib inhibited erbB signalling and restored OHT sensitivity in T47D-TR cells. The AKT inhibitor perifosine restored OHT sensitivity in MCF-7-TR cells. All cell lines showed expression of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) I and II, and analogs of GnRH-I/II restored OHT sensitivity in both resistant cell lines by inhibition of erbB and AKT signalling. In conclusion, mechanisms to escape endocrine treatment in breast cancer share similarities in expression profiling but are based on substantially different genetic aberrations. Evaluation of activated mediators of growth factor receptor cascades is helpful to predict response to specific inhibitors. Expression of GnRH-I/II receptors provides multi-targeting treatment strategies.

Genotypic and phenotypic differences between nodal and extranodal diffuse large B-Cell lymphomas

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that have diverse clinical, pathological, and biological features. Here, it is shown that primary nodal and extranodal DLBCLs differ genomically and phenotypically. Using conventional comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), the authors assessed the chromosomal aberrations in 18 nodal, 13 extranodal, and 5 mixed DLBCLs. The results demonstrate significantly distinct chromosomal aberrations exemplified by gains of chromosomal arms 1p, 7p, 12q24.21-12q24.31, and 22q and chromosome X and loss of chromosome 4, 6q, and 18q22.3-23 in extranodal compared with nodal DLBCLs. Nodal DLBCLs showed an increased tendency for 18q amplification and BCL2 protein overexpression compared with extranodal and mixed tumors. Using a panel of five antibodies against GCET1, MUM1, CD10, BCL6, and FOXP1 proteins to subclassify DLBCLs according to the recent Choi algorithm, the authors showed that the genomic profiles observed between the nodal and extranodal DLBCLs were not due to the different proportions of GCB vs ABC in the two groups. Further delineation of these genomic differences was illuminated by the use of high-resolution 21K BAC array CGH performed on 12 independent new cases of extranodal DLBCL. The authors demonstrated for the first time a novel genome and proteome-based signatures that may differentiate the two lymphoma types.

Advanced molecular cytogenetics in human and mouse

Fluorescence in situ hybridization, spectral karyotyping, multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and more recently array comparative genomic hybridization, represent advancements in the field of molecular cytogenetics. The application of these techniques for the analysis of specimens from humans, or mouse models of human diseases, enables one to reliably identify and characterize complex chromosomal rearrangements resulting in alterations of the genome. As each of these techniques has advantages and limitations, a comprehensive analysis of cytogenetic aberrations can be accomplished through the utilization of a combination approach. As such, analyses of specific tumor types have proven invaluable in the identification of new tumor-specific chromosomal aberrations and imbalances (aneuploidy), as well as regions containing tumor-specific gene targets. Application of these techniques has already improved the classification of tumors into distinct categories, with the hope that this will lead to more tailored treatment strategies. These techniques, in particular the application of tumor-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization probes to interphase nuclei, are also powerful tools for the early identification of premalignant lesions.

Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia

A total of 127 adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) patients were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) at diagnosis. Conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) showed a normal karyotype in 45 cases and an abnormal karyotype in 56 cases; in the remaining cases, CCA either failed to yield sufficient metaphase cells (19/26) or was not done (7/26). Abnormal CGH profiles were identified in 39 patients (30.7%). DNA copy number losses (61%) were high compared to gains (39%), whereas partial chromosome changes (76%) were more common than whole chromosomes changes (24%). Recurrent losses were detected on chromosomes 7, 5q (comprising bands 5q15 to 5q33), 7q (7q32 approximately q36), 16q (16q13 approximately q21), and 17p, and gains were detected on chromosomes 8, 22, and 3q (comprising bands 3q26.1 approximately q27). Furthermore, distinct amplifications were identified in chromosome regions 21q, 13q12 approximately q13, and 13q21.1. No cryptic recurrent chromosomal imbalances were identified by CGH in cases with normal karyotypes. The concordance between CGH results and CCA was 72.5%. In the remaining cases, CGH gave additional information compared to CCA (20%) and partially failed to identify the alterations previously detected by CCA (7.5%). The majority of discrepancies arose from the limitations of the CGH technique, such as insensitivity to detect unbalanced chromosomal changes when occurring in a low proportion of cells. CGH increased the detection of unbalanced chromosomal alterations and allowed precise defining of partial or uncharacterized cytogenetical abnormalities. Application of the CGH technique is thus a useful complementary diagnostic tool for CCA in de novo AML cases with abnormal karyotypes or with unsuccessful cytogenetics.

Determination of cutoff values to detect small aneuploid clones by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization: the Poisson model is a more appropriate approach. Should single-cell trisomy 8 be considered a clonal defect?

We applied a dual-color interphase in situ fluorescence hybridization (I-FISH) technique using centromeric probes specific to chromosomes 7 and 8 on 20 control samples in order to define the statistical model best suited to determine cutoff values for detection of small abnormal clones. We found that the Poisson model is a more appropriate approach than a Gaussian model. Then, based on the analysis of 91 samples from 80 patients with myelocytic malignant hemopathies and either clonal or nonclonal -7 or +8 as determined with conventional cytogenetics (CC), we compared the respective power of I-FISH and CC for detection of aneuploidy, with special emphasis on the potential contribution of I-FISH as a complement to CC in the case of small abnormal clones. The I-FISH results were positive in samples with clonal -7 or +8 according to CC analysis. Whereas I-FISH was negative in samples with nonclonal -7 according to CC, thus confirming the reliability of the criteria used to define the clonality of -7; the situation was different with nonclonal +8. I-FISH revealed the clonality of +8 in most samples with single-cell +8. In several cases, however, the unquestionable clonal nature of +8, as evidenced during follow-up, could not be established with either CC or I-FISH according to accepted criteria. Our data suggest that, in case of a single metaphase with +8, the general rule should be amended and the single-cell +8 should be considered and reported as potentially clonal.

Pentasomy 8q in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome due to cyclophosphamide therapy for fibrosing alveolitis

Trisomy 8/8q is a common cytogenetic event in myelocytic malignancies, ranging from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) to acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) to blastic transformation of chronic myelocytic leukemia. Isochromosome 8q results in the same gene dosage effect. Duplication of i(8q), resulting in pentasomy 8q, has been reported only in two cases of AML. A patient with fibrosing alveolitis on prolonged cyclophosphamide treatment developed therapy-related MDS. Karyotyping, FISH, and CGH analysis showed a duplicated i(8q) among other complex abnormalities. The clinical features of 11 cases of myelocytic leukemia with pentasomy and hexasomy 8/8q were summarized. Compared with trisomy and tetrasomy 8, significant features included reduced median survival (90 days), treatment refractoriness (even with transplantation), monocytic differentiation, trilineage dysplasia, and radiation or toxin exposure. Increasing copy numbers of chromosome 8/8q may therefore be a marker of advanced leukemic evolution, exposure to toxins, underlying myelodysplasia, and an overall poor prognosis.

Compilation of published comparative genomic hybridization studies

The power of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been clearly proven since the first paper appeared in 1992 as a tool to characterize chromosomal imbalances in neoplasias. This review summarizes the chromosomal imbalances detected by CGH in solid tumors and in hemopathies. In May of 2001, we took a census of 430 articles providing information on 11,984 cases of human solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. Comparative generic hybridization has detected a number of recurrent regions of amplification or deletion that allows for identification of new chromosomal loci (oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, or other genes) involved in the development, progression, and clonal evolution of tumors. When CGH data from different studies are combined, a pattern of nonrandom genetic aberrations appears. As expected, some of these gains and losses are common to different types of pathologies, while others are more tumor-specific.

Detection of secondary genetic aberrations in follicle center cell derived lymphomas: assessment of the reliability of comparative genomic hybridization and standard chromosome analysis

Secondary chromosomal aberrations in follicle center cell derived lymphomas (FCDL) usually involve gains and losses of genetic material and may be an important prognostic value. In the present study, we aimed to determine the power of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) as compared to standard chromosome analysis (CA) to detect such secondary aberrations. The same lymph node cell suspensions prepared from 30 patients with FCDL were analyzed in parallel by CGH and CA based on R banding. In all, 73 discrepancies were found. Sixty-two imbalances were detected only by CA and 11 only by CGH. In cases with completely resolved karyotypes (n= 17), the median number of discrepancies between CGH and CA was one. However, when the karyotype was partially resolved (n = 12), the median was four (P < 0.01). Discrepant results were further studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization using locus-specific probes. These data confirm, that not only for the detection of balanced aberrations, but also for the detection of unbalanced aberrations in FCDL, standard chromosome analysis is still the 'gold standard'. In contrast, CGH is useful to detect chromosomal imbalances when no metaphases are found or no fresh material is available.

Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias

The information obtained by conventional cytogenetics (CC) in human leukemias is sometimes limited, in particular by complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. While CC is restricted to metaphases with a good quality, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH) is also capable of analyzing specific anomalies in the interphase nuclei. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) gives additional information about the imbalanced karyotype changes in the whole genome. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of CGH to the unraveling of complex GTG karyotypes, which are difficult to evaluate by banding analysis, and to compare these results with those by CC and FISH. Thirteen bone marrow samples and one sample obtained from peripheral blood of 13 leukemia patients were examined by CC, FISH and CGH. The GTG banding analysis showed complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. The most frequent abnormalities were numerical and structural aberrations on chromosomes 5 and 7. In 12 of the 14 samples, the CGH analysis was able to detect chromosomal imbalances with losses of material on chromosome 5 and 7 as the most frequent aberrations. In all 14 samples, additional FISH analyses were performed. For most of the studied neoplasias, a close correlation between CC, FISH and CGH data was observed. CGH was considerably helpful in adding additional information to classical karyotyping, if the low quality or number of metaphases was insufficient for a reliable CC analysis. Even in cases where whole chromosome painting could be applied, it added information on the breakpoints of the observed rearrangements. In only 2 of the studied 14 samples, neither CGH nor I-FISH could improve the result of karyotyping. CGH, nevertheless, can be regarded as a powerful additional technique in leukemias with unsuccessful CC, incomplete, or complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. A systematic analysis by three techniques such as CC, FISH and CGH guarantees an optimal genetic characterization of the neoplasias.

Cytogenetic aberrations in primary and recurrent fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLC) is a rare entity of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not yet analyzed cytogenetically. By using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), we looked for chromosome changes in 2 primary FLCs and a recurrent FLC with and without metastases. CGH revealed an amplification of 1q in 1 primary FLC. The other primary FLC and a metastasis revealed no changes. The recurrent FLC showed 18 aberrations, including 1q+, 2p+, 3p+, 3q+, 4p+, 4q+, 5p+, 5q+, 6q+, 8p+, 8q+, 9q+, 12p+, 12q+, 18p+, 18q+, Xp+, and Xq+. In 2 metastases, 9 and 10 aberrations were seen, including 1q+, 3p-, 3q-, 4q+, 5p+, 5q+, 8q+, 10p+, 10q+, Xp+, and Xq+. In 9 cases of other entities of HCC, a mean of 10.2 aberrations per case were detectable affecting 1q (7 cases), 4q (5), 5q (4), 6q (5), 8p (5), 8q (5), 9p (4), 9q (5), 16q (4), 17p (5), and 17q (4). Chromosomes 2p, 2q, 3p, 3q, 4p, 5p, 6p, 7p, 7q, 10q, 11p, 11q, 12p, 12q, 13q, 14q, 16p, 18p, 18q, 20p, 20q, and 21q were altered in up to 3 samples. Our findings indicate striking differences in the number of chromosomal imbalances in primary FLC and recurrent FLC, whereas imbalances seen in the recurrent FLC and the other entities of HCC were similar in number and chromosomes involved. It may be speculated that these aberrations represent secondary events based on a genetic instability and do not mirror the primary alterations in these carcinomas.

Differentiation of multicentric origin from intra-organ metastatic spread of hepatocellular carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), multifocal growth may be due to intrahepatic metastatic spread or to the multicentric origin of clonal neoplasms. Although this issue is of potential clinical and prognostic importance, reliable differentiation cannot be achieved using clinical or morphological criteria alone. In this study, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to differentiate between metastatic spread and multicentric growth in two cases of HCC. In the first case, six carcinoma nodules were examined. The affected chromosomes and their pattern of aberrations were almost identical for all six nodules. In addition to aberrations of chromosomes 1, 4, 9, and 13, further aberrations were observed for chromosomes 2, 5, 7, and 17, which are less typical for HCC. These findings were seen as indicative of metastatic spread of the HCC. In the second case, 75% (3/4) of the nodules showed comparable aberration patterns involving chromosomes 1, 4, 8, 13, and 17, together with a number of further aberrations also not frequently seen in HCC including chromosomes 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, and 18. Chromosomes 4, 5, 8, 10, and 12 were also altered in the fourth nodule examined for this case, but they exhibited a unique aberration pattern. Additionally, gain of chromosome 15q was seen in only this fourth nodule. In the two cases examined, metastatic spread and multicentric origin of HCC could be differentiated by different patterns of karyotypic change. The CGH results were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In conclusion, CGH facilitates the differentiation of multicentric growth from metastatic spread in HCC and appears to be superior to techniques previously used to resolve this clinically important diagnostic problem.

The histopathology of chronic myeloproliferative diseases

This chapter discusses the histopathology of five groups of chronic myeloproliferative diseases: chronic myeloid leukaemia, polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia, chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis and unclassifiable myeloproliferation. Histological staging of the four haematologically defined diseases is performed by grading the three most prominent variables: megakaryocytes, fibres and blasts. Histological outcome is correlated to the staging of diagnostic bone marrow biopsies; megakaryocytic involvement is correlated with the risk of myelofibrosis. An excess of blasts is related to the risk of leukaemic transformation. The progression of myelofibrosis depends on the grade of fibre increase at diagnosis. These three statements are highly significant and valid for all types of chronic myeloproliferative disorders. The results of cytogenetics are discussed in relation to the histological classification for these patient groups. Changes in bone marrow histology following myelosuppressive therapy is presented. Prospective studies under standardized protocol therapy are recommended, so that the long-term effects of therapy can be assessed.